Polygraph testing raises many legal and moral issues.

A problem that Ziko ABC company should

avoid. You may use some of the "paper and pencil" honesty tests available. In general, these
have been shown to be reasonably reliable and effective. They are still controversial. The costs
associated with these tests can also make them exorbitant for small operations like Jennifer's
Ziko ABC company.
Some screening methods may be background checks, reference checks, pre-employment
information, and substance abuse screening. All of these are vulnerable to theft and can be
used to prevent a decline in sales. These can be used to avoid hiring people who are not
qualified or do not meet company standards. When conducting a background check, we will
make sure that the applicant's personal information provided is correct and that we have not
provided any false information. There are many ways to get information, and line managers and
HR managers can call the applicant's previous supervisors, social network sites, and personal
references. Many companies also use employment screening to conduct more detailed
background checks. In Jennifer's situation, I think it's more expensive to use. However, they can
still perform honest tests and substance abuse screenings, and can also investigate how much
private sector charges to perform automated data processing. As long as your company
complies with the law and follows practical guidelines, there is room for error, such as the
company's liability for not providing provisions in the application, if the company is authorized
to conduct such an investigation.