You are on page 1of 25

Optimum Dia

Sr Number Zone Design flow (MLD) MOC of pipe


required
1 MS- Cement lined 1800
2 Zone-01 152.9 CI 1200
3 DI 1800
Total cost of pipe
Kw rating
Head loss across the pipeline network including
required Pumping station
26.19 793.99 71.54
64.59 1958.40 147.51
23.32 824.82 57.27
1 Water Demand
Transmission Demand
Sr No Descripsion Year Requirment
losses (MLD)
1 Cumment 2021 108 10% 118.8
2 Intermedient 2035 123 10% 135.3
3 Design 2050 139 10% 152.9

2 Length of Pipeline 11200 m

3 Static head 20 m

For Period From2021 to2035

Sr Water demand From Water demand Water demand Avg Water Avg Water
demand at demand at
Number 2021 To 2035 at End of 2035 at End of 2050
End of 2035 End of 2050
1 118.8 135.3 152.9 127.05 144.1

A) Head loss calculation across Pipe


FOR YEAR 2035

C, Hazen Operating Hr
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams of pump, Q, M3/HR
Constants Hr/day

1 MS- Cement lined 1400 100 17.37 7788.42


2 MS- Cement lined 1600 100 17.37 7788.42
3 MS- Cement lined 1800 100 17.37 7788.42
4 MS- Cement lined 2000 100 17.37 7788.42
5 MS- Cement lined 2200 100 17.37 7788.42

B) Power consumpsion of pumps across various head


FOR YEAR 2035
C, Hazen
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams Q, M3/HR Head loss
Constants

1 MS- Cement lined 1400 100 7788.42 41.05


2 MS- Cement lined 1600 100 7788.42 30.98
3 MS- Cement lined 1800 100 7788.42 26.19
4 MS- Cement lined 2000 100 7788.42 23.70
5 MS- Cement lined 2200 100 7788.42 22.33

C) Commercial Evaluation of economical pipe Size


Length of Cost of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss
pipeline, m pieline, Rs/m

1 MS- Cement lined 1400 41.05 11200.00 29,448.81


2 MS- Cement lined 1600 30.98 11200.00 33,655.78
3 MS- Cement lined 1800 26.19 11200.00 37,862.75
4 MS- Cement lined 2000 23.70 11200.00 42,069.73
5 MS- Cement lined 2200 22.33 11200.00 46,276.70

Summary

Kw Rating of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss Project Cost
Pump

1 MS- Cement lined 1400 41.05 1244.48 793173121


2 MS- Cement lined 1600 30.98 939.36 723797077
3 MS- Cement lined 1800 26.19 793.99 715415122
4 MS- Cement lined 2000 23.70 718.68 733780435
5 MS- Cement lined 2200 22.33 676.97 764975542

Optimum Dia Head loss


Sr Zone Design flow MOC of pipe across the
Number (MLD)
required pipeline
MS- Cement
1 Zone-01 152.9 1800 26.19
lined
Hr of Hr of Operation of Hr of Operation of
Operation for pump at Average pump at Average
Pumps flow for 2035 flow for 2050
18.5 17.37 17.44

OR YEAR 2035

ADDISIONAL
VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP, TOTAL PRESS. , STATIC HEAD,
LENGTH (M)/NOS. LOAD DUE TO
(M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH LOSS (MWC) FITTINGS (M)

10%
1.41 11200 0.00171 19.13 1.91 20.00
1.08 11200 0.00089 9.98 1.00 20.00
0.85 11200 0.00050 5.63 0.56 20.00
0.69 11200 0.00030 3.37 0.34 20.00
0.57 11200 0.00019 2.12 0.21 20.00

FOR YEAR 2050


Cost of Power
Efficiency of Kw Rating of the
50% standby Pumps per Annum @ 6 Cost of Pumps Q, M3/HR
Pump set pump rwquired @ 2000 Rs/Kw
Rs/Unit
50% 6 2000.00
70% 1244.48 622.24 47345677.42 3733437.40 8769.59
70% 939.36 469.68 35737365.33 2818065.42 8769.59
70% 793.99 396.99 30206942.03 2381964.59 8769.59
70% 718.68 359.34 27341808.53 2156034.85 8769.59
70% 676.97 338.49 25755127.85 2030917.35 8769.59
FOR YEAR 2035 FOR YEAR 2050

Total Cost for


Total Energy Cost
1st Year
Cost of for Pumpset for
cost of Pump set inclusing Pipe Q, M3/HR Pump Cost
Pipeline period @ 10%
and Pumpset
annual interest rate
cost, A

10%
329826654.32 3733437.40 348780808.01 682340899.72 8769.59 4733487.63
376944747.79 2818065.42 263266000.92 643028814.13 8769.59 3449498.45
424062841.26 2381964.59 222525100.95 648969906.81 8769.59 2837781.29
471180934.74 2156034.85 201418557.96 674755527.55 8769.59 2520870.41
518299028.21 2030917.35 189729977.27 710059922.83 8769.59 2345368.51

Total cost of pipe


Kw rating network including
required
Pumping station

793.99 71.54
FOR YEAR 2050

GROSS TOTAL
Operating hr of VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP,
PRESS. , LOSS Q , M3/HR
(MWC) pump , Hr/day (M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH

41.05 17.44 8769.59 1.58 0.00213


30.98 17.44 8769.59 1.21 0.00111
26.19 17.44 8769.59 0.96 0.00063
23.70 17.44 8769.59 0.78 0.00037
22.33 17.44 8769.59 0.64 0.00024

Efficiency of Kw Rating of the 50% standby Cost of Power per


Head loss
Pump set pump rwquired Pumps Annum @ 6 Rs/Unit

50% 6
46.22 70% 1577.83 788.91 60246570.50
33.68 70% 1149.83 574.92 43904298.03
27.71 70% 945.93 472.96 36118524.89
24.61 70% 840.29 420.15 32084967.57
22.90 70% 781.79 390.89 29851226.10
FOR YEAR 2050 Total Project cost

Total Energy
Cost for
Initial Capital
Pumpset for
cost and annual
period @ 10%
Electricity cost, B
annual interest
rate

10% 10% A+B


458240205.24 110832221.14 793173121
333939581.51 80768263.28 723797077
274720371.99 66445215.13 715415122
244040814.28 59024906.99 733780435
227050799.11 54915618.68 764975542
AR 2050

GROSS
TOTAL TOTAL Nuber of
ADDISIONAL LOAD STATIC Pump
PRESS. , LOSS PRESS. , pump
(MWC) DUE TO FITTINGS HEAD, (M) LOSS capacity required
(MWC)

10%
23.83 2.38 20.00 46.22 4500 =
12.44 1.24 20.00 33.68
7.01 0.70 20.00 27.71
4.19 0.42 20.00 24.61
2.64 0.26 20.00 22.90

Cost of Pumps
@ 2000Rs/Kw

4733487.63
3449498.45
2837781.29
2520870.41
2345368.51
1 Water Demand

Sr No Descripsion Year Requirment Transmission Demand


losses (MLD)
1 Cumment 2021 108 10% 118.8
2 Intermedient 2035 123 10% 135.3
3 Design 2050 139 10% 152.9

2 Length of Pipeline 11200 m

3 Static head 20 m

For Period From2021 to2035

Avg Water Avg Water


Sr Water demand From Water demand Water demand
demand at demand at
Number 2021 To 2035 at End of 2035 at End of 2050
End of 2035 End of 2050
1 118.8 135.3 152.9 127.05 144.1

A) Head loss calculation across Pipe


FOR YEAR 2035

C, Hazen Operating Hr
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams of pump, Q, M3/HR
Constants Hr/day

1 CI 800 100 17.37 7788.42


2 CI 900 100 17.37 7788.42
3 CI 1000 100 17.37 7788.42
4 CI 1200 100 17.37 7788.42
5 CI 1500 100 17.37 7788.42

B) Power consumpsion of pumps across various head


FOR YEAR 2035
C, Hazen
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams Q, M3/HR Head loss
Constants

1 CI 800 100 7788.42 341.37


2 CI 900 100 7788.42 201.07
3 CI 1000 100 7788.42 128.38
4 CI 1200 100 7788.42 64.59
5 CI 1500 100 7788.42 35.04
C) Commercial Evaluation of economical pipe Size

Length of Cost of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss
pipeline, m pieline, Rs/m

1 CI 800 341.37 11200.00 38,000.00


2 CI 900 201.07 11200.00 46,000.00
3 CI 1000 128.38 11200.00 56,000.00
4 CI 1200 64.59 11200.00 66,000.00
5 CI 1500 35.04 11200.00 105,000.00

Summary

Kw Rating of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss Project Cost
Pump

1 MS- Cement lined 800 341.37 10350.08 4365400044


2 MS- Cement lined 900 201.07 6096.23 2830908613
3 MS- Cement lined 1000 128.38 3892.44 2101519354
4 MS- Cement lined 1200 64.59 1958.40 1475118022
5 MS- Cement lined 1500 35.04 1062.35 1569811714

Optimum Dia Head loss


Sr Design flow
Zone MOC of pipe across the
Number (MLD)
required pipeline
1 Zone-01 152.9 CI 1200 64.59
Hr of Operation Hr of Operation of
Hr of Operation of
pump at Average pump at Average
for Pumps
flow for 2035 flow for 2050
18.5 17.37 17.44

OR YEAR 2035

ADDISIONAL
VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP, TOTAL PRESS. , STATIC HEAD,
LENGTH (M)/NOS. LOAD DUE TO
(M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH LOSS (MWC) (M)
FITTINGS

10%
4.30 11200 0.02609 292.16 29.22 20.00
3.40 11200 0.01470 164.61 16.46 20.00
2.75 11200 0.00880 98.53 9.85 20.00
1.91 11200 0.00362 40.54 4.05 20.00
1.22 11200 0.00122 13.67 1.37 20.00

FOR YEAR 2050


Cost of Power
Efficiency of Kw Rating of the 50% standby Pumps per Annum @ 6 Cost of Pumps Q, M3/HR
Pump set pump rwquired @ 2000 Rs/Kw
Rs/Unit
50% 6 2000.00
70% 10350.08 5175.04 393764468.69 31050247.32 8769.59
70% 6096.23 3048.11 231928339.42 18288679.84 8769.59
70% 3892.44 1946.22 148086273.51 11677324.35 8769.59
70% 1958.40 979.20 74506663.96 5875213.55 8769.59
70% 1062.35 531.18 40416735.48 3187056.56 8769.59
FOR YEAR 2035 FOR YEAR 2050

Total Cost for


Total Energy Cost
1st Year
for Pumpset for
Cost of Pipeline cost of Pump set inclusing Pipe Q, M3/HR Pump Cost
period @ 10%
and Pumpset
annual interest rate
cost, A

10%
425600000.00 31050247.32 2900739772.50 3357390019.82 8769.59 43050684.42
515200000.00 18288679.84 1708543588.91 2242032268.75 8769.59 25150076.92
627200000.00 11677324.35 1090905293.61 1729782617.96 8769.59 15876350.95
739200000.00 5875213.55 548867306.86 1293942520.41 8769.59 7737749.79
1176000000.00 3187056.56 297737458.28 1476924514.84 8769.59 3967081.07

Total cost of pipe


Kw rating
network including
required
Pumping station
1958.40 147.51
FOR YEAR 2050

GROSS TOTAL TOTAL


Operating hr of VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP,
PRESS. , LOSS Q , M3/HR PRESS. , LOSS
pump , Hr/day (M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH
(MWC) (MWC)

341.37 17.44 8769.59 4.85 0.03250 363.95


201.07 17.44 8769.59 3.83 0.01831 205.06
128.38 17.44 8769.59 3.10 0.01096 122.74
64.59 17.44 8769.59 2.15 0.00451 50.50
35.04 17.44 8769.59 1.38 0.00152 17.03

Head loss Efficiency of Kw Rating of the 50% standby Cost of Power per Cost of Pumps
Pump set pump rwquired Pumps Annum @ 6 Rs/Unit @ 2000Rs/Kw

50% 6
420.35 70% 14350.23 7175.11 547937651.78 43050684.42
245.57 70% 8383.36 4191.68 320103484.40 25150076.92
155.02 70% 5292.12 2646.06 202069968.87 15876350.95
75.55 70% 2579.25 1289.62 98484019.59 7737749.79
38.73 70% 1322.36 661.18 50491951.89 3967081.07
FOR YEAR 2050 Total Project cost

Total Energy
Cost for
Initial Capital
Pumpset for
cost and annual 1475118022.12
period @ 10%
Electricity cost, B
annual interest
rate

10% 10% A+B


4167657343.91 1008010024.20 4365400044
2434732552.56 588876343.88 2830908613
1536960249.03 371736736.00 2101519354
749077283.09 181175501.71 1475118022
384045800.50 92887198.90 1569811714
GROSS
TOTAL
ADDISIONAL LOAD STATIC
PRESS. ,
DUE TO FITTINGS HEAD, (M) LOSS
(MWC)

10%
36.40 20.00 420.35
20.51 20.00 245.57
12.27 20.00 155.02
5.05 20.00 75.55
1.70 20.00 38.73
1 Water Demand

Sr No Descripsion Year Requirment Transmission Demand


losses (MLD)
1 Cumment 2021 108 10% 118.8
2 Intermedient 2035 123 10% 135.3
3 Design 2050 139 10% 152.9

2 Length of Pipeline 11200 m

3 Static head 20 m

For Period From2021 to2035

Avg Water Avg Water


Sr Water demand From Water demand Water demand
demand at demand at
Number 2021 To 2035 at End of 2035 at End of 2050
End of 2035 End of 2050
1 118.8 135.3 152.9 127.05 144.1

A) Head loss calculation across Pipe


FOR YEAR 2035

C, Hazen Operating Hr
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams of pump, Q, M3/HR
Constants Hr/day

1 DI Pipe 1200 140 17.37 7788.42


2 DI Pipe 1400 140 17.37 7788.42
3 DI Pipe 1600 140 17.37 7788.42
4 DI Pipe 1800 140 17.37 7788.42
5 DI Pipe 2000 140 17.37 7788.42

B) Power consumpsion of pumps across various head


FOR YEAR 2035
C, Hazen
SR NO. PIPE MOC ID (MM) Williams Q, M3/HR Head loss
Constants

1 DI Pipe 1200 140 7788.42 43.91


2 DI Pipe 1400 140 7788.42 31.29
3 DI Pipe 1600 140 7788.42 25.89
4 DI Pipe 1800 140 7788.42 23.32
5 DI Pipe 2000 140 7788.42 21.99
C) Commercial Evaluation of economical pipe Size

Length of Cost of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss
pipeline, m pieline, Rs/m

1 DI Pipe 1200 43.91 11200.00 11,153.00


2 DI Pipe 1400 31.29 11200.00 19,527.89
3 DI Pipe 1600 25.89 11200.00 22,317.59
4 DI Pipe 1800 23.32 11200.00 25,107.29
5 DI Pipe 2000 21.99 11200.00 27,896.99

Summary

Kw Rating of
SR NO. PIPE MOC and class ID (MM) Head loss Project Cost
Pump

1 MS- Cement lined 1200 43.91 1553.31 684306454


2 MS- Cement lined 1400 31.29 1106.66 613863265
3 MS- Cement lined 1600 25.89 915.76 574912639
4 MS- Cement lined 1800 23.32 824.82 572714899
5 MS- Cement lined 2000 21.99 777.70 586634118

Optimum Dia Head loss


Sr Design flow
Zone MOC of pipe across the
Number (MLD)
required pipeline
1 Zone-01 152.9 DI 1800 23.32
Hr of Hr of Operation of Hr of Operation of
Operation for pump at Average pump at Average
Pumps flow for 2035 flow for 2050
18.5 17.37 17.44

OR YEAR 2035

ADDISIONAL
VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP, TOTAL PRESS. , STATIC HEAD,
LENGTH (M)/NOS. LOAD DUE TO
(M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH LOSS (MWC) (M)
FITTINGS

10%
1.91 11200 0.00194 21.74 2.17 20.00
1.41 11200 0.00092 10.26 1.03 20.00
1.08 11200 0.00048 5.35 0.54 20.00
0.85 11200 0.00027 3.02 0.30 20.00
0.69 11200 0.00016 1.81 0.18 20.00

FOR YEAR 2050


Cost of Power
Efficiency of Kw Rating of the 50% standby Pumps per Annum @ 6 Cost of Pumps Q, M3/HR
Pump set pump rwquired @ 2000 Rs/Kw
Rs/Unit
50% 6 2000.00
60% 1553.31 776.66 59095120.10 4659938.21 8769.59
60% 1106.66 553.33 42102388.10 3319978.48 8769.59
60% 915.76 457.88 34839878.10 2747294.18 8769.59
60% 824.82 412.41 31379878.56 2474456.35 8769.59
60% 777.70 388.85 29587364.67 2333107.89 8769.59
FOR YEAR 2035 FOR YEAR 2050

Total Cost for


Total Energy Cost
1st Year
Cost of for Pumpset for
cost of Pump set inclusing Pipe Q, M3/HR Pump Cost
Pipeline period @ 10%
and Pumpset
annual interest rate
cost, A

10%
124913600.00 4659938.21 435335279.97 564908818.18 8769.59 5099304.39
218712410.68 3319978.48 310155134.34 532187523.50 8769.59 3488255.55
249957040.77 2747294.18 256654493.03 509358827.98 8769.59 2799710.69
281201670.87 2474456.35 231165757.81 514841885.03 8769.59 2471674.67
312446300.97 2333107.89 217960868.22 532740277.08 8769.59 2301729.81

Total cost of pipe


Kw rating
network including
required
Pumping station
824.82 57.27
FOR YEAR 2050

GROSS TOTAL TOTAL


Operating hr of VELOCITY , PRESSURE DROP,
PRESS. , LOSS Q , M3/HR PRESS. , LOSS
pump , Hr/day (M/SEC) MWC/M LENGTH
(MWC) (MWC)

43.91 17.44 8769.59 2.15 0.00242 27.08


31.29 17.44 8769.59 1.58 0.00114 12.78
25.89 17.44 8769.59 1.21 0.00060 6.67
23.32 17.44 8769.59 0.96 0.00034 3.76
21.99 17.44 8769.59 0.78 0.00020 2.25

Head loss Efficiency of Kw Rating of the 50% standby Cost of Power per Cost of Pumps
Pump set pump rwquired Pumps Annum @ 6 Rs/Unit @ 2000Rs/Kw

50% 6
49.79 70% 1699.77 849.88 64902588.87 5099304.39
34.06 70% 1162.75 581.38 44397588.12 3488255.55
27.34 70% 933.24 466.62 35633972.41 2799710.69
24.13 70% 823.89 411.95 31458817.22 2471674.67
22.47 70% 767.24 383.62 29295804.31 2301729.81
FOR YEAR 2050 Total Project cost

Total Energy
Cost for
Initial Capital
Pumpset for
cost and annual 572714898.51
period @ 10%
Electricity cost, B
annual interest
rate

10% 10% A+B


493654251.14 119397635.79 684306453.97
337691585.12 81675741.26 613863264.76
271034827.29 65553811.24 574912639.22
239278264.95 57873013.48 572714898.51
222826216.78 53893840.50 586634117.58
GROSS
TOTAL
ADDISIONAL LOAD STATIC
PRESS. ,
DUE TO FITTINGS HEAD, (M) LOSS
(MWC)

10%
2.71 20.00 49.79
1.28 20.00 34.06
0.67 20.00 27.34
0.38 20.00 24.13
0.22 20.00 22.47
Table 1: Hazen Williams Constants[1]
C
type of pipe or surface material: range clean design

mineral
concrete 85-152 120 100
cement-asbestos 140-160 150 140
vitrified clays 100-140 110
brick sewer 100

iron
cast, plain 80-150 130 100
cast iron, old, unlined 40-120
cast (10 years old) 107-113
cast (20 years old) 89-100
cast (30 years old) 75-90
cast (40 years old) 64-83
cast, tar (asphalt) coated 50-145 130 100
cast, cement lined 130-150 150 140
cast, bituminous lined 130-160 148 140
cast, mitumastic 140-150
cast, sea-coated 100
Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) 140
Ductile Iron, cement lined 120
galvanized, plain 120
wrought, plain 80-150 130 100

steel
welded and seamless 80-150 140 100
interior riveted, no projecting rivets 139 100
projecting girth rivets 130 100
projecting girth and horizontal rivets 115 100
vitrified, spiral-riveted, flow with lap 110 100
vitrified, spiral-riveted, flow against lap 100 90
corrugated 60 60
concrete lined steel forms 140
coal-tar enamel lined 150-154
miscellaneous
copper and brass 120-150 140 130
wood stave 110-145 120 110
transite
lead, tin, glass 150-120 140 130
Polyethalene (PE and PEH) 140
plastic (PVC and ABS) 120-150 140-150 130
fiber 140
fiberglass 150-160 150 150
fire hose 135
wooden or masonry pipe (smooth) 120
concrete lined wooden forms 120

Note: C values for sludge are 20-40% less than the corresponding water pipe
values.

You might also like