Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DETERRITORIALIZATION
&
RETERRITORIALIZATION
Gilles
Deleuze
Deterritorializa5on:
Desestabilizes
spa5al
boundaries
or
increase
internal
heterogeneity.
Concept
of
territorializa4on
plays
a
synthe5c
role,
through
the
permanent
ar5cula5ons
produced
by
this
process
that
the
whole
emerges
from
its
parts
and
maintains
its
iden5ty
once
has
emerged.
Territorializa5on:
Process
that
define
or
sharpen
spa5al
boundaries
of
actual
territories.
Non-‐spa4al
process
which
increase
internal
homogeneity
of
an
assemblage.
Reterritorializa5on:
Establish
a
new
rela5onship,
a
new
process,
a
new
intrac4on,
a
new
interlinking,
provide
a
new
concept,
re-‐define,
re-‐
configure,
re-‐combine,
differen4a4on
the
role.
One of
the
exemple
on
which
Deleuze
explain
the
process
Deterritorializa5on
&
Reterritorializa5on
is
the:
Beautiful story… “Orchid
and
the
Wasp”
3.
What
is
the
poten7al
of
this
process?
What
is
really
happend?
What
is
the
process?
NOT
IMITATION
NOR
RESEMBLANCE
but
CAPTURE
OF
CODE,surplus
value
of
code,
an
incrase
in
valence,
a
VERITABLE
BECOMING
BECOMING-‐
wasp
of
the
orchid
and
BECOMING-‐orchid
of
the
wasp
The
two
becoming
INTERLINK
and
form
relays-‐pushing
the
deterritorializa4on
futher.
…because
of
assemblages?
aparelle
evolu7on?
veritable
becoming?
Assemblage
Theory:
Ontology
of
assemblages:
Contains
differently
scaled
individual
singulari5es
Each
individual
is
unique
Iden4ty
of
assemblage
is
product
of
a
process
of
a)
Stabiliza4on
b)
Destabiliza4on
Territorializa4on
Deterritorializa4on
Coding
Decoding
The
dis4nc4on
to
be
made
is
not
between
exterior
and
interior,
which
are
always
rela4ve
,
changing
and
reversible
but
between
different
types
of
mul4plici4es
that
coexist,
interpenetrate,
and
change
places
–
machines,
cogs,
motors
and
elements
that
are
set
in
mo4on
at
a
given
moment,
forming
an
assemblage
of
produc4ve
statements:
“I
love
you”
APARALLE
EVOLUTION
of
two
beings
that
have
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
each
other...?
APARALLE
EVOLUTION
with
the
books
and
the
world=If
the
book
is
the
rally
not
an
image
of
the
word?If
the
book
forms
a
rhizom
with
th
eworld?
The
book
deterritorializa4on
of
the
world
but
the
world
effects
a
reterritorializa4on
of
the
book,
which
in
turn
deterritorializa4on
itself
in
the
world.
Deterritorializa5on
the
Rhizom=
Me(world)
and
Rhizom
The
idea
of
the
book
as
a
machine,
composed
of
not
heterogeneous
elements,
open,
non-‐linear
structure,
and
not
a
product
but
material,
is
not
something
given,
crea4ng
between
reading,
mobile,
nomadic,
reader(ME)=
creator
so:
APARALLE
EVOLUTION
of
two
beings
that
have
absolutely
nothing
to
do
with
each
other...?
More
generally,
evolu4onary
schemas
may
be
forced
to
abandon
the
old
model
of
the
tree
and
descent.
Evolu4onary
schemas
would
no
longer
follow
models
of
arborescent
descent
going
from
the
least
to
the
most
differen4ated
but
instead
a
rhizom
opera4ng
immediatly
in
the
heterogenous
and
jumping
from
one
already
differen4ated
line
to
another.
APARALLE
EVOLUTION
=if
the
Pink
Panter
imitate
the
pink?
or
if
she
paints
the
world
in
pink
on
pink?
Becoming-‐world
=becomes
impercep4ble,
asignifying,
makes
its
rupture,its
own
line
of
light
so,
what
to
do?
1.ALWAYS
FOLLOW
THE
RHIZOM
2.CONJUGATE
DETERRITORIALIZATION
FLOWES
3.
WRITE
4.FORM
A
RHIZOM
6.INCREASE
YOUR
TERRITORY
BY
DETERRITORRIALIZATION
7.EXTEND
THE
LINE
OF
LIGHTS
TO
THE
POINT
WHERE
IT
BECOMES
AN
ABSTRACYT
MACHINE
COVERING
THE
ENTIRE
PLANE
OF
CONSISTENCY
do not know...?
thank you....