Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit III
International Financial System
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Q.1. International Financial System: Concept, Evolution, Importance of
Study and Recent Changes.
Answer:
In finance, the financial system is the system that allows the transfer of money between savers
(and investors) and borrowers. A financial system can operate on a global, regional or firm
specific level.
–A firm’s financial system is the set of implemented procedures that tracks financial activities
of the company.
– On a regional Scale, the financial system is the system that enables lenders and borrowers to
exchange funds.
– The global/international financial system is basically a broader regional system that
encompasses all financial institutions, borrowers and lenders within the global economy.
Or
The financial system refers to set of complex and interconnected components consisting
specialized and non-specialized financial institutions, organized and unorganized financial
markets, financial instruments and financial services. The aim of the financial system is to
facilitate the circulation of funds in an economy.
It is concerned about money, credit, and finance. Money refers to the medium of exchange or
mode of payment. Credit refers to the amount of debt which is returned along with the interest.
And the finance refers to the monetary resources comprising the own funds and debts of the
state, company or a person.
According to Dhanilal,
“Financial system is the set of interrelated and interconnected components consisting of financial
institutions, markets, and securities.”
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE:
International Finance is an important part of financial economics. It mainly discusses the issues
related with monetary interactions of at least two or more countries. International finance is
concerned with subjects such as exchange rates of currencies, monetary systems of the world,
foreign direct investment (FDI), and other important issues associated with international
financial management.
Like international trade and business, international finance exists due to the fact that
economic activities of businesses, governments, and organizations get affected by the existence
of nations. It is a known fact that countries often borrow and lend from each other. In such
trades, many countries use their own currencies. Therefore, we must understand how the
currencies compare with each other. Moreover, we should also have a good understanding of
how these goods are paid for and what is the determining factor of the prices that the
currencies trade at.
Note − The World Bank, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) are some of
the notable international finance organizations.
International trade is one of the most important factors of growth and prosperity of
participating economies. Its importance has got magnified many times due to globalization.
Moreover, the resurgence of the US from being the biggest international creditor to become the
largest international debtor is an important issue. These issues are a part of international
macroeconomics, which is popularly known as international finance.
The very existence of an international financial system means that there are possibilities of
international financial crises. This is where the study of international finance becomes very
important. To know about the international financial crises, we have to understand the nature
of the international financial system.
Without international finance, chances of conflicts and thereby, a resultant mess, is apparent.
International finance helps keep international issues in a disciplined state.
The Global Financial System (GFS) is the financial system consisting of institutions and
regulators that act on the international level, as opposed to those that act on a national or
regional level. The main players are the global institutions such as International Monetary Fund,
and Bank for International Settlements, National Agencies and Govt. Departments, e.g. Central
Banks and Finance Ministries, Private Institutions acting on the global scale, e.g., banks and
hedge funds, and regional institutions, e.g. the Euro Zone.
Alternatively,
International finance plays a pivotal role in the international trade and in the sphere of exchange
of goods and services among the nations
The following points highlight the importance of international finance.
1. International finance helps in calculating exchange rates of various currencies of nations and
the relative worth of each and every nation in terms thereof.
2. It helps in comparing the inflation rates and getting an idea about investing in international
debt securities.
3. It helps in ascertaining the economic status of the various countries and in judging the foreign
market.
4. International Financial Reporting System (IFRS) facilitates comparison of financial
statements made by various countries.
5. It helps in understanding the basics of international organizations and maintaining the
balance among them.
6. International finance organizations such as IMF, World Bank etc. mediate and resolve
financial disputes among member nations.
The very existence of an international financial system means that there are possibilities of
international financial crises. This is where the study of international finance becomes very
important. To know about the international financial crises, we have to understand the nature
of the international financial system.
Without international finance, chances of conflicts and thereby, a resultant mess, is apparent.
International finance helps keep international issues in a disciplined state.
Best Answer/Reference,
Significance of studying International Finance:
International Finance is related to business decisions such as asset selection, resource allocation
and financial management.
1. For Business Firms:
Every firm faces the four important decision-making areas in financial management.
These are:
i. Investment decision
ii. Financing decision
iii. Working capital management decision
iv. Dividend decision.
Firms with a presence in different factor and product markets have to grapple with complex
issues unique to their operations. Decisions regarding where to set up a new plant (investment
decision), in the capital structure and where to raise finances (financing decision), how much
cash to hold, which currency to choose for denominating receivables and payables, the sources
of short-term funds (working capital management decisions) and whether to pay dividend or not
(dividend decision) are routine areas in financial management, for which standard evaluation
techniques and management methods exist.
However, in the globalized scenario, each decision acquires layers of complexity as it needs to
be taken in the context of differences between countries in their political and judicial systems,
economic conditions and financial infrastructure.
Will policies with regard to foreign investment be subjected to sudden and violent change? How
safe are assets held in other countries? Firms with several overseas affiliates are confronted with
the most complex web of problems, since value maximizing decisions have to be made for the
group as a whole rather than just for the parent company, or for each of its subsidiaries.
International Finance is often discussed from the perspective of the MNC because it has to
contend with political risk and exchange rate risk in numerous countries on a daily basis.
i. Investment Decision:
When an MNC decides to set up or acquire an affiliate overseas, it conducts a financial
evaluation. A capital budgeting proposal is evaluated in accordance with accepted measures
such as the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR). But an overseas
capital budgeting proposal involves exchange rate forecasting, political risk assessment and tax
planning.
Differences in corporate tax rates between countries, availability of subsidies in the host
country, and displacement of profits from exports must be accommodated into the framework of
the overseas capital budgeting evaluation process.
A related question is that of cash management. A firm’s cash holdings are attributed to the
transaction motive, precautionary motive and speculative motive respectively. This money may
be deployed in the money market and converted to cash as and when required. How much
autonomy will the parent give its affiliates with respect to cash management? It involves an
assessment of the direction of movement of exchange rates and its impact on funds required by
affiliates. Globalization, exchange rate volatility and financial and technological innovations
have converted cash management into a part of the treasury management function—exchange
rate forecasting is as important as funds procurement and deployment.
Does the host country have dividend remittance restrictions? If so, the affiliate, in consultation
with the parent MNC, may choose to transmit the un-remittable dividend through legitimate but
indirect routes. One of the most common methods is through under-invoicing and over-
invoicing between affiliates or between the parent and the affiliate. The mode of transmission
depends on whether there are any business dealings between the associate concerns and/or the
parent.
This method also serves the objective of moving funds from a country with a higher corporate
tax structure to one with a lower tax rate. The result is that the affiliate located in the country
with the higher corporate tax structure ends up with a lower tax burden. But governments have
woken up to these modes of transmission and have brought in Transfer Pricing regulations.
Accounting Decision:
Consolidated financial statements for the whole group are prepared at the end of each
accounting year. This necessitates conversion of the profit and loss statement and the balance
sheet of each affiliate into the parent company’s home currency.
2. For Investors:
Exchange rate movements affect returns from overseas security holdings. That is, the expected
return on the security is not the sole factor that determines the investor’s ‘buy’ decision.
Exchange rate risk is equally important, and it has to be factored into the decision-making
process.
Foreign portfolio investments (and foreign institutional investors) move between overseas
markets in search of investments that offer a higher return. Returns in a foreign currency get
neutralized by adverse exchange rate movements. Of course, the reverse can hold, and favorable
exchange rate movements can magnify the portfolio return. It is important to be able to forecast
the likely exchange rate at the end of the holding period. Exchange rate forecasting plays a
significant role in portfolio destination.
Speculators play an important role in the foreign exchange market by imparting liquidity.
Their ability to make a profit rests on their constant following of exchange rate movements, and
accurate assessment of the impact on exchange rates of policy pronouncements, geopolitical
maneuvers, interest rate movements and economic growth. Foreign exchange markets are
extremely sensitive to new information, which is almost instantaneously factored into currency
pricing.
This underscores both the inherent fragility of the foreign exchange market and the
interdependence of financial markets across the globe. Individuals are also concerned with
exchange rate movements in their capacity as depositors and investors. When they are free to
move their deposits between countries, they compare interest rates, and factor in the effect of
exchange rates on their holdings.
3. For Central Banks:
Central banks are investors too, and are concerned with the gyrations of exchange rates in that
capacity. Since the RBI holds a portion of its foreign exchange reserves in the form of US
Treasury Bills, dollar depreciation affects the rupee value of its portfolio.
Sometimes, a commercial bank may be asked to buy or sell foreign exchange on behalf of the
central bank. Banks conduct proprietary trades and usually hold several foreign currencies as
part of their asset holdings. They have to be able to take a call on exchange rate movements. In
many countries around the world, commercial banks are the only entities that offer foreign
exchange risk management solutions to corporate clients.
When a country’s financial market lacks a currency derivatives exchange, corporate clients have
no alternative but to depend entirely on OTC contracts with a bank as the counter-party.
International banks offer and/ or participate in the syndicated foreign exchange loan market.
Banks arrange and provide foreign exchange loans to corporate clients, and sovereign loans to
governments, underwrite the corporate issue of securities in the euro currency and international
bond markets, and participate extensively in international trade transactions.
4. For Regulators:
The flow of capital between countries is impeded by capital controls. The removal of capital
controls requires careful sequencing and must be preceded by ‘the creation of institutional
structures ensuring the stability of the financial system’. The fewer the controls on capital
movement, the greater is the financial openness of an economy, and the better the chances that
domestic financial market will get integrated with financial markets in other countries.
In other words, capital account convertibility (or capital account liberalization) is viewed as the
predecessor to financial integration. Developed countries are characterized by open financial
systems, in contrast to the financial markets of many developing countries.
The benefits of financial openness include higher inflows of private capital in the form of FDI
and FII. Since capital inflows are associated with development, employment generation, and
growth, they are much sought after. But continuing inflows cause domestic currency
appreciation. This affects the country’s export competitiveness. A decline in exports has an
adverse effect on Balance of Trade.
The second and more serious effect of capital inflows is that the money supply within a country
increases. Price rise makes domestic goods more expensive in world markets, and acts as a
deterrent to exports. The balance of trade deteriorates further. A rise in inflation also affects
market expectations.
What can the central bank do? It can let these forces play themselves out. But more often than
not, it is galvanized into action. Monetary policy is revisited, interest rates are re-adjusted, steps
are taken to arrest domestic currency appreciation, and management of foreign exchange
reserves is re-assessed. The responses vary with time, but currency appreciation due to capital
inflows evokes prompt and timely action by market regulators and governments.
One of the biggest dangers of regulation is that there is a need for continuous fine-tuning, and
there is no guarantee that it will always work. The central bank’s efforts to stabilize the
domestic currency’s value can be stymied by factors beyond its control—such as hot money
flows, and interest rate changes in other countries.
Financial openness gives frightening speed to money entering and leaving an economy. It also
increases the ferocity of the financial crisis, as the domestic currency is susceptible to sudden
and large appreciation and depreciation. Regulators watch the foreign exchange market, ready
to intervene but unsure whether their efforts will yield the expected results.
These are some of the fascinating contradictions that make International Finance a dynamic
discipline that changes in accordance with market needs. Since International Finance is
concerned with the structure and functioning of the foreign exchange market, it follows that its
importance grows in tandem with the rise of cross-border movements of money.
The issues discussed above are by no means an exhaustive list of the reasons why knowledge of
International Finance is so crucial. But it does give the reader an idea of how essential it is to
develop an understanding of foreign exchange markets, international financial markets,
domestic financial markets, the linkages between both, and the array of institutional and
regulatory structures that shape the movement of funds between countries.
In the wake of the persistent uncertainties about the US sub-prime mortgage market and other
credit markets exposures, liquidity demand surged. To ease liquidity conditions, major central
banks continued to inject liquidity in a more collaborative manner.
Elevated inflationary pressures in many economies reflected historical peaks in crude oil prices.
Share prices in advanced economies fell, while those in emerging market economies (EMEs),
which had shown some resilience, declined sharply from January
2008. Long-term government bond yields in advanced economies softened, reflecting flight to
safety by investors and easing of monetary policy in the US. In the currency markets, the US
dollar depreciated against major currencies.
The pricing behaviour has begun to mirror the strains of the ongoing economic recession and
prices have been decidedly volatile given the environment of heightened uncertainty.
Pressure on credit market persists in the wake of recession in many economies and subdued
corporate performance, which has given rise to the expectation of possible increase in defaults.
During the fourth quarter of 2008-09, the equity valuations generally remained low on account
of concerns stemming from the weak financial and economic outlook.
Money Markets:
The policies initiated by central banks and the guarantees offered by governments assuaged to
an extent the funding pressures that were evident in the international financial markets during
September and October 2008. The spreads between Libor and overnight index swaps (OIS)
have been gradually narrowing.
In the UK, however, bank funding markets came under renewed pressure. The Sterling Libor-
OIS spreads slightly widened and the inter-bank term lending remained subdued during late
January and February 2009.
The benchmark credit default swap (CDS) indices have shown significant spread volatility since
end-November 2008 up to the fourth quarter of 2008-09. Investment grade spreads, however,
mostly performed better than the lower-rated borrowers.
For instance, between end-November 2008 and end- February 2009, the US five-year CDX
high yield index spread had risen by 148 basis points, while the investment grade spreads
registered a decline of 28 basis points.
The same pattern was exhibited by the European CDS indices. As problems persist in the
banking sector internationally and recessionary conditions have become widespread, it is
expected that default rates will increase. Risk tolerance in the market is low and lower-rated
spreads are expected to see increased volatility. In March
2009, the Federal Reserve approved the application of the ICE Trust to become a member of the
Federal Reserve System. The ICE trust would provide central counterparty services for CDS
contracts conducted by its participants.
Under the arrangement, the ICE Trust would work towards reducing the risk associated with the
trading and settlement of CDS transactions by assuming counterparty credit risk and enforcing
participation standards and margin requirements.
However, as concerns mounted over the fiscal implications of the support packages and the
depressed risk appetite, spreads on sovereign CDS rose during the first three months of 2009.
Recent measures taken by the governments and central banks do seem to be having a favourable
impact on certain segments of the money and credit markets, which had faced severe
disruptions during the acute phase of the crisis in the third quarter of 2008-09.
For instance, the US government’s announcement in November 2008 and the subsequent
initiation of a programme for purchase of up to US$ 100 billion of direct obligations of housing
related government-sponsored enterprises and up to US$ 500 billion of mortgage backed
securities (MBS) backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae has helped in reducing
spreads on agency debt and the conditions for high-quality borrowers in the primary residential
mortgage market recovered to an extent.
In March 2009, the Federal Open Market Committee also announced plans to purchase an
additional US$ 750 billion of agency MBS and invest an additional US$ 100 billion in agency
debt. The Committee also announced that it would buy up to US$ 300 billion of longer-term
Treasury securities over the next six months to help improve conditions in private credit
markets.
The Federal Reserve launched the Term-Asset Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) on
March 3, 2009 in an attempt to unfreeze markets for securities backed by loans.
Spreads in the areas where the programme is focused – pooled credit card, auto, student and
small business Voarvs – narrowed during the first two months of 2009 in anticipation of TALF
and narrowed considerably in March with the launch of the programme. The first tranche of
funding under TALF was settled on March 25, 2009.
The banking sector in the US and Europe continued to show further signs of problems, despite
the massive injection of capital by the government and from private sources since late 2007.
Notable instances of governments picking up or hiking their stakes in financial entities during
the fourth quarter of 2008-09 include the German government taking a 25 per cent stake in the
merged entity of Commerz Bank and Dresdner Bank, the US authorities’ investment of US $ 20
billion in Bank of America through a preferred equity stake and the UK government
restructuring its investment in the Royal Bank of Scotland.
The UK authorities continued to announce a series of measures during the fourth quarter of
2008-09 for enabling sufficient credit flow to households and businesses.
These measures include capping the losses on banks’ holdings of risky assets, state guarantees
to facilitate bank funding and purchase of commercial paper, corporate bonds and other
securities to enhance credit availability in the economy.
In March 2009, the Bank of England embarked upon a policy of credit/quantitative easing
entailing the purchase of £ 75 billion worth of conventional gilts and notified private sector
assets in the secondary market, in a bid to support the flow of corporate credit. The UK
programme has resulted in significantly lower yields for the gilts, which the Bank has agreed to
buy.
Corporate bond yields have also fallen. By the first week of April 2009, £ 26 billion of asset
purchases had been made and it is expected that the programme will be completed in another
two months.
In April 2009, the Bank of Japan announced that it would offer credit-worthy commercial banks
subordinated loans worth up to VI trillion to smoothen financial intermediation in the country.
The US federal funds rate remains in the range of 0.0-0.25 per cent set in mid-December 2008.
The Bank of England affected a 50 basis point cut in policy rates-in each of the three months of
the fourth quarter of 2008-09. As of March 5, 2009, the official bank rate was at an all-time low
of 0.5 per cent.
The ECB has reduced its policy rates by 300 basis points since October 2008, the rate for main
refinancing operations thus stands reduced to 1.25 per cent. The softening of interest rates was
broad-based and across the spectrum, as emerging economies also saw frequent cuts in policy
rates and liquidity injections by the authorities.
Countries that effected cuts in policy rates during the fourth quarter of 2008-09 include Turkey
(cumulative reduction of 725 basis points since October 2008), South Africa (cumulative
reduction of 250 basis points since October 2008) and South Korea (cumulative reduction of
300 basis points since October 2008).
The policy rate cuts by the Czech Republic, Peru, Sri Lanka, Chile, Egypt, Canada, Poland,
Malaysia, New Zealand, Iceland and Brazil, during the fourth quarter of 2008-09, ranged from
50 basis points to 600 basis points.
Government Bond Yields:
There has been much volatility in the government bond yields because even as most advanced
economies are facing a recession, concerns have mounted over the increased borrowing
requirements of the governments. This contributed to the increase in the 10-year government
bond yields in some advanced countries during the fourth quarter of 2008-09.
The 10-year government bond yield in the US increased by 72 basis points between December
29, 2008 and April 8, 2009. During the same period, yields on 10-year government papers
increased by 34 basis points in the Euro area, 20 basis points in Japan and 15 basis points in the
UK.
The US dollar, generally, appreciated against most of the currencies as the US investors were
liquidating their positions in overseas equity and bond markets and repatriating the money back
to the US. Notwithstanding the deepening of the financial crisis and weakness in economic
activity in the US, the flight to safety considerations helped strengthen the US dollar.
During 2008-09, the US dollar appreciated against most major currencies including the euro and
the pound sterling. The US dollar, however, depreciated against the Japanese yen, as a result of
unwinding of carry trades.
Amongst Asian currencies also, the US dollar appreciated against Korean won, Thai baht,
Malaysian ringgit, Indonesian rupiah and Indian rupee but depreciated against Chinese yuan. As
on April 14, 2009, however, the US dollar depreciated against most major currencies, except the
euro and the Japanese yen, over end-March 2009 levels.
Equity Markets:
The year 2008-09 continued to be a dismal year for the stock markets. As a reflection of the
economic and financial market outlook, the year was characterised by depressed equity
valuations.
Equity price indices in most advanced economies were relatively flat during July and August
2008, but caught on the downward spiral subsequently, which continued into the first two
months of 2009.
Consequently, price/earnings ratios in most markets across the world followed a downward
trend. They remained at or close to all-time low levels for most regions during the fourth
quarter of 2008-09. Though the decline in equity valuations was broad-based across all sectors,
financial institutions, particularly in Japan, were the worst sufferers.
The volatility in the markets in the fourth quarter was compounded by the lack of detailed
information about government rescue packages.
The equity markets saw a slight recovery in most countries/regions since mid-March 2009,
helped further by the US government announcing the details of the public-private investment
programme aimed at repairing balance sheets of financial institutions.
Derivative Markets :
In the second half of 2008, the financial crisis resulted in a decline in the total notional amounts
outstanding of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives to $592 trillion at end-year, an indication of
reduced market activity. Foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives markets both recorded
their first significant contractions.
Against a background of severely strained credit markets and efforts to improve multilateral
netting of offsetting contracts, credit default swap (CDS) markets continued to contract, with
outstanding amounts decreasing by more than 25%. Facing significant price drops, outstanding
commodity and equity derivatives also declined notably.
Despite the drop in amounts outstanding, significant price movements resulted in notably higher
gross market values, which increased to $34 trillion at end-2008. Gross market values, which
measure the cost of replacing all existing contracts, can be used to capture derivatives related
exposures.
The higher market values were also reflected in gross replacement costs after taking into
account bilateral netting agreements, also referred to as gross credit exposures, which grew by
nearly one third to $5 trillion.
The market for interest rate derivatives contracted for the first time in the second half of 2008,
with notional amounts outstanding of these instruments falling to $419 trillion. Nonetheless,
declining interest rates resulted in almost a doubling of the gross market value.
The gross market value of interest rate swaps, by far the largest market segment, reached $17
trillion. The most significant increase took place in the US dollar swap market, where the gross
market value nearly tripled.
Amounts outstanding of CDS contracts fell to $42 trillion against a background of severely
strained credit markets and increased multilateral netting of offsetting positions by market
participants. This was a continuation of the developments which began in the first half of 2008.
Single-name contracts outstanding declined to $26 trillion while multi-name contracts,
including CDS indices and CDS index tranches, saw a more pronounced decrease to $16
trillion. The composition of market activity across counterparties also changed in the second
half of 2008.
Outstanding contracts between dealers and other financial institutions as well as between
dealers and non-financial institutions saw large declines relative to the inter-dealer market.
Despite the lower outstanding amounts, the gross market value of CDS contracts also increased
significantly as a result of the credit market turmoil.
Notional amounts outstanding of foreign exchange derivatives decreased to $50 trillion, while
their gross market value rose to $4 trillion. The dollar and the euro remained the most important
vehicle currencies, followed by the yen and the pound sterling.
Amounts outstanding of commodity derivatives fell by two thirds to $4.4 trillion. The continued
declines in commodity prices during the second half of 2008 also had a substance impact on the
gross market value of commodity contracts, which fell to $1.0 trillion.
Outstanding equity derivatives decreased to $6 trillion, well below the levels seen in recent
years and a notable change of pace from the increase in the first half of 2008. Reflecting lower
outstanding positions and significantly lower equity prices, the gross market values of
outstanding equity derivatives saw only a moderate decline.
Exchange-traded Derivatives:
The first quarter of 2009 saw a continued but limited decline of activity on the international
derivatives exchanges. Total turnover based on notional amounts decreased further, to $367
trillion from $380 trillion in the previous quarter. Consistent with a gradual return of risk
appetite, however, trading activity on a monthly basis did start to increase towards the end of
the quarter.
Overall turnover in interest rate derivatives remained largely unchanged at $324 trillion
compared to the previous quarter. The moderate change in overall turnover nonetheless; reflects
differences across regions, with turnover in North America declining notably relative to the
previous quarter, while European turnover increased.
In contrast to interest derivatives markets, equity derivatives turnover fell for all contract types
and all major currencies, including the euro. Against a background of negative economic
growth and Uncertainty about growth recovery, activity in equity index derivatives declined
significantly to $38 trillion.
Foreign change derivatives turnover also continued to slide. The decrease in activity among the
main currencies was most pronounced for the yen and US dollar segments. Turnover in
Australian and New Zealand dollar futures, possibly driven by renewed interest in FX carry
trades, increased substantially relative to the previous quarter.
With time, economists have established theories that explain global trade. These theories
explain what exactly happens in International Trade. There are 6 economic theories under
International Trade Law which are classified in four: (I) Mercantilist Theory of trade (II)
Classical Theory of trade (III) Modern Theory of trade (IV) New Theories of trade. Both of
these categories, classical and modern, consist of several international theories.
Theories:
1. Mercantilism
This theory was popular in the 16th and 18th Century. During that time the wealth of the
nation only consisted of gold or other kinds of precious metals so the theorists suggested
that the countries should start accumulating gold and other kinds of metals more and
more. The European Nations started doing so. Mercantilists, during this period stated that
all these precious stones denoted the wealth of a nation, they believed that a country will
strengthen only if the nation imports less and exports more. They said that this is the
favorable balance of trade and that this will help a nation to progress more.
Mercantilism thrived during the 1500's because there was a rise in new nation-states and
the rulers of these states wanted to strengthen their nations. The only way to do so was by
increasing exports and trade, because of which these rulers were able to collect more
capital for their nations. These rulers encouraged exports by putting limitations on
imports. This approach is called “protectionism” and it is still used today.
Though, Mercantilism is one the most old-fashioned theory, it still remains a part of
contemporary thinking. Countries like China, Taiwan, Japan, etcetera still favor
Protectionism. Almost every country, has implemented protectionist policy in one way or
another, to protect their economy. Countries that are export oriented prefer protectionist
policies as it favors them. Import restrictions lead to higher prices of good and services.
Free-trade benefits everyone, whereas, mercantilism's protectionist policies only profit
select industries.
2. Absolute Cost Advantage
This theory was developed by Adam Smith, he was the father of Modern Economics.
This theory came out as a strong reaction against the protectionist mercantilist views on
international trade. Adam Smith supported the necessity of free trade as the only
assurance for expansion of trade. He said that a country should only produce those
products in which they have an absolute advantage. According to Smith, free trade
promoted international division of labour. By specialization and division of labour
producers with different absolute advantages can always gain over producing in
remoteness. He emphasised on producing what a country specializes in so that it can
produce more at a lower cost than other countries. This theory says that a country should
export a product in which it has a cost advantage.
Adam's theory specified that a country's prosperity should not be premeditated by how
much gold and other precious metals it has, but rather by the living standards of its
citizens.
3. Comparative Cost Advantage Theory
The comparative cost theory was first given by David Ricardo. It was later polished by J.
S. Mill, Marshall, Taussig and others. Ricardo said absolute advantage is not necessary.
He also said a country will produce where there is comparative advantage.
The theory suggests that each country should concentrate in the production of those
products in which it has the utmost advantage or the least disadvantage. Hence, a state
will export those supplies in which it has the most benefit and import those supplies in
which it has the least drawback.
Comparative advantage arises when a country is not able to yield a commodity more
competently than another country; however, it has the resources to manufacture that
commodity more proficiently than it does other commodities.
4. Hecksher 0hlin Theory (H-0 Theory)
Smith and Ricardo's theories didn't help the countries figure out which products would
give better returns to the country. In 1900s, two economists, Eli Hecksher and Bertil
Ohlin, fixated on how a country could profit by making goods that utilized factors that
were in abundance in the country. They found out that the factors that were in abundance
in relation to the demand would be cheaper and that the factors in great demand
comparatively to its supply would be more expensive.
The H-0 Theory is also known as the Modern Theory or the General Equilibrium Theory.
This theory focused on factor endowments and factor prices as the most important
determinants of international trade. The H - 0 is divided in two theorems: The H - 0
theorem, and the Factor Price Equalization Theorem. The H - 0 theorem predicts the
pattern of trade while the factor-price equalization theorem deals with the effect of
international trade on factor prices. H - 0 theorem is further divided in two parts: factor
intensity and factor abundance. Factor Abundance can be explained in terms of physical
units and relative factor prices. Physical units include capital and labor, whereas, relative
factor price includes the adjoining expenses like rent, labor cost, etcetera. On the other
hand, factor intensity means capital, labor or technology, etcetera, any factor that a
country has.
5. National Competitive Theory or Porter's diamond
The diamond theory was given by Micheal Porter. This theory states that the qualities of
the home country are vital for the triumph of a corporation. This theory was given its
name because it is in the shape of a diamond. It describes the factors that influence the
success of an organization. There are Six Model Factors in this theory which are also
known as the determinants.
a. Factor Condition;
b. Demand Conditions;
c. Related and Supporting Industries;
d. Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry;
e. Chance; and
f. Government.
6. Product Life Cycle Theory
This theory was developed by Raymond Vernon in the Mid 1960's, he was a Harvard
Business School professor. This theory was developed after the failure of Hecksher
Ohlin's Theory. The theory, detailed that a product goes through various stages in the
course of its progress. These stages are: (1) new product stage, (2) maturing product
stage, and (3) standardized product stage. This theory assumed that the production of a
new product would take place in the nation where it was innovated.
In the 1960's this was a very useful theory. At that time, United States of America was
dominating the whole globe in terms of manufacturing after the World War II.
This stage may include product development. Demand for the product will continue to rise in
this stage. demand can also be expected from less developed nations. Local competition with
other cooperation's will begin.
Conclusion:
The theories discussed above have aided economists, government and industries to comprehend
trade internationally in a healthier way.
The mercantilists view dominated in the 17th and 18th century. Mercantilists held that trade is
not free and its main was to achieve surplus. However, they failed to address various issues.
Adam Smith opposed the Mercantilist Theory and highlighted the importance of free trade in
increasing the prosperity of nations. Smith's theory was criticized by David Ricardo and others.
According to Ricardo, each nation should focus in the production of those goods that yield the
most. Heckscher - 0hlin explained the basis trading in respect to factor endowments. Vernon's
theory scrutinized the effect of technical changes on the pattern of international trade.
The Mercantalists theory, Cost Adavantage and Comparative Advantage theory assumed only
two commodities, factors and countries, and the rest of the factors as constant. On the other
hand, the New theories that consists of Product Life Theory and Porter's Diamond are based on
more explainable assumptions, that talked about changes in factors. Therefore, the new theories
are better at explaining the pattern of world trade today.
Convertibility facilitates conversion of any currency into rupee or in any currency freely. In
simple words rupee can be freely convertible into any foreign currency for acquisition of assets
like shares, properties, and assets abroad. Banks can also accept deposits in any currency.
The Capital Account convertibility being linked with the monetary and economic policy is
regulated by the Reserve Bank of India Convertibility is mainly related to Foreign Exchange
transactions which are mostly government by the foreign exchange management Act 1999.
Section 2(i) defines a current account transaction as a transaction and without prejudice
to the generality of the foregoing such transaction includes:
1. Payments due in connection with foreign trade, other current business, services, and short
term banking and credit facilities in the ordinary course of business.
2. Payments due as interest on loans and as net income from investments.
3. Remittances for living expenses of parents, spouse and children residing abroad.
4. Expenses in connection with foreign travel, education and medical care of parents, spouse
and children.
For the current account transactions any one can sell or draw foreign exchange to or from any
authorized person. However the Regulatory body may restrict current account transactions/limit
of transactions in case of need and keeping in view the public interest.
Taking everything into account and liberalized economic policies adopted by the government of
India is fully convertible on the current account which means all payments and receipts
concerning trade and services (export/import payments/receipts) are free from forex regulations.
One can make payment in any currency to other parts of world for goods/services purchased but
not for capital creation. So if you want to pay your supplier $ 100 million for import of raw
material you can do it freely. RBI will not come in the way of making such huge payment as it
is a payment on the current account. But in case of buying any immoveable property like
investment in real estate exceeding the cost of $ 100000/- the permission of RBI is required.
Acquiring an immoveable property tantamount to creation of capital asset and RBI has fixed an
upper limit for such transactions. Like wise no foreign national can invest in real estate in India
without the prior permission of the RBI.
Section 2(e) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 defines a Capital Account
Transaction as a transaction which alters the assets or liabilities, including contingent
liabilities, outside India of persons resident in India or assets or liabilities in India, and includes
transactions referred to in subsection (3) of Section 6. Transactions under the capital account
are restricted and controlled by a number of regulations.
For example Foreign Exchange Management (Permissible capital account transactions)
Regulations 2000 and FEMA Act do not permit capital account transactions without obtaining
specific permission from the Reserve Bank of India.
The system appears paradoxical as all capital account transactions are prohibited, unless
specifically permitted. In case of current account transactions the fact is otherwise true that all
current transactions are permitted unless specifically prohibited.
However there is very little difference in current and capital account transactions in certain
unspecified and undefined cases and is matter of further consideration for more clearly.
However a difference between the two type of transactions i.e. current account transactions and
capital account transactions can be understood by a very simple example.
If an Indian needs some foreign exchange for paying his fees for study abroad or wishes to visit
his relatives settled abroad he can get foreign currency exchanged from any approved money-
changer or from any bank. It is treated as Current Account Transaction.
But if any Indian citizen wants to import some heavy equipment, plant or machinery or wants to
invest abroad and the amount involved is big it will be treated as a capital account transaction
for which he shall be required to obtain the permission of Reserve Bank of India.
As per monetary policy of any country with regard to capital account convertibility to ensure
ability to accept such transactions where local financial assets are transacted into foreign
financial assets freely and at the same time also at the foreign exchange rate of interest
prevailing in the market.
Convertibility of capital or current account depends how sound is the position of balance of
payments with any country which solely depend how much foreign exchange reserve any
country possesses.
Time is not for ahead in 1990es our country was depleted of foreign currency reserves so that
an Indian citizen wishing to visit abroad was eligible for foreign exchange currency of only $
2000/- only hardly sufficient to survive on a foreign land even for two days. During those days
it was not possible to think about even partial convertibility of rupee. But the regulatory
authorities were cautious enough to improve the situation.
Forget the days of FERA 1947 when it was just like impossible to import an item for personal
use costing as low as $10/- for which RBI’s approval was required. Some changes were made in
FERA in 1973 and latterly FEMA 2000 shifted its focus from conservation of foreign exchange
to facilitating trade and payments.
With the result India has adopted current account convertibility for export and import of goods
and services but in case of capital account convertibility it is only partially allowed. Upper limit
has been fixed by the RBI and beyond that limit permission of RBI is required.
When we are talking about full convertibility on capital account we should be able to
understand the difference between full and the fuller convertibility. The difference between full
and fuller convertibility leaves much to be desired. As is well known, in the scenario of global
recession there is always a chance of relatively unstable and volatile economic situation before
any country and in view of this fact any country needs controls over capital flow.
In case of current account India is fully convertible but in case of creating capital assets outside
India that too on credit basis it accounts for creation of capital liability on the country and
adversely affects the balance of payment account of the country and it is for this reason that
certain limits have been prescribed.
In case fuller convertibility is allowed there shall be no restrictions of any kind and the national
economy and monetary policy shall also be adversely affected. There is glaring examples of
what happened to the economy of several nations where fuller convertibility was permitted.
For example some countries in east Asia where some Foreign financial institutions had invested
in real estate by miss utilising short term funds for long term investments and with the result
which destabilized the entire economy of these countries. In view of this very fact the fuller
(complete) convertibility on capital accounts is still under consideration of the government of
India. Because it would mean no restrictions without any question.
But developing countries like India (now declared as developed country by the president of
USA Mr. Barak Obama.) may face foreign exchange problems in keeping the sufficient foreign
exchange reserves to maintain stability of trade balance and stability of its economy. With the
increase in foreign exchange reserves the stipulated restrictions shall go on removing gradually.
Till date the capital account convertibility remains a major question for the government to
decide whether full rather fuller convertibility on capital account shall or not be in the larger
interest of the economy of our country, particularly when there are glaring examples of many
countries which allowed full capital convertibility.
3. Diversification of Investment:
It will also help in the diversification of Investment by ordinary people, wherein they can invest
abroad without any restriction and diversify their portfolio.
Special Topics:
Q.A. Find out the similarities and distinction between International
Financial System and Indian Financial System.
Or
International Financial System Vs. Indian Financial System
Answer:
https://byjus.com/govt-exams/indian-financial-system/
Introduction
The economic expansion of any country depends upon the existence of a well-ordered financial
system. It helps in the creation of wealth by linking savings with the investment. The
financial system is an organized and regulated structure where an exchange of funds takes place
between the lender and the borrower. It supplies the necessary financial inputs for the production of
goods and services, in turn, promote the well-being and standard of living of people in the country.
It is concerned about money, credit, and finance. Money refers to the medium of
exchange or mode of payment. Credit refers to the amount of debt which is returned
along with the interest. And the finance refers to the monetary resources comprising
the own funds and debts of the state, company or a person.
The efficient financial system and sustainable economic growth are corollaries. The
financial system mobilizes the savings and channelizes them into productive activity
and thus influences the pace of economic development. Economic growth is
hampered for want of an effective financial system. Broadly speaking, financial
system deals with three inter-related and interdependent variables, i.e., money,
credit, and finance.
“Financial system is the integrated form of financial institutions, financial markets, financial
securities, and financial services which aim is to circulate the funds in an economy for economic
growth.”
According to Dhanilal,
“Financial system is the set of interrelated and interconnected components consisting of financial
institutions, markets, and securities.”
The financial system provides channels to transfer funds from individuals and groups
who have saved money to individuals and group who want to borrow money. Saver
(refer to the lender) are suppliers of funds to borrowers in return with promises of
repayment of even more funds in the future.
1. To attain economic development, financial systems are important since they induce people to
save by offering attractive interest rate. These savings are then channelized by lending to various
business concerns which are involved in production and distribution.
3. It links savers and investors. This process is known as capital formation
4. It helps in lowering the transaction cost and increase returns which will motivate people to save
more
1. Financial institutions: it is a corporation affianced in the business of dealing with financial
and monetary matters such as deposit, loans, investments and currency exchange. They are
providing various services to the economic development with the help of issuing financial instruments.
They are further divided into banking institutions and non-banking institutions.
a) Banking institutions: they are the key part of economic development. They play a vital role in the
field of savings and investment of money from the public and lending to business concerns.
b) Non-banking institutions: they are the entities and the institutions that provide certain bank-like
and financial services but do not have banking license. E.g. IFCI, IDBI, LIC.
2. Financial market: it is a market which deals with various financial instruments such as
shares, debentures, bonds, etc. and financial services such as merchant banking, underwriting, etc.
They are further divided into
a) Capital market: institutional arrangement for borrowing medium and long term funds and which
provides facility for marketing and trading of securities. E.g. shares, debentures, bonds, etc. They are
then divided into:
Primary market: where securities are offered for the first time for receiving the public subscription.
3. Financial services: these services are provided by the finance industry. They are usually
customer focused. They study the needs of the customer in detail before deciding their financial
strategy, giving due regard to cost, liquidity, and maturity. Eg insurance company, credit rating facility,
etc
4. Financial instruments: it is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and
a financial liabilities or equity instruments to another entity. The various instruments are shares,
debentures, bonds in the capital market and Treasury bill, commercial paper, certificate of deposit,
repurchase agreement in the money market.
Remarks
The money market is usually accessed alongside the capital market. This money market is termed as
a good place to park funds that are needed in a shorter period. They provide a variety of functions for
individuals, corporates or government entities such as high liquidity. The company may want to invest
funds overnight and look to the money market to accomplish or to cover operating expenses or
working capital of any. Those individuals living on a fixed income often use the money market
because of the safety associated with these types of investment.
The capital market is a widely followed market. Their daily movements are analyzed for the general
economic conditions of the world markets. The institutions operating in the capital market access
them to raise capital for long term purposes such as for merger and acquisition or to expand the
business or capital projects.
#Functions of Financial System:
Functions and Role of the financial system, market are given below.
Pooling of Funds.
Capital Formation.
Facilitates Payment.
Provides Liquidity.
Short and Long-Term Needs.
Risk Function.
Better Decisions.
Finances Government Needs, and.
Economic Development.
Now each one Functions of the financial system are discussing on brief:
Pooling of Funds:
Capital Formation:
Business requires finance. These are made available through banks, households and
different financial institutions. They mobilize savings which leads to Capital
Formation.
Facilitates Payment:
The financial system offers convenient modes of payment for goods and services.
New methods of payments like credit cards, debit cards, cheques, etc. facilitate quick
and easy transactions.
Provides Liquidity:
In the financial system, liquidity means the ability to convert into cash. The financial
market provides the investors the opportunity to liquidate their investments, which
are in instruments like shares, debentures, bonds, etc. Price is determined on the
daily basis according to the operations of the market forces of demand and supply.
The financial market takes into account the various needs of different individuals and
organizations. This facilitates optimum use of finances for productive purposes.
Risk Function:
The financial markets provide protection against life, health, and income risks. Risk
Management is an essential component of a growing economy.
Better Decisions:
Financial Markets provide information about the market and various financial assets.
This helps the investors to compare different investment options and choose the best
one. It helps in decision making in choosing portfolio allocations of their wealth.
The government needs a huge amount of money for the development of defense
infrastructure. It also requires finance for social welfare activities, public health,
education, etc. This is supplied to them by financial markets.
Economic Development:
Through capital accumulation, the steady growth rate in the work done by the
financial system affects the rate of capital formation. The financial system affects
capital accumulation either by either changing the savings rate or by reallocating the
savings between capital production levels. Through technological innovation, focus on
innovation of new production processes and inventions.
Because friction of the market and laws, rules and policies are quite different with the
economies and the times, the impact of financial development on development can
have different effects for the economy allocation and welfare in the economy.
Alternatively,
This system exists at the regional, national, and international levels. It is an efficient tool
that helps in the economic development of a country by linking savings and investments
thereby leading to wealth creation. The financial system acquires money from people who
are keeping it idle and distributes it among those who use it for yielding income and
generates wealth in the country.