The story of in a grove, is not your common murder mystery.

The husband, the wife, and

the robber all admits to the murder, the witnesses and those who are involved throw out
inconsistent information. It is a murder mystery that simply cannot be solved. While we
are given information, we have no way of confirming any of the information to be the
truth. It is slanted that way, at least from my perspective, because it tries to show that
there can never be an absolute ‘truth.’ What we identify to be the truth is simply
something that we perceive or gather from the information on hand. There really is no
way for any one to be sure that what they consider to be true is actually true; while there
could be information that proves an idea to be true, there will also be information that
contradicts it. In the case of the story, who the murderer is relies on the reader, the reader
needs to decide who the murderer is, and as it has been said, we may never know if the
that is what is true.