DEBATE

- Students Under 17 Years Old Must'nt Ride Motorcycles -

Member :

1. Andi Naufal Al Fayydh ( 2 - CONS 2 )

2. Arya Primawiradhika ( 3 - CONS 1 )
3. Shafina Maharani ( 33 - PROS 1 )
4. Zahra Kartika Salma ( 36 - PROS 2 )

PROS 1 : " I agree that the under age of 17 years is not allowed to ride
motorcycle because of the mental not ready so that concentration is easily
distracted " .

CONS 1 : " I appreciate your opinion but for me, as long as the person is
educated and mastered on the correct driving technique and has the ideal
posture for driving, the minimum age limit is not a problem, thus I do not agree
the minimim driving limit of 17 years " .

PROS 2 : " I don't agree with the statement or opinion that Arya conveyed.
Because by law, drivers of vehicles who are underage or do not have a driving
license are certainly prohibited from driving a vehicle. Even though the
underage rider has good posture and technique in driving. Therefore, drivers of
motorized vehicles who do not have a driver's license will receive sanctions in
the form of criminal threats or fines " .

CONS 2 : " I know that the rules exist however we are here do debate on this
strange rule so I think your statement is not valid. I agree with Arya’s statement
as the body size and driving techniques are more important than age. If we do
legalize someone to drive when he’s 17 of age but his body size and driving
skill arent not on par, it will be more dangerous than someone who is younger
who drives with a good posture and technique even though he is not yet 17
years old " .