SPEECH

Introduction-
To understand the concept of obeying laws it is vital to
analyze both models. The society obeys or governs under
the light of moral laws or legal laws. In our research paper
we basically have assessed the role of naturalism and
positivism in defining laws and how these laws govern
society. It highlights the differences in two models and
identifies the most suitable one. The comparison of the
two types of laws helps in understanding the most
realistic model that makes laws mandatory for the people
and communities. In our paper we consider argument
between natural law theory and legal positivism and
determine the most effective system.

WHICH SYSTEM PROVIDES MOST POWERFUL

SOLUTIONS IN TODAY’S WORLD?
Now before answering this question I would like to tell
you that the concept of choosing between naturalism and
positivism relies on the ideology of law, justice and legal
system. The society that relies more on moral values will
consider naturalism as an effective legal system for
controlling the actions of people. The legal system
presented by positivism represents laws that control
wrongful actions and prevents them from illegal
conducts. The theory of naturalism focuses on the natural
duty that people acquire through birth while in positive
school the same thing is not there. While the application
of naturalism in realistic settings is less significant as
people are unable to make moral decisions when they
don’t fear immediate outcomes while the same thing is
not there in positive school
At the last I would like to say that Compared to
naturalism, positivism focuses on common good that
prevails in the society. It denies the ideology of moral
obligation and replaces it with the legal obligation. The
morality is not sufficient to justify obeying the law.
Positivism, on the other hand, plays a crucial role in
eliminating misconduct and evil from society.