Corrosion control and Monitoring 3.1 to 3.1.

5:

 Why other failure mode are not identified such as Hydrogen penetration monitoring and other
metallurgical modes of cracking. Associated damage mechanisms specific to each equipment
shall be clearly identified to define future NDT requirement. monitoring techniques specific to
damage mechanism greatly helps in reducing facility shutdown time and extending the life of
the asset.

3.2.3.1 TML assignment for piping:

No clear justification has been given for excluding piping circuits having NPS 2” and below. NPS
2” line could be that of hydrogen or wet H2S service !
 What is TRM(Trim) and why Lines having such designations are excluded from TML assignments.
 “Simplified isometrics will be developed reflecting all TMLs” an OSI isometric drawing shall
include comprehensive information such as corrosion loop#, circuit # and shall clearly identify
injection points, dead legs, pipe nipples and mixing points by use of distinct symbols, if there are
any.
 Electronic copy( AutoCAD file) to be submitted along with 3D model

3.2.3.2 & 3.2.3.3 TML assignment for injection points / dead legs

 TML numbering/ designation for injection points, dead legs and mixing points are not clearly
identified. Such classification greatly helps in segregation and separate monitoring.

3.2.3.7 Baseline Survey

 Quantity of TMLs to be clearly identified specific to each piping circuits based on corrosion
service. What is the criteria for quantity of TMLS? ( base line survey)

3.2.3.8 Requirement for insulated items

 Type and model shall be mentioned for insulation plugs in TML report

Drawing – TML orientation:

Orientation are only gathered in the TML report. TML isometric drawings shall not include the
orientations, this conflicts with statement in 3.2.3.5 where TML number and orientation are to be shown
circle.