Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fully Narrated: This type of documentary has a direct mode of address which is an off screen voice over,
that makes sense of visuals. Example of this is a nature documentaries. The voice over usually has a
sense of authority - "Voice of God".
Fly on the Wall: This type draws on cinema but mostly observational documentary that has no
commentary or narration. It’s just the cameras left to record subjects without interference. The camera
can also affect the behaviour of the subjects.
Mixed: A mixture of observational and narrative to advance the exposition. This type of documentary mixes
the use of interviews, voice over and observational footage.
Self-Reflexive: This one is where the person acknowledges the presence of the camera and speaks
directly to the film-maker, talking to the interviewer who is behind the camera or sometimes on screen.
Critics say this is a confusing way to do a documentary because it makes the documentary look more about
the film-maker than the subject it meant to be about.
Docudrama: This is a reenactment of events that are based on the truth. has style-elements of argument
and exposition are combined with fictional narrative, with the story based on facts
Docusoap: This a phenomenon of recent years where it follows daily lives of people in a range of different
jobs or positions in society. E.g. airports, cruise liners, however there are disputes that if these docs are
actuality documentaries.
Narrative
For this section on the analysis sheet, you need to explain and describe how you think the narrative is
structured.
It would also be useful to use terms you learnt about when studying Homeland, e.g. is the narrative linear
or non-linear, open or closed, single or multi-stranded?
For these sections, please ensure you identify specific examples – just for some examples…e.g.
● For graphics quote the graphics for particular interview(s) or any other times graphics are used and
why?
● How is the mise en scene in an interview relevant for the topic/themes of the documentary and the
person being interviewed?
● Are there establishing shots? Why?
● Does there seem to be a conventional set up for an interview? If so, what is the shot construction?
TITLE OF PROGRAMME: The Final 24 – Tupac Shakur
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=Bc1BMTZWQ08&list=PLanxfg3ReJtEU0c8e6mY_C_vQ5bCMHz38&index=26
TYPE OF DOCUMENTARY
Mixed
THEMES
Hip Hop and pop Culture
NARRATIVE STRUCTURE
The structure is the final 24 hours in the order in which it happened, whilst giving specific details of what
happened. However, it starts with a short reconstruction of his death, so you already know whats going to
happen. Also I think it is single stranded because its talking about Tupac
CAMERAWORK
Interviews were medium close up.
When the documentary starts getting more emotional it zooms into their face.
In the interviews if someone would talk about a place such as LA, there would be an establishing shot to
give you a better picture of the location.
In the opening sequence it showed small parts of the whole documentary to make the audience stay and
watch. This incises the audience as it shows how Tupac was killed in a reconstruction.
MISE-EN-SCENE
In this documentary the rise en scene is always relative to the interviewee or the subject of the interview. For
example, Tupac studio team are sat infant of platinum records to show that they were his music team.
SOUND
All through the documentary, hip hop music is playing as the show is about Tupac.
In some tense pats there is more serious music towards the end.
Non diegetic with the music so it doesn’t clash with the narrator.
EDITING
Cut aways
Establishing shots
Montages
ARCHIVE MATERIAL
I don’t understand this one.
GRAPHICS
Shallow depth of field and rule of three
TITLE OF PROGRAMME: Don’t Blame Facebook
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=nRm6EjY8ZWo&list=PLanxfg3ReJtEU0c8e6mY_C_vQ5bCMHz38&index=105
TYPE OF DOCUMENTARY
Mixed
THEMES
Horror/ Thriller
NARRATIVE STRUCTURE
Multi-stranded because it is talking about more than one person and there are multiple events and it didn’t
just happen to one person
CAMERAWORK
Interviews were medium close up.
When the documentary starts getting more emotional it zooms into their face.
When talking about the underground, if they were in an interview, and then started talking about a place,
they’d then have an establishing shot
MISE-EN-SCENE
When doing interviews and reconstructions, they have to use a dark background, maybe with an outcast of
white light. This is to show the audience that this documentary is more serious than previous ones
In the interviews the peoples clothes were the clothes they’d be wearing if they were on the job
SOUND
Very dull.
Non diegetic music to once again not clash with the narrator
EDITING
Montages
Cross cutting between scenes
Cut aways
Establishing shots
Quick cutes
ARCHIVE MATERIAL
GRAPHICS
Variety of shots and movement
Tule of thirds
TYPE OF DOCUMENTARY
Mixed
THEMES
~Reality
NARRATIVE STRUCTURE
Follows multiple people on their journeys
CAMERAWORK
Similar to the other documentaries. Interviews are a medium close up. it zooms in when they get emotional
and establishing shots are used when talking about a place.
MISE-EN-SCENE
When doing interviews and recreations, its very reality tv like not very serious but maybe it should be. This
is to show the audience the topic
In the interviews the peoples clothes were the clothes they’d be wearing if they were on the job
SOUND
Non diegetic music. Its like pop culture and hip hop.
Incidental music
EDITING
Montages
Cut aways
Establishing shots
Quick cuts
ARCHIVE MATERIAL
GRAPHICS