Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The word charge, means only an accusation of a crime or an information given by the
Court of an allegation made against the accused (AIR 1963 SC 1120)
An offence always leads to a case and a case would always involve offence or offences
Word case relates to transaction of which information is given and not merely one of
the offences committed during the course of transaction
Cognizance: Application of mind by the Court on the facts and circumstances of the
case. Taking cognizance means expression of intention by magistrate to initiate judicial
proceeding
Ingredients of complaint:
i. Oral/written allegations
ii. Some person known/unknown committed offence
iii. Must be made to a magistrate
iv. Must be made with a view to taking action by magistrate
v. Action proposed must be under CrPC
Complaint vs FIR
magistrate acts on complaint vs Magistrate acts upon own initiative
in case of information there is no complainant and in this case a complainant is first
examined on oath
4(K) INQUIRY
Inquiry extends to matters which are not offences e.g. proceedings u/s 133, 144, 45,
164, 176, 202, 329
Trial ---- A trial pre-supposes the idea of an offence. A trial is a judicial proceeding which
ends in conviction or acquittal.
4(L) INVESTIGATION
It is the Court who has authority and obligation to form an opinion about guilt or
innocence of accused person and to adjudicate accordingly.
All proceedings conducted by police officer or by any person other than a magistrate for
collection of evidence
Case commences its course only when investigation reveals that an offence has been
committed
INVESTIGATION (GENRALLY….!)
Stage – I
Information SHO u/s 154 CrPC
Stage – II
commencement of investigation 156, 157, 172 and police rules
Stage – III
Arrest of an accused 54, 60, 61, 167
Stage-IV
Investigation 170, 173, 169
Stage – V
Cognizance of offence
magistrate to inquire either to discharge or proceed with trail
in both cases magistrate has to pass an order to that effect
If challan is put before magistrate not competent to take cognizance, he shall refer the
same under section 190(2) to Sessions Court
Sessions Court, even if police has opined Cancellation/Discharge, after taking cognizance
under section 193 would have power again to carryout inquiry without recording
evidence
Even in Mehr Khan’s case (1984 SCMR 267) the apex court has gone to the extante of
empowering both magistrate and sessions court in respect of inquiry
Rationale behind all this is to ensure ‘checks and balances’ upon police and also upon
trial and decisions of magistrate to be purposeful and not merely technical.
The test is “whether in course of that proceeding the presiding judge has the power
legally to take evidence on oath” and not whether he has actually taken such evidence
(AIR 1964 All 290)
As per the view of FSc in PLD 1987 FSC 9: No judicial proceeding can be
conceived in which evidence of a witness is recorded without oath unless he is unable to
understand implication of oath by reason of tendervage or otherwise
A case include one offence or more than one offences. It would be termed as non-
cognizable case only if every one of the offences is a non-cognizable offence
It would be cognizable even if one or more of the offences in the case are cognizable
offence(s)
4(O) OFFENCE
Section 40 PPC referred usually to denote a thing made punishable by penal Code
Offence is constituted as soon as the acts which constitute that offence have been
committed
Combination of the intention with the action exposing such intention would bring the
act under definition of an offence (actus reus + mens rea)
As per 1995 PCrLJ 877 the elements of attempt to commit a crime are:
i. an intent to commit it
ii. An overt act towards it commission
iii. Failure of consummation/commission
iv. The apparent possibility of commission