.

; (

. ..
.. - Jl :vi IT Jl 0 1.1 H A P A E 0 T A

Ha
niO.il.i'I:~1Jl ~1B.AHOB .l.C'Ptl.UAHOB

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
3A .HBJIEHYIETO ITAPEHTETW.ffiOCT

/CEil.tlHT~1KA H.A II 3.1I'Y EEH..'\.TA ii.UEH'I·~IllliOCT 11 I

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Q=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=•=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

HAY l!EH P'.bKOBO.ID1TEJI:

.IlOU. K.YIBAHOB.A .

. ..........
~
 C'b.U'bP)K.A.HHE
CTp •

B'LBe.rteH:~t~e •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I-IV

~eTo~onorJttqecK:~t~ npo6neMe ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1-17

Tli'tlHOCT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .18-38
HanonaynaHa n:~t~Teparrypa •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 39-43
EKcuepn:~t~paH MaTepHan ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1-72
 B ~ B ~ ll E H ~ E

B CTpeMe~a HH ~a Oc5XBaHeM 6e3KpaHHOTO B KpaHHOTO C~~eCTByBaT

~Be anTepHaTHBH t e~HaKBO rrpHMaMnHBH H rrary6aH; cne~BaiKH He-

C~3HaTenHHH CTpeMe:r.c 1\.".bM HCTHHHOCT - ,na ce 3aryc5HM B Jiac5HpHHTa
Ha eMrrHpHHTa, Ha HaJIHqHo-.ua~eHoTo jVorhC:Indenseinj, oc5na,naHH oT
WaHaTH3Ma Ha TOqHOCTTa , X~ITHOTH3~paHH OT qyBCTBOTO 3a CHCTeM-
HOCT /Gefi.ib.l fi.ir des-Ganze/ H .ua Ce OITHTaMe ,na LlOKal<:eM , qe HH-
IitO He e CJiytlaHHO, qe H~l:!_aH-MaJIKHTe e,nHHHL{H 11
pac50THT 11 ; ,npyraTa
B~3MO~HOCT e ,na ce OITHTaMe ,na OTXB~pJIHM Hanar~reTO Ha BCHKaKBa
CHCTeMa, HOpMa H .rta ce OTT.TiaCHeM OT llV.CTHH pa3yM /KaHT/ B ~ap­

CTBOTO Ha eK3HCTeH~UanHo-oc5~pKaHOTO. Ho LlOpH H B CTpeMe~a HH 3S

OTXB~pnHHe Ha BCHKaKBa CHCTeMa Ce KpHe ,n~nc50KO ~XOBHaTa ITOTpec5-
HOCT 3a HHKaKBa rrpOUHHa B CHCTeMaTa, 3apa,nH He~OCTaT~qHaTa H
npo.tzyKTHBHOCT T.e. CTaBa .J:lYMa 3a 11
3ary6eHaTa HLleHTHqHOCT" 1 H
HeHHOTO KOMITeHCHpaHe. TIOCTOHHHHHT CTpeMe~ K~M HCTHHHOCT / der
einzige immer regende Trieb nach \vahrhei t HH TnacKa K~M aHa-
IDI3 Ha A6yo~ t B KOHTO MHT~ofqHQTO MHCJieHe Ha ~peBHHTe r~p~~ot CHeMa
orro3H~HHTa e3HK : peq 3 , orrpe.!leJIHiiKH qoBetca KaTo Cliiov :\6yov- E:xov
T.e. KaTo AHBeemoTo, crrococ5Ho .ua H3B".bpmH peqeBH aKT H orrpe,ne-
JIHmo CBOeTO 6~otTHe B".bB H qpe3 Hero.HaBJIH3aHKH B pelleBOTO 6HTHe
1 Cum vero id omne quod notitiam distinctam ingreditur,rursus
distincte cognitum est,seu cum analysis ad finem usque producta
habetur,cognitio est ad~~uata,cujus exemplum perfectum nescio
an homines dare possinti/Leibniz.l900.Ceuvres philosophiques.
Tome I,622/;ibid.,l90-206;Kant.l787.Kritik der reinen Vernunft.
/besonders Dritter PDraloe;ism,der Personelitati/,617-620; Hegel.
1968.Jenenser Logik,I•!etaphysik und Naturphilosophie ./Satz der
Identitat oder des \·Jiderspruchs/,135-137.
2 Wenn Gott in seitl~r rechten alle Wahrheit, und in seiner ~in­
ken den einzigen immer regenden Trieb nDch Wahrheit,obschon mit
dem Zusatze mich immer und ewig zu irren verschlossen hielte,
und sprache zu mir: \'IB.hle! Ich fiele ihm mit Demuth in seine
Linke und sagte: Vater,gieb! die reine Wahrheit ist ja doch nur
fur dich allein!/Lessing.Werke.Vol.X,53/ /~ Kierkegaard Antho-
logy.ed.R.Bretall.New York,l95/
3 N.Heidegger Gesamtausgabe.l976.Bd.2l.Logik.V.Klostermenn,6.
 II.

KaTO HHKaKBO C'l>-6IIITyDaHe /Liteino_nderreden/ C8 HaT'l>K!laMe Ha ,ItBe

OCHOBHIII on03IIIUIIIIII - A3:'~ III A3:To /B CMIIIC'l>na,B KOMTO rill ynoTpe6H-
Ba .6y6ep/, tlJIIeTO rrynCIIIpaHe ocpopMFI 83IIIKa Ka TO CIIICT8Ma OT B'l>:3MOJ!CHH
HanperHaTOCTIII jS;;."stem m()c;_licher Spannungen : Bubcr. Werke .1962.
I Bd. ,446/ no.n HaTHCKa Ha BonHTa 3a oc'l>meCTBHBaHe Ha r-<oMyHMKail~UI..

Ta /der verwirklichungsfahige Wille zur Kommunikation : ibid.,

443; der 'I'rieb zu sprechen,soine Gecl.enken zu G.ussern,rnitzuthei-
len : FeuerbB.ch.Samtliche Herke .1903. VI Bd.Das \i/esen des Chris-
tentums,96/. flpeKpatlBaMe rpaHHUaTa Ha xepMeHeBTIIItlHMH Kp'l>r,3a .r4a

MIIITHtleCKa MOHOnHTHOCT M e.rtHOBpeMeHHO C TOBa HCHO pa3rpaHJIItliiiMa no

HatlHHa Ha 6MTyBaHe /SeinsvJeise/ .HamltlHO C'l>CTOHHHe jpra.senter
Bestand/,noT3HUHanHo npH~e~aHHe /potentialer Besitz/ H aKTyanHo
cTaBaHe /aktuelles Begebnis/ ca Te3III B3aHMH0o6ycnaBfltnH ce Hatii~r­

HH Ha e3HKOBaTa 6IIITIIIHHOCT /: Buber.ibid.,442-443/.~H~n~q~o_c~c~~

!!III~ e o6mHOCTTa oT H3I<asyeMoTo 3a onpe.neneH nepiiio.n BpeMe,pa3rneY.<:-

I .I4aHO no OTHOilleHHe Ha noTeHUHanHaTa B'l>3MOZHOCT 3a III3Ka3BaHe K'l>M

III3Ka3BagOTO C8 11 T.e. TOBa 8 C'l>OTHOill8HHeTO MeJ!C,I4y nOT8HUIIIanHO pea-
nH3yeMOTO H peaniii3HpatnOTO Ce B 06~HOCTTa OT 3a8,ItHO ~IIIB8etniiiT8

/Miteinander der lebenden Menschen/. "flo.!e~U!!al!H.Q. !!P~T~:-iC~H!!,e e

o6mHOCTTa OT H3pa3HBaHOTO B onpe,I4eneHa C~epa Ha 83HKa .I40TOnKOBa,
.I40KOnKOTO 8 ome OTHOCHMO K':D.M 83IIIKOBaTa HHT8HUI1Ifl III III3pa3HBaHe Ha
XOpaTa /HOCIIITe1IH Ha :>KHBOTO C1IOBO cera III TyK/ OT Ta3H ccpepa"."Tpe•
TIIIHT HatlHH Ha e3HKOBa 6IIITHHHOCT e H3rOBOp8HOTO B npo~ec Ha CTa-
BaHe,cnoBOTo,KoeTo ce e roBopHno H ce roBOpH". H TaKa ce oKasBa,
tl8 ce HaMHpaMe B 3aTBOpeH XepMeHeBTHtleH Kp-:Dr. lla Ce npeKpatlaT He•
roBHTe rpaHHUH He e cna6ocT Ha aHa1IH3a,.nopH H npH OC'l>3HaTaTa He-
B'l>3MOJ!CHOCT 3a H3niii3aHe OT Hero. T'l>pceHKIII TI'l>pBOnpHtiHHaTa,Ha HaC
He HH OCTaBa ,npyro OCBeH ,na OtlepTae.M B3aiiiMOnopa:>K,ItaHeTO Ha T83H
TpH THna 6HTIIIHHOCT,KaKTO H THXHOTO B3aiiiMO.rteMCTBHe. HaniiitlHOTO
 III.

C~CTOflHHe H DOTeHUHaflHOTO npHTe~aHHe ca O-pa3flH~eHH OT ~pyr:vr e:JH-

l<OBH eK:JMCTeHUHH B C~InHfi 06XBUT nocpe~CTBOM H3MepeHH8TO - B~3MQ)!<:-

HOCT 3a aKTyamiO peanH3HpaHe B crpepaTa Ha A<:HBOTO CflOBO T • e • KaTO

xaeMO ca enHHCTBeHO npennOCTaBKH,3a na Ce ~OCTHrHe no HCTHHCKHfl

aBTop /der echte Autor/ H :vrcT:vrHCKHfl pa:Hoaop /das echte Gesprach/;
KaKTO TB~pn:vr Ey6ep /ibid. ,4L~3/ HflH TOBa ca CBOe06pa3HO :JaTBOpeHH-
B-ce6e-CH C~epH Ha e3HKOBaTa 6:t-rTHHHOCT,He3aBHCHMO OT TflXHaTa

KOllTO HHe H3B'bpUIBaMe HaCHfl:t-re, MonenHpaifiKH OT TOBa MHOrOr nacHe nHa-

nor? ~ nanH TyK He npen:pa~BaMe rpaHMUMTe Ha KpaiiHoTo,orpaH:vr~eHo-.

XBaTHOTO B HflKaK'bB 06XBaT VI TOBa na 6'bne nonno~eHHflT Ha Henpe-

CTaHHH TpycoBe non:vrnorH3'bM?
fl OTHOBO CMe Ha H3XOnHHfl nyHKT - pe~eBHfi aKT - npMeMaifiKH KaTO
rpanHBHa en:vrH:vrua - pao-n B o e H VI e T o /Zwiefalt u Zwiespalt/
A3:llpyrHH,Hano~eHa HM OT orpaH:vrqeHaTa CDOC06HOCT Ha qoBelliKOTO
na perMCTpHpa Ha HHBO C'b3HaTenHO ifiepapXMqHQ 3ByqamOTO B llpyrOTO
MHorornac:vre,Koe~0 HH Hanara na MHTonor:vr3:vrpaMe M o H o-nMTHOCTTa
Ha llpyrHH. llocT:vrraMe no B'bnpeca 3a c~mHoCTTa Ha nync:vrpamaTa ono-
rr
3HUHfl ..._3:,u,pyrMfl.
A n
,u,&JIH ·
Tfl e MMaHeHTHa :Ja qoBeUIKOTO MHCfleHe4 HnH
enBa oT ~aKTa Ha pe~eBOTO C'b-o6myBaHe /Miteinandersprechen/ Me~~

xopaTa CTaBa B'b3M0jKHO HetiHOTO C'bii{eCTByBaHe KaTO TflXHO Brn'b6HBaHe

/Verinnerlichung/ I: Buber. ibid. ,444/? .Uan:vr :.1oHonor H n:vranor He
Ca TpaHC~OpMaUHH Ha enHH H C~mM THO 6HTMe,npH K09TO MOHOnor~T He
e HHl!lO npyro OCBeH nManor-B-Ce6e-CM,nop:vr H B CBOeTO npen-e3MKOBO
6MTHe,KoraTO nyncVIpa~OTO nHCTaHUHpaHe H O~~~p3B8He /Urdistanzie-
rung und In-Beziehung-treten5/ ca Beqe B HanperHaTa ono:JHUHH.
4
Zum denken gehoren ursprunglich zwei.Fragen un Antworten sind
die ersten Denkakte /Feuerbach.ibid.,lOl/.Ohne den Anderen ware
die ivelt fur mich nicht nur todt und leer,sondern auch sinn- und
verstandlos.Nur an dem Anderen wird der Mensch sich klar und
selbstbewusst /ibid.,lOO/.
5 Buber.ibid.,412.
 IV.

npe.u-ea:tnwBo /Ey6ep/ ,:vraB'bH-e3HKOBO /l(aHT/ nyncHpar-re Aa : .Upyr:vrfi

HJIH cy6eKT'bT,tiH8~0 ITOCpe,UHHtieCTBO He e H3B'bH Hero,He e UHCJIHM OC-
B8H KaTO cy6eKT B HHKaKBa e3HKOBOCT /XaMaH,Iepuep,~o~tep6ax/ ? Pa3-
6Hpa ce,ToBa e caMo qacT OT no-rorreMHH "BetieH Kp'br" - eaHK : pa:::yM;
-:P.opMyn:epaH OT Xep.nep: ".Oe3 eaHK lloBei< HflMa paayM H 6ea paayM -
e3HI< 11 /G.Herder.l966.Abhandlune; uber den Ursprung der Sprache,37/.
~ ~2Ba pa3-.U B 0 e H H e M .UBy-e ll M H H 0 C T Ha rOBOpHHR
aKT ce KI:He ome e.nHa eH~trMa, npoHanHaama oT ~aKTa, tie "roBopHMOTO
CJIOBO He OCTaBa npH CBOfl rOBOpmTeJI,TO 6'bp3a Kl>M CBOH CJiylliaTen 11 /Ey-
6ep/ • Ho K'D,Ite C T a B a rOBOpHMOTO CJIOBO - ,nanm B H K'bM Hac /'ad'
und "in" uns I Hnm MeEcy uac,B ae~HanaTa Me:'o!Ccy Aa H .UpyrHR "npo-
nacT", KOHTO Ey6ep HapHlla l:e:JK.UHHHOTO I das Zwischen/ ? ~I TaKa, HaJIM-
n;e e HOBa TpHa,na .A.3 : ,llpy:rmH : lle:lK,UHHHOTO, B 'IIHflTO HanperHaTa 6H-
TH1HOCT Ce OC'bi!leCTBHB8 /begibt sichf roBOpHMOTO CJIOBO,e,UHOBpeMeH-

~O,OTKpHB8I!l0 H npmKp:v!B8~0 -.UH81IeKTHli8CKH OIT03HD;HH,B KOHTO ce ,UBH-

8H81IHTHtiHOTO MHC118H8 H8 cpH1IOCOtiJCK8T8 110li'HK8 /philosophierend'e
ItH

Logik/, 38 liHATO OCHOBOITOJIOJKHHK MOj!8 ,na 61>,ne CliHT8H ApHCTOT8JI 6

/Kants v/erke.l962.Bd.IX.Walter de Gruyter~20/o

me 38B'Dpma TOBa KpaTKO B'DB8.U8HH8 C e.UHO M8JIKO 8,UHOCTp8H'IIHBO

H8IT'D1IHO ITOC118.UOBaTe1IHO,B H8CTOHI!laTa pa6oTa: "ITpoapaliHOCT Ha Hay'll-

HOTO H3C119.UB8He e B'b3MO~CHa e,U:viHCTBeHO ITO IT'DTH Ha ~HJIOCO~CKaTa JIO-
rHKa" /MoHeidege;er.l976oop.cit.,l7/o

~ '6
6 IIe:a't&., ue: "' yor. cmcxs
W 'I
!-LEV t ~
O'Tli-LIXV'ti.K 6 s, ••. cxno<pCXV'ti.Kuc;; .C:'
ue: out nefc;;,cxA.A.'
p

kv ~ ,ftb aA.T]-&e:!lca.v ~ '-Ve:!loe:a-&aa. ~m<ipxe:t. /de interpretatione 4, 17a 1-3/,

".<: ~ ,
EV
'
otr_ u£
_c:\_
XCXL' 'tO' <Ve:Uoor_ H.aL' 'tO' aA.T)-&tc;;,
,
a!lv-&e:uCc;;
.1:
'tLS T)uT) VOT)!-Lt.r.'tOV wan£~

Ev ov'tov /de anima 6,430a/,Ea'tL 6£ e:tc;; np~'toc;; A.6yoc;; &n.o<pav~LK~c;;,e:t'ta

&n6<paa&.c;; /de interpretatione 5,17a 8/, Metaphysica 9 10 etc.
 1.

Ha 93ItiKOBOTO 6HTitie CJie.IJ;Ba ,na pa3rJie.UaMe HHI-<OH OCHOBHH npo6neMH

npH nocTaBflEeTo na rpam1UHTe Ha Hay tea Ta ::~a e3t·ma - T. e. KaKBO e

11
;:tOpVI B 3aCTVIHaJl BVI.tt 11 ITOX(06Ha OIT03VI~VIH,CJle,n I<aTO B:CB
BCVItrim BpeMeHa H 9ITOXH C'l>ll(9CTByBa aaaJ1JI3a TOpCKB r..IVICJleHe, KOeTO He-
11
rrpeC_TaHHO pyum: aH8JlHTVItlH0 11 OCTap~Jllri rrapa,UVII'MVI,riOJiaraKKiti HOBVI
11
.UVIaJieKT~Itlii0 11 ? ~lMaMe -JIM rrpaBO HOMHHaJlHCTVItlHO .IJ;a rrpe-H M e H y B a -
11
Me HayKaTa 3a e3:vrKa,cne.n KaTo pa3-m :vr p H B a M e" pycnoTo Ha
H3Cne,nBruiHH o6eKT7? 0TI'OBOpVITe Ha T03VI c:cmeCTBeH B:CITpOC He Ca pe-
neBaHTHIII 3a Ha!lleTO MVICJieHe,OCBeH aKO He ITO.UXO.IJ;VIM 11
peaJIVICTHtlH0 11
I<:CM VI3CJie.I:(BaHHTe flBJleHHflS • H TaKa, OITHTBaMe ce ,na 11
CHeMeM 11 OT
e.ttHa CTpaHa rrpOTVIBOpetrHeTO o6no : ttaCTHO,KaTO 11
3a§paBHM 11 HflKOH
Ha.VIMeHOBaHHfl, ITOJIYtliiiJIIti j~:VIBOT 0'1' .UOI'IIa THtlHOTO MHCJleHe, B KOeTO tlOBeK
ttecTo :vr3rra.na, a O'l' .upyra - TpH6Ba .ua np:vr3HaeM,tte peanHOCTTa HH Ha-
nara .na 6opaB:vrM ITOtlTH VI3~flJIO C ng,parMeHTH 11 , 11 3aCBiti.UeTeJICTBY-
BaHH 11 y T03H nnn OH31il aHan:vr3a Top, a noruncora :vr c:cc 3arnaBHH rra rtr3-
e.ne;ttBaHHH, rropa,UH rrpaKTHtteCKaTa HeB:C3MOA<HOCT .tta .ttOCTHI'HeM .UO caMH-
Te rrpOH3Be,neHHH. He Hit! OCTaBa Hlii~O ,npyro OCB9H .tta ce IIpHMHPHM,tre
npoTitiBopettHeTo He cauo He ce cHeMa,Ho .nopH ce pa3rp:c~a.

3a .ua ce cS3.na.ue no-acHa npe.ncTaBa Iti .na ce o6xnaHe "HeynoBHMa-

TannoneBa ~OpMa Ha Te3H THIT Iti3CJie,UBaHHH,M:CtreQH Ce ,na rrpOHitiKHaT BCe

pa3rOBOpa, KOMYHHKa~~mTa, Iti KOitiTO Ca 6eJIR3aHH C e,UHO 11

0 T B "!> ¢; • • •

ce Hanara ,na Ce,';H3B:CpmaT HfliCOVI onpOCTHBaHrtrfi U a6COJll'OTiti3a~VIH, H ,na

1/
7
une science qui etudie lo vie des signes au sein de la vie soci-
ale; elle formerait une partie de la ps~chologie sociale ••• nous la
nommerons 8emiologie.La linguistique n'est qu'une partie ••• et les
lois que decouvrira la semiologie seront applicable la lin~uis­
tique./F.de s.CLG,33/la langue,le plus complexe et le plus repandu
a
des systemes d'expression ••• en ce sens la lin$uistiq~e ••• le patr~
general de toute semiologiejCLG,lOl/general l~ngu1st1CS/Morr1s,l
on.cit. ,_116/Hn:vr uaKpaTKO le Dehors eat le l)edans;nerr~la,:Q.~~a/- ~
'(j- 111 reuus _ .f9S~,PariS,iltp
 2.

ce cneMe M3Ka3a Ha Hl1BO 11

113JIO:lKeHHe" ;Constative : J.L.Austin.l962.
How to do tkine;s with words.Oxi'ord New York,}/. H TaKa,mrKonKo rpy!!
IIJ.i OT 113CJle.UOBaTeJI11 /11n11 IDKOJIH/ ca B 11 aKTVIBeH 11 .I~l1aJIOr IIpH pa3tlyrt-
BaHeTO Ha orpaHl'tltleHOTO, 11 He06B'I:.p3ar!0 11 C'I:.~ CO~HaJieH KOI-ITeKCT KOM;YHH-
KUTHBHO C'I:.-IIpl1 K 0 C H 0 BeHJ.ie / interactionnal setting9,face-to-.
. t erac t"J.on 10; , B KoeTo nexm r<o.r.mpaHa HfiKaKBa co~t-IanHa pean-
f ace J.n

uocT /R.Birdwhistell.l97l.Kinesics:inter- and intrachannel commu-

nication research.In:Essays in Semiotics,533/ 11 • Ha rpaHl'tl~aTa Ha
III H X:X: BeK ,nBal\ta MHC~HT-eJil'tl /~ • .u:oo Cocl0p1 ~ 'll.C.lliipc/3 ca B
"cKpl1T 11 LU!Ianor, 11 paaKnama~KH 11 aBiopecpepl'tlpamaTa .necmoTMtma C'brrtHOCT
. 3aTl!Q.PeHO-
Ha H3cne.nBaHHrrTa 3a eaHKa,KaTo 6l'tiTHe1B-ce6e-cH; e3l'tiK'I:.T ce pa3-

Ba CO~Hamra 06rrtHOCT o ITonara~KH OCHOBHTe Ha nparllaTHtlHOTO H3MepeHHe

/KaTO He)leJIHMO OT Cl'tiHTafKTHtlHOTO H CeKaH~l'tltlHOTO 113MepeHl'tle/ Ha e3H-
11
KOBHfi 3HaK, 'll.li10pHC U3$1CHSH3.J 11
3Hai<OBaTa TeOpHR Ha ITHpc.Cnope,n Hero
/Foundations on the theory of signs.l938.Vol.I of the Internatio-
nal Encyclopedia of Unified Science.Chicago Press,al.e. in Writi~

on the General ~li-eory of Sighs.i»971,48/ "e311KOBHA:T 3HaK p a 6 o -

'1' H B KOM6HH8IolHfl C ,npyrH 3H8J4H Ha tlJieHOBeTe Ha CO~HaJIHaTa rpyrta 11
11 11 .na ce pa36Hpa e,nRH e311K HJIH .na ce H3non3yBa npaB11JIHO /?/,3Ha'IH
)la Ce CJie)lBaT npaBHJlaTa /Cl1HTaKTHtlHH,ceMaHTHtlHH H nparMaTJ.itlHH/
3a l'tl3IlOJI3yBB.He,KOHTO Ca B CHJia 3a ,na,neHa C 0 ~ H' .a 1I H a 0 6 ·-

Cne.nBantaTa 11
B'I:.JIHa 11 na 11
0TMeCTBaHe 11 OT e3HKa K'I:.M fiB-
nemmTa 11
0I(OJI0 11 H 11 0T:9'I:.)l 11 e3HKa e npe3 60Te ro.nHHH,Hape,g C'I:.C CH11-
9 M.Bierwisch.l980.Semantic structure and illocutionary force.In:
Speech act theory and Pragmatics.Dordrecht.Boston.London,j-35.
1
1 1/
°F.Poyatos.l983.Language and Nonverbal systems i~the structure
of face-to-face interaction:In:Language and Communication.'{_ola3k
. 129-~~v.
11 PHKOmeTHa HHTepTeKCTyaJIHOCT Hl-1 OTilpama K'bM COC!Op /CLQ. 1973,
ed.T.de Mauro.Paris,34/: ••• une science qui etudie la vie des
signes au s e i n de 1a v i e s o c i a 1 e.
12
cours de Linguistique generale.l973./ed.M.de Mauro/,Pari~.RaGo­
robinsk1.II.l964.Les anagrammes de F.deS.:~Mercure de France' 3 50 c
delal957•Le~ sources manuscrites du Cours de Ling.genera1et ~ .st e
 prriH, B ttllleTo noHo ce nopaY.C.na Kpa:~HoTo .ue3HHTerpMparre Ha 03HattaBamo:
.neiTCiriXOJIOl'Jri3a~Mfl Ha KOMyr-mKa TiriBHiriH 11 !Wriirip 11 no Monena
WYM B
b
0 c
-t---~---2 r· ······1
.D (\ ...

/BY.C R.L.Birdwhistell.l970.Kinesics and Context,69/

~ vr ttvrrrTo Ha~t-51pKa rrpos:rBa e TeopHHTa Ha RoaM qoMCI<m /1959.Syntactic
structures/, Ce IIOCT:vtra C':bBMeCTHO CIIOpaayMeHJrie Me:J<:ny JlHHl'BV!:CTH/N.
McQuown,Ch.Hockettj,aHTporronoa:vx /Gregory Bateson,Ray Birdwhistell/
vr rrcvrXMaTpvr/Henry Brosin,Frieda Fromm-Reichmann/ aa vracne~BaHeTo

Ha ITOBe.rteHHeTO Ha yttaCTHH~MTe B KOM,yHHKaTHBHOTO C':biTpHKOCHOBeH:vte

/interactionnal behavior/ KaTo B3a:vtMonelcTByBama MHoro-KaHanaa
c~eMa /B~ R.Birdwhistell.l96B.Communication.In:International En-
cyclopedia of the social sciences.fe~.David Sills] Vol.~p.24-28/.

Hapen C T03H C ':b -BMeCTeH 8KHIT OT C ~ -Tpy.JJ.HH~H /joint team :

F.Poyatos 1983.LijC,l39; co-werkers : R.Birowhistell.l970.op.cit.,

231 I c-:o-6HTyBa ome enHa co~vronor:rrrqao-rrcHxonoY.CKa :rrr3cnenoBaTencKa
11 06IItHOCT 111,~oKTO 6:vx.uefK:vt B ,40MHHHpaqa IT03H~Hfi nopa.rtH CO~HamraTa
C':bt4HOCT Ha KOMYHMKa~HRTa; ,naBa "xpaHa 11 KOHUeiTTyaJlHO H TepMHHOJlOI'lolq
HO Ha 11
0Ttcy'At.JJ.eHHTe 11 B ITO-rOJifiMa CTeiTeH JIHHrBHCTH,ITCHXHaTpH H ITCH-
XOJI03H. ~I TaKa, KaK .rta ce rrpeo.uonee c-:orrtecTByna•a Ta "rrporracT" MeY.C.ey
HHJJ.HBH.tzy'aJIHO,HHTpacy6eKTHO
TOJIKOBa r-:ocTo OT M-:ormiBBTe notiones vulgares U!\U praenotiones /h
Bacon.l620.Novum 6rganum scientiarumoi,26 /? llanH c-:omecTByBa HH-
f
ftt L4the Palo Alto group /Gregory Bateson,Ray Birdwhistell,Henry Bro
sin,Frieda Fromm-Reichmann,Charles Hockett,Norman McQuown/ in a
co-research with Williem ~ustin,Albert Scheflen at the Eastern
Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute /incl.H.L.Smith,G.L.Trager/and
Harvey Sarles,William Condon,Felix Loeb,Joseph Charny at Western
I Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute and Clinic /R.B.l970,86;231/
l5Talcott Parsoms,Edward Shils,George Allport,Clyde Kluckhohn,H.
A.Murray,R.C.Sheldon 9 Samuel Stouffer,Edward Tolman.
KaKBa cou~am-ra Heo6xo.u~MocT,KOFITO H~ Eanara no np~IIy~a I coerci-.
tion/ .na "~rpaeM" HHKaKBa ponFI ;role-expectation : T.Parsons/Eo
Shils/eds ./ .1951. 1r0\·Jard a general theory of action, 19/ ~~l .namt TFI
e ~aurrno "B'l>HmHa" 3a cy6er<Ta /en dehors des conscienc:es ir;.di vi-
duelles : E.Durkheim.l895.Les regles de la methode sociologique,
6/ ~m'I e HMaHeHTHa aa ~om.n~n~.eymrocTTa jBuber.l962.i;'/erke .I Bd.,
454-474/, KOFITO 11
TerHe 11 .na 61>.ne n~qaocT-B-ponR /person in role/
KBTO e,llMHMUa OT HfiKBKBa COUJ.iBJIHa 06J!tHOCT /T.Parsons.l968.Interac-
tion:social interaction.In:International Encyclopedia of the so-
-
cial sciences.Vol.7,438/? E~xMe MornH ,tta ce H3M'l>KHeM OT riepe.UHHs:I
xepMeHeBTHqeH Kp'l>r KBTO paarnez.naMe C'l>mHOCTTa Ha fiBJieHHFITa II p

u e c y a n H o , B - .n e ~ c T B B e /action process/o OTTyK

C T B M e : B 1> T p e B .nelllcTnynamaTa e.nMrmua /HeaaBII!CII!MO oT

Ba .UBJIH j]]•lqiiOCT-B-pOm=i Hmt KOJieKTHBHa e)lHHHUa/ H Me :lK .n '3' .neJ-

)lH:311I.JJYBJIHOCTTa KBTO JIHqHOCT-B-pOJifi, KOJiei<THBHaTa 06!!tHOCT KBTO e.rtH-

HHUB CieMaMe,MaKap H e.UHOIIOCOqHO,OII03HUHHTa HH.nHB~.rtyaJIHO : COUHan-
HO B paMKHTe Ha .ne~CTBynama e.nHH~Ua ;actor UAu acting unit/. T,yK
11
Ha ITOMOJ!t HH H.nBa HaiTHpaQHFIT CTpeMeE .rta OTll,lleM 0TB'l>)l .neliCTBHeTO"t
)la ro 06XBaHeM B Ta3H HeroBa .n~3 0 ~ H C T B e H 0 C T, KOHTO
nyJICHpa 11 /B'Yt. no-rope/. TaKOBa "pa3.m'IpaH0 11 B CBOFITa IIpHBH)lHa H.UeH•
11

THqHOCT IIOHFITJ.ie Beqe IIOJIOBHH BeK16 e interaction,KoeTO ITO CBOHTa

Hi<OHHqHa H CHMBOJmqua C~na 1 7 H3BeCTBa transaction,IIOTHCKaliKH TII!pa-
HHqHo 3ByqamOTO MHOrOrJiaCJ.ie /OTB'l>.U-,MeE.rty-,B3BIIJ:M0- 9 C1>~/ B IIOJIHJIO•
~~~a Cne.ua18 • ilopa.UH CBOFITB BM6HBaJieHTHa C'l>mHOCT e Tpy~HO. IIpeBO•
16 B'Yt. H3rron3ynaHa mtTepaTypa - H3cne.uBaHHHTa, MapK:to~paH.d
'/
/;J •••• I
1? ••• HMH,KOr.rta C HHM BCTpeqaroTCH B rrepBhlX pa3,CBH3BHO C H8KOTO-
pl>IM BOCIIp~FITHeM HJIH C HIUIM 8KBHBaJieHTHhlM HHJ{HBHJzy'BJI:bHDIM 3HBHHeM .
HH.llHBH.JJ.YaJI:DHOI'O 06':beKTa, KOTOphlM 3 THM HMBHBM HB3:biBaeTCH • TOJI:DKO TO I'•
)la OHO FIBJIHeTCH IIO.nJIHHHMM ~H)leKCOM.l<or.ua C HHM BCTpeqaiOTCR B cne-
.uy~mH• pa3,0HO ••• ~KOHHqecKHI 3HBK 3TOI'O ~H)leKca.ilOBC8.UHeBHOe 3Ha-
l<OBCTBO c HMeHeM .uenaeT ero CHMBOJIOM /11Hpc .1983. B: CeM~OTHKa, 164/
18 aa noHHTHeTo cne.ua B% Derrida.l967.De la grammatologie,lo3.
 .14HJ.[\ KOeTO 031-IatlaBa, qe Ha HTIKOH MeCTa 14e ro OCTaBTIMe C :lero Ba Ta ne-
HOT a T~IBHa CT01!10CT, a Ha .IlpyrH - me 11
OCBeTJifiBaMe 11 HHKOTI OT HvriUI<HTe
Ha CeMaHTHtiHOTO 11
C'HOIIt18 11 OT rrpeiiJIHTaiUH ce ,J,eCHrHaTHBHO-I<OHOTaTHBH::
CTOA!·IOCTVI /M.e;KJzy'-l~eJlCTBHe, B3a:m.W-.I18"'-CT BH8, C'I>~IlpHKOCHOB8I·IHe, C'b-B0-
19
KYIIJifiBaHe H T. H. I. ~I TaKa, B HHTerpa THBHHTI Mo;o;en Ha tlOBelllKO noBe.r.te-
HHe TpTI6Ba ;IJ.a OTrpaHHtlaBaMe ,JJ;Ba TVIIIa C'l:.-BM8IT(aBai-re,HH.D;V:IBH.nyamro H
Me:iC.ny-HH.I4V:IBH.I:cy'aJIHO, KOHTO Ce B3aJI!MOIIpOIUIKBaT, B3aHMODOpa)l()..~aT V:I B3aH-
MO.!leXCTByBa T, 3a .na --e·e -,l:~OCTMrHe .U.O .D;BO:itHCTBeHa Ta .::LyaJIMC%HtlHOCT Ha
interaction:
-1\.
e e .U. H 0 B p e M e H H 0
CTByBam cy6eKT H o6eKT Ha OpUeHTa:UH1I e .U. H 0 B p e M e H H 0 Ha
caMHTI ce6e Cvi H na .u.pyrHTe
2/ KaTO .n.e:iCTByBam cy6eKT, TOZ OpH8HTHpa K'bM ce6e CH H K':&M
.u;pyr:v~Te,a KaTo o6eKT,HMa 3HatteH:vre 3a ce6e Cli!f n 3a .n:pyruTe
Toj e rro3HaBam H o6eKT Ha no3HaHHe,H3non3yBam cpe.ncTBa VI caM
TOlt cpe.U.CTBO,T':bJIKyBarq CHMBOJIVI VI CaM Toi.i CVIMBOJI ••• 11 /T.Parsons.l968o
International Encyclopedia of the social sciences.Vol.7,~36/

19
HaKoJIKo 9parMeHTa oT eTHMonorHtiHHTe petlHHilH Ha \valde/Hofmann
/Lateinisches etymologisches Worterbuch.l938.3.AufloHeidelberg/ u
Ernout/Meillet /Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue latineol985
~.edition.ParisoKlincksieck/ ca B "aKTHBeH 11 .u;Hanor npH "peKOHCTP:YH
paHeT0 11 Ha rpHJIOCOCi)CKaTa 8TVIMOJIOrmi Ha inter-action KaTO KOH!leHTpH-
paMe BHHM8HMeTO CH Ha MOp~eMaTa inter-.
inter "zwischen unter" ••• ; zur spatlat. und romoVermischung mit
intra s. Schmalzol928.Lat.Syntax u.Stylistiko5.Aufl.,510; aus idg.
~enter oder "ltter • tJ.anter "zwischen" m.Akk_ •. , "innerhalb
11
m.Abl. o. o
*idg. enter~~ter ist Komparativ zu en /s.2. in/
intra Adv. 11 innerhalb,innen,binnen": aus~intera,Abl.Sg.F. wie
·~su~ra, extra usw. Vgl. interius Adv. "mehr nach innen" ,letzteres mch
gr. ~crlfl-r;£pov .- intro "hinein; inwendig" Adv. u. Praev. ,spatlat./=
intr'a /. : Walde,lHofmann:So708,7ID2.
inter preverbe et preposition 11 entre 11 .Proprement dit ~~~ l'inte-
rieur de".S'emploie au sens local "entre,parmi" ou temporel 11 du-
rant ,dans 1 'espace d~f· .Comme preverbe inter a le sens de: l/ 11 entre'
2/ 11 par inter-u:alles ,ail temps en temps" 3/ ••• introdui t une idee de
prigation,de destruction,de mort.De intra derive sans doute: intro
~aller a l'interieur de,entrer dans".Une etymologie souvent adop-
tee le fait deriver de i:Jrl.l.tro, verbe h:'pothetique dont le participe
present serait conserve dans la preposition preverbe trans. :Er~
Meillet :p.312,313.
C.U.BOTIBaHeTO Ha .D;Ba OCHOBHH CeMaHTHtlHH pe.na: B'bHmHOTO /Mex.ny,oT-
B:&.Il,O~~!~! B:&Tpe H OTB:&H He e B:&Tpe - .u;oneiKna no caMopa3pymana~
TO Ha ~ction VI npenp:&maHeTo MY B cne.na Ha action.
 6.

CnenonaTenHo noHRTBeTo interaction ce nopa~~a Ha rpaHMn;aTa

MH~MDM.lzyBniiOCT : COIJ;Mamra CHCTeMa : 06IItO KyJITypHO !!pOCTpaHCTBO n
I-taTO .:iepapXMtleH C'l>-I!pon;ec OT )~eACTBHB,IlOCTaBHli{- MH.ItMBM~a KBTO r)yHr

con;ManHa MaTpun;a, rrpennocTaBeHa OT r<yn-rypeH Mo.nen.Ko.rmpaHeTo Ha

KoMymmaTMBHMn aKT c T a B a B M tzpe3 interaction r:rocess. Bee--
KM I<O.UMpaH aKT,:rte3aBMCl'rtMO OTYJ.TI;aJIHOCTTB,M3l!OJI3yBaHa 3a HRKBKBM .
n;eJIM Ha npe.rtaBaHe,rrOCTMra CBOTITB M.I(8HTMtlHOCT,COUMBJIHaTa CM pean-
HOCT,CBOHTa peneBaHTHOCT BaTO COUMaJIHO .rte~CTBMe He OT MO.UBJIHOCTT~

11
a OT CMCTeMaTa,KOriTO ro M3IlOJI3yBa 11 /R.BirdvJhistell.l971 /1967-8/
Kinesics: inter~ and intra-channel communication research.In:
Essays in Semiotics./J.Kristeva/J.Rey-Debove eds./ The Hague.Hou-
11
ton,533/ • B M tlpe3 KOJlOBM1.l BKT Ilp03Mpa 11 MHTepHaJIM38Il;klfl:Ta Ha CO-
n;MaJIHaTa CHCTeMa B paMKMTe Ha HHKilKBa KYJITypHa HOpMa ja shared
basis of normative order T.Parsons.l968.o~.cit.,437/. BceKm HH-
]J;MBM,ItyaJieH KOMy'HMKBTMBeH aKT HOCH C'l>C Ce6e CM 11
CEHKaTa 11 Ha npe~IlC
f
r CTaBeHa HJIH (popr.mpa~a ce con;HaJIHa napa.!tHI'Ma, npeBp':bli\aliKM ce B He~-
I
I
!
Ir.
Ha Cnena. ll"DJI60KO B CBOETa C'l>~HOCT TOBa e H8C'1>3HaTeJIHMHT CTpeMe%
aa participation mystique /L.Ikvy-Bruhl.l912.Les fonctions men-
tales dans les societes inferieures.Paris,78,79/B HnKaKBa tzoBemKa
06~HOCT OT e~a CTpaHa,a OT npyra- HBI!HPBIT\MHT CTpeMe~ 3adiffe-
ranee /Derrida.l967.De la Grammatologie,92/,"0TKJIOHstBaHe",oTrpaHM
11
'tlaBaHe OT I!pMC'l>DeHaTa 11 HB MHDHBM.Icy'BJIHOCTTa 11
ponst 11 /HeM3ri':bJIH8HMe-
TO Ha T.Hap. role-expectations :T.Parsons/E.Sbilsol95J,Toward a
general theory of action,l9 MJIM "e(teKT Ha H3JI':braHMTe otzaKBBHHH"/.
Ko"HMKBTMBHMTe CMCTeMI-! /K8TO .!I.MHaMH'tlHHE acneKT Ha COUHBJIHMTe CMC•
TeMH :R.Birdwhistell.l97l.op.cito ,539/ M T8XHHTe l!OD-CMCTeMM - B()-
20
KaJieH,I.CHHe3MtleH,IlpOKCeMMtleH,060:ariTeneH,OCe3aeM M T.H. - Ce CTpya-
TypMpaT ~O£P~D£T~O~ H ~azo KYJITypa /RoBirdwhistell.l97l.ebd./e
20 3a necpHHMpaHeTO Ha pa3JIH'tlHMTe IlO~-CHCT8MM HJIH KBHBJIH B~ aa6 • 27,
28,29 H 30 Ha CTp.13 H 14.
 11: TaKa,npeA-UfHOBaDe K':hM pa3rJiejK~aHe Ha IU!KOH OT MO,IteJIHTe Ha I<O-
MYHBKaTHBHTtt.fi aKT, KOHTO "pa3tzyl1B8T 11 ~OrMaTa 3a e,nHOKSHSJli-IOTO KOI\-tyHH
KaTHDHO B3aHMOneJCTBlle /B~ CTp.3/. lle3aBHC:t1DO qe Ce IlO.fiB.fiBa OTHOCH
T;JJJIHO B no-HOBO BpeMe /198~.Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics./J.
t1c,A.e~Jl Ha.
Searle/F .Kiefer/N.Bierwisch eds ... ;'{ 11. EHpnum npeo~oJIRBa 11
orpam1:qeHH.fi..
Ta tt Ha HH~'iopMS~HOHHH.fi MO,!l;eJI, 6a3HpaJ!K:t1 Ce Ha H.fiKOH OT KOHD;enTyaJIHH-
I1p:t1HD;HllM Ha 6Hxe1BHopn3Ma /Niller/Galanter/Pribram.l960.Plans and
the stnucture o~ behavior.N.York : M.Bierwisch.l980.Semantic struc·
__. ~

ture and illocutinary #orce.In:Speech Act Theory and Prqgmatics.

Dordrecht,29/· Cne.nna~KH jrege /1973.Einleitung in die Logik.In:
Schriften zur Logik.Berlin/, Austin /1962.How to do things with
words/'! Searle /1969.8peech Actsh Grice /1975.Logic ancr con
versation.In:Cole/Morgan eds.Syntax and Semantics.Vol.3.Speech
acts,~-58/ EupBMm npeKpaqna .norMaTa 3a ycnoBH.fiTa 3a HCT~OCT
/truth conditions /,3a .na nono~H HOBa,MaKap M rro-a~eKBaTHa KaTo 113-
YepeHHe Ha peqeBH.fi aK~ ,no,nqHHeHa ua T.nap.communicative sense
T • e • I1p:t1 HHTJ>aKD;HOBHOTO C':bBMe~aBa~~6eKH peqeBH 8KT ~e MOY.Ce .rta 6'1>·
.rte Ollpe~eJU1H llOCpe,IJ;CTBOM H.fiKaKBa HCTHHHOCT + ycnOBH.fiTa Ha SOCial
21
interaction /SI/ .. UHTepaKD;HOHHaTa CTPYKTJJpa Ha KOMYHHKaTHBHH.fi
aKT ua::(e ~a 6'!:1,D;e cxeMaTH3Hpaua no cne~HH.fi HaqHH:
cs cs /communicative sense/
ma /meaningful activity/

ca 22 ca /communicative act/
/B~ 59:M.Bierwisch.l980.op.citf9
2

~
B 'l.)' All speech acts are to be explained in terms of J.ng
~ trRth conditions plus something else./M.B.l980.op.cit.,ll
· B 2) All explicit performative utterances must be explained in
terms of truth conditions plus conditions of,~ocial interaction.
/M.A~l980.op.cit.,l5/
{B 2'~ The communicative sense of all speech. acts must be explai-
ned in terms of denotation conditions plus the conditions o~ SI.
22 · /M..-B.l980.op.cit. ,18/
••• I will first define a communicative act as a meaningful acti
vity to which a communicative sense is assigned with respect to a
given interactional setting ias:
(D 4) ca= /ma,ias ,cs/ /N.B.l980.op .cit. ,6/
 OTrryi< cne.nBa npe.nnonoACermeTo I-ra E~pB~lll sa B3a~Moo6B':bp3BaHe vr B3aH-

uoBrpa~.naHe Ha KOMyHvtKaTvrBH~fl CM~C'lln np.Tti cne.nBal:4vr ce e.nHa .npyra

KOMyHvtita T~BH~ cwrya~~vt T• e • npMH~IIJ:na Ha B3avtMOnopa)?.,UaHe ~ KOHTHHYH-

TeT Ha KOrJYHUKaTvtBHHfl CMvtC':bJI:

EJG
;13::K 60 : N.B.l980. op. cit. ,29/
Tio.no6eH TMn cxer.m Tvt3a~MH Mo::tee .na 6':b,rte vranonayBaH, aKo KOMyHHKa THBHa .

Ta c~rrya~vrH ce Ko.nvrpa no .npyr HaqHH /no-6nvt3':bK .no nHHrB~CTMqH~fl K

m m /utterance meaning/

u /utterance/

mu /meaningful utterance/

mu
/B~ 61 : M.B.l980.op.cit,,29/

aa na .nocTMrHe no oKoHqaTe!JHOTO "paarpauvrqeHvre" eaMK : Kor.cy-HvrKa:qmt

lilnlil ,no 110TMeHr.tBe1 Ha e,nJ.IH 11

l."pHX 11 Ha TeOpvtfiTa Ha peqeB~Te aKTOBe /M.B.

1980.op.cit.,2-3/ . ________ ...

cs
----- --- m
--------

mu
D 23
ca }3x 62:M.B.op .cit. ,30/
I.
e3HKOBO H IIee3:VrKODO HHBO Ha KOMYHHKaTHBHHH aKT • 0IIHTBaJtKH ce ,na H3Jle
3e OT e3HI<OBOTO HHBO Ha KOMYHHKaTHBHOTO C'DIIpHI<OCHOBei-me, aBTOP'DT 11
60K
cyBa 11 /He3aBHCHMO tie paarpaHHtzeriHeTO e3:V1KOB0 : nee3HKOI30 H:VIBO ,e .UOCT8
flCHO MapKHpaHO ( ua cxeMa GO c ttepBeH n;'JHKT:t-tp) I, KaTo
HeC'D3HaTeJIHO HalJieTO BHHMaHHe K'l>M e3HKOBOTO HHBO,.IJ;OKaTO . Hee3HKOBO-
TO HHBO 3ao6m<aJifl C M'DrJIHBa Heonpe.n;eneHOCT /BX M.B.l980.op.cit. ,20-21.
U 3a6.23j T• e • HeroBaTa IIOCTaHOBKa 3a KOMyHHKaTHBHHfl 8KT e OIIHT 3a '{e

11 H3JlH3aHe 11 OT JIHHrBOD;eHTpH3Ma. 0CBeH TOBa TOlt Ce OIIHTBa ,na IIO.UtiHHH

!iepapXHttHO Bceo6xBama~~taTa social interaction rro.n ".uecnoTHtzHaT<!!opHeH
TarJ;MH Ha purposive behavior I: M.B.l980.op.cito,34 : note 28/.
ilpe.UH ~a pa3rno.n;aM MHOrOKaHaJIHHH HJIH HHTerpaTHBeH MO.IJ;eJI /: R.
Birdtvhistell.l970.op.cit., 86/87/ 6Hx HCKan .n;a MapKHpaM rropen;HHH xeP-
MeHeBTHtieH Kp'l>r. KynTypaTa C'DC CBOHTa COD;HaJIHa 6HTHitHOCT ce 11
paarra-
.IJ;a 11 Ha KOMyHUKaTHBHO C'D-6HTyB81ltH .IJ;Ha,n;H,trHHTO 11
aKTHBHa" OII03HUHH OC'l>-
mecTBHBa rrnypanHCTHt~HaTa couHanHa CTPYKTypa Ha KynTypHeTa rrpocTpaH-
CTBOe ll TaKa,rrpe.UIIOCTaBeHOTO COUHO-KyJITypHO IIpOCTpaHCTBO-B-ce6e-CH
B paMI<HTe Ha KOMJTHHKaTHBHaTa .IJ;Ha.Ua C T a B a COD;HOKyJITypa-3a-ee6e-
CH,3a .Ua .UOCTHrHe CBOeTO C'DiltHHCKO 6HTHe-B-H-3a-ce6e-CH H ,na Ce CaMG-
paapymH B MHOrOrJiaCHeTO OT B3aHMOIIpOHHKB8IUH ce KOMyHHKaTHBHH .IJ;Ha~. ·
n:&JIHornac:t-teTo /la pleine voix I ,n'l>JIH03HatiHOCTTa Ha I<OMJTHHKaTHBHaTa
HHTepaKD;HOHHOCT e.rr;HOBpeMBHHO H npaBH CTa6HJIHa /T.Parsonsol968.op_.
cito,437/B HHK8KBa o6ma COUHOKyJITypa H fl pymH ttpe3 HeRe 0CHOBHHHT
23 cJie.UHHTe ~parMeHTapHH
- D;HTaTH MapKHpaT HflKOH M'l>rJIHBH,HeHCHH,He,no-
H3ftCHeHH IIyHKTOBe OT MO.UeJia Ha lii.E:t-tpBHm, I<OHTO Cal\fH riO ce6epH rOBOpSl'J
•.. I wil~consider a linguistic utterance u to be an inscription
ins related by a person p at a time t to a linguistic structure ls
~ ~ u=/ins,p,t,ls/.The inscription is the acoustic or visual stimu-
produced or perceived by p./ebd.,4AD ~m•/att,m'/ where the attitude
att determining a judgement is an e)ement of a well defined system
of alternative cognitive attitudes Att./ebd.,20-21/ The contexte ct
of mu and the ias of the embedding ca may actually ov~rla£,i.e. a
part of the communicative setting can be a part of the utterance ct
and vice versa ./1.Che notion 'part of' mu3t be understci>od in the sense
of 'belonging to' suggested above./ The limits of this type of repre
sentatian are obvious /s.62/.But it indicates !o_s£m~ extent how the
components of a ~i~le speech act may be interrelated.7ebd.,30/
 10.

aTpH6yT Ha I-~01.-tyHHKaTHBHaTa ,IUia;J.a,rrocpe.ncTBOM KO.tTO Tfi Ce 11

0T.1leJUI 11 B

CO~MOKynTypH&TO npOCTpaHCTBO H ¢yHK~HOHMpa KaTO OTHOCHTem-ro CaMOCTOH

JIOI'Hqeci<O i1pOCTpaHCTBO, KOeTO C '.h 3 .1l a B a KOMyHHKaiUUITa • EnarO.rta-

peH&e Ha TOBa MHCTHtlHO rr:;mC'.hCTBHe MHTOITopa:iiCHaUlHRT MeXaHM3'.hM CHeMa

OTI03M~HHTe HCTMHHOCT : HeHCTMHHOCT,BRpa : He,!l;OBepMe,,nMCKpeTHOCT :

11 11
He,UMCKpeTHOCT H T .H • B MMT0JlJ1JI'MqHaTa 06Bl>p3aHOCT A3 : ,Upyrrut • 0T-

TYK H ocHOBHaTa TPY.UHOCT rrpM aHaJIM3HpaHe :r-ra :tWMYHMKaTHBHMR aKT - cae

11
TaTa, 11 ITO:Jl:VICmaTa KpHTMqHQCT Ha yqacTH:VIIUITe-Bl>Tpe-B-.UHa.UaTa H Hepene-

11 11
OTB'.hH,3a KOI'OTO KOMYHMKaTMBHOTO C'I>rrpHKOCHOBeHHe ce pa3rra,na aHanH-

THqHQ Ha MHO:l!CeCTBO KaHaJIM OT eMm~pftfqHa JJ;a.D;eHOCT l-I KOATO ITO HRI<OH

11 CMMTITOMH 11 B ITOBe,neHMeTO Ha C'.h6It~TyBamMTe-B-.1lMa.D;aTa,6H MOI''.hJl ,!T,a pa36e

pe,qe C TaB a 11
Hemo 11 ,HO He H ,na· ao pa3-T'I>JIKyBa a,neKBaTHO /B"AC CTp.1

3a6.1/. Pa36Hpa ce,C'.hC CBORTa CKerrTHRHOCT He TpH6Ba ,na .JlOCTHraMe ,ItO

KpaltHHR arHOCTH~H3'.hM Ha roprM:l,"qe ,nopH Het!40 ,na e, TO He e ynOBHMO

hf&xa.,;a:X.T)n't6v/ 3a xopaTa,a .nopH ~~ .na e ynoBMMO,To He e M3Ka3yeMo /&.vt.-

l;o t.a'tov J H ocTana Heo6RCHHMO /~vEpiJ.nvEu.,;ov I 3a .upyrHTe"_

24 , a rrpocTo

11
HCKaMe ,na 0603HaqHM 11 rrporraCTTa Mei!.uy aHaJIH3aTOpa-C'I:l-yqacTHHK-B-KOMy'

HHKaTHBHaTa-,nHa,na H aHaJIH3aTopa-OTB'I:lH, KOf.TO B CTpeMe~ICa CH ,na 11 peKOH-

CTpyHpa" KOMYHHKaTHBHaTa CHT,Ya~HR ce rrpeBp'I:lrqa B C'l>-yttaCTHHK B KOMYHH

KaTHB~OTO C'I>ITpHKOCHOBeHHe /He3aBHCHMO ~aJIH B MOMeHTa Ha C T a B a -

H e Ha KOMJ'HHKaTHBHHfi aKT HJIH rne,naitKH ro Ha 3aiTHC/. Crrope,n TpeTHH

ITpHH~HII Ha ,!l;HHaMHKaTa,®opMynHpaH OT li~TOH,BCHqKH Tena B e.D;Ha CHCTeMa

CH B3aHMO}le~CTByBaT /B:iiC BCfiKa mKOJICKa ~H3ItiKa 3a 9eKJiac/,K09TO 6H

03HaqaBaJIO, tte ~Cei<H BKJI~qHJI Ce B KOMyHHKaTHBHOTO C'.hiTpHKOCHOBeHHe 6JI
/,
MOI''l'>Jl .na "npeqH" Ha KOMYHHKaTHBHaTa HH;r~paK~HOHHOCT Ha .JlHa;UaTa T.e.
 11.

~BaMa ca MaJIKO,Tp~Ma Ca MHOrO ~ TO nBORKO - KaTO ~~3~~eCK~ ~ CO~~an

H~ 5
o6eKT# ; : T.Parsons/E.Shils eds.l95loop.cito,5/.
Cnen KaTo MapK~paxMe enHa ocHoBHa opa3n~tl~Temra qepTa Ha KOMyH~

K8TI-IBH~R 8KT, Bp'l>~aMe MaXaJIOTO Ha H3JIO:r:eH:vteTO Ha MHOrOKaHammR, 0 6 e

M e H MOnen Ha KOMYHHKaT~BHOTO C'l>Ilp:vtKOCBOBeH~e .. KaTC HatlaJIHO OrpaH~

qeH~e vt ~3xonHa Totma me H~ C.l!"J:.i<H i<OMYHVIKaTVIBHaTa J:t:vrana,aoeTo He

3HaK~,~e 11
¥t3m~3aHe-oT" ~ 11
BP'l>IJ.taHe-K'l>M 11 .rma.naTa ~e 6'l>,r~aT :vt36RrBaH~.

ABTOpCTBOTO Ha T03~ MO,UeJI e ,neno Ha C'l>-TpynH~~eCTBO ~ C'l>-.Ue~CTB~e

-
y~CT'l>n/ITo~aTOC,IlOpan~ ~aKTa,qe OT .UOCT'l>I1HHT8 H3CJie,UBaHVIR TeXH~Te

/R.Birdwhistell.l970.Kinesics and Context;F.Poyatos.l983.Language

and nonverbal systems in the structure of face-to-face interaction.
In:Language and Communicotion.Vol.3.No.2,129-140/ ca aHTporronorHtleH
OI1HT 38 06XBamaHe Ha KOMyHHKaTHBHaTa VIHTepaKq~OBHOBT KaTO HRKaKBa r~
'
11
c~cTeMa. Tipeo.nonRBa.IK~ T~paH~RTa''Ha ~3cne~­
11
3aB':I)pmeHa" aamnnaa npH
Ba.HeTo Ha KOMyH~Kaq~RTa K8TO ll.mx'OKaHaJIHa /BOKaJIHO-ai<yCT~~Ha,K:vtHeCTe

nose.neH~e

TO He C8MO Ha 11 rOBOpH:vtTe 11 OpraH:vt,KOVITO JIHHrBoqeHTp~3M'l>T Hanpa3HO

e,nHHCTBeHO
ye;~HHRBa 1-taToYytlaCTByBam:vt B pelleB~R 8KT tlaCT~ OT TRJIOTO ,E"Dp.IzyVICTBn

IlOnara K8TO OCHOBeH ~yHKq~oHaneH Ilp:vtH~~Il Ha tlOBemKaTa KOMyHHKaqnR

11
KO-CTpyKTYPHP~HeTO Ha pa3JI~~HHTI! CeT~BH~ MO.U8JIHOCTH 11 IlOCpe,UCTBOM

Time:
Channel 1 /audio-acoustic/
Chonnel 2 /~:inesthetic-visual/

Channel 3 /odor-producing-olfactory/_____
;,
Cqannel 4 /tactile/
efe ...
/:FIGURE 4 :R.Birdwhistell.op.cito,70/l
TyK aHaJIHCT'DT Ce ~3M'l>KBa OT KarHeT~3Ma Ha JIHHrBO~eHTp~3M~
 12.

Bep6amia "paMr<a" :vrm1 KaTo Bep6aneH MaTep:vran,npoMeHRH OT .!(pyro rroBe-

.nea:vre /R-.Bird\"Jhistell.l970.op.cit. ,71/. B n.rreH Ha JIMHrBou;euTpH3Ma
OCTaBa~IToiiaTOC /1983.rt:vrT.C'L'li./, rronaraX!-<H B OCHOB8Ta Ha KOMYHHKaTHB
')C:.. 2'7 28
HHT.I ar~T TpHa.uaTa e3HK '-r' napae3HI~ ~ K:vrHe3HKa KaTo r.J.essa&re-convey-
i.ng systems, I<o-cTpyKTYPHpamH ce c .!(pyr:vr coaa THttH:vr CHCTeun 15 npocTpaH

CTBOTO /rrpOKCeMHKa2 9; H BpeMeTO /xpoHeUHRa 30 j:

Interpersonal Communication Systems

SENDER ~CEIVEE
..-----t Full interaction------------~. L---
CODING PECODING-
Obronemic relationship------------------~

Phronemics Phronemics
r--~----------- ( .• •' ....-~---------
Paralanguap;e Paralanguage
--------------
Lexico-
-------------
Lexico-
morphologico- Common culture --------------~ mgrphologico-
syntactical syntactical
complex. ,_ ________
complex _
----------
Kinesics ________ _
._Kinesics
---------
,_ ______ _
Chemical Chemical
Dif f e~t cultures • -------- '--+poo---;::-·--------...,-::-·-+-_.
Dermal Dermal
--------
Thermal , 1-Tneriiia~
r--------- r--------
l?roxemic:o Prox3mics
--- ----r----
Proxemic relationship

Costructuration Redundancy
Intensity ComplementarJ.ty
Duration

Reduced interaction

/Fig.l : F.Poyatosol983.opocit.,l30/
~27=6-.-.-.-v-e_r_b_a_l_l_a_n_g_u_a_g_e_i_s_t_h_e__;b__;a_s.:::i~c-s_y_s_t_e_m_ through which, along the vo-
cal-auditory channel,people carry out the most complete and sophisti-
cated form of interaction,that is,conversation /F.P.o~.cit.,l29/lan­
guage had to be seen not only as part of the basic trJ.ple s~ructure,
but in the broader context of intersomatic conversation;F•.Ptop.cit ,129/
 13

Paarne:-:t.IJ;aEfKH T0311: MO.IJ;en Ha KOJAYHl1:KaTl1:BHO C'D-ITpli:KOCHOBeHJI!:e H C'D-BMe-

HO HCHI-1 11
ecTeCTBeHH 11 rpaHli:IJ;li • Jlopa.D;H CBOflTa B'DTpemHO-, C'D- H Melc.ny-
6HTli:~1.Ha C"DntHoc~ pa3mi'tllHiTe I~aHanH li!:MaT "paaM~tTH 11 rpaHli!:IJ;H. TaKa 'tle e
I13nHmHo .IJ;a ce cnopH Hanp. B"Dpxy Bep6anHaTa HnH HeBep6anHa c"Dm:aocT
Ha rrapae3HKa,KaKTO OT.IJ;enHHeTO B CaMOCTOHTenHH 3Ha'tle~H CHCTeMli XMMH-
2 7 The fi~st conscious effort to devise a system of notation for
paralangua.ge \vas \vorked out during the 1950s by George L.Trager,
Henrj: Lee Smith,Jr. ,Norman A.-Mcquown and Ray L.Birdwhistell,along
with Gregory Bateson,Henry W.Brosin and Charles F.Hockett at the
Center for Advanced Study in ·the Behavioral GciencGs I : G.L.Tra-
ger.l96L~./uell F~mes ed./ Language-in Culture and Society,275/.Tra
ger summarized the work and outlined paralinguistic features such
as voice set,voice gualities and vocalizations,which comprise vo-
cal characterizers ,vocal qualifiers and vocal segregates.T'iiJO stu-
dies /HcQuown.l957.Linguistic transcription and specification of
psychiatric intervie~ materials.In:Psychiatry 20:1,79-86; Pitten~
ger/Danehy/Hockett.l960.The first five minutes: A Sample of Micro-
scopic Interview Analysis.Ithcca.N.York•/ applied this and modi:-
fied notations to actual data.Sometimes earlie~ Pike /1945.The In-
tonation of American English (An etic system of voice quality,p.99
104}.Ann.Arbor.r1ichigan./ had recognized paralinguistic effects in
language and devised a simple notation for these "qualitative gra~;
dations", \vhich he noted were "socially significant" /IYI.R .Key .1977.
Nonverbal communication.The Scarecrow Press Inc.,57/.
P&relcmguage is constituted by the nonverbal voice qualities
/~itch,rhythm etc./,voice modifiers /pharyngeal control,lebial con
trol,articul0tory control etc./ and independent sounds /clicks,his
sing sounds,hesttation sounds,narial sounds etc./,and silences
with which,consciously or unconsciously ,we suppoiJt ,emphasize or c<n-
tradict the linguistic,kinesic and proxemix messages /F.Poyatos.
1975.Cross-cultural analysis of paralinguistic 'alternants' in fa-
ce-to-face interaction.In:Kendon/Harris/Key eds.Organization of be
havior in face-to-face interaction,285-314; F.P.l976.Man beyond
words :Theory and Nethodology of Nonverbal Communication./Chapter lJ#
/: F.Poyatos.l983.op.cit.,l38/o
28
The earliest work in kinesics attempted only the crudest corre-
lation of body motion and speech behavior /R.Birdwhistell.l952.In-
troduction of kinesics.!Photo-offset1 Foreign Service Institute.
Louisville./.I had yet to comprehend either the feasibility or ne-
cessity of sound film recording and was,in fact,resistant to the
idea early suggested by IVJc~uown /1951/ that the future of kinesic-
linguisic research as related to social processes depended upon in
tensive and parallel phonetic and microkinesic recording and analy
sing I : R.Birdwhistell.l970.Kinesics and Context,230/. Gilbert
Austin /1806oChironimia .Londoltl~Hepr o1966.South. Illinois Univ .Pres~
is thought to have provided the first system for notating gestures
in a field other than dance /:M.R.Key.l977.op.cit.,62,90/.See also
Hayes F.l957.Gestures:a working bibliography.In:Southern l~uaterly
21,218-317; J.I\risteva/M.Lacoste.l968.Bibliographie.In:Langages 10
Kinesics can be defined as the systematic study of psychomuscu~.
larily-based movements /gestures and manners/ and/or their resul-
ting positions /postures/,either learned or somatogenic,of visual,
 14.

~eH /o60BHTeneH/ OT TepManeH /TorrnHHeH/ H nepManeH /rrocpeACTBOM KO

ZaTa/ KaHan,rrpOKCeMHKa OT XpOHeMHKa: paarpaHH~eHHe,KOeTO He 6H TpH
Bano Aa ca rrpaB:vr nopu H B c~epaTa Ha 'tlHCTHH paayM /Bx Kant.l787.
R .B. QP.ci t. ,lJJ.rJ
Kritik der reinen Vernunrt.c:.Aufl. ,,3'f'/• "C¥IHKpeTH3M'l>T 11 Ha OT.JJ;eJIH:HTe·
HUBa B KOMYHHI~BT:HBHaTa CHTyau;Hfl rrpe.JJ;rronara HHK&KBB rrpO~IeHIDfBa :!tepa
xH~rocT,a He u;eHTpH3'l>M a priori. lloXaToc Bee rraK rronara Tp:HanaTa
e311:K-rrapae3HK-K:vrHe3HKB KaTO OCHOBHO r!.JJ;pO HB KOMyHHKBTHBHHR aKT. 11 TO-
BB,KOeTO rrpBBH e3HK-napae3HK-KHHe3HKa QYHKIJ;llOHanHO KOXepeHTHa /co-
hesive I CTPYKTypa - H OTTaM HCTHHCitOTO s:rnpa Ha troBemKaTa KOMyH.UKa-
D:Hfi - e npeAH BCH'tli<O TeXH:HfiT 06~ KHHeTH~eH 11
reHepaTop 11 /F .Poyatos •
11
1S83.op.cit.,l32/. Cou;HoKynTypHHfiT ~~HJIT'l>p KOAHpa 11 nopo.JJ;eH:HTe OT
T03H "reHepaTop 11 HMnyncH,rrpecTpyKTyp:HpaPiK:H ru lzpe3 Verdichtung,
Ubertragung, Verdrangung, Gegenbesetzung, Verkiirzung ,r<Iischbildung H T~

visual-acoustic and tactile or kinesthetic perception,that,whether

isolated or combined with the linguisic-paralinguistic structures
and with the situational context,possess communicative value,cither
in a conscious way or out of awareness /Birdwhistell.l970.op.cit.,
F.Poyatos.l977.The morpfological and functional approach to kine-
sics in the context of interaction and culture.In:Semiotica 203/4,
197-228/ /:F.Poyatos.l983.op.cit.,l39/
The transcription of language,paralanguage and kinesics -which
I first used in 1976 lvith a joint team from the Universities of
Birmingham and Nancy in a project of discourse analysis - had been
suggested to me by the pioneering works on psychotherapy interviews
by Pittenger/Danehy/Hockett.l960.The first five minutes:A Sample ~
Microscopic Interview Analysis.Paul Martineau.Ithaca.,McQuown.l957o
Linguistic transcription and specmtication of psyciatric interview
materials.In:Psychiatry 20,79-86. and McQuown/Bateson/BirdwhistelJV
Brovvin/Hockett eds.l97l.The natural History of an Interview.Chica- ·
go.,and,of course,by Trager's /1958.Paralanguage:a first approxima•
tion.In:Studies in Linguistics 13,12./ first thoughts on paralan-
guage /:F.Poyatos.ebd./
2 9 Proxemics,initiated by Edward ToHall /1966.The Hidden Dimensio~
N.York./ will be defined here as: ~~·eoplc's conception,use and struc·
turation of space,from their built or natural surrounding to the
distances consciously or unconsciously maintained in personal inUr-
action /:F.P.ebd.(.For a bibliography :M.R.Key.l977.op.cit.,ll4. /,
-c !/
~ As analogous to proxemics,I have proposed to study formally the
other basic dimension of soc1al life,time as cgronem1cs /acknow-
ledged in Key.l986.The Relation~hip of Verbal and Nonv~rba~ Commu-
nication.The Hague.Mouton./,deflned as: our conceptual1zat1on an~
handling of time as a biop~ychological and cultural element lendlng
specific characteristics to social relationships and to the many
events contained within the communicative situation.Chronemic beh&-
V!O» must be analyzed as a structured overriding upra-act~v~ty' ,
a continuum that can be coded in universal and culture-spec1f1c~
/:F.P.ebd./~~ther bibliography :Key.l977.op.cit.,ll6.
B KOHBeHUMOHaJIHO-peneBaHTHH CHMBOJIM. H TyK OTHOBO ce OTKpOHBB Ta3H
~B01HCTB8HOCT Ha ITOBe~eHMeTO KaTO ~e~CTB~H0-3!1aqe~o 31 ,KO~HpaQa no-

C'l>3.!(aBaHeTO Ha HflKBKBa OIT03H:UVIfl ftia e;IJ;HO HJIH HflKOJ!KO KO~H:VIKaTHBHH

HVIBa ,:vm:n Me:.:\.Izy KOMJ'HHKa THBHH HHBa/, B VI qpe3 qlleTO aKTVIBHO B3aVIMO-
~elicTBvie ce "no.rt.n'l>p:lKa", "noTVICKa" HJIH "pymu" KorvtymntaTHBHHs=IT
CMMC'l>JI /HeroBa Ta rr'l>nnoanaqr-rocT/ 32 • Paa6urpa ce, ToBa npoTVIBOCTos=r<-me, I

pe.u;yrrnHIU'lPE!-_He,HapH'tlaHO pe.eyHJ~BHTHOCT,He BVIHaru e e~HOBpeMeHHO /:Roll

Bird1.vhistell.~l97C.op.cit.,111/o Bcs:IKo HHBO na noBe~enqecr<a ~eltHOCT
11
e HaK'l>CaH0 11 ,~rrpeK'l>CBBHHR,H3T'l>KaHO OT npOH3BOJ!HH .!tliCKpeTHH eneMeH

no :nraqer-me B u aa ce6e cu jR.Birdwhistell.l970.op.cit. ,88/. TRx-

HOTO KO-CTpyKT,YpHpane,c':b-BMemaBaHe ,naBa l-tOHTHHYH'i'eT Ha KOlcy'HHKa
THBHHR ITOTOK KaTO :Us=IJ!OCTe B H qpe~ TOBa C'l>-BMemaBaHe ce nop~~a TO
Ba aa-cpe~ane, no-BTopenue /peeyn.naHTHOCT/, 6naro.naper-me na KoeTo Ko
11
MyHHKaTVIBHHTIT CMHC'l>JI,cTaBa:itKH 6HTHe-B-VI-3a-ce6e-CH CaM ~eKO,nHpa 11

ce6e cu,caMopaapymaBa ce "oT.naBaiiK:n" ce na MaCOBHTe noTpe6:nTenu,

/.neKo~upamu ro/ T.e. TOX ce caMo-pa3pymaBa Ma c o-BH3Hpa~KH ce,
~ e ·3-HHTerpupa ce c T a B a i Ku JieCHO ~eKO.!(HpyeM 3a MaCHTe 33 •

3l two kinds of sign-activity ••• expressions £iyen expressions£~

yen Qf£ /E.Goffman.l959.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
N .York, 14/; instrumental : demonstre.tive acts ••• to see i,nst£,U!£e,g-
tal acts in a social situation as "carriers" of other messages •.••
demogstrat~v~s are convetionalized forms ••• Th~ act is clearly,at
one levei,~n§_t£ll!!legt~l.However we cannot define the act itself a~
demonstratlve -the shange of cadence may very well be at times,ln
in'd £f-iiself,de!£O.£S!r~ti,v~ /R.Birdwhistell.l970.op.cit.,231-232T
3 2 redundandancy : complementarity /F.P.l983~op.cit.,l36/ communi-
cation is,by nature,redundant /R.Birdwhistell.l970.op.cit.,lo7/
33 Huma~eings do not all mature at the same rate and at maturity
they ar~ ~pt sensorily equel.Ee~und~n£Y mukes the contents of meffB
ges avall'able to a greater portlon of the population than if oneme
dality were utilized to teach,leArn,store,transmit or structure e~
perience /R.B.l97o.op.cit.,i07/ ••• all natural languages that survi·
ve are sufficientlY redundant tHAt t~Y can be learned by the mem-
bers of-any-HOmo sapiens group /M.Mead.l964.Contlimuities in Cultu-
ral Evolution.Terry Lectures.London,45/.
 16.

,llBOfi.HCTBe.BOCTTa B KOMyHliii<aTli!BHOTO IIOBe,!leHVIe IlpVI Tlo\aTOC /1983.

op.cit,137/ ce KO~~~tpa B ~Be ~Bo~KVI onoa~~t~ll!ll! modifier : contextual
/4.5 :J?.P.cbd./,st:lf-re~julAtory : interac·tional function /ebd./,
II':bpBaTa, CB'l>p3aHa C BJlVIflHll!eTO , KOeTO OI<a3 Ba TIOBe~ermeTO Ha ~<OMYHVI- '.
KHpBII'(HflT B'.bpxy Hero CBMVIH VIJlH Bnpxy C'.b-KO!\<tyHVIKHpam~~tfl T• e • IIOBe~eHl

HVIeTO Ha e~VIHVIfl C'l>-KOMyHVII<VIpall\ nopa)lt;r~a 11

IIpOMeHVI 11 B COOCTBeHOTO VI
~~~oTo noBe~eHHe /modifier I VIJIH e KOHTeKcTyan:ao o6B'.bp3aHo /con-
textual/; BTopaTa ~BojKa paarpaHH'tlaBa aBTope~ep~~tpamo,~oo~opMHQo,
caMoperynVIpamo B noBe~eH~~teTo /self-regulAtory I OT 3Ha'tlVIMO aa C'l>- ·
OVITyBaHeTo,HHTepaK~HOHHOTO c'.b-BMemaBaHe Ha C'l>-KOMYHVIKVIpam~~tTe /in-
teractional/ • Ta3VI VIHTepaK~HOHHOCT 11
nyJICHpa 11 , C'l>-OLiTyBa :S Hm~aK­

BB . npOCTpaHCTBeHa /npOKCeMHKa/ Ilf BpeMeBa /xpOHeM:li!I.Ca/ C'L-Li3MepHOO'I

Cne~BaitKLi JIOrVI'tleCKHfl II03li!TI1BH3'.bM rro~aTOC HaCO'tlBB K'.bM B':DHmHaTa,ce-
THBHB CTpaHa Ha ~H3HqeCKHTe KO-Op~HHaTH IIpOCTpaHCTBeHOCT H BpeMe-
BOCT T.e. K'.bM B'.bHillHBTa,0opM8J1Ha CTpaHa Ha VIMBHeHTH:li!Te C'.b-BMeCTHMH
~e2CTBHH npouecyanHOCT K OOeMROCT HB B'l>TpemHO-HH~BH~yaJIHO H MeX-
~-HH~LiBH~anHO KOM,yHHKBTHBHO C'.b-IIpHKOCHOBeHHe.llaJIH C'.b-OHTyBam~~tTe

B':DB WOPMBJlHO MapK:HpaHVITe npOCTpBHCTBeHa VI BpeMeBa /KaJieH~apHa/

BeHHe Te C a :S ~HCTBHTHB 11
IIyJ1C:ll!pama" C'l>-qeTaeMOCT,C'l:-BOKyiiJlflBB-
He HB npe~IIOCTaBeHVIeTe VI HenpeCTBHHO ~0-0~0pMflmH Ce CO~HOKYJITypHH

BpeMenpOCTp8HCTBB-B-ce6e-CH npouecyaJIH8 :11! OOeMHO ? ABJIH e B':D3MOZ-

/':'"I
HO peKOHCTpyHpaHeTO HB TOBB BpeMenpiJPTpaHCTBO /ens imaginarium :
Kant.l770.De· mundi sensibililis atque intelligibilis forma et
principiis /III Absc%itt:De principiis formae mundi sensibilis/,
317I, aa~HTeHo OT MHCTH'tlHOTO npHC':DCTBVIe-:s-.nVIa~aTa, oT-rpaHH'tleHo, o'l'-
MeCTBamo Ce OT ,npyrOTO B':DHillHOT0 9 cpopMaJ1HOTO Bp~MeripOCT.Jd.HCTBO H
riOCpe,nCTBOM KOeTO B':DHmH:li!HT xpOHOTOII ,noCTHra CBOHTa ri':DJlHB CTeiieH,
C T a B a XK H xpOHOTOII-B-:ll!-3a-ce6e-cH, H CBOHTB rVI6eJI,CBMOpa3-
pymaBalKH ce,ocTa:sam KaTo MapKHpama c n e .n a Ha npyrHH.- Taan
 17. I

34
He-C ~-BMeCTHMOCT Ha C~-BMe~aBa~OTO Ce e n~nHaTa CTeneH Ha OC~-

meCTBHBamOTO Ce e~HHCTBO Ha BpeMe-npOCTpaHCTBO-B-H-3a-ce6e-CH.

~1 TaKa,KaKBO OCTaBa Ha aHamt3aTOpa-OTB~H,OCBeH ~a Ce OilHTBa

~a peKOHCTpyHpa OT MHOrornacHeTO Ha M a p K H p a ~ H cne~H C~-

6HTHeTO Ha KOMJTIHKaTHBHOTO C~-npHI<OCHOBeHHe H ~OKOnKOTO e B~3MOJ.t-

HO xpOHOTOna OT C~-c~meCTByBamH, .~HCKpeTHB-C'lltleTaeMI1: H ,ItHCTaHTHO

C~tleTaBamH Ce eneMeHTH B MHTOnOrHqHaTa TOTanMTapHOCT Ha 3HaqeHHe-

T0.35
- -
3 4 Siegfried Kracauer /1963.Time and H~story.In:Zeugnisse - Theo-
dor Adorno zum 60.Geburtstag.Frankfurt,;50-64/ bestreitet den An-
spru~h ••• Eremgnisse aller Lebensbereiche in der chronologischen
Zeit als einen einheitlichen ••• konsistenten ProzeB begreifbar zu
machen. eoeimmer noch im Banne von Hegels Begriff des "objektiven
Geistes" stehend,setze voraus,daB alles,was sich gleichzeitig
ereignet,gleichermaBen vom Moment Gepr~gt sei,und verdecke die
fRktische Ungleichzeitigkeit des Gleichzeiti~en /:H.R.Jauss7lg67o
'ti~era~urgesch'icnte afs Provokati'on O:er 'ti~era-:rur\·lissenschaft oKon-
sta.nz,58~ s.w. Hegels De.utung der Zeit in der "Enzyklopadie".In:
M.Heidegger.Logik.l976,251-262.
35 Meaning is not to be conceived,fundamentally,as a state of con-
sciousness,or as a set of organized relations existing or subsis-
ting mentally outside of the field of experience into which they
enter; on the contrary,it should be conceived objectiyely as ha-
ving its existence entirely within this field itselfi~ •••• l3 Na-
ture has meaning and implication but not indication by symbols.
The symbol is distinguishable from the meaning it refers to. Mea-
nings are in nature,but symbols are the heritage of man /1924/
I :George I'-Iead.l934.r1ind ,Self and Society: from the Standpoint of
a Social Behaviorist.Chicago,78/

·. , X: 1 " .... r: :.:. _, ..., ~ :t'+-~--

~~.i.e ~~ E: :::) ;,.;. ,~·: ·~ :~1e it: de 1"
__ t / .. '~ e :i deg~~" ri"lT:..-.B':i. nk.l9~
 IIapeHTeTHttHOCTTa - npHC'l>CTBHe-oTC'l>CTBHe Ha rmKaKBa
11
HTMttHOCT 11

BceKH aaHattanam npouec rrpennonara cTpaHHa /no-necHo HnH no-

3E
TpynHo nonomnm/ Hrpa Ha oT-rpaHirttaBaHHH, o-paanHttaBamm, paanHttHfi.

3 y a n H H H KaHan,ocTaBHJi.I<H ITHCMeHH C n e .It Ho Q}T TTiXHOTO

K~HBHOTO C'1>-I1pMKOCHOB8HHe,ttH~TO C MH C n 0 B 3apH,It

nOMKHT8 11 Ha m·ICMeHOTO CnOBO. rH6enTa Ha KOMyHHKaTHBHHH aKT KaTO
6HTHe-B-H-aa-ce6e-cH rropa~na c n e n H OT paanHtteH nopR.It'l>K B
,ItBe OCHOBH:£1 HaCOKH- HHT8pHOpH3BQHH /CI10M8HH,BI1ettaTneHHH H .np./H
eKcTepHopHaau;HR /nHcMeHo "~HKCHpaHe".H np.BH.UOBe aanHc/. A B nBa-
Ta C.JrJttafl Ce 11
H3nM3a 11 C HaCHml:e OTB'l>.It 6HTlil8TO Ha KOMyHI1KaTHBHaTa
HHTepaKIJ;HOBHOCT, BH3HpaJtKH HHI<aKBa I1 0 B T 8 p fi e M 0 C T3 7 •
0CTaBf!HeTO Ha ITHCMeHH C n ~ .It H B I1 cnen KOMYHHKaTHBHOTO C'l>-BMe

TO Ha-CnOf!BaHe,c-MeCBaHe H OT-rpaHHttaBaHe Kay3Hpa HOBaTa HM ~HK­

QHOHanHa CTOllHOCT • 06n'l>C'l>K'DT MeA~:.ny ,ItBa /MnH ITO Bette/ COUHOKynTYPHH

Kona noBe:,.'t.ua .rto "noT".DBaHeTo" ,Yia6nenHriBaHeTo 11 aanHttaBaHeTo Ha

3 6 The meaning of a word or phrase is not its dictiontJry equiva-

lent but the difference its utterance brings about in a situation
/Clyde Kluckhohn.r9E57The gift of tongues.In:Fr.Smolinski ed.
Landmarks of America~ Language and Linguistics,67/. La difference
e'est le jeu systematique des differences,de l'espacement~de de=
venir-espace qui seul rend possiole I'ecriture et toute corres-
pondance entre la parole et l'ecriture,tout passage de l'une a
l'autre /J.Derrida.l97l.Semiologie et grammatologie.In:J.Kriste-
va/J.Rey-Debove/D.J.Umiker eds.Essays in Semiotics.The Ha~ue.rJiou­
ttlH,l9/•"Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues
1 und ihren EinfluB auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschenge-
// sclechtes". Uber die J:e..1:S..Qh,ieg,e_..h~i.]. des menschlichen Sprachbaues,
nicht tiber den Sprechbau; denn Iinoboldt l~onnte sich diesen [58r
nicht anders denken· als in Verschiedenheit /H.Steinthal.l852.Ent-
wickelunr; der Scrift.:Ser'Tin,)L~7.-----
37 Ans Fra_J?;ment 10 /Heraklit In: H.Diels .193Jf. .]'~aefiJ.ente d§r Vorso-
fratiker.Bdj;f~heben wir die v/ortfiigung heraus: ~'K n<iv-r;~v f!v xa:l ~{.
Evos n~v-r;a:.wir miissen also auseinanderhalten d1e Mann1gfalt der
Dinge und Elemente die inbegriffliche Gesamth~it der wdv:a: und
die im ~v gedachte 'Tot ali tat ,die di: Gesamthel. ~ der 1t <1 v-r;a zur: V(l['-
schein kommen laBt und umfangt .M.Hel.degger/E ... Fink.l97o .Herakl1 t,;:Q
pene:saHTHOCTTa Ha OI103~IJ;~HTa /~JI~ OI103~IJ;HHTe/ B npoiJ;eca Ha C T a
B a H e /H OCTaBRHe/ Ha I1~CM8HH cne~~,He3aBHCHMO OT TOBa,qe Te 6H-
BaT OCTaBHH~ /C~3HaTeJIHO HJI~ H8C~3HaTeJIH0/,3a ~a H a IT 0 M H fl T

U3JIU3aHeTO 0 T B 'D ~ B CBORTa MH8MOT8XHHqecKa aM6~BaJI8HTHOCT H

38
o-B~HmHrrBaHeTo 1KaTo n~cMeH:vr cne~~/ e ome no-~'Dn6oKo Ha-:s n u a a-
H e-HaB~Tpe /B CITOMeHa/ 3 9 • .[J.BmJCeH¥I8TO-H a B ~ H ce OKa3Ba ITO CBOH
Ta C':bl:qHOCT ~B¥!7.\8H¥Ie-H a B ':b T p e• ~1 TaKa rOBOpHMOTO CJIOaD-:S.-KOMYHI
H~KaT~BH~H-aKT Ce no~qnHHBa Ha y C JI 0 B H 0 C T ¥I T e Ha ITUCMe-
HoTo,Hyl<:.rtaTa I der Trieb der Scgrift I :-ra.n.nenrr:sa Ha,n 6ynry:samaTa
CTpaCT Ha C T a B a m0 T 0 ~UBO CJ!OBO. E3HK':bT O-I1¥ICM8HHBa,npo-
perpecHpa caMo-o:sna.na:sa~Kn,caMo-paapymaBa~K~ H caMo-~ouarpa~naAKH

't~
CBORTa C'DmHOCTe 40 llOBaTa CTeiTeH Ha KOHBeHUHOHaJIHOCT Ha 0-UHCMeHa:sa;
38 EQ •••• £1tELOT]
, ' OE'1. e:nt.
, ' - 1 ~ .,. ' :
'tOt.~ yP~~!J.O:O"LV T]V,'to\ho uf,w ~a.crt.f..e:U,"t:O ll~{}T]-'
!l~,e:~TJ
, o1 9e:u&,ao~o,;fpou~ At.yun,; ' cou~ x~t.' IJ.VTJIJ.OVt.xw,;fpou~ na:pf~e:t.• IJ.V~-
1-lTJ~ ,;e: uap xa:t oo~ C:x~ ~cip!J.a:Mov e:vpf-&TJ. /PLATO!aS DIA!.OGI. ~CMIX.Vol. II
~AI~POE 274E/ 'tO'O'to yap 't~V !J.0:{}6v'twv \~{}T]v ;1tv tv ~uxa:t~ na:pt~e:t. !J.V~-
'
llTJ~ C~IJ.EAE'tT)u .<:. ca:,a:'te:
.. ut.a:J:. "\
n~..u'tt.V
, J:. 9<
ypacp.,~ a.
"F:r~!Jlv£V
-r!
un
' ' O:A.A.O'tp
' ... ' cwv 'tvnwv,ouM
.. ' "EV;:
Oo{}e:v O:V'tOD~ O~'a:D't~V aVO:!J.L~VT]GXO!J.fVOU~· ouxouv IJ.V~IJ.TJS a\f..'OnO!J.V~ae:os:
~ci~!laxov e:~pe:s. ao~Ca~ 6~ ,;ots !la.3TJ'ta:ts 66~a:v,ovx &r..~&e:t.a:v nopCCe:t.~ ·
/ibid., 275A/
39 •.. o'tt.
.. 1. - t J:. ' , \ ,.. ,
r 1 ~.1t.v TJ !J.ci-&T]ut.~ oux af..f\.O 'tt. ll a:v~~J.VTJO"t..S ,;uyx~ve:t. ouaa:,xca KC:f-
.,. \

't~ 'tO'O'tOV &v6:yxT] 1tOU n~J.tt~ tv npo'tfP!tl 'tt. VL xp6vw !lE!la.-B-nxfva:t. '&: vUv <ha-·
J:.'- , ' J.. \ ' ,
!J.L!lVTIOX6!l£{}a:.To'U'tO ue: a:6uva:'tov,e:t. llTJ.. ..,TJV 1tOU T]IJ.l..V
' :..
'I ~UXTJ npt.V e:v 't~Oe:
,;~ a~{}pwnCV<tJ e:i:6e:t. ye:vfcr-&at. /Platon.l934.<:euvres completes.Tome •IVo
Phedon 72e/
40 Le devenir-langage du cri est le mouvement par lequel la pleni-
tude parlee commence ~ devenir ce qu'elle est en se perdant,en se
creusant,en se brisant,en s'articulant 1Derrida.l967.De~a Gramma-
tologie,381/.Le progr~s comme regression est le devenir de la rai-
son comme ecriture •••• la necessite op~re a l'interieur de la lan-
GUe et de la societe ••• c'est le besoin et non la passion qui sub-
stitue la lumiere ~ la chaleur,la clarte au desir,la justesse ~ la
force,les idees au sentiment,la raison au coeur,l'articulation a
l'accent.Tel serait le temps etrange,l'indiscriptible trace de 1~
criture,le mouvement irrepresentable de ses forces et de ses mena-
ces.La langue s'ecrit,pro-regresse ~ mesure qu'elle mattrise ou .
efface en soi la figure libid. 1382/ ••• indem wir flir die Bildung 1
der Scrift diese~ organische instinctive Lautgefuhl nicht als hin-r
langlich anerkennen,sondern dazu noch die Erhebung dieses·. ·Ge:£iihls 1

in das BewuBtsein,in die \r./ahrnehmung fordern.Nicht die instinctiv I

sprachliche,sondern die wahrgenommene Lautsonderung bildet das :1m&
re Alphabet und ist,der Trieb der Schrift./H.Steinthal.l852oDie
Entwickelung der Sc!,l'I:f~ ,zt67 - - - - - - - :
~OTO Ce 6.UTRe Ha .U3rOBOpeHOTO KaTO r 0 B 0 p R M 0 - Q ! ! Q ~

CHeMa IIpOCTpaHCTBeHaTa pe.uyH.rtaHTHOCT Ha C'D-KOMYHHKaTHBHOTO B 1t

H e l H .u a KaHan Ha n.uayanHoTo. B T'DpceHe Ha "aary6eHaTa .u.uea-

THQ:IIOCT" Ha .IlHHaM.UtUIOTO BpeMe-npOCTpaHCTBO aHaJW3aTOp'DT Ce

HOCT /KaTO H 0 B THII IIOBTOpReMOCT/ CHeTaTa npOCTpaHCTBeHo-BpeMeBa

IIOBTOpHeMOCT-B-KOMYHRKaTRBHOTO-C':b-I1p.UKOCHOBeH.Ue. E.rt.UH OT

~.UOHHO H3TnacKaH.UTe CRMIITOMH Ha "aary6eHaTa .U,UeHT.UtlHOCT 11 /He3S.B.U-

-~ ~-

.. 41;
CUMO OT He.itHaTa IIp.UBH.IlHOCT . e np.U-B H e C e H a T a, B M e T H
~

T a T a cne.ua,KOHTO HOCH HRKaKBa B T 0 p H q H a

MapKHpaHocT-B- .u -3a-cec>e-c.u .u cTaBali.K.u 6vrT.ue-B-.u-aa-ce6e-c.u,.no-

cT.uraiKH cBORTa n 'D n H o a H a q H o c T ce caMopaapymasa,ocTa-

BHMKH .rta 3Byq.u II p H B H .Il H 0 T 0 npHC'DCTEHe,6.u.ueXKH He

OT OTC'DCTBHeTO Ha Hemo,KoeTO e T p g 6 B a 1t 0 .rta 6 ':b ,Il e

42 •

~ TaKa,napeHTeTHtlHOCTTa-B-Ce6e-CH 1 KaTO HMaHeHTHa /B ~

~a BCeK.R H3Ka3,6HBa MO.rten.upaHa IIO,Il HaTHCKa Ha KOHBeH~.UOHa1tHOCT'l'a

Ha o-rr.ucMeHr.rBaHeTo,3a .na c T a H e napeH'!'eTHtlHOCT-aa-ce6e-c.u,

pa3-.rt B o e H a Me~~ 6.uTue-B-ce6e-c.u .u 6HTHe-B-.u-aa-ce6e-c.u,Me~-

.IlY CBORTa IIOTeH~Ha1tHa pean.uayeMOCT R II':b1tHaTa CTerreH Ha

H e H CaMo-paapymaBaHe, H e.rtHOBpeMeHHO e,IlHHHa ITO CBORTa II':bpBOIIO-

pa~.rtama C'DmHOCT Ha QT=KEH~a!eLn£H=K£.U~a!e_Ha CRHKaTa Ha C'DMHeHH8e

44· Die Selbsterhaltung des Besonderen ist daher vielmehr seine

Idealitat und eine Herstellung des Allgemeinen; ••• und das Allgemei
ne ist als schlechthin einfaches Sichselbst~le~ches das Aufgehobel
sein seines Andersseins oder seiner-Veruoppelung ~fegel.l968.Jeren
ser Logik 1 Netaphysik und Naturphilosophie.Berlin,ll2/. Die Sich-
selbstgleJ..chheit ist; hier zu einem Satze geworden, und dies ist es,
was die absolute Gleichheit an sich ausdrtickt;denn sie stellt hie-
durch als eine in sich reflektierte dar,aber welche die Reflexion
in sich selbst vollbracht hat,so daB der Schein derselben ols Ent-
gegensetzung an ihr,a~7r diese auch in der Tat ganz aufgehoben,
reinerSchein ist /ibifr.,l36/.
4
t. - Non,la phrase ne dit pas ce qu'elle est,mais ce qu'elle fut
/Derrida.l987.feu lo cendre,l9/ Reste la cendre.Il y a 1~ cenure,
traduis,la cendre n'est pas,elle n'est pas ce qui est.Elle reste
de ce qui n'est ~as,paur ne rappeler au fond friable d'elle que
non-~tre ou impresence.L'~tre sans presence n'a pas ete et ne sera
pas ~lus la oh il y a la cendre et parlerait cette autre memoire. ,
L~ ou cendre veut dire la difference entre ce qui reste et ce qui
est,y arrive-t-elle,l~?/ibid.,23/
r 21.'

Ha RB1I8HHeTO napeHTeTH~

HOCT Hll HacoqBaT K~M K 0 1I e 6 a e ~ 0 T 0 Ce B CBOHTa Cllr~p-

HOC T/HecnrypHOC T 9 ycTaHOB8HOCT /H eye TaHOBeHOC T ,yTB'.b p~.naBaHe/ 0 TXB'.bp-

n;nre, T~m<yBaeMOCT/HeT1>1IKyBaeMOCT, o6xnaTHOCT/He06XBa THOCT • • oll T • H,
c q n T a H e - B - .n e ;i c T B n T e n H o c T /Fi.irwahrhalten/.
B"l>TpemHaTa npoTnnopeqnnocT HefiCTHOCTHOCT ce rrpofiBHBaT B Herona-:
1-1

4-
Ta .n B 0 j H C T B e H o c T ~. Ta3n Herona .nno•HCTBeHocT ne~H
44
B OCHOBaTa Ha B".b1IHaTa OT HOMHHa1IllCTHtJ:HH pecpneKC:t-rH 9 KOHTO 3aM'.b:t'1Ifi ·
Ba t-r 6e3 TOBa He ,nocTaT'.btJ:HO fiCHaTa C".b~HOCT /: 3a6.1 Ha CTp.1/.
B3eMaiKH npe.nnH.n HeronaTa H e 3 a B "1> p m e H o c T T.e. npn

H HeroBaTa I1 a p a 3 li T H 0 C T T.e. TO BHHarH C".bn.{eCTByBa B,Ha-

cotteHo K~M HJI:t-r Mez.ny • • • ,c~-pa3rronaraue ceaaHTHqHM:Te ~oKyc:a Ha
Tpy.nHo o6xnaTHOTO none Ha rrapeHTeT:t-rtJ:HOCTTa,pa3rnez.naH:t1:
TO Modi4 5 des Flirwahrhaltens: Meinen,Glauben und Wissen /:Kant•
\1/erke .1968 .Bd. IX.Lot;ik,65/:

4 3 Das Flirwahrhalten ist liberhaupt von Z\viefacher Art ,ein

oder einn ungewisses /Kants \'Jerke .1968.Bd. IXo Logik ,66/.
44 Bjjt 0TOHHOB .1977 .rnarOJibi :Z:MCTBeHH~l_.neR,!8~:b!!,O£T_! B 6onrapCI<OM
H3biKe./Ha.J.-neqe BBe,neH:ure,cTp.;j'-S'r.KMeB.HayKOBa .llyMKa.; B)i( C".bn.{O t-r
ono3t-tUHfiTa rrapeHTeT:urttecK:ure rnaronbi : rrc:urxonor:urqecK:ure .necKp:urrru:ur:ur ~
MOHorpatj?HflTa Ha .ll:xt.O.YpMCOH.1985.I1apeHTeTitJ:ecK:t-re rnaronhi.B:HoBoe
B 3apy6e:xtHo.l n:viHrB:t-rCTHKe.B~r~cK IVI,199.
4
5 ••• innere Bestimmungen eines Dinges /modi/ ••• auBere Verhalt-
nisse /relationes/.So bezeichnet z.B.das Merkmal de• Ge~ehrsa~t
eine innere Bestimmung des Menschen,Herr oder Knecht seln,nur eln
auBeres Verhaltnis desselben /Kants Werke.l968.Bd.IXoLogik,61/.
~1 TyK ce HaT".bKDaMe Ha e.n;~H 11
CK!_)liiT 11 rrapa.noKC - C".bntHOCTTa Ha flBJie-
H~eTo napenTeT~tmocT OT e.nna cTpaHa e HeaaB".hpmeHa, OT .npyra ce
nBHE~ B 3aTBOpeH xepMeHeBTJiiqeH Kp~r,T.e. OT e.n;Ha CTpaHa 6 e 3 -

K p a}. H a 110 CBOfiTa C".b!liHOCT,OT ,npyra- K_p a lit H a riO OTHOme-

HYie na /Baa~Mo/T"bJIKynaeMocT ~ /naaHMo/rropaJK.naHe. B npo~eca ua He-
rrpecTaHHo c-6nM:KaBaHe : oT-rpaHJ.tttaBaHe : c-n~BaHe : oT-nanetlaBa-
He • • • m1e no.n;-xo•.ua;~.ie c HHKaKBO npe.n-ycen:taHe, npe,n-qyBCTBVIe, npe.n-
xo.nHo-.n; a .u e H o-aa ••• /He aaB~CHMO namr ::n~nore.ne.T~tlHo BponeHo, pa
BVITO-B'I>B,pa3B~TO-OT/,e.UHOBpeMeHHO ~3-HatlaJIHO /intu~tus Orie;ina-
rJ.us . . .. ge b end e Ansc h auung 4 7;
. 46 ; or1g1nar ~
--
BTopHttHo-nonytteHa I.J.nt UJ.·
.

tus derivativus /. U TaKa,6MxMe uorJIH na onpe.nenHM ~HTyHT~BHOTO-

TaHe-:a-.n;eitcTB~TeJIHOCT jFtirwahrhalten I, HeHcr.ro npe.n;-ycemaHe-aa ••

npll He,UOCTaTS'tlHD o6ei<T~BHH H cy6eKTMBHH OCHOBaHHH /Neinen/ • I1pOHC- '
HTIBaHeTO Ha 01103H~~HTa o6eKT~BH~ : cy6eKTHBHH OCHOBaHHH B .z:tBa
OCHOBH~ THTia - .UOCT8T".btlHO c~6eKTHBH~ : He.z:tOCTaT".bqH0 o6eKTHBHVI
~ ~·
/G1auben/·~ .UOCTaT".bqHD ey6eKTHBHVI : .rtOCTaT".btlHO o6eKT~BHH/Wissen· /,

B".h3Bex.ua K'I:>M caMo-paapymaBamoTo ce /no/aHaH~e-B-~-aa-ce6e-c~ KaTo

BTOpHtlHO-TIOJiytleHOTO VIH~~TVIBHO-HaCOtlBaHe-K'I:>M,TIOpa%.namo 11".bpBHtlHO-

BJiaCTH~,o:rpaHHtle'HH OT !!3!!_a~al!H2_-888e!!a.!_a=.B~'tl!:,- ~ e,UHOBpeMeHHO C

ToBa !!egp~c.!.a!!H£-~O£M!!P~m~T~-£e=.H!!~HgHfi /inte11ectus archetypu;o
u intuitus derivativuq/. Tiapa.n;aKcanHaTa C".bntHOCT Ha HBJieHHeTo rra-
46 ••• a11es end1iche denkende ~"/esen hierin mit dem Nenschen i.ibere:in
kommen mi.isse,so hort sie /die Anschauungsart/ urn dieser A1lgemein
gi.iltigkeit \'li1len doch nicht auf,Sinn1ichket zu sein,eben darum
wei1 sie abge1eitet /intuitus derivativus/,nicht ursprunglich /in
tuitus originarius/,mithin nicht inte11ectue11e Anschauung ist.
/Kant.1787.Kritik der reinen Vernunft,2.Aufl.,7)./
47 '
.<1.m Pr 1nz1p
. . a 11 er Pr J.nz1p1en:
. . . d a B Je
. d e orJ.gJ.Il'at'
. . I/ ge b ende Ansc h au-
ung eine Rechtsque11e der Erkenntnis sei ,daB al1es, was sich in der
Intuition originar darbietet,einfach hinzunehmen sei/Husser1.191~
Ideen zu einer reinen Phanomeno1ogie ••• 43/
48 4 ibid. , 70
Kants V/erke .1968. Bd. IX. Logik, 67. 9
50
Kants \·/erke .1968. Bd.X,123.
 23

H SSTBOpeHOCT /OT,IJ;aJieqaBaHeTO OT ~HTyVITv!BHOTO-iiSCOtlBaHe-I.C'LM HH

11
OT-MeCTBa OT C'Dl!lHOCTHO-C'DII\eC'!'ByBaLUOTO-Bl>Tpe-B'DB/ Ce C'DI1p0THBJI.fl-
Ba 11 Ha TIIIIIOJIOI'HSvipSI!lOTO OTK'DCBaHe 0'!' 11
HOBBT8 11 C'D-6IIITI.ie HS CJie.rtH-
Te. dpiii6JI:£oij!m.BaHeTO K'DM eKC~eprrHpaHHTe ;!.parMeHTH C TflXHaTa CO~HO­

KyJITypHa CIIITya~IIIfl III BepOHTHOCTHaTa KOHTeKCTyS1IHO-mrqHOCTHa HHTeH-:

~HOHaJIHOCT e e.rtiiiHCTDeHIIIflT peaJIMCTIIItleH ITO.rtXO.rt /in rebus/ Sa aHaJIIII-

CTaTyC rrpe.rtiiiSBHKBa CITOpOBe Sa C'DiltHOCTTa III CTHJIIIICTIIItlHLf.fl LIM CTaTyC.

~
llanl.i rropa.rt:rrr Hecp'DqHoCT .npyroRtle na ce :rrrapaaiiim
51 IIIJII.i aa .na Cl>B.rta-

.nem .no6po nrreqa TJieHae VI .na OA{HBvim "Cl>06~eHHeTo" 52 ? .Uan:rrr rropa.nvr

CO~Jila1IHa He06XO.rtiiiMOCT ,(T.e.aa.rt'DJI::KHTeJIHO/;aKyJITSTLfBHO) HJIH rrpoaa-
53
BOJIH():,rrO B'DTpemeH rrO.rtTLfK· Ce H3B'DpmBa CHe!'.IaHeTO Ha :rpaMaTIIItlHSTS
/MOHOJIOJ:'!IIIqHa/ E-T'DKSHOCT III IIOCJie.rtOBSTeJIHa 06Bl>pSaHOCT B'DB H qpea
cr"DCTeHaTa /Verdichtung 54; rrapeHTeT:rrrt~Ha cne.nl?r<oHTO MapK:rrrpa,.no-
H3HCHH~a56,oT-rpaH:rrrqana~KH ce MeTa-,napa-,:rrrHTep-TeKcTyaJIHo.06ea-
JIHqeHaTa ~ ceMaHTHt~Ha H c:vtHTaKTLfqHa /durch Abschviachung5~verdich-
tung u.a/ C'li~HOCT e CMy'!!taBana :rrracnenonaTemiT~KOHTo ca H sao6HKa~.l

JIBJILf c "M'DJiqaH:rrre" ,nona.rtH He.!HaTa TD:Y.rtHO orme.n;eJmMa paaHo-mu<oc.(S.

~l Wackernagel W.l873.Poetik,Rhetorik und Stilistik.Halle,348.
5 2 Ciassen Jol867.Beobachtungen tiber den hornerischen Sprachge-
brauch.Frankfurt am Nain,5.
53 illa quoque ex eodem genere possunt videri: unum quod interpo-
sitionem vel interclusionem dicimus,Graeci rtaptv~EaLv[napt~n~waLvJ·
voco.nt,dum continuationi sermonis medius aliqui sensus intervenit
••• alterum,quod est ei figurae sententiarum,quae &noa~pop~ dici-
tur,simile,set non sensum mutat,verum formam eloquendi /Quintilia
ni institutionis oratoriae.l97l.Leipzie;.IX 3,;~3-2LJ-/o naptv-&c:aL~l:
napEv·n-&tvaL fc'l.aneben hineisetzen '/bezeichnet die Figur als Will-
ktirhandlung des Sprechenden, napf.!J:It~Waq; I: napqmCn~E Lv fdaneben em'
fallen' /als UTI;Willktirlichen Vort;eng /Sch·:;yzer E.l939.Die Parentbe'
se im engern und weitern Sinne.Abh.d.Pre~ss.Akademie 6.Berlin,5/
4
5 schv,ryzer.l939oop.cit. ,3l;die Dauer 1tlird allerdings durch das ra-
schere Sprechtempo der Parenthese verringert /ebd.,32/ ••• Gestalt
der sprachlichen Konzentration /ebd. ,41/ ·1
55 uL~
J:. \_ J:. ~ ' w '\6 \ ' • ' l
~~oou u~ EO~Lv EVWOLS ~ you ~o ax6~ou~ov apaLpou~tvn E~f.pou
,l.
~
~LVO~ napa.&taEL A5you/Herodianus.nEp~ axrn..t.tf~wv .!!.286//:Schwyzer.ebd. II
I ,
~~ Der Nebengedanke oder Beglettgedanke gelangt meistens erst ,
 24.

(Ha n.CIIeA...,)
Pa3.nemmeTo MM~~Ia .nBe roner.m KaTeropHH oT C!JyHKUMOHanHa rne.nHa TOlol-.

I<a - KOHTaKTHo-o6nl>p3BamH /kon;;aktbezof_5ene I H KoMeHTHpamH ;kom-

1:1entierend~J BO.IlH .IlO onpOCTHBaHe Ha THXHaTa 6MTH.\tHa C'l>mHOCT • 3a TBO-
peHMHT xepMeHeBTH~eH Kpnr,B KO~TO Te Ce ,IlBM~aT /B3aHMO-nopa~.naT H
B3aHMO-T'l>JlKyBaT/, npe.nnonara npe.ncTaBmreTo "&ry .na ce "')opMaJIH3Hpa"

zum Durchbruch,nachdem der Houpteedonl:e schon e~n~germaBen deut..n.cn

geformt ist:so entsteht die haufigste sprachliche Parenthese oder
Paremptose /Schv.ryzer.l939oopocit. ,33/.
57 Schwyzer.ebd.,40 5B ebd.,31
59 Bayer Klo 197lo Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthe- 1 1
se in Texten gesprochener Snrache,In~Forschungen zur gesprochenen :
Sprache und Nogl~chkeiten ihrer D~ac..Ktisierung.Mi.inchen,202. 1

. ~
I
25.

Paar~BaHeTO Ha CeMaHTHqHaTB CI1HpaJia Qe CS~.z:te ~OpMaJIVI3VIpaHO no KBa-

60
3VICHHOHHr.!HqiiO-I<OHBepCHBHK 11 HHIDKH 11 , q:vreTO CI1Jl:vtTaHe C'l>-I10pBjK.z:tB HeRC-

HHTe B3BHMO-T'l>JIKyBall{H Ce /B3BHli·10-.UOI1~JlBBil{H ce -HeyTpaJIH3liipBil{H

ce/ OtiepTBH:rt!R Ha 0 6 ll{ H 0 C T T a OT napeHT~TL-!l!HVI CJie.'!lVI. TRX-

HoTo Haqano H KpaJt ce rye5rr.T B HRKaKBO npen-ycemaHe-aa • • •

• • •
KoA aHae- 1,18,23,27,33,52,357,366/_,_1,577/_KaK/,898

aHae ce - 434 --
KBKTO Ce 3Hae - 175

aHaem JIL-l - 11

3HBeTe JlH - 858

3HBM JlH - 672

KBTO 3HaeM - 405

KBKTO 3HaeTe - 662

aHaeTe 407

3HaXTe - 215,216

nenHRT rpan aHae - 226

He aHaM /B Koe ceno/ - 118

He 3HBM - 237,268,274,292,974,1129

B3 I10He HHil{O He 3H&R - 378

BCe I1BK He 3HBB - 89

~· He 3HBM KBKBO - 260

He 3HBR JlH 249

CSea .ua 3Haem C'l>C cvrrypHOCT - 1140

3HBR - 301

'
60 11 11
j/
KBB3VICliiHOHHM:bi - CJIOBa, CMhlCJlOBhle pa31IHqvrg Me::K.Izy' KOTOphlMH ,ItO-
CTBTQqHQ qaCTO MOryT He.TpBJIVI30B~~~~H~MOI1pe.z:teJI8HHhlX KOHTeKCTBX
/CKaaoquoe He BBJIReTCR,paayMeeTCR~B3HCHHOHHUHH; qeTKyl'O rpaH:b
MeA~ KBB3HCHHOHHMHeA H npOCTO npHHB.rt1Ie~HOCT:bl'O K O.UHOMY CeMaHTH-
qecKOMy I10Jll'O M:bl npOBO.UHT:b He ;yMeeM/ /IJen:&qyK Yf.1974.0I1hlT TeOpHH
JlHHrBHCTHqeCKHX MO.rteneX 11 0MoiCJI--TeKCT 11 .MOCKBa,82/ • KOHBepCHB: C1IO
BO,KOTOpOe HB3hlBaeT TO xe CBMOe OTHOmeHHe,qTo H KJII'OqeBOe CJIOBO,HC!
B3RTOe 11 B HHOM HanpaBJieHHH 11 T.e. 0 nepeCTBHOBKO. TeX ~e BKTBHTOB
Ha .UP:JTHe MeCTa /ibid.,83/.
3HaM - 198,229,346/_,_/, 741, 794/BC".'&U~HOCT_/, 997,1051/_, • •• _/
H3BeCTHO e - 330 ,LJ-02/_Ha BCHqKH/
H3BeCTHO BH e C".'&~O - 404
KaKTO BH e H3BeCTHO - 1176
KaTO e H3BeCTHO- 411,626
H3BeCTHO MH e - 953
.UOI<:OnKOTO HH e H3BeCTHO - 476
• ...J.... •

RBHO 6eme - 10
HaHCTHHa 6eme HCHO - 17
RCHO e - 784/KaKTO BH~~aTe_/,829

482/_H ITO TOBa/

nHqH HCHO- 32/y~ cnyqajHo ••• _/
nMqH CH - 267,809
oqeBH.UHO- 531,848,886,1075,1123,1128
~CHO MH e - 744,1167
no3HaBa ce - 167
KaKTO Ce BH~.Ua - 184
BH.UH Ce- 66,311,313,344,372,383,422,426,447,465,474,475,477,497,

512
3a 3a6enH3BaHe e - 483
oqeBH.UHO e - 968
3a6enH3an C".'DM - 1001
KaKTO BH~~aTe - 645
KaKTO BH~.UaTe,BcHqKQ e HCHO - 784
KaKTO BH.U~ZTe - 648
;,
M07,~ C".'&~O TaKa .Ita Ce BH.UH - 976
KaKTO BHX.Uam -318
MO~eTe .Ita CH npe.UCTaBHTe - 310

Itte BH.UH - 187

~eme ~a no3Hae - 800/pa36~pa ce_/
~ a3 3a6errH3ax -1037
Mora na cH n npe~cTaBH - 1074
He c~ n 6nx npencTannrr 1135
CBMO CM B~06pa3HBaM - 590
B~06pa3HBBM CM - 10G2
He MM Ce BMZna - 916
CTpyBa MH oe - 7,230,290,291,315,316,345,400,484,507,510,511 ,7~·---.

742,753,756,768,770,790,804,820,830,870,926,943,967,974,983,
994,1043 '1079 '1147' 1175
~3rne~na- 319,414,419,429,446,L~51,459,464,466,470,471,478,486~

521 '552, 560,561 '567' 570' 571 '576,678 ,822,835,849' 1044,1078 '110/i
no BCM~Ko M3rrre~na - 462
3a MeH To He ~3rnexna - 1077
Ha OHMH ••• ce CTpyBame 3
cTpyBame My/M ce- 15,49,58,76,76a,79,108,140/Bce_!,535,597,60C,
615,616,622,?12,717, 738,822,1167
cTpyBa MY ce - 45,94
BCeKHMy Ce CTpyBa - 44
KaK TH ce CTpyna - 90
He BH ITM Ce CTpyBa - 952
KOnKOTO H na CH B~06pa3HBaM - 1149
/KOR.TO/ CM B~06pa3RBBX ·/, 'l!e/ 749
My ce CTpyBame KBTO C~H - 66
CTpyBame MM Ce - 747,754,803,80 /KOITKO CTpaHHo_/,846,927
KaTo CH naBame BMn,qe ne BM:Kna -72
me MY ce cTpyBa - 1174
~3rrrexname - 62,84,666
~~oCsp~~Jt~~,~~9 - 1062
BCH~KM OCTaHaiTH CH B~o6pa3HBaT - 924
 28.,

rne.naM - 125
6nx CH B~o6pa3HJia - 917
a3 ce ycemaM - 1052
CTOpH MH ce -815,853,963
CTOp:rt~ MY ce- 64,74,135 9 136/ ••• cnKam, ••• KaTo qe/
CTOpH i1 Ce - 77
HMame tlyBCTBOTO - 638,654
yceTHX - 129,884
~BCTByBaX - 793a
oKa3Ba ce - 337
He CMHTaMTe - 1008
KaTO CM ITOMMCJIR- 851,852,909,913,915
YHC~ - 212,214,232,351/_.na~e/,394,504,505,508,509,542,572,827,

832,836,877,925,936
Bee MHCJIH - 271,356
MHCJieX CM- 254,601,869,918,930
ITOMHCJIHX CH - 963
MHCJieX- 750,774,818,897
ITOMMCJIHX 806
MHCJIH CH - 275,354,856
ITOMMCJIMX - 102
TH nOMHCJIH- ?67/_MaK~p a3 ,na C':bM y6e,neH/
MOeTO CKpOMHO MHeHHe e - 424,947
CMRTaM - 499
CMHTaMe - ~31

nHTaM ce - 172,789
1
npeMHCJIHX - 806 I/,

nHTame ce ;ranyHKa/ - 181

CMHTame - 655,853/KoraTo_/
CMRTaX - 823
 38.

M nee rraK ce CTpaxynaM - 734

TonKona ce 6on na He Te oTerqa - 730

• • •

OT Tai~'DB TMII aHaJtM3 ,rropanvr TOBa, qe 11

pa3MVITMTe 11 rpaHH~M Ha flBJte-
HvreTo rrape~TeTvrqHocT ne~aT o T B 'D n rroneTo Ha nvrHrnoueHTpvr3-·
Ma:
1.HeflCHa ceMaHTHqHa CTpyKTypa
-- -
CHHTaKTHqHa 06B'Dp3aHOCT KaTO C'D~HOCTeH 6ener
3.rpaMaTHqHa /MOPWOJtOrHqHa/ pa3HOJtHKOCT
B rr'DpBorropaJE.u;amaTa C'D~HOCT Ha rrapeHTeTHqHoCTTa ne1.<H HeC'D3Ha-
TenHHffi' CTpeMejit 3a OT-rpaHHqaBaHe /A.3 ! .UpyrHfl/, nlUH30WPeHHtzHaTa
HaKnOHHOCT Ha tlOBeKa K'DM KOMJTHHKaQHSI 11 /N • .Herleau-Ponty.l947.Phe-
nomenologie de la perception.Paris.Gallimard, j,rrontzHHflBaHeTO
~S:f Ha COUHanHaTa He06XO,IJ;HMOCT 3a "MHCTHtlHO rrpHC'DCTBHe 11 B HHKaK-
Ba tlOBemKa o6~HOCT KaTO JmtlHOCT-B-pOmi H OTKnOHHBaHeTO MY OT
"rrpHC'D.u;eHaTa" MY pona /BYl. cTp .6/. ~inM MOjiCe 611: rrapeHTeTHtlHOCTTa
..
ce rropa~na KaTO cnena OT KOMYHHKaTHBHOTO 6HTHe-B-H-3a-ce6e-CH
B HerrpecTaHHHH CTpeMe)K K'l>M 11
B'D3CTaHOBHBaHeT0 11 Ha CaMopa3pymHJtO-
TO ce KOMYHHKaTHBHO 6HTHe H 3aTOBa HOCH B ce6e CH IT'DpBOIIOpajK.Ita-
~aTa-0 T H 0 B 0 C'D~HOCT Ha KOMYHHKaTHBHHH aKT? 61
61 Diese Gesammeltheit des Herstellens aber ochwingt in der
Sammlung /"A.fyELv/ des Durchsprechens und durc1:wprechenden Kund- ·
h2bens dessen,was sich ~ehort und nicht eehort.Dieses Durchspre-
chen ist jens Sichsagen,das meistens gero.de schweigend verlauft
oder Dln jenes ins \'lerk verlorene Vorsichhinsagen,oft nur in -
auBerlich gesehen - abgerissenen 1:/orten.Das Herstellen ist in
sich ein Lichsagen und Sichsagenlassen. Sich et\·Ias sagen,da.s
heiBt gerade nicht: Worte machen,sondern: so und so vorgehen
wollen,d.h. schon vorgehen.Dises Sichentf?lten der Kunde aber
ist das ,v;as \vir die Uberlegune; nennen,al~; Bei-sich-durche;ehen
und -durchsprechen von eh;as .Dieses Durchsprechen ist die inne-
re Entfaltung des A6yos und selbstA6yo~ .Diese /stillschweigen-
de/ Uberlegung flihrt die einzelnen Schritte des Herstellens,und ·
dieses bcdarf der Flihrung ,\'Jeil es seinem We sen nach ein Tun ist,
das zuvor schon das zu Tuende,Herzustellende in den Blick genom-·
men hat /N.Heidegger.l98l.Aristoteles Metaphysik 9 1-3. Vom W:esen :
und Vlirklichkeit der Kraft,l46/. '
 39 •

.W3llOJ13Y h.A.EA JU1TEP ~.\.1:1P A

Austin G.l806/reprol966/.Chiromania: or a 'freatise on Rhetori-

cal DeliveryoLondon./repr.Bouthern Illinois Univ.Press/.
Austin_J ...l962.Hm·J to do things ·1:1ith \·Jords.Cambridge.Mass.:Har-
vard Univ.Press.
~

Bacon Fr.l620.Novum organum scientiarum.

*Bateson Gr.l972.Steps to an Ecology of Mind.New York:Ballantine.
Bayer Kl.l971. Verteilune; und Fun:::tion cler soc;enannten Pare:c.the-
I
se in 'fexten zesprochener Sprache.In:Forschungen zur gespro-
chenen Sprache und Moglichkei ten ihrer Diclaktisierune;.f-lii!'l..cb.en.
*BiervJisch N.l980.Semantic Structure and illocutionary Force.In:
Searle/Kiefer/Bierwisch eds.Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics.
Dordrecht:Holland/Boston:US..A/London:England.Vol.lO.
*Bird\vhistell R.l952. Introduction to Kinesics .Ann Arbor .Nichigan.
*___ •1970.Kinesics and Context.Philadelphia:Univ.of Pennsylvania
Press.
*'___ .197l.Kinesics:inter- and intra-channel communication re
search.In:Kristeva J./Rey-Debove J.eds.Essays in Semiotics.
The Hague.Houton.
*Bruneau Th.l973.Communicative Silences:forms a.nd functions.In:
Journal of Communication 23:1 /Narch/.
Buber M.l962.i'ierke.I Bd.Schriften zur Philosophie.Lambert Schnei·
1
der .'lie ide lbere;.
Cassirer E.l964.Philosophie der symbolischen Formen.I Teil:Die
Sprache.IV Aufl.Darmstadt.
Classen J.l867.Beobachtungen tiber den homerischen Sprachgebrauc~

Frankfurt am Jvlain.
 LJ.O.

Derrida J.l967.De la e;rammatologie.Ninuit.

_.1971.0emiolo3ie et Grammatologie.In:Kristeva J./H8y-Debove J.
eds.Essays in Semiotics.The Hacue.Louton.
_.1987.feu la cendrc.Des femmes.
~Dittmann A.l970.The body movement-speech rhythm relationship as
a cue to speech encoding.In:Siee;man A./Pope B.eds.Studies in
dyadic Communication.Ne-;.J York: Pergamon.
~ ___ .1967.The phonetic clause as a unit of speech decoding.In:
Journal of Personality end social Psychology 9:1./coautor
Lle\'lellyn L./
Ernout A./Neillet A.l985.Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue
latine.IV edition.Paris:Klincksieck.
Feuerbach L.l903 .sarntliche \verke. VI Bd.Das l[lesen des Christen-
tums.Stuttgart:Fr.Frommanns Verl.
Frege G.l973.Schriften zur Logik.Aus dem NachlaB.Akademie Verl.
Berlin.
Godel R.l969.Les sources manuscrites du cours de linguistique
generale de F.de Saussure.Gen~ve.
Grice H.l975.Logic and conversation.In:Cole/1-'lorgan eds.Syntax
and Sem2ntics.Vol.3:Speech Acts.London:Academic Press.
Goffman E.l959.The presemtation of self in everyday life.N.York.
Hall E. T.l959.T.he silent Language .Nel·J York: Doubleday.
_.1966.The hidden Dimension.Ne\17 York:Doubleday.
Hayes F.l957.Gestures:c working bibliography.In:Southern Fol-
klore Quarterly 21:4- /December/.
Hegel G.l968.Jenenser Logik,r·1etaphysik und Naturphilosophie.
hrgb.v.G.Lasson.Akademie Verl.Berlin.
Heidegger M.l976.Logik:die Frage nach der \'lahrheit.Gesamtausgabe.
Bd.2l.Vittorio Klostermann.Franl~urt am Main.
~·198l.Aristoteles Metaphysik 8 l-3.Gesamtausgabe.Bd.33.Vitto-
 41.

rio Klostermann.Frc:mltfurt em Nain.

_./Fink E.l970.Heraklit. Vittorio Klostermann.Frankfurt am I\ilain. ·
Herder J.l966.Abh:3.ndlung i.iber den Ursprung der LI>:·,._.. Ghe.Reclam.
Stuttgart.
Husserl E.l913.Ideen zu einer reinen Phfuwmenologie und phanome-
nologischen?hilosophie.I Buch.Nax Niemeyer Verl.Halle.
Kant Im.l770.De mundi sensibilia atque intelligibilis forma et
principiis.Diss.KonigsbergT -
_.1787.F.ritik der reinen Vernunfp.2.Aufl.Berlin und Leipzig.
_.1968.\'Jerke.Bd.IX.Logik.Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen.Vialter de
Gruyter.Berlin.
*Key h.R.l977.Nonverbal Communication.A Research Guide and Biblio-
e;raphy.The Scarcrm; Press Inc.l·!etuchen.U.S.l.•
Kluckhohn Cl.l985.The Gift of Tongues.In:Landmarks of American
Language and Linguistics.ed.Smolinski Fr.~lashington D.C.
Y~isteva J./La Coste.l968.Bibliographie.In:Langages 10.
Kristeva J./Rey-Debove J. eds.l97l.Essays in Semiotics.The Hague.
Nouton.
Kracauer S.l963.Time and History.In:Zeugnisse - Theodor W.Adorno 1

zum 60.Geburtstag.Frankfurt.
Leibniz G.l900.Geuvres philosophiques./par P.Janet/.Tome I.Paris. 1

Levy-Bruhl L.l918.Les fonctions mentales dans les societes infe-

rieures.3.edition.Paris.
NcQ.uown Nol957.Linguistic transcription and specification of
psychiatric interview materials.In:Psychianry 20:1 /Febr./
*11cQuown N./Bateson Gr./Birdvrhistell R./Brosin H./Hockett Ch.l971.
If

The natural History of an r6.Sterview./Nicrofilm Collection of

Ivlanuscripts on cultural Anthropology ,15 series/ .Chicago.
*':r-1ead G.l934.I"lind,Self ,Society:from a standpoint of a social be-
haviorist.Chicago:Univ.of Chicago Presso
Merleau-Ponty N.l945.Phenomenologie de la perception.Paris:Galli-
Mardo :
 '+2.

I'-1iller G./Ge.l.:mter E./Pribrc~fi K.l960.PL.mc and the Structure of

Beh~.:.vior .Ne1.-1 York: Holt ,Rinehart and \'fins ton.
I ojj

Horris Ch.l97l.Hritings on the general Theory of Signs.The Hague.·,

Nouton.
*Parsons T .1968. Intcra.ction: social int(~roction. In: Interl!Dtional
Encyclopedia of the social sciences.Vol.?.Macmillan.
*Parsons T./Shils E. eds.l95l.Toward a general Theory of Action.
New York:Macmillan.
Pierce Ch.l93l.Collected Papers./esp.Vol.II/.Cambridge.Nass.
*Pittenger R./Hockett Ch./Danehy J.l960.The first five minutes: a
Sample of microscopic interview Analysis.Ithaca.rTew York:Paul
Hartineau.
Pletonis Dialogi.MCNIX.¢AILlPDE'.Vol.II.Lipsiae.In Aedibus B.G.
Teubneri.
Platon.l93'+.~uv.res compl~tes.Tome IV.Phedon.Paris.Societe d'edi-
tion "Les Belles Lettres".
~Poyatos F.l975.Cross-cultural analysis of paralinguistic 'alter-
nants'in face-to-face interaction.In:Kendon A./Harris R./M.R.
I Key eds.Or~gnization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction.
The Hague.Mouton.
if
_.1976.f·1an beyond Vlords: Theory and Nethodology of Nonverbal
Communication.NevJ York:State English Council.Oswego.
~__ .1983.Language and Nonverbal Systems in the Structure of Face-
to-Face Interaction.In:Language and Communication.Vol.3.No.2.
Quintilianus.l97l.Institutio oratoria.Edidit L.Radermacher.
Leipzig.BSB B.G.Teubner Verl.
Saussure F.de.l973.Cours de linguictique 56nerale/CLG/.Edition
critique par T.de I"lauro.~aris.Payot.

Schwyzer E.l939.Die Parenthese im engern und im weitern Sinne.In:

Abhandlungen der Preu8ischen Akadecie der Wissenschaften.Phi~

hist .Klasse .M6 .Berlin.

Gearle J .1969.Speech Acts .Nevi York and London.Cambridge Uni v.tres
Bta.robinsky J.l964.Les anae;rommes de F. de Saussure.In:Kercure
France 2.
Steinthal H.l852.Die Ent·,-Ticklung der Schri:ft.Berlin.Ferd.Dlimmler'£
Verlagsbuchhandlung.
L
I

\1/ackerna.gel W.l873.Nachgelassene Vorlesungen tiber 'Poetik,Rheto- ,.,

rik und Gtilistik'.Halle.
Walde A./Hofmann J.l938.Lateinisches etymologisches Vlorterbuch.
I Bd.Heidelberg.Carl \·linter Verlag.
·I
',,
I

lle1Ib\lyK i1.1974.0iloiT TeopHH JlHHI'BHCTH'tleCKHX MO~eneti 11

0MDIC1I--TeKCT 11
llOCKBa.W3~. "HayKa". ;~1

llil:pc Y.C.1983.:VI~ pa6oTor "3neMeHTbi norvrKH.Grammatica Speculativa.• 11 ~f

B:CeMHOTHKa.i:locr-cBa. "Paeyra".
,.I
0TOHHOB ll.A.1977.rnaronor YMCTBeHHOi ~eHTeJlbHOCTH B 6onrapCKOM
H3biKe .KxxeB. "HayKoBa .llyMKa 11 •
YpMCOH n~.1985.ITapeHTeTHt~eCKHe rnaronor.B:HOBOe B 3apy6e~HO~ 1IHH-
rBHCTHKe.BornycK XVI.liiocKBa."ITporpec".

I.