Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Summative Assessment p. 19
Formative Assessments p. 42
Application of Research p. 46
Harper 3
assessments can occur on a larger scale as they are administered by state and
immediate feedback.
highly engaging
classroom/school-centered.
cumulative learning.
1) Why
Assess?
4)
Communicate
How?
2) Assess
what?
Avoid bias
while
assessing
Students can
3) Assess participate In
assessment too
How? Teach students to
(Design) communicate and track
progress
Harper 6
Harper 7
Harper 8
1. Is our current state of mental assessments (like the SAT, ACT, LSAT, ect.) a
comfortable and useful place?
2. How did our nation obtain this culture of assessment?
3. What should we change?
Harper 9
2. Average Score, Median Score, and Deleting the Lowest Score (Guskey, 2009)
Several teachers have debated whether students should earn zeros on their
assignments. George Knights from Solution Tree advocates for a system called
ZAP—zeroes are prohibited. Students are held to a very high standard as
teachers ask them to complete work, even if it is late. However, other teachers
believe this is unfair because it does not benefit the students who do turn in their
work on time.
My Harper 11
Grading
beliefs Project-based learning, as well as
group learning, allows students to
demonstrate creativity. Students also
have the opportunity to work at their
6 point grading own pace (rather than being limited
system . a = 90 - during a testing slot).
100%. and f = 16.7% <
(Folsom Cordova Unified School District,
n.d.)
Provide
Feedback
Homework:
I want my students to
understand that I view their
learning as a long-term process.
Elementary: Reading logs. Other As a result of my written
homework - once a week. feedback and student-teacher
Middle School - I will coordinate conferences, I want students to
with students' other teachers to develop confidence in their
ensure they are not overloaded with abilities to learn and produce
homework assignments. work.
Harper 12
Protocol to Effectively Use Data (Education for the Future Initiative, 2006):
1. Identify the problem
2. Describe Hunches and Hypotheses
3. Identify Questions and Data
4. Analyze Multiple Measures
5. Analyze Political Realities and Root Causes
6. Develop Action Plan Resolution
7. Implement Action Plan
8. Evaluate Implementation
9. Improve the Process
10. Start over again! (Identify the problem)
My Data Beliefs
Harper 15
Objectives
This three-week unit teaches third graders to look for context clues while reading
and writing. As students strengthen their awareness of context clues, they will
The resources for five different assessments are attached in the pages to follow.
running reading record based on students’ individual reading levels. Then, I will
Week One:
• L.3.4.a – “Use sentence-level context as a clue to the meaning of a word
or phrase.”
o Objective 1: The student will identify the effect of the silent ‘e’ by
fixing incorrectly spelled words while gathering clues from a
sentence’s context with the whole class. The student will then
individually distinguish where syllables are located in two-syllable
silent ‘e’ words, and his or her performance will be measured
proficient by correctly completing nine “Syllable Match” problems
and reading the nine words aloud without major errors.
Week Two:
Harper 17
Week Four:
• RF.3.4c – Use context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and
understanding, rereading as necessary.
o Objective 4: Students will identify words read incorrectly in their
leveled readers and go back to reread the text to self-correct using
the “Smooth It Out” strategy on their bookmarks during
independent reading. The students will be measured proficient in
identifying words read incorrectly by individually writing one
challenging word found when reading and identifying the strategy
used to self-correct on the exit ticket at the end of the lesson.
o Objective 5: Students will apply their knowledge of self-correcting
strategies and recognition of context clues as they perform a
running reading record based on their indicated levels of reading.
Students will be measured proficient by individually reading the
book aloud to the teacher and demonstrating 95% accuracy in
their reading.
Harper 18
Assessment Titles
FLUENCY RUBRIC
3. REFLECT
• What did you learn about the student as a reader?
• Does the student read accurately? Consider their errors and how to improve accuracy.
• Does the student read with phrasing and fluency? If not, provide more instruction in fluency.
• Does the student understand what they are reading? If not, provide more opportunities for discussion of themes,
concepts, and story structure to help the student build deeper understanding of what they are reading.
WHEN ACCURACY AND THE THIS TEXT IS AT USE TEXTS AT THIS NEXT ASSESSMENT STEPS
RATE IS ... COMPREHENSION THE CHILD’S ... LEVEL FOR ...
SCORE IS ...
98–100% 4–6 independent level independent Try moving the student up 1–2
reading text levels
98–100% 0–3 instructional level guided reading Use this level for guided
reading
95 –97% 4–6
93–94% <3 frustration level read-alouds and shared Try moving the student down 1–2
reading text levels
Below 93% 0–6
Summative Assessment:
Harper 21
Analysis of Errors
Count and Self-Corrections
E SC
PAGE E SC MSV MSV
Interim Assessments:
Handout 1
2. Can you hardly smell your notecard, or can you smell it really
well?
4. If this card was smelly because lots of juice dripped on it, what juice
do you think it would be? What juice does it smell like?
Harper 40
Harper 41
Harper 42
Formative Assessments:
Point of View
• Students will exhibit understanding in comparing the point of
view of a human and an ant based on the text Two Bad Ants.
As I am reading the text aloud to the class, I’ll call students up
to the front of the class to fill out a model of the “Point of View
Chart” on an easel/poster board. I will use inquiry, asking, “How
would you feel if you noticed an aunt inside the teacup you
are about to drink out of?” “How do you think an aunt would
feel swirling in a cup of tea?” Once a student raises his or her
hand to answer, he may write both the human’s point of view
and ant’s point of view side by side on the poster board.
o Intended Data Gathered & Specific Intervention Plan: For
this assessment, students will relate their own thoughts to
the thoughts/actions of the characters. This “Point of View
Chart” will help logical-mathematical learners because
they can visualize the two points of view in organized lists
and analyze both sides. If I notice a student is struggling to
answer my questions about the differences between an
ant’s perspective and a human’s perspective, I will spend
individual time with him or her during the summative
assessment, particularly with the writing assignment
(question #4). For students who show proficiency early in
the lesson, I will allow them to read Two Bad Ants aloud to
the whole class instead of reading it myself (this is
effective fluency practice as students will be able to hear
the peer reading the same text I was reading). By giving
an advanced student that role, it will challenge him or her
because the book is for grades three to five.
Harper 44
Harper 45
Harper 46
References
Bernhardt, V. L., (1998). Invited Monograph No. 4 California Association for Supervision and
Guskey, T.R., McElligott, J., and Brookhart, S.M. (2009). Practical Solutions for Serious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgROr3o9_rY
O’Connor, K. (2002). How to Grade for Learning: Linking Grades to Standards, 2nd Edition.
Pellegrino, J. W. (1999). The Evolution of Educational Assessment: Considering the Past and