THE EVALUATION OF RISK MANAGEMENT OF HAZARD: CASE STUDIES ON FLYOVER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IN INDONESIA. Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo International Program, Civil Department jineering, University of Indonesia Email: reno.bayuajikusprayogo@gmail.com Abstract The main objective of this project is to study the use of Risk Management in managing hazard in construction project in Indonesia, The another objective regarding the feasibility study analysis to evaluate whether the existing project which is Jalan Layang Non-Toll GLNT) Flyover construction project is capable in managing risk of hazard, The data analysis is focusing on three main activities which are Excavation; Movement People and Vehicles; and Work Equipment. The analysis of Risk Management of Hazard shows that, in theory, the existing Risk Management Plan of PT. Wijaya Karya~Jaya Konstruksi would be effective to implement the Risk Management theory and Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) theory Keywords: Risk Management, Risk Management procedure, Risk Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Control, Risk of Hazard, Quantitative Matrix, Risk Management Analysis. Background & Problem The flyover construction project or road construction project is categorising into a big project category because of the high total estimated cost of the project. The bigger projects are also having the higher risk, Each work activity and equipment in a flyover construction project has a different potential accident of risk for people including workers and employees as human resources and the main role in construction industry. Due to the important role of workers in construction, each company needs to improve the quality of labour with the protection for them. The hazard mitigation can be reduced by following the Occupational Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Health and Safety (OHS) concept and Risk management model. The OHS concept has emerged since the period of the industrial revolution in England (Abrams, 2001). Safety is the protection of people from physical injury (Hughes & Ferrett, 2012). The protection means the protection to people when people are doing work activities. A successful flyover or road construction must be managed and maintained in safe, comfortable and convenient. However, The construction industry has the highest rate in mntaneda, & the most hazardous industry in many countries (Jannadi & BueKhamsin, 2002). According to (Byung, 1998), Construction work has been described to be nonerepetitive and ergonomically dangerous, requiring heavy lifting and awkward positives, resulting in a high proportion of injuries and fatalities. In the United Kingdom, there are 120 death cases and 3000 major 1999). A survey of 400 road workers experience conducted in 2004 showed the following (HighwayAgency, 2006): jury cases in construction industries every year (Sawacha, Naoum, & Fong, * 20% =the passing vehicles on the road construction cause some injury * 3% = experienced in fatal injuries. + 13% experienced in minor injuries. + 71% = suffered verbal violence from drivers. + 40% = having objects thrown at them by road users * 54% = experienced a near miss with a motor vehicles. Some researcher from different countries had investigate the problem to identify the solution for construction failures, for instance Taiwan (Cheng, Leu, Lin, & Fan, 2010), Scotland (Cameron, Hate, & Davies, 2008), Portugal (Macedo & Silva, 2005). As according to (Chen, Gu, & Long, 2009) that there has been an increasing concern about excavation because of its high frequency of accidents, work equipment (construction vehicle) in construction causes many death cases (Hinze & Teizer, 2011) and movement of people and vehicle is one of the & Chatterjee, 2013).In the implementation of a Risk Management System, there are three initial steps which are most concern in urban road construction (Khatoon, Tiwa Identification Risk, Risk Assessment, and Response Plan or Control as can be seen in Figure 1 (Cretu et al., 2011). Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Research Method The main method of data collection in these case studies was interviews and observation. The first respondent of this interview was the Manager of Ilealth and Safety Environment (IISE) on PT. Wijaya Karya, Mr. Bayu Budi and the second respondent was Mrs. Julia who is Manager of Health and Safety Environment (HSE) on PT. Jaya Konstruksi, The interviews were conducted using structured questions, which were divided into four parts. The first section was concemed with all types of activities that have hazard risk and what are the types of activities that are more priorities for the company. The second section was the procedure of the company to manage the hazard risk in their project. The next section was concerned with how useful their procedure and the last one was concerned with is it necessary to held the revision to their procedure. The observation was conducted when the author was Working in the project for 3 months. The author was also being the safety officer in the company for couple of week. The observation was started with safety patrol around project site on daytime and night day. This safety patrol was useful to find all types of risk that occur in this project. Then, the observation was continued with finding the document of the company that contain the Work, Health and Safety Regulation. Result Risk Management Plan PT. Wijaya Karya — Jaya Konstruksi realize that the operational activities of the company are not regardless of the various risk, risks are under control the company or risks are beyond the company’s control. Therefore, the company recognized the importance of integration and the effectiveness of Risk Management Plan, This document outlines the Risk Management Practices and Procedures of Safety, Health and Environment Plan. The plan is developed with specifics of the project included where appropriate. The company has some objectives in managing Risk of hazard: + Identify Assessing, Controlling the potential hazard and risk control are carried ‘out in order to not endanger the worker and interrupt the production, + Decreasing the probability and potential impact for the outcome of this project + Producing a high quality product, whilst also honouring all goals made, relating to ‘quality, safety and the environment Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014High level risk management is the highest priority of the company, and therefore is the main force behind the working culture at JLNT Flyover Constructions project. One of the aspects ‘ero Accident”. The of risk management which aims to encourage and award the team is “ company has own Risk Management Procedure method, they usually called HIRARC. The purpose of HIRARC Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment & Risk Control is to: * Define the management of risk process during the JLNT Flyover Construction; Provide guidan ‘management; + Maintain a high levéllof risk awareness, identification and qualification; * Define the risk response development and control plan; * Outline how the Risk Management Plan processes will be assessed. When developing the Risk Management Plan alliStakeholders of the Project have been considered and liaised With, including residents, road users) Toeal business, the genéral public and Indonesian Government. The. Risk Management Plan_aims to. provide_asystem based around/the fundamentals Of risk mariagement, Thes® include, but_are not limited to Risk Identification, Risk Assessment aiid Risk Control. Structure and Responsibilities All team imembets' at the JLND Flyover Project (intéluding office, projéct-and"field, and managerial staff), are responsible for managing risks This must be, however, within their specific levels of control, whilst-also encouraging the implementation of risk management. This may bevin/the/form 6F notifying contractors and subcontractors Of theyprocesses and procedures developed: by the company, which could. impactethe Project’as, whole. It is anticipated that through regular inductions and training Sessions, risk management will be constantly reviewed, with all stafF aware of the respective protocol. Area managers (such as Site, Construction and) Project Managers) are all responsible for ensuring that risks are assessed, documented and hindered throughout the Project. This is in the form of notifying the correct personnel of risks, having them quantified, and procedures implemented to prevent accidents from occurring. Regular meetings are held for the Area Managers, to continually update the Risk Action Plan, and recording risk mitigation strategies and action plans. This collaboration will form the Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Risk Management Committee. Representative will be appointed throughout the project, who acts as points of contact for risk communication, coordination and awareness. Further, a Risk Management Committee is required to: * Coordinating the meeting of Area Managers and the review of the Risk Action Plan and Risk Registers; * Maintain and track all processes associated to risk control information; + Identify areas where risk may not be appreciated such as external providers and sub- contractors; * Encourage risk awareness throughout the site through PreeStarts and training; * Analyse arid report to the client on regulat basis (monthly) As will be fitther discussed, regular audits will be caftied out atthe JLNT project, to ensure that all of these responsibilities are honoured, Monitoring It is prime objective 6F the\Fealth ahd Safety Manage? to continually monitor and reassess the risk management! system atJLNT Project. This is particularly important in'the areas where newesubcontractors are continually introduced and cycled, An oyerall analysis of the Risk Management Plan will be pérformed biannually, in the absence of significant:¢hanges and/or appointments to activities and procedures, An additional area to consider during this review process is the effects of the Risk Management Plan upon other planniig. Review Coinciding with the monitoring. process is the aspect of review!” During the monitoring meetings (carried out biannually), the following will be reviewed: * The rating levels (asiwill beidiscussed in the Risk Assessment) All extreme risk and gh risk must be accounted for planning and review processes * Overall risk performance during the last six month period. Criteria will include statistics relating to improvements in risk mitigation strategies. Prior to cach meeting an audit will be conducted by an independent party, to provide a systematic review and assessment of the risk management strategies, Areas requiring improvement, and those that are successful, will be noted, with the necessary changes made to the Risk Management Procedures (HIRARC) Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Risk Identification One of the most important aspects of the Risk Management Plan is the identification of risks. In this stage, the company needs a scope statement as input to know the goal and objective of this project. The main objective of risk identification is to determine which risks are likely to affect the project and documenting the characteristics for each. This can include, but is not limited to the risk, its possible cause, preventative controls, the party who is responsible, what it will affect, the likelihood and the overall impact. Resource requirements and WBS are also required to know what activities need to be conducted for this project and also who are going to involved in it. In addition, the historical information of the organization to learned how company a usually run a,6Onstruction project, The Risk Identification in this company must be reviewed periodi¢ally every six months or occurred following terms: © Any change in the company’s operations © New working methods © After an accident, incident, anid/each time found tear miss accident The risk identification'in this"ompany must be compiled and organized before conducting the activities and necessity distributed to all stakeholders. Inputs ‘As meftioned previously, when! identifying risk it_must first be defined (including the possible cause and those who will be effected),/but also consider mitigation controls. There are several-critétia to meet when determining and defining a risk, includingsa product scription, planning outputs and historical information, Researching aprodiict (incliding materials, goods, equipment, services and labour) will assist in identifying what tisks are possible. Those that have been reviewed and/or reported upon by reputable sources provide lessét risk, compared to those-that_may require innovation, invention or additional testing: Tools and Techniques There is a wide variety of risk exposures for a construction project. As outline in the previous section, there are many elements to consider in the risk identification process. However, correct tools and techniques must also be used to achieve a successful result. PT. Wijaya Karya — Jaya Konstruksi uses three methods to identification risk of hazard such as checklist, flowcharts and interviewing, Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Checklists are a thorough analysis tool to adopt when identifying risk. The source of the risk may also be found during this process, allowing for the elimination of further related risks The use of flowcharts is also quite common. In this application, a cause-and-effect diagram was used to better understand the processes involved within the project. Interviewing is a less conventional method, however successful in identifying risk. It is particularly helpful when including the thoughts and opinions of stakeholders (i cluding the general public). Often risks will not be identified in the initial stages of risk assessment; however interviewing offers a way injwhich to cover all/bases, Outputs As initially mentiOned, after a risk identified many aspects are obtained arid used to develop mitigation controls, These include} but are not limited) {0 identifying the source of a risk, further potdntial risk events;"observing) symptoms and providing further inputs to other proce ‘When identifying the Sources"@8 Outlined in the previous! Section, tater risks may also be mitigated, There are many common sourees that miay be classified, ineluding changes in the initial requirements, design errors (ahd similar issues), poor definition (including roles and responsibilities), poor estimates dnd insufficient skilled. staff, Through this pro estimate of the probability and outcome may also be assessed, Potential tisk @Vents are often those that are discrete in nature, however causifig/@/Significant impact upon the!projéct. This includes, bit is hot limited to, weather, Conditions (and its associated outcomes) and.the departure of staff’ members, Again ansestimate of the probability and outcome are simpie to assess after the initial identification process Symptoms are a relativelyjsubtle, but effective. way of identifyingiand assessing a risk. The final aspect is related to assessing risk as an. input'to another process. In this case, a risk may be classified as a constraint or assumption required for another process. a Generally, all risks will be initially assessed and classified as a particular class or level. This isk Assessment 1 majority of the risks on this project will be assessed using a quantitative risk criterion, is the interpreted to assess the final level for the risk. This will be applied to the likelihood and impact categories, whereby their values are summed to obtain the final reading, Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Essentially, this approach determines which risks warrant a particular level of preventative action or mitigation procedures. As discussed in the identification section, aspects considered prior to this assessment include the source of risk, other potential risk events, symptoms that may be observed and areas in which a risk may act as an input into another process. A probability and impact category will be both be applied. In some cases, varying impact areas will also be presented, to offer a too! which The responsible party for each risk has'also been usedyto assist in identifying which areas of the project possess the highest levels of risk, These therefore become the areas where most attention is paid, particularly during the auditing process. The parties whoshave been used in the classification inelude the following managers: Commercials,’ Construction, Quality, Project, Project Engineer, Design, Environmental, Health and:Safety, Human Resources and Stakeholder: The risk probability is againstrisk-impact to kn6w whichqualititive level the risk is. ‘The differertee of each Tevell shows a consistency and credibility. The probability describes the measure of uncertainty that a risk able to occur. In ordet to prioritize the risk, expected loss technique will be applied to ensure the optimistic, most likely and pessimistic impact of the risk (Table) The risk will be quantified based on/their rank in the matrixvand will be multiplied on another to ensure the expected loss (Table 2), The bigger the expected loss is the one that £0 be maintained critically Risk Anatvss:Liketibo dd of Risk Occuring Probability (>) ‘A__ | Almost Certain B | Likely [C [Might Occur | Unlikely E [Rare Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014‘Table 2. Rik Analysis: Consequences of Risk Occuring Tmpact (I) T No Injuries, Low Losses 2 Minor Injuries, Medium Losses 3 Working Day Loss, Substantial Losses 4 Disability, High Losses Death, Extreme High Losses, It can be measured in number of ways; for this project iS usitig low risk to extreme risk. Table 3 is defining the risk ranked on the basis of its effect on the project through the combination of probability andjimpact. This matrix will assist de jon making managerent. 1 able Oita He RK Assen Mar Probability : . ra —— A A H ah E B ™M a A E E ¢ T ™ 7 E E D T T ™ H E E T T ™ | co Extreme Risk (F) = Expected to ceeur, quite common © High Risk (H)= Will probably occur, has happened © Moderate Risk (M) = Might occur at some time © Low Risk (1) = Could occur at some time although unlikely All risk with Extreme’ Riskanid [igh Risk rate will be reviewed'daily while moderate Risk and Low Risk will be reviewed weekly. Any risk triggers that will affect the project need to be notified to the responsible person as soon as possible. The decision of risk assessment carried out in a team meeting fiom findings in the field. In addition, the risk assessment measures should specified the existing risk assessment. After knowing the impact of the risk ing the matrix, the next step is Risk Control. Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Risk Control PY. Wijaya Karya — Jaya Konstruksi always implement the integrated risk control and management policy of the company in order to able the optimal profit production, For each identified risk, a response must be identified. The probability of the risk event occurring and the impacts will be the basis for determining the degree to which the actions should be taken. The possible response options are: * Avoidance — change several aspect of the project, such as scope or objective, to avoid the risk * ‘Transference — shift the’ impiict responsibility of arisk'to a third party without climinating it * Mitigation reducing the probability or inipact of the risk which might include prototyping, adding tasks to the project schedule or adding resources * Acceptance — Simply accept that this is a risk and will accept the cost, schedule, scope. and quality impacts if its occurring The leyel of Low Risk that’ obtainéd, from risk assessment thatrix Gan be categorised to Acceptable risk, IF the risk is acceptable, itis only necessary be monitored.to the condition or the existing control. Lastly, there are tany aspects Of thelfesponse management system that Will: be adopted by PY. Wijaya Karya= Jaya Konsteuksi for the JLNT Project. These include: + Identify changesthatmay occur throuighGut the Project; * Assist imthe education of identify} quantify and respond; + Ensure risk identification is an ongoing process: + Ensure that the Ri8K Management Plan is regularly: reviewed and updated to account for any, or all, of the above: * Observe, assess and document ‘workarounds’ — where an unplanned response is implemented; * Assess and document those responses which have been planned for — where they adequate, necessary and/or does? And + Assess the Risk Register and various characteristics, particularly the risk quantification process. Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Three Main Activities in Road Construction Respondents state that all activities in road construction were necessary to be considered because they had all types of risk that can make bad influence to the project. However, respondents underlined that there are three activities that will be important or need more attention as these activities have higher risks than other activities in road construction which are excavation work, work equipment and movement of people and vehicle work. Excavation PT. Wijaya Kar ed with excavations Jaya Konstruksi identified 3 specific hazards associa are as seen on Table 4, the hazards is followed by rules & legislation in Indonesia. ‘Table s Hazard Idepttieation of Exeavation ‘tivity Activity Hazard Identification Rules & Legislation Fall of people ar vehieles Permenaker Ri intolexeavation No.Per: 01/MEN/1989 Permenaker Rl No. Per. 01/MEN/1989 Permenaker RI NoJPer. 01/MEN/1989 There ‘are two hazards was categorized into moderatcTFisk because the chanee of risk is Excavation Accident cueto disruption of utility Collapse oftthe sides of exeavation possible and their effects are minor injuries and the medium material losses (See Table 5). In addition, the high-risk level was identified in excavation activity which isthe accident due to disruption of utility’. This hazafd has possible chance and the effects are deaths and very high material 1688€8| (see Table 5), Therefore, the high risk must be gave more attention to be controlled. raat ssment of F eavanowiNer Haar ee Risk Assessment ‘Acceptance impact | Probabiityi[ Risktevel | Risk (Y/N) all of people or vehicles Fall of peopl 1 = p A N into excavation Accident due to disruption of utility 5 B H N Collapse of the sides of excavation 2 c M N Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014The control of the High Risk in excavation is ascertaining the location of utilities and securing the existing utilities during excavation process in coordination with the relevant parties. The other risk control can be seen in Table 6. Table 6, Risk Control of Excavation Activity Hazard Identification Risk Control Fall of people or vehicles 1. Providing appropriate safety sign, safety barriers and into excavation safety fence 1. Astertaining the location of utilities and securing the Accident due to disruption of utility.» existing utilities in coordination with felevant parties | Collapse ofthe side of excavation.) 4, Shoting thé wall af excavation with sheeting system (Hughes & Ferrett, 2012) recommend that the lights are also required if the excavations is also occurring in the night day because the construction of JLNT flyover constrtition is a daily construction. that works. inya full time of thé day..Moreovers (King & Hudson, 1985) recommend that the risk$ to ground wotkers of tetarlus (from special bacterium in the soil), Weil's disease (from rats’ urine) and. other biological hazards should be assessed and, where suspected, monitored by bacteriological examination of soil samples. Where risk of infection exists, Cofisideration should be given {© immunization] Grotind workers Should. belinstructed in personat hygiene and proper washing and adequate toilet facilities must be provided for them, First aid boxes with antisepties and sterile dressings-for treating wounds and abrasions should be readily availabley Moreover, thé hazard of flooding fi Excavation should bé added in HIRARC form, (King & Hudson, 1985) also believed that the risk of flooding from heavy rain, rivers, tidal waters, ground water, surface andtinderground stteamsiand other. water sources must be carefully considered, This type of hazard is important! because the project of non-toll flyover construction is a multi year’s project which is the project has 2 seasons, rain season and dry season, The accurate response plan must be taken to mitigate the hazard which is the floors of excavations should slope down to sumps at low points where drainage pump can be used (Hughes & Ferrett, 2012), Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Work Equipment In the work equipment activity, the company was focused on 4 types of work equipment which are welding, crane, grinder and painting spray. The company has identified three hazards on welding equipment and one hazard on crane, grinder and painting spray equipment (see Table 7). All types of hazard are also followed by the rules or legislation in Indonesia “Table 7 Hazard Identification of Work Equipment Activity Hazard Identification Rules & Legislation Inhalation of Welding Fumes PPINo.41 1999 Work Equipment Eye Itation PP No.4 1999 (Welding) a a Seorch | PP No.at 1999 Work Equipment | Accidents when the crane Iting Permenaker Rl Grane the heavy.material No. Pet. 01/MEN/1989 Work Equipment Exposedito Hot metal flake PermenakerR (Grinder Grave by Grinder No, Pe. 174/MEN/1986 Work Equipment inhalation of Pant Flumes Permenaker Rl (Painting Spray) [Fires due vaFlammmable material) No. Per. 174/MEN/1986 All type of hazard was assessed with quantitative risk assessment that using multiplication of Impact atid, Probability. The risk level) in work equipment/are categorised-in- Medium risk level and High risk level (see Table 8).‘Therefore, the company was not accepting all hazards and must prepared the risk controle je 3 Risk A lasment of Sr quprgehe Risk Assessment, ‘Acceptance Impact | Probability | RiskLevel_| Risk 1V/N) Hazard Identification Inhalation of Welding Fumes 2 c m N Eye lritation 2 c M N Scorch 2 c M N Recidents when the erane lifting \ccidents when the crane lifting 5 D HW N the heavy material Exposed to Hot metal flake 2 8 H N Graze by Grinder 2 c M N Inhalation of Paint Flumes 3 c H N Fires due to Flammable material 3 c H N Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014All work tools should be suitable for the purpose and location in which they are to be used, Specific needs were designed for specific tools, thus the first step in safe used is using the correct tool for the right job. In addition, the personal protective equipment is primary to prevent all risk, The various controls have been prepared by the company to control the hazard as can be seen in Table 9. Table 9, Risk Control of Work Equipment Hazard Identification Risk Control T. Gireulation Of air with enough ventilation Inholation of Weld aia 2. Welder position nat fating wind direction 3. Using standard welding maskand welding clothing ik 4. Checkjinstalation of welding cables ae 5. Provision of eye drops medicine in frst aid box 6. Using standard gloves for welding 1. Using standard procedure of bonding material on ‘Accidents when thecranesiftings._| crane the heavy material 2. Checking the condition of sling Exposed to Hat metal flake 4 Using protective chemicalciothes Grave by Grinder 2. Using safety glove inhalation of Paint Flumes 4, Using standard safety of mask |___ Fires due to Flammable material 2. Restriction of smoking area Movement of People and Vehicles The hazards of Working with movement of people and vehicle on cofistruction site are numerous but PT. Wifaya-Katya= Jaya Konstruksi identified'thtee hazards in movement of people and Véhiel activity (s¢ ‘Table 10). The types of hazards are also followed by the rules and legislation inindonésia Fable 10 Ha7srddeutidation of Movdevens Reopteand Vehicles Activity Hazard Identification Rules & Legistation | Hit by movement vehicles Permenaker (Ht 2006 no.7 Movement of People and Vehicles ‘Accidents due to Dump Truck Driver Permenaker Rl error No. Per. 03/MEN/1989 Traffic congestion due to the Permenaker Rl No. Per. movement of heavy vehicle 17ayMen/1986 Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014All type of hazard was assessed with quantitative risk assessment that using multiplication of Impact and Probability. The risk level in movement of people and vehicles activity are categorised in Medium risk level, High risk level and Extreme High risk level (see Table 11), ‘The company must give more attention to the Extreme High risk level, because this hazard is quite common and expected to occur. Table 11. Risk Assessment of Movement People and Vehicles Hazard Wdentification Risk Assessment Acceptance Impacts Probability | Risk Level _|_Risk (Y/N) Hit by mavementt vehicles 3 D M N ‘Accidents du iver idents due te Dump Truck Dr 3 r t N Error Traffic congestion due to the 3 c 4 N movement of heavy vehicle The vatious controls have|been preparéd by PP, Wijaya Karya Jaya Konstruksi (oj control the all typesiof hazards as can be'séen in Table 12. Table 12. Rig ontrot af MiBbement Peofpand Vehicles Hazard Identification Risk Control 1. Traffic Management in coordination with relevantparties 2, Providing aparopriate safety sign Hit by movement vehicles! |B. Trafffe cone, safety barriers and MCB{Movement Concrete Barriers) 4. Personal Protective Equipments ‘Accidents due to Dump Truck Driver 1. Driver with Licence Error 2. Driver in healthy condition Traffic congestion due tothe | 1. Adequate traffic signage movement of heavy vehicle _| 2. Flagman with PPE Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Conclusion In conclusion, there are three main activities in road construction that need more attention which are excavation work, work equipment and movement of people and vehicle work. These activities have more important than other activities because the risk of these three main activities were highest in road construction, In order to prevent the high risk of three main activities, PT. Wijaya Karya — Jaya Konstruksi has their own Risk Management Procedures that called HIRARC (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment & Risk Control). Moreover, PT. Wijaya Karya — Jaya Konstfuksi.form a forum or risk management team which provides consideration im deision-making, in order ‘6yhandle the new job that has not been done by the company in advance and all activities conducted in all work units. The company uses thé forum of Risk Management Plant to brainstorming the idea of hazard identifi tion) With a product description, planning outputs and historical information. ‘The Forum also discussed the Risk Assessment with consider the multiplication of probability and the impaét of Risk, The d& result of Multipl jon of probability and iipact are discuss in this meeting. ‘The Ther all hazard identification are also diseussed in this’ meeting tofind the right control of ion will be assessed with quantitative risk mate Risk controls of response, This Risk Management procedureior HIRARG was really effective because this procedure is the implementation of Occupational Health,and Safety theory which is the planning and organization of;all works to be performed by recognizing and identifying all high risk activities, preparing preventive aétions in ordéFito reduce the potential risk of accidents. The effectiveness of Risk Management procedure of PT. Wijaya Karya —Jaya Konstruksi was proven with 6 accident/or zero accident that occur in this'project, Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014References Abrams, H. K. (2001). A Short History of Occupational Health, Journal of Public Health Policy, 22(1), 34-80. doi: 10.2307/3343553 Byung, Y. J. (1998). Occupational deaths and injuries in the construction industry. Applied Ergonomics, 29(5), 355-360. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(97)00077-X Cameron, I., Hare, B., & Davies, R. (2008). Fatal and major construction accidents: A. comparison between Scotland and the rest of Great Britain. Safety Science, 46(4), 692-708. doi: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1016/ ssci.2007.06.007 Camino Lépez, M. A., Ritzel, D. O., Fontanteda, Iiy& Gonzalez. Alcantara, O. J. (2008). Construction industry accidents in Spain. Journall of Safety Research, 39(5), 497-507 doi: http://dx.doi o#@/10. 016M. ist 2008,07.006 Chen, L., Gu, X., & Long, X, (2009). Safety assessment of excavation with fault tree analysis. Georisk Assessinent and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 3(3), 126-133. doi: 10.1080/17499510902896620 Cheng, C.-W., Leu, SiS., Lin, GaGa, & Fan, C. 2010). Characteristic analysis of ‘occupational accidents at smal! construction enterprises. Safety Science, 45(6), 698- 707. doi: Wtp 74S. doi.org/10.10 1644 8S6i.20.0.02.001 Cretu, ©, Stewart, R_Bg& Berends, T2011). Risk Management for Design and Construction, Chichester: Wiley Highway Agency. (2006). "Roadworkers' Safety Focus Group Report.". Retrieved 23 April, 2014, from, fuipilivww highways. edv.uk/knowledgeddotuments/Roadworkers Safety Report Ph ase-One_Binal pdf Hinze, J. W,, & Teizer, Jo@Q011): Visibility lated fatalities telated:to construction equipment. Safety Sciencé) 49(5), 709-718. doi: htp:/idxsdaizorg/t0,LO 161i. ssei 201101007 Hughes, P., & Perrett, E, (2012), Introduction to Health and Safety in Construction Retrieved from http:#QU Leblib.dom au patron uRecord aspx")p=1024614 Jannadi, O. A., & Bu-KhamsinyM, 8. (2002). Safety factors considered by industrial contractors in Saudi Arabia. Building ad Environment, 37(5), 5392547. doi: http://dx.doi.ong/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00056-7 Khatoon, M., Tiwari, G., & Chatterjee, N. (2013). Impact of grade separator on pedestrian risk taking behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 861-870. Macedo, A. C., & Silva, I. L. (2005). Analysis of occupational accidents in Portugal between 1992 and 2001. Safety Science, 43(56), 269-286. doi http:/idx.doi.org/10.1016/).ssei.2005.06.004 Evaluation of..., Reno Bayuaji Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., & Fong, D. (1999). Factors affecting safety performance on. construction sites. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 309-315. d 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00042-8 Evaluation of... Reno Bayuali Kusprayogo, FT Ul, 2014