II.

DISCUSSION
A. Strengths

The 1st Journal The 2nd Journal

No (Use of Visual Arts in Facilitating (The Impact of Visual Arts in Students’
the Speaking Skills of Students) Academic Performance)
1 The journal has realy good content, The identity of the article mentioned clearly
and has the topic that interested to and completesuch as the title or name of the
discuss article, the author, publisher, andyear of
publication.
2 The abstract from both journal can cover all the information of the journal, it will
make the reader easily to get the point before they are going to read the whole journal.
3 The journal explains the material in The way the author interpreting the content
depth and detail in each chapter, and is very good and not monotonous, every
the discussion is interrelated with each topic is related each other which is it can
other and explain step by step, make the reader easily understand the main
sometimes the explanations are point of the topicand the content explained
followed by figure that will help step by step and detail in each variable, and
readers better understand with the also put the clear statements, so we as the
explanation and the materials. reader can get the point easily.
4 The data that has been provided is very accurate interpreted structurally. Last, the
important point is, the journal has explained to the readers what is actually the
objective of the journal itself and the objective already answered the problem of the
study with a good finding and result.
5 This journal provide many theoris to There are so many useful theories and the
emphasize the result and finding and theory is realy update to emphasize the
provide many referencess of the article result and finding, and so many referencies
in the end of the pages in the end of the article.
B. Weaknesses

No The 1st Journal The 2nd Journal

1 The identity of the journal not clear,
they not provide the city of publisher
and the appeacancee look monotonous
2 There are still wrong pantuation in the
sentences.
For the appearance, the article seems quite
monotonous.
There are some terms or words used is
quite difficult to understand and it’s like a
high order thinking skill

3. Both jurnal not provide the glossary in the end of the