Melk 8 sae andiorant
fen one 4S SOS Dre eSt8
Fonteingatens 0%
aN nek
a olongres
| bey
E 2
$y
EOI TERRA
.-———_
4+ East of GreenwiclTHE CONGRESS OF VIENNA
A study in Allted Unity: 1812-1822
»
HAROLD NICOLSON
“Nothing appears of shape to indicate
‘Vhat cognisance has marshalled things tetrene,
Or will (such 1s my thinking) 1 my span
Rather they show that, lke a knitter droused
‘Whose fingets play 1n’slalled unmiadfulness,
‘The Wall has woven with an absent heed
Since lee frst was, and ever will so weave’
Tuowas Harpy, The Dynasts
‘elistoric sense forbids us to padge results by
mottve, or 1eal consequences by the ideals and
intentions of the actor who produced them ”
‘Viscount Mortey
LONDON
CONSTABLE & CO LTDfirst published 1946
The quotation from Thomas Hardy on the
title-page 1 made wish the kind permission
of Mess1s Macmillan & Co LidTHIS BOOK IS DEDICATED
TO
ANTHONY EDENCONTENTS
n
nr
wv
Vv
vir
x
xr
Aan.
-xur
/
Saw
t
esa
ye
INTRODUCTORY NOTE - > - = ==
THE RETREAT FROM MOSCOW (OCTOBER 18-DECEMBER
Heo 6 8 Be |
“THR REVIVAL OF PRUSSIA’ (1812-1813)- =~
‘YE INTERVENTION OF AUSTRIA (JUNE 1-AUGUSY 12,
yy 6 68 6 eee ee
HE FRANKFURT PROPOSALS (NOVEMBER-DECEMBER
Bey
HR ADVENT OF CASTLEREAGH (JANUARY-MARCH
1 ee
THE TIRST PEACE OF PARIS (MAY 30, 1814) =~
LONBON INTERLUDE (JUNE 1814) - =
‘THE CONGRESS ASSEMBLES (SEPrEMDER 1814) = -
THE PROBLEM OF PROCEDURE (OCTOBER 1814) -
XHE APPROACH 0 THE POLISH PROBLEM (OCTOBER
18t) eF-F=E
THE POLISH NEGOTIATIONS (SEPITMBER 1814—FEB-
RUARY 1815) - - - : 2 - :
THE ITALIAN AND GERMAN SETTLEMENTS (FEBRUARY—
MARCH 1815) ~ - - - - - -
GENERAL QUESTIONS (FEBRUARY-MARCH 1815) - -
‘THE SECOND PEACE OF PARIS (MARCH-NOVEMBER 1815)
‘THE HOLY ALLIANCE (SEPTEMBER 26, 1815) ~~
SHE FAILURE OF THE CONFERENCE SYSTEM (1818-1822)
: mw
1
30
ror
118
134
164
182
201
2ar
242,
259Aw NS
ey ae
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
HE CONGRESS OF VIENNA - = =~ Fromtisprece
ALEXANDER T, EMPEROR OF RUSSIA - - — Faacg page 10
EDERICK WILLIAM 111, KING OF PRUSSIA = = 20
FRANCIS I, EMPEROR OF AUSTRIA = - - - - 36
PRINCE METTERNICH = - = += == 42
VISCOUNT CASTLEREAGH - - - - - - 126
PRINCE VON HARDENBERG Se rrrts—SCi
COUNT NESSELRODE == = 2g
(All but the first of these portraits were painted by Sir
Thomas Lawrence at the request of the Prince Regent
They now hang in the Waterloo Gallery at Windsor
Castle and ate reproduced by gracious permission of
His Majesty the King )INTRODUCTION xi
warn us that the Zestgessi also 1s subject to invisible muta-
tions and delays How came it that the younger geneiation
in Germany, who at the time of the ‘Tugendbund and the
War of Liberation, displayed so resurgent a spirit, should
have been snuffed out so lastingly by the Carlsbad Decrees?
How came it that the partisan movement in Spain, which
had manufested such heroic activity during the French in-
vasion should thereafter have so surprisingly declined? How
came it that the Italian Resorgemento, which seemed so im-
muinent in the days of Murat and Lord William Bentinck,
should have been so long deferred? How came st that the
general rising so confidently predicted in 1820 should have
been postponed till 1848? These questions ate not answeted
by ascribing the pause which ensued to the ingenuity of
Metternich or the potency of the Holy Alliance ‘They can be
explained only by the hidden interplay of challenges and te-
sponses, of enetgy and exhaustion, of enthusiasm and
apathy, of youth and middle age
‘Tam left with the impression’, wrote Gentz after attend-
ing all the Conferences of his time, ‘that nobody 1s ever quite
sight all through’ If he was referring to the accuracy of
human prediction, then I agree with his conclusion But if he
was referring to the efficacy of moral principles, then I refuse
to subscribe to so defeatist a doctrine I belteve in fact that
certain principles are absolute and must im the end prevail
But I admit that their functioning 1s obscute, that no single
interpretation of the combinations of citcumstance can ever
be a valid interpretation, and that if history can teach us
anything it can teach us the folly of prophecy and the
wisdom of patience
HN.
SissinGHuRsT,
September 1, 1945I
THE RETREAT FROM MOSCOW
[October 18-December 18, 1812]
‘The 2gth Bulletin—Napoleon abandons his army and reruns to Panis—His journey
‘with Caulancoust through East Prussia and Poland—His arrival in Dresden—
He reaches the Twleries at midnight on December 18—The Russian campaign
mught have proved decisive—What would have happened sf a Cossack patrol
hhad noticed the ford at Studtenksa?—If the Tsar had captured Napoleon, what
sort of peace would ave been made?—Estumate of the character and educa-
tion of Alexander I—The influence of La Harpe—His weakness 2s Commander
sn Chief during the 1812 campaign —His consequent loss of populanity—Eifect
Of these circumstances upon his subsequent policy and action—The balance of
power as it existed in December 1812
(2)
‘Tue 2oth Bulletin was issued from Molodetchno on Decem-
ber 3, 1812 In st Napoleon confessed that ‘an atrocious
calamity’ had befallen the Grande Armée and that his Rus-
sian campaign had ended tn disaster The Bulletin reached
Paris on Decembet 16 and was published on the following
motning (1) + Foreseeing the dismay which this news would
occasion tn France, Napoleon decided to leave the front and
to return to his capital with all speed Only his personal
ptesence in the Tuileties could allay the consternation
which the Bulletin was certain to provoke At Smogorni, on
the mght of December 5, he abandoned his army and took
the road to the west. He reached Paris at midnight on
December 18
The details of that secret journey have been preserved 1n
the memoirs of Caulaincoutt, Duc de Vicence (2) In alll the
library of Napoleonic literatute thete are few passages which
illustrate so forcibly the dominance which Napoleon’s
genius, insensitiveness and egoism exercised upon the minds
and hearts of those who served him Caulamcoutt had no
cause to love or trust his pitiless master He can have had
4 See ‘Notes to the Several Chapters’ at end of book, p 278,
12 THE CONGRESS OF VIENNA [r812
little doubt that Napoleon had sought deliberately to im-
plicate him in the murder of the Duc d’Enghien tn 1804
Although innocent of anything worse than the violation of
the neutiality of Baden, the stigma of this incident weighed
upon Caulaincourt throughout his honourable life Thete 1s
no doubt eithet that Napoleon, in selfish mischief, destroyed
Caulaincou1t’s domestic happiness by foi bidding his mariage
to Madame de Canisy for ten long years, only at Fontaine-
bleau 1n 1814, when he had already signed his abdication, did
Napoleon accord the consent which he was then powerless
to withhold, with superb devotion, Caulaincouit kissed the
hand of his fallen mastei tn gratitude for this empty boon
For ten long years had Caulaincourt endured the per-
versity of Napoleon’s temperament Having been Ambas-
sador to Russia, having enjoyed the intimacy of the Tsar
Alexander I (3), Caulaincourt was fully aware of Russian poli-
tical and social conditions, of the menace of the Russian
climate, and of the strain of obstinacy which flowed like
some dark current beneath the gentle stpples of the Tsat’s
desire to please (4) Again and again had he warned Napol-
eon against the dangers of a Russian campaign ‘You have
no knowledge of such things,’ his master barked at him,
‘you have no judgment 1n political affairs You are mote
Russian than you ate I'tench, you have been mesmerised by
Alexander’s charm A single victory, and the Tsar will come
cteeping towards me as he did at Tulsit The great land-
owners will tise against him, I shall emancipate the serfs’
‘Thus did he reject all warnings And when they entered the
Kremlin, and found the clocks there still ticking quietly in
the saloons, Napoleon turned m scorn upon his Master
of the Hotse ‘Well, My Lord Duke, what about this
Russian climate of yours? It is mild as a September day at
Fontainebleau’ Caulaincourt bowed his head in silent
apprehension
Then followed the horiots of the retreat, the muacle of
the Beresina The corpses of those who during the advance
had fallen at Borodino or outside Smolensk still littered the1812] THE RETREAL FROM MOSCOW 3
fields beside the roadway—hummocked now by snow, hav-
ing the appearance in the dim light ‘of vast flocks of sheep’
From time to time Napoleon would leave his carriage and
ease his numbed limbs by stamping along the frozen track,
a staff cut from a larch tree in his hand The tattered
stragglers from his atmy would stop and stare at his passage
and then drop dead beside him on the road Then followed
Smogornt and the intimate ditve across an uncertain Rurope
from Russia tnto Fiance :
Caulaincourt tiavelled under his own name as Duc de
Vicence Napoleon appeared upon their passports as his
secietary, under the name of Monsieur de Rayneval The
Empetor’s travelling carriage proved too heavy for the
snow-bound road and the horses shpped and struggled on
the ice On reaching Kowno Caulaincourt discovered an old
covered sledge—a mere box on runners which had once
been painted 1ed They abandoned the comfort of the
travelling carriage, they abandoned the luggage, even Rus-
tam the mameluke and the Empetot’s dressing case were
left behind Unshaven and alone they puisued their journey
day and night across the snow At Tilsit they entered Pxus-
sian territory and the Emperor became afraid lest he might
be recognised and serzed, he cowered back into the recesses
of the sleigh, pulling his fur cap down upon his eyes,
muffling himself in the great green velvet bear-skin which he
wore They cut across East Prussia into Poland and on
December 10 they reached the Hotel d’Angleterre at
Warsaw The Abbé de Pradt, the French Ambassador, was
summoned to the hotel sittimg-room and upon him the
Emperor discharged for a few hours the vials of his accumu-
lated wrath ‘The Abbe de Pradt was one of those men who
even at the best of times was apt to ruffle Napoleon’s nerves
“He was extremely addicted’, remarked the Emperor to Sur
Neil Campbell when at Elba, ‘to descanting upon military
subjects, which 1s very disgusting to mulitary men’ The
interview in the parlout of the Hotel d’Angletetre was
thunderous, the Abbé de Pradt retired to his Embassy out-4 THE CONGRESS OF VIENNA [812
raged and bewildered, he thereafter revenged himself upon
hus master by conspiting with M de Talleyrand
On again they drove through the night towards Germany
and the Rhine Napoleon’s spirits revived as soon as the
Prussian danger had been left behind them His tear guard
under Mutat would make a stand at Vilna, he would collect
another aimy and rejoin them in the spring And what would
have happened to them had they been seized by the peasants
or the Tugendbund in East Prussia? Would they have been
handed over to the English? Would they have been exposed
in wicker cages for the delectation of the London crowd?
The picture of Caulaincourt, so dignified always and so
austere, in such a position aroused Napoleon’s sense of farce
He flung himself back in the hard and draughty sledge and
laughed vulgarly He stretched out his hand 1n order, as was
his wont, to tweak the lobe of Caulaincourt’s ear But the
Master of the Horse had swathed his face in bandages, the
Emperor ceased from rummaging and tapped him amicably
upon the nape of the neck,
During all those days and mights Napoleon talked and
talked Feverishly he talked about his former gloites and his
future plans Three hundred and thirty thousand men of the
Grande Armée lay hummocked in snow upon the plains of
Russia, but he talked only of further armies, further cam-
paigns, and further victories His voice at times was almost
jubilant, at other moments it would tse or fall into the
scteam or snarl of hatred One name alone (since as a tule
he was mild about his enemies) would rouse these parox-
ysms of rancour That name was England, The insatiable
enemy, who had defied him all these years, who had defied
him even when she stood alone ‘England! England! England?
—as the postillions lashed their tottering horses and the
great red box slid and lurched actoss the snow
(2)
At midnight on December 13, 1812, they reached Dres-
den. It was here, scarcely more than six months before, that1812] THE RETREAT FROM MOSCOW 5
he had celebrated in full pomp the apogee of his renown,
and had appeared as Charlemagne among the tributary
Princes of Central Europe He had gone there ‘with all the
display and apparatus of an Eastern potentate’ in order to
imptess upon his satellites the magnitude of his power and
the splendour of his pre-eminence (5), Duting those weeks
of May the roads which led from France to Saxony had been
thronged with long lines of vans and carriages bringing to
Dresden the chamberlains and the maids of honour, the
equerries and the pages, the silks, the velvets and tapestries,
the gold plate and diamonds, the cooks and footmen, of the
Court of France The tulers of Germany and Austria flocked
to do him homage On the night of May 15 he attived in
Dresden and established his household 1n the palace of the
King of Saxony His lords in wating, the ladies who formed
the suite of Marie Louise, bore the oldest names in France
Turenne, Noailles, Montesquiou The strictest etiquette was
preserved At 9 am he held his own levée at which were
present the princes of Germany; at ro am came the
levée of the Empress which he himself attended with the
officers of State Then followed a solemn mass in the chapel
of the palace and in the evening came a ceremonial banquet
‘The officers of the Impetial household would gather in the
throne-room and two of the Lords Chamberlain would
stand at the entrance to announce in loud tones the styles
and titles of the guests These formal entrances were planned.
by Napoleon upon a rigid and ascending scale and with pre-
cise tegard for dramatic effect. First came the Ministers and
Ambassadors each tesonantly introduced, they were suc-
ceeded by the minor royalties, the Duke of Weimar, the
Duke of Coburg, the Duke of Mecklenburg, the Grand
Duke of Wurzburg After a short pause the Queen of West-
phalia was announced ‘Their Majesties, the King and
Queen of Saxony’—the Chamberlain shouted, and Fred-
erick Augustus with Queen Marta, abashed and benevolent,
would enter their own drawing-room ‘His Majesty the
King of Prussia’—the Chamberlain called, and into the 1oom6 THE CONGRESS OF VIENNA [x81
hesitated the hapless widower figure of Fredetick Willtam TI
looking like a bewildered major in some minor iegiment.
“Theit Imperial and Apostolic Majesties the Empeto1 and
Empress of Austtia, King and Queen of Hungary’—and
Fiancis the First entered giving his atm to bis young and
ailing wife ‘Hei Impettal Majesty the Empress of the
French, Queen of Italy,’ and Marie Louise, followed by her
ladies and diaped in diamonds, swept gitlishly into the
1oom