Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Exudates
Baltimore, Maryland
In this prospective study of 150 pleural effusions, the A pleural-fluid protein level of 3.0 g/100 ml is
utility of pleural-fluid cell counts, protein levels, and frequently used to separate transudates from exu-
lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels for the separation dates; however, this dividing line has consistently
of transudates from exudates was evaluated. According led to the misclassification of many effusions. Carr
to preset diagnostic criteria, 47 of the effusions were and Power (4) found that 8% of their exudates and
classified as transudates and 103 as exudates. Three 15% of their transudates were misclassified by this
characteristics were found, each of which was criterion. Recently, Chandrasekhar and colleagues
associated with over 7 0 % of the exudates and, at (5) have proposed that the absolute level of the
most, one of the transudates: [1] a pleural fluid-to-
pleural-fluid lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) can sepa-
serum protein ratio greater than 0.5; [2] a pleural
rate transudates from exudates more effectively than
fluid LDH greater than 200 IU; and [3] a pleural fluid-
the pleural-fluid protein level. The purpose of the
to-serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6. Moreover, all but
present study is to compare the utility of the pleural-
one exudate had at least one of these three
fluid protein level, the pleural-fluid LDH level, and
characteristics, whereas only one transudate had any
of the three. The simultaneous use of both the pleural-
the pleural-fluid cell counts for the separation of
fluid protein and LDH levels better differentiates transudates from exudates.
transudates from exudates than does the use of
Patients and Methods
either of these values individually.
One hundred and fifty pleural fluids from 150 differ-
ent patients from the medical wards of The Johns
Hopkins Hospital and The Good Samaritan Hospital
were studied prospectively, between 1 April 1970 and
PLEURAL EFFUSIONS are classically divided into 1 October 1971. The following precise criteria were
"transudates" and "exudates" (1). A transudate oc- established before beginning the study, to place the pa-
curs when the mechanical factors influencing the tients in various diagnostic categories.
The diagnosis of malignant effusion required that
formation or reabsorption of pleural fluid are altered. malignant tissue in the pleural cavity be shown by pleu-
Increased plasma osmotic pressure or elevated sys- ral biopsy, cytopathology, or autopsy. When a pleural
temic or pulmonary hydrostatic pressure are altera- effusion in a patient with proved malignancy was be-
tions that produce transudates (2). The pleural sur- lieved to be caused by the tumor but could not be docu-
faces are thought not to be involved by the primary mented in these ways, it was excluded from the series.
pathologic process (3). In contrast, an exudate re- The diagnosis of congestive heart: failure as the cause
sults from inflammation or other disease of the pleu- of the pleural effusion required that all four of the
following criteria be satisfied: [1] an enlarged heart; [2]
ral surface, such as occurs in tuberculosis, pneumonia
an elevated central venous pressure or distended neck
with effusion, malignancy, pancreatitis, pulmonary veins and pitting edema or ventricular cardiac gallop;
infarction, or systemic lupus erythematosus. [3] the absence of pulmonary infiltrates, purulent spu-
• From the Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University
tum, thrombophlebitis, and pleuritic chest pain; and [4]
School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. clearing of the effusion in response to a therapeutic
Annals of Internal Medicine 77:507-513, 1972 507
Discussion
In the evaluation of a pleural effusion, its classifica-
tion as either a transudate or an exudate is the first
diagnostic step. If an exudative effusion is present,
further diagnostic procedures are imperative, such as
cytopathology, pleural biopsy, and sometimes even
Figure 2. Ratios of pleural-fluid protein to serum protein. See
thoracotomy, so that a definitive diagnosis can be
Figure 1 legend for explanation of abbreviations. made and specific therapy for the pleural disease may
Light et a/. • Pleural Effusions 509
be instituted. On the other hand, if the fluid is clearly be used to separate transudates from exudates. In a
a transudate, one need not worry about therapeutic subsequent publication Carr and Power (4) reported
maneuvers directed at the pleura and need treat only that only 16% of effusions secondary to congestive
the congestive heart failure, nephrosis, cirrhosis, or heart failure had proteins of more than 3.0 g/100 ml
hypoproteinemia. and that only 7.'2% of 167 fluids caused by malig-
In the past, transudates were separated from exu- nancy and none of 20 tuberculous fluids had protein
dates by the specific gravity, the cell count, and the levels of less than 3.0 g/100 ml.
presence or absence of clotting of the fluid (1). It Our findings concerning the separation of tran-
was soon found, however, that it was often difficult sudates from exudates by the use of protein measure-
to classify a given fluid. Paddock (1) in a retrospec- ments are in general agreement with those reported
tive review of 863 pleural effusions, in which no previously. The use of a pleural-fluid protein level of
criteria for the various diagnoses were recorded, 3.0 g for separation of transudates from exudates re-
found that 10% of 350 effusions secondary to con- sulted in erroneous classification of 8% of the tran-
gestive heart failure, cirrhosis, or nephrosis had spe- sudates and 11% of the exudates. Moreover, 19%
cific gravities greater than 1.016, whereas 10% of of the malignancies were misclassified. A dividing line
the effusions secondary to tuberculosis and more than based on a pleural fluid-to-serum protein ratio of 0.5
40% of those caused by malignancy had specific yielded a somewhat better separation than the pro-
gravities of less than 1.016. He found that the pleu- tein level of 3.0 g, and only one of the transudates
ral-fluid protein level was no more helpful than the was incorrectly placed. But 10% of the exudates
specific gravity in differentiating transudates from were still misclassified. There is no reason to believe
exudates. that measurements of specific gravity would better
Luetscher (7) found that it was impossible to draw separate transudates from exudates, since their use-
any dividing line between exudates and transudates, fulness is apparently related to their correlation with
from the total-protein content, without encountering protein count. The specific gravity is probably less
frequent exceptions. He suggested that the ratio of helpful than the protein concentration because it is
the pleural-fluid protein to the serum protein was measured with the commonly available hydrometer,
more discriminating than was any protein concentra- which gives unreliable results (9).
tion but that some exceptions still occurred. It might be presumed that any pleural fluid that
Leuallen and Carr (8) reported that 28.1% of 32 appears bloody would be an exudate, although some
pleural effusions caused by congestive heart failure exudates might be serous. The present study shows
had a specific gravity of 1.016 or more and that 27% that this is not true, since 15% of the transudates had
of 137 fluids caused by neoplasm or tuberculosis red cell counts greater than 10 000/mm3. These re-
had specific gravities of less than 1.016. They sug- sults are very similar to those reported by previous
gested that the protein level of the fluid might better authors. Paddock (1) found that 12% of transudates
510 October 1972 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 77 • Number 4
conditions of the pleura. Chandresekhar and his failure. Meyer (19) has observed that more than
associates (5) more recently concluded that the 40% of patients with pleural metastases do not have
absolute level of pleural-fluid LDH served better an associated pleural effusion at autopsy. A tran-
than the protein level in differentiating exudates from sudative pleural effusion in such a case could con-
transudates; this conclusion contrasts with our re- tain malignant cells. The "transudate" placed in the
sults, which show (Figure 6) that the use of the pro- exudative category by two different characteristics
tein ratio is better than either the absolute LDH or was from a patient who definitely had congestive
the LDH ratio for separating transudates from heart failure but who quite possibly also had pul-
exudates. Although red blood cells contain a large monary emboli.
amount of LDH, there was no correlation between A single chemical test or a set of chemical tests is
the pleural-fluid LDH level and the red blood cell rarely 100% effective in separating two populations,
count, making it unlikely that hemolysis contributed but increasing the number of tests results in a more
significantly to the elevated LDH in exudates. reliable separation. For the separation of pleural
In Figure 6 it is seen that either a pleural fluid-to- transudates from pleural exudates, the simultaneous
serum protein ratio greater than 0.5 or a pleural- use of the protein and the LDH levels is more effec-
fluid LDH level greater than 200 IU, or a pleural tive than the use of either one by itself. The presence
fluid-to-serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6 mis- of any one of the following three characteristics in-
classified more than 10% of the exudates but only dicates that a fluid is an exudate: [1] a pleural fluid-
one of the transudates. Since any of these three to-serum protein ratio greater than 0.5; [2] a pleural-
characteristics was associated with a misclassification fluid LDH level greater than 200 IU; or [3] a pleural
of only one transudate, it is reasonable to question fluid-to-serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6.
whether the same exudates were misclassified by the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Supported in part by training grant
individual variables. Figure 6 shows that, in fact, 1T12HE05885 from the National Heart and Lung Institute,
each of the characteristics misclassifies different exu- Bethesda, Md. Dr. Light is a Special Research Fellow supported
by grant LF03HE51315-01, U.S. Public Health Service, Wash-
dates. Fewer exudates were misclassified with any ington, D.C.
pair of characteristics than with any one characteristic Received 24 April 1972; revision accepted 26 June 1972.
by itself. Moreover, when all three variables were • Requests for reprints should be addressed to Wilmot C.
used simultaneously, the chance of misclassification Ball, Jr., M.D., The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 N. Broadway,
Baltimore, Md. 21205.
became exceedingly small. Only one of the exudates
and one of the transudates were classified incorrectly. References
Both of the misclassified effusions quite possibly 1. PADDOCK FK: The diagnostic significance of serous fluids in
were placed in the wrong category by the preset disease. N Engl J Med 223:1010-1015, 1940
2. AGOSTONI E r TAGLIETTI A, SETNIKAR I: Absorption force of
criteria. Although the pleural fluid of the mis- the capillaries of the visceral pleura in determination of the
classified "exudate" contained malignant cells, the intrapleural pressure. Am J Physiol 191:277-282, 1957
3. STEAD WW, SPROUL JM: Pleural effusions. DM July: 1-48,
cause of the effusion appeared to be congestive heart 1964
512 October 1972 • Annals of Internal Medicine • Volume 77 • Number 4