Professional Documents
Culture Documents
!
"
#
$
%!
IFRS affects US businesses in multiple ways
&
'(
"
What companies can and should do now
October 2011
The heart of the matter
within the next
H'H( +'',)=
" *
!
"
) ((
(
"#
!
;=?
=
"
)
( !
>
!#
"
"
)>
*
" (
"
"
*( *
"
)
)>;=
*
"
=(<
(
)'
(# (
"
;=?
( "
*
(
188A
"
"
) (
potential use of IFRS by US domestic
N( (
! /
) (;=
1898(;== $
<
"
;=
"
!
application of IFRS outside the United
)
* (
(
!
(
>
"
(
"!
( (
"
" /
;<
implications
+,
>! ("
+'',
)>
"
Customers Adoption
and vendors Manage non-US sub-
Know how IFRS sidiaries’ ongoing
influences non-US adoption of IFRS
counterparties’
negotiation
biases
M&A Cost
es
No
n-
US
bs
shared services
co
idi
US
ari
n-
es
No
Contracts System
Consider how ▲ upgrades
IFRS affects Convergence Anticipate IFRS impact
the structure of long- on new companywide
term contracts and and subsidiary
financial IT systems
agreements Income tax US
strategies reporting
Prepare for the effect Plan for business
of IFRS on tax rate implications driven by
and cash flow accounting changes
An in-depth discussion 5
$
*
"
(*
" "
O
"
)'*
O X"
<
!
< O")
!
)<
(
"
"
$
#
"
"*!
(!
)
)'
(
=#
(
multinational companies should
*
!
(
" !" )
'
"
)
"
""
) ("
*
'
( < >
decision typically cannot be undone (
(
"
) #
(
((
(
)
( " ? D
(
!
< ?>"
(
!
!
#
< O
"
"
) +'',
(
!" !
T
"V
) "
)
"
Leases (b)
FASB—investment properties
(a) Although the FASB has not yet reached a decision about re-exposure, we expect that the FASB will issue an exposure draft on classification
& measurement and impairment in Q4 2011, with a final standard expected in 2012. The IASB expects to finalize its project on hedging by
Q4 2011, but the FASB’s timing is expected to be later (2013).
(b) The boards decided to re-expose revenue and leasing. Final standards are expected in the second half of 2012.
(c) The FASB is working with the IASB to converge and improve US GAAP in the insurance contracts project. Re-exposure is expected, with a
final standard possible in 2012.
(d) The IASB issued its final consolidation standard in Q2 2011. The FASB plans to issue in September 2011 an ED with limited amendments
to FAS 167 (ASU 2010-10). Discussions continue on the investment companies topic with the FASB to issue an ED in Q3 2011 (the IASB ED
was issued in August 2011).
(e) These projects have been delayed until the boards have further capacity.
An in-depth discussion 7
(! '<
!
"
Q (
(
/
/)D 1899(
(
)
"
!
O*
!
/ <
) *
!!"
"* >
((
!
! ( !
"#
)= ! )
(
(
Z>
>
!
"+'',
"
estimates of uncollectible amounts
"
"
!
! ( )
*)'H?
)M
"/ )
(
"
(
" )
" -
4
) =#
(
+
"
)'
/( <!
""
"(
" !
"*
<
) /
"
!
'
/
<!
!
)=
(
<
(
/
)
# *
+'',
!"
!
)><
""
[
\9(
*
"),!
1899("/(" '
"
!
effect and if IFRS is adopted in the
" !
<
)/ ( )'
)
An in-depth discussion 9
&
'
&
>
" /
(!
)
(
/ *
M
*
)
(;=!
" )>
"
(
(
<
"
"" !
(
(" !
)H
*
)
(
! planning.
*
""
"
=
! !
/ "
)
)
"
H
O " ( (<(
^ $ " ! (
!
(
?
( (
!"
((*
'
+'',
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
>
"
>1899
+'',Q
(
Z
!
"
q9z!A8(Disclosure about an Employer’s Participation
in a Multiemployer Plan
"(
"
! ^ , , '"
='
$;)
>
"
*
!
^ [ 'HQ'H;<
D(Leasing
+'',
[
\9(1899)>
"
(
"
(
)
'$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
About this publication
Derivatives and hedging
^ 'H'
_)1899!8\(Transfers and ^ 'H,
'
(Accounting
Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for
Repurchase Agreements Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Liabilities—taxes
Business combinations
^ 'H''91(Deferred Tax: Recovery of
^ 'H'
_)1898!1A(When to
Underlying Assets
%
+ %
! - .
4
%
*
Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts
Liabilities—other
^ 'H,
'
(4
* -
^ 'H''9`(
for Impairment
^ 'H'
_)1898!1q(Fees Paid to
! " #
$ !
%
Other accounting and reporting topics
^ 'H;<
D(Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37, and ^ 'H'
_)1899!8z(Presentation
M* D(|(Liabilities of Comprehensive Income, 'H''9(
Presentation of Financial Statements
^ 'H;<
;<
D(Disclosure of Certain
&'
* ^ 'H''1{(Related Party Disclosures
PricewaterhouseCoopers ';
>"
Revenue recognition 23
!
"#
$
!
%
$
!
"
&!
'
&!
(
!!!
)*
#
+,
, ""
- !
%#
/*
"
0
*
'"
1
!!
*
4
$/5$/6
*
"
+,
#
9(First-Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards,
?!"
)9
*!
! )
)
&
+,
'
4=
>*
9
^
^ ,
"
^
^ '
<
^ $*<
<
9
!
)>
9A
!
<
"
)><
"
$
PricewaterhouseCoopers '<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
&
+,
'
=
9
)
+,
>
"
^
^ ;<
"
^ =
(
"
(#
^ $
>
<
<
#
!
(
(
")
>( PricewaterhouseCoopers
IFRS first-time adoption
+
?
);<
;
'
"
*
(
Z
)} * (
"
# )>
! )
<
( # ";=""))(
PricewaterhouseCoopers >'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
,
+'', <
" "
'
H'H(; >*;>(' = ,"
''=,'(
;<= ;=)> "
!
)M
'H?
/
+'',
(
Q )
!
)>"
<
)
'
!
"
"
)N(
(
+'', # !
"/ ~B; !
)<
(
"
!
""
)>+'',
(( )'
(
)'"(
!
)("
!"
"
"
)
*
""
" !
Y "
"
# (
)>
(
"
*)_+'',!
" [9z(1898# "
"
!
"
+'',(
" "
"
)'
"+'', ))("
"
"
( !
))(
+'',)
>$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
)>#
!
(
)
!
(
M
*
*(
!
)>('H'H
( [1898(/ <
(Revenue from Contracts with Customers. >
<
B"1898
" [1899)>" !<
<
"1899( 918!
)>
<
!
"+'',);
/ "(
)Q
/
/)
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 25
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Revenue recognition—general
>
"
! < >
"(+'',"
!
!
Y
'
!
"
"
"
)'
"
)
(
")
O
>
< )
"
B
Q
~B;
<
)
!
)> # ! >
~B;
"
< ("
# +'',)
)
'
"
"
?
(*
"
(
("
"
)
26 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Contingent consideration—
general
" O
+
!
(
*
!
Z
Q
) ;=' H
"
" )
Y
s > "
"
"
)
"
!
"
)
""
"
Y
"
"
(
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 27
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Multiple-element
arrangements—general
M
>
"
!
*(
"
) ((
# (
"
(+'',
)
"
"
"
(
# )
) +'',
!
"
) ' (!
> #
>
"
!
" ?
)'
" )_
( !
"(<
(!
!"
!
"
)
+ # " ! "
)>
"
)
)
>
)
>!
"/
"
<
+'',
#
"
*
*
)
28 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Multiple-element
arrangements—contingencies
"
>
!
**
("
"
(
Z
( !
!
) s
" O
*
O
"
""
(
"
) "
Y )
s >"
)> (
!
"
)
"
M
"
"
(
)
not impose a limitation on the amount
"
)
<
(
Q
"
(
(
"
PricewaterhouseCoopers 29
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Multiple-element
arrangements—customer
loyalty programs
;
=
( < # (
(
(
+'',
("
"
)> "
" (
) ("
"
!
)'(
O
!
#
(
" O) "
"
)
<
T
@( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Multiple element
arrangements—loss on
delivered element only
> ! M
M
nition in situations with multiple !
!
(
Q! !
<
(
!
*) ( )
M
< )
"
M
(
!
"
""
"
)>
9
?
)
))( O
)
(
B
(
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers @'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Sales of services—general
'
! +'',
" ! # "
! "
" O
!!
)>
)
"
!
) " (
!!)
+
(
" O !
"
!
"
!
)
"
< (
"
)
!!(
<
(" M !
) O" "
"
(
"
( < ( " O<
!
"
<
)>
"
) (O!
"
O(
!
!
)
"
"
)
""
(
"
")
"
)
Sales of services—right of
refund
D
'
!
" O ! " !
!"
<
)
) "
"
(
""
""
O
"
X
X
)
) M
"
"
(
O
<
""
)
32 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Construction contracts
> " >
>
<!
*
)
"
) '
"
")'"?"
/
"Q
*
(
(
)
)
"
))(
(
!!
"
O!
(
!(
!
")
PricewaterhouseCoopers 33
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)
Sale of goods—
continuous transfer
B B ( M
(
+'',
#
#
(
"
)
)
)
M
( !
O"
!!
)
!
"
<
!
)
@$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Barter transactions
>*
# +'',
#
#
"" )
" ) " )
(
*
"
"O)
)
N(
<
) (
" "
O))(
"
(
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 35
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Extended warranties
>#
!
"
! " O O
"
!
" )
<
)'<
< <
!
<
)
!!
))("
(
!
" )
"
>
"
< "
"
)
Discounting of revenues
D
> # D
"
#
(
! # Y
+'',) "
#
)
!
>
(
(
"
"
"
O " O
)
Q )
Technical references
IFRS '99('9A(=9\(=9z(=9A(=\9
Note
>
" +'', )
36 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
Recent/proposed guidance
( )'
<
!
("
T
*
V
"
#
"
" (
( ( )
>
PricewaterhouseCoopers 37
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
1
1
!
'
"
),"
*T
VT
"
)V>
"
< ),"
"<
"
)}
#
"
"
<
)'
"
""
( ?
("
"
)>
!
"
(
"
)
!
(<
(
O* <
+'',
)>
"
(
"
"
(
)B
(
(
)
({
)
"
) !
O
"
(
"
" )
" O
< "
"
<
)>
(
/)
$!!
1
!
"
"
("
"
<
9
1
)'
"
(
"
)
'
"
"
*
"
)* (
9
(1
))("
(\
)
)>
"
)
"
9
"
1
(
"
)
"
(
#
))(
38 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Revenue recognition
# /) "
"
9
"
(1
(\
({ *
)>
*
!
)'
"
"
)>
"
9 ?
(1 ?
"
*(
*
(
)
(
))(
(
))(
(
" O)>"
"
)
>
"
)
+'',
))( )
*
,
>"
!
)>
< +'',
(
!
( <
!
+'',)>"
PricewaterhouseCoopers 39
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
# #"*
[1898<
)># <
(
"
)}
!
"
"9# "
(1
!
)
$( PricewaterhouseCoopers
;<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
%!
B#
'
+'',
( <
)
>"
!"
(
"
<
" O)
(
))("
(1z
!
<
"<
)>
!"
)H
(
!
!
"
<
( " "
O )
> < # !"
+'',)=
<
<
"
<
!"
)> "
"
* ("(
?*
)<
(
?*
(
<"
(
()B""("#
?
*
<<
)> "
"#
< "!"
)
>
"
)
$> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—share-based payments
Scope
O
> Q "
+'',
"
)
<
Q<
)
!
><
)'
'=q9A(Compensation—Stock
" !
!
Compensation,
O
)
to employees and Employee Stock
+'',
)
B
,
)'=z8z!z8
1(Share-based payments, includes
=
)
!
!"
)(
(! (
"+'', )
)
Measurement of awards
granted to employees by
nonpublic companies
=
"
"
#
) *!"!
!
" !
)
!
)
Liability-classified
>
"
!
* !
*!"!
"
)
!
(
!
( !
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers $@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Measurement of awards
granted to nonemployees
H '=z8z!z8
>
# !
"
)
"
9
(
!
"
)>
"
"(1
?
)
<
)
)
_
_
"
"
(
$$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—share-based payments
Classification of certain
instruments as liabilites or
equity
'
'=q9A1 (
"
,"
"
# )
"
)
*!"!
(
} "
# !
"
"< # "
) (
"
" "<
"
#
)
" )
+'',
"
(
"
'=q9A ! 1
"
+'',#
# Q
"
'=
) #
"
)'=q9A
q9A)N(
'\1
'={A8( '={A8(
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,
1
) '\1)>(# Q
"
!"
#
(
)
# !
)
" !
)_ *
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers $;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Attribution—awards with
service conditions and graded-
vesting features
>
+'', =
* =
"
"
"
! "
!
! )=
# ) )> "
!
)
"
"<
* (!
)
"
# )
Certain aspects of
modification accounting
D " '
""
""
>
(
""
""
compensation cost that is less than the "
(
O)
"
)M "
<
*
""
O
<
!
" O
" (!
)
"Y >
O)
"
)
$C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—share-based payments
"
"
< )
(
+'',
)H <
(
" "
#)>
<
"!
O
#
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers $D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Tax withholding
arrangements—impact to
classification
>
" '
<
<
)
<
"# ! ("
)
# !
(
<
?
"
)< ! "
(
< )=
(
"
?< !
"
)
"
(
" "!
# !
)>
!
<
!
**
<
"
)>
#
)
<#
" !
<
<
< ( (
/! O)>
*
< "
"
) < ( (" *
< "
on the amount of compensation cost *
)
=
+'',
O"*
)=
< M<
<"
*
" # <
<
/
< O
O<
<
)'
<
O) "<(<"
<(
amount of the tax effect of the cumulative
>
! *
!
"*
<
Y
<
<
?<") )
# )
$E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—share-based payments
)
company does not have accumulated
(
(
<<
)
Y)
(<<"
"
Y )
<
"
*!"!
+'',)
" O *!"!
(
<
<
Valuation—SAB Topic 14
guidance on expected volatility
and expected term
=
+'', 'H>
9{
"
<
<
( )
!
)
9
=
1T
!
T
! V
<
V
"'H>
9{) #
)
'
(
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers $<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
! ;,,
;,,
Z
*# !
!"
+'',) s ; 9"
)
"
(
"
# "
"
s
))(
*!"*)
)(
"
?"
"
)N( "
!
"
"
"
"
(
# !
!"
)
) >
!
!"
!
)
;( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—share-based payments
Technical references
IFRS 1(=A(=99
Note
>
" +'', )
PricewaterhouseCoopers ;'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Recent/proposed guidance
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs, and IASB IFRS 13, Fair
Value Measurement
B$91(1899('H '
_)1899!8{(Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to
!# ' "
." 'H 9\(Fair Value
Measurement.> +'',
)
>
52 PricewaterhouseCoopers
%!
B
>" "+'',
!
")
(
)>
)
(
(* )_'H'H
)>'H
(
(
"(
'H
B,;H
"(
"(
"
"" )
'
O"
)
<
? " Q
"
)B
"
Q
))(
+'',)
#
)'(
)>Y< "
"
<
)D "+'',
" "
)
"
"
"
+'',"
"
)=
<
"
)
[1899('H '9`
(
(
"
)> [9(189\(
)
' Q
"
( (
" O
(
"
!
), ("(
" O
)_ <
"
"
O"
)'
(
(
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 53
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Expense recognition—actuarial
gains/losses
(
>
"
)
! O
Q
+ Q
1 Q
B=)
"#
B O B=( Q
)
"#
)
)
the volatility of pension expense in a [1899('H !
? " M Q
O '9`(
)
Q
"
O
(
) (
!
>
X
)
# !
(! O B="
*
"
)
+'',
)
;$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
) on a net basis within the income state!
'
)(
>
<
!
<
QB,;H)
)
(
[1899('H !
>
"
'9`(
)
) Y< "
9
!
O
))( "
+'',1
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 55
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Expense recognition—
prior-service costs and credits
, !
" O
(
<
Q
!
" O(
of the adoption of the plan amendment ( !
"
O
""
))(
! )
"
<
><
"!
+'',( #
!
"
" O
"
! )
"
<
_
!
)
s >
?
<
[1899('H !
! '9`(
)
> # !
_
!
"
( O!
"
!
?
<
)
56 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
)
)
_ <
"
"
""
"
"
)>
"
"
))(
""
O
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 57
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Expense recognition—
measurement frequency
# >
'
+'',) ""
# ""
?
!"
O
># !
(
"
Q
B=
" #
"
<
)
);
(
)
(
!
(
) (
(
)
; O
B=
""
"
O B=(""
( (<
(
(
)
(
(
)
58 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
) "
)
(
)
" O
( ! Q
O
"
"
((
Y
+'',)
"
"/
)
Substantive commitment
to provide pension or other
postretirement benefits
D > "! (
" <
Z
"" s
*
"
?
#
(
""
) )'
*
s
"
"
)
< " (
( "
)N( " " !
"
"
)
("
"" "
!
)>
?
(<
!
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 59
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
)
)
<
)
(
$
! ""
"
)'
)
"
"(
"
"(
)N(
"" " "#
)
"
)
C( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
Curtailments
'" <
'
>
(
<
"
#
!
(
" cantly reduced
!
")}
" ")
)
)
=
"
M
"
=
O
"
))(
O(
O ))( *
!
O
+'',)
) )
> >
#
Q
O Q
"
O Q
(
( O Q
" !
)
) O
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers C'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Settlements
"! '
'
O
O+''," O
!
)
!
"
)N(
"
+'',")
"
!
(
#
)
<
)
D
'
'
" !
"
!
O) "
! "
"
"
"
)
"
?
")
~
!
#
<
#
<
#+'',!
#
" O O O
)
!
) )
62 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
Asset ceiling
>
O (
value of the net pension asset that can be
" limits the amount of the net pension asset
"
)> ! "
) " O
9
! 1
!
"
) O
( O
!
(
"
"
"!
)=9{
# "!
O )
"
" "
"#
"
)
'
(
O
!
" O
!
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 63
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Measurement of defined
benefit obligation when both
employers and employees
contribute
( >
"
[1899('H !
? Y
? '9`(
)
<
"
"
<
>
" "
*
*)>""
)= "
""
"
;
""
)B
? *
"
"
"
)
C$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
Deferred compensation
arrangements—employment
benefits
> ( D
"
"
<
<
( "<
"
T
V
*)
<
? +'',)M
!
Y< "
+'',
)<
" " "
<
"
)
(
" ! )D
!
"
"
"
!
O
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 65
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)
(
*) Y<
"<
"
) ?!
"*
!
>
"
)
*
!"
< (
! # *(
(
X
"
")
"+'',
)
"
"*
)
'
" !*
)
66 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
Discount rates
D
> " >
"
"
" "*
!
"
)=
* #
"
) !#
(<! ""
!
""
""
)
"
)>;=
M
* !#
T #
V
"< (
!
"
#
*
"!
"
O ))('
)
"$?)
'
!#
!
*
""
!#
"
)
< / !
)N(
(
!
!#
"
"
"
)
M D" #
(
"
)+
)
"
Z O
"
1*!!* ))( "
)
"
"
company would pay out if the employee
left the company as of the balance
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 67
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
! '
[1899('H !
Y ""
! '9`(
)
<
)N(
(
"
) *
(
"
"<
)><
)
"
"
' " <
" O
""
(
"!
)
)
Technical references
IFRS '9`('\q('\`(=9{
US GAAP '=q98('=q91('=q9z('=A18('=A\z\8
Note
>
" +'', )
68 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
Recent/proposed guidance
Z
" O
B=)>
'9`(
"(
"
"#
)
+
"
")>
"
(
( )>
"
) +'',
)M
"*
" 9 1
!
)_ +'',
<
)
1
,
81
,
*9:;$$<=
'
)
>
"
(
<
)
"
"
!
""
)> # <
"
"
O
""
(
O
)>
)
+'',
<
"
(
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 69
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
<
1
'9`Y< "
<
" O)'
>
> " '9`
"
+'', ! ") Q
} "
X
)
+ ! *)*
'
"#
?"
( O
(( ( Y "
!
)>
"/
*
#
)>#
*
)
>
"
)
Timing
'
[1899)> [9(189\(
)
>'H?
/ ("" *'H
<
)>'H
"
)>
"
<
"
")>'H
'H)
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, and IASB Amendment to
IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
[1899('H '
_)1899!8z(Presentation of Comprehensive Income( #
("
(
)>
#
)' ('H
'9(
Presentation of Financial Statements)M O B='9`( "(!
*)
B
)
!! )N(
"
*
" *
?
)
D( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Expense recognition—employee benefits
(
(
))( O# ", , '188
?
))(
"z
" )
"
("
(
#
"
)H"* ("
#
"1898<
(
"
(
""
(
? "
" )> <
"
O '
"
"1899)
>
' "('H'9`( $
( [1899(
#
)'
"
(
(
# '9`
<
" <
)('H
"+'',
)
<
(,,'='<
"
"
#
"$ ,D)'
,,'='("
"
+'',)+'',#
<
" O
)#
<"
"
T"* V)+'',
" "* )} "
X<
"#<)
"
"(
"
)'
# !
Y * "
(
)B(
"
"
)(
"
)+'',(
"
)N((
(
"#
Q
)>("
"+'',
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers D'
'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"B
> +'',
))( "
(
(#
(
'
"
(
(+'',
)
>
!
"
"*)
M +'',( !
"
"
!
"
" "
!
)(
*
"
+'',)'
(
O}B
"
!
( (B !)!"
(
' Q
('H'H /
/
<
1891
)><
)
>
"
)
D$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
General
>
Y(
! 1?
)
#
!
O(
(
) "
!
+'',"
#
")B
"
)>
(
*
"
(
""
!
"
<(*!!
# ) Y
assessment of the time value of money
*
Y
"/)
(
(
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 75
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
( )
!
"
*
"
)
"*
$!
1,!*
)*
)
>
>
#) +'',)
'
#
!
"
(
)
!
B (
# )
76 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Y<
s = Y
Y)'
!
=+
(
!
(" s =Y
Y <
Y
s 'Y =+
)
" Y(
Y
<
"
!
""
=+
s =Y
s =Y ""
(
""
!
(
!
"
" =+
s =Y<
"
=+
s =Y
!
< (
(<
(Y
!!
PricewaterhouseCoopers 77
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Cash flow estimates (continued) +'',
=Y
/
""!
Y"
" "
"
"
set of economic conditions that will exist
T
V
) ?
)
=Y<
=Y
);<
Y
?
"<
)
?" !
"""
=Y
"
),/ "!
?"Q
<
(
"
"/ );
"
) Y
/ "
""Q!
<
/
""Q
"!
#(
"/ )>
<
!
( (
(
* )
78 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Asset groupings
D
! '=+
"
/
(
!
Y
"+'',)
Y
!
)
Y
"
)
Y ?=+
/)
"
) *<
"
(
(
!
"
))(
=+(
)
Y
"
) (
!
shall include all assets and liabilities of
)
Carrying basis
>"
+'',
O
N
"
*
"
<
)N(
!
(
) "
(
(
+'',) #
))(
"*Q
)
# "
!
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 79
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Intangible assets
( )<
(
!
) s >"
"
"
"
>
!
)
" s N "
)>(<
( "
O
<
(
*(
(
"
"
O) s >
"
#
to complete the development
s >"
"
<
""
!
"
;<
"((
"
(
(
""
"
)>(
O "
)
D
O
as expenses may not be capitalized in a
"#
)
E( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Indefinite-lived intangible
assets—level of assessment for
impairment testing
+'',(
!
' !
"
)( "
(# ))("
"
(
"
"
)
Y
!
"
"
Y
"
!
(*=+(
"
"
)
"
!
)
+'',
"
*
" "
)
Indefinite-lived intangible
assets—impairment charge
measurement
;
!
! !
"
!
"*( "
"
"
)
) "
)>"
)>
!
Y)
PricewaterhouseCoopers E'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
O
"
)
"
)
O"
> 9
)>"
1
O
O
"
(
<
O"
"
)>
)>
O"
Y)
"
)
>
O"
O Y)
Advertising costs
( >
= <
"<
)
" <
)>
<
!
*
) *
( <
!
>
O
"
)
)
,
"
=
"
O (
# (
""
?
"< )D )
>
(
"
O O
"
( O
""/
as an expense when the entity has the
)
)
'
!
(
"
"
<
"(
"
)
82 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Depreciation
(
! +'',
Overhaul costs
+'',
<
+'',
#
O
O /
!
) /
)=
)
!
=
O
"9<
(
( #
1
!
(\ O
" O)
""
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 83
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
>
<
"
"
Y*
)>
*
"
"
)
!/( *!<
"
(
( =
E$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Borrowing costs
H " =
O # H
""
#
"
# ( (
!
+'',) ) #
#
"
O
+'',
/ > #
)
O ( " "
!
!
O! > *
!
O) )(# "
O"
""
O! ?# #
#
!
"
/)N (
# ! (
" ) #
+'',
O
' "
"
)
# #
#
" )
"(#
!
*"
(
? !
#
)
#
)
#
#
)
Leases
Lease scope
"
>
>
"
(
(#
)
(
(#
!
"
)'
( "
'
"
)
"
(
O
) N("
"
(
(
<
(
(
(
!
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 85
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Lease classification—general
} "
>
>
+'',)
" )}
!
D
"
Y
"
)>
))(#
)
"
+'',
Z
"
*
s B
)
the lessee '
s H
+'',
s }
of the asset
(# !
"*
"
s ,
))(`8
)
the leased asset '
!
/ !
>
"
#
)>
"
"/
#
<`8
*
)
)
(
!
!
(
)'
(
")
"
"
)
86 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Sale-leaseback arrangements
D * >
!
"* M
!
"*
M < (
" O
<
)
"* ()
) !
"*" )
"* "
"
(
"
(
O
" O !
< <
(<
)
"
"
!*(
"
O
(
<
")
"
(
O
)
<
"
M
!
"*
O
( O <
")
O
M
!
"*
)
( !
>
O
(
!
"*
#
)
)
(
>
!
"*
'
(
!
"*
!
?"
!
"*
(
"
)>
"
Y")>(
"
(
!
?"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 87
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
}"
"
!
(
(
1z
)>
"
) (
)
"
""
#
(
!
)
)
>
"
"
"
payments to be at least substantially all of
)
)
Lease classification—other
><
Q<
>
<
"
"
(
"
+'',(" "<
"
!
)
(
88 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
)
+'',
"
)'
"
)
"
"
"Y
)
"
)
"
!
"
)
O
'
(
!
))( "!
!
PricewaterhouseCoopers 89
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Other
Distributions of nonmonetary
assets to owners
! ' " ' "
!
"
)
""
""
+'',( ( " ")'
" (
(
!
"
O)
"
")
" ( ")
Y
"
(
O
?# ) "
" "
"
)
Inventory costing
=
O}B ' ! '"
+'', <
!
}B(B(Q B !
!
)
)>}B((
Y)
)
}B
(
! <
("*Q<
!
O(
# }B"*
!
<
! Q
)
!#
"# )
!
" )
)
Inventory measurement
>
* *)$*
!
O"
)_
O"
+'',
O"
) (
"
O"
)
O"
"
)_
O"
)
<( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
(
(
!
) "
"#
"
)
"
"
"# !
!")
T
"
)V
'
Investment property
'
>
! ,
Q"
)
Q
)
>
!
>
!
)
(
" (
!
)
"
!
X !
),
(
?
!
("*!
(
"
)
X
"
)
!"
>
" )M
(
< )
O
)>
)
>
"
)
Technical references
IFRS '1('9('9q('1\('\('\q('{8('{9(z(9\(={(=9q(=9z
US GAAP '=18z('=1z8('=\\8('=\898('=\8!18('={9818('={98181z('=A\z18('=A{8(
'=A{8{8('=`8A\8('=`q
PricewaterhouseCoopers <'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Note
>
" +'', )
Recent/proposed guidance
)>
[
\9(1899(
O"
)
Lessee accounting
"?
(/
<
Z
s }
(
"
"
(
<
!
(
)>
" !
(
"
)
s '
"
!
X <
"
91
X #
)>!
"
" )
s
"
<!
<
(<
)
s =
9" <(1 !"<
"
(\
<
"
"
"
"
)
s >
"
"
?
" )'
(
" *)>
#
(
(
(
"
)
s !
<
"
" O
<
"
)<
"!
O )
s
!
<(
!
)}
92 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—nonfinancial assets
Lessor accounting
>"
(
"
<
)>"
Z
s }
T "
V
"
"
? !!
"
)
s '
O
T"
)V,
"!
O "
"
O
O)
s MT"
(V
<
)
s =
<
(
"
<
(
<
)
s > ""
)<
(;H>D' "
(<(
( O
(
>" <
"*""*
(
"
)D("<
!<
!
1899(
<
1891)>"
<
" / )
PricewaterhouseCoopers 93
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"#
Z
s _" X>
"
)
s ;<
"
X>
(
O
!
(
)
s
XB
" (*
)
s ,
X> ?
)>
)
s
X>
)>
"
)
<
"
)
"
# !!
)
<$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
"B
>'H'H* /
/
!
(
)B
O(
'H?'H?
)>"(("* "
)>
'H" *
(
_"188` `(Financial
Instruments"#
B"1898)H
" ( `
"
" [9(189z(
)
[189\)>
Q
)>
+'', )
>
O
"
"+'',)
'
!
"
"
)N(
(
+'',
# "
+'',(
)<
("
O" ))(
!
)(
" (
* )'
O)
("+'',
O
"
Y
)(
Y
" "
!
Y !
)+'',#
!
!"
)
"
!!
" (
)
(+'',
*
9? "
1<
" )>
!
)(
"
!!
" !
"
(
"
!!
"
"
" Y<
" "
PricewaterhouseCoopers 95
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)'
#
" )
Z
^ +'',( "
(
<
*)
^ (
!
)
( O
"
#
*
( #
+'',)
>
))(
"
#
)
$
" *
X
!`9\ "
"
)
96 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
Available-for-sale financial
assets—fair value versus cost
of unlisted equity instruments
$
#
#
"
!!
(
= <
# !
# !
# "
(
<
<
))("*Q
( !
"
"
)
(
(
"
)
"
"
"
""
""
)
Available-for-sale debt
financial assets—foreign
exchange gains/losses on
debt instruments >total
"
!
"
!!
" (
> < !
" X
" (
"
!!
"! <X
)>
*
"
!
<
O
(
"
!!
"
<)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 97
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
"
*) on contractualY? the estimated Yexpected
contractual
)
)
>
*
><
(+'',( =
Y
+'',
Z
<
s }
"
"
"
Y
)
" <
)
"
s =
s = "
!
O
s =
"
#
98 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
!!
!"
)
?""
"
"
"
!
"
))(Y
*!
" (<(
(
O
)
>
"
Y!
?
)
>/ O
<
))("
!!
)
+
PricewaterhouseCoopers 99
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
(
!
<! )>( ?# ! !
*
(+'',
"
"!") !
) Y
(
# ! )
Fair-value measurement—
bid-ask spreads
D " !*
>
#*
"" *
(
"
"
) " !*
"
(
! "#
"
( *
)' (+'',
)N(
*
"
*
!
(
<
!
!
"
" !*
)'
( *
)
( (
"" *
"
" *
(
"#
("" *
9\)(
(
" !*
" *
)
"),
Q
)
'(( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
"
#
+'',)>
!
# *Z
"# " s >
'=\18)
(
+''," ) (
(
"
(
and those that the entity upon initial
} "
"
)
!
"
("
*)
)>
s >
" '=\18(
"
# "
"
<
*((
" s >
(
O "
"
)
"
"
} "
'=\18
PricewaterhouseCoopers '('
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Reclassifications
>
=
" (
"
!
"
!!
(
!! " (
"
"!
/ " )
*)
(
$
("
"
'=\18)+
"
)>"
(
"
!
"
(
"(
"
( "
") )
"
entity has the intent and ability to hold
"
)
'
(
"
"
)
" !
!
)
Impairment principles—
available-for-sale debt
securities
( ' " '
!
"
Y
"/
? )+'',
* )'
!
!
" "
<
)
Y) Y
(
"
"
)
(!
"
!!
"/
(
Z
Z
)+'',(
Step 1—=9 s
!
1
)
*
s N
""
"*
'(> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
Impairment principles—available-for- Step 2—D<
s D
*
sale debt securities (continued) " "
(
s H(
)(
#
)
s B""
B
"
(
Y
O
Z
>
*
s
" ?
9(
#
"
? ("
(
)
(
s
1( "
!
" )
' (
Y<
"
" "
!
)> !
O
<
)<
(
<
be to discount the best estimate of cash
"
Y"
*
!
)> "
#
!
!
)
O
) '
Y
? )
PricewaterhouseCoopers '(@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Impairment principles—held-to-
maturity debt instruments
( >!
!!
"
"
! ""/
Y
)
""
? )+'',
*
"<
!!
"
!!
" )
!
" "
9
B
(
<
)(
"
Y)
1
)
Y"
B (
)'
<
(
(
* <
""
)+'',( "
"
!!
" ?""
)
! )> "
)
!
O
!
B=
"
)
'($ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
Impairment of available-for-sale
equity instruments
"
!!
# +'',
*
" (
"
"
!
"
!!
#
)>
Z ""/
!
+'',) s >
< ) <
*
" "("/
less than cost
"
!!
#
Z
s >
!
(
s
Y
"
(
( s
(*( (
;
"
))(
(
"""#
( # )
"
!!
#
)
Losses on available-for-sale
equity securities subsequent to
initial impairment recognition
"
"
"
!!
" )'(
" )'(
# ( ! below the new cost basis may be consid!
"
*
)
!
" )
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '(;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Impairments—measurement
and reversal of losses
(
"
O
" '=\98!98!\z ( "#
)+'',( '={z8
"
" ! (
""/
(! < !
!
"
) O(
" );<
! O
)
B!
Y "/ >
((<
"
) O
"
"
!!
!!
" O)
((
" )
(<
"
!!
" (
YY
"#
/) "
""/
# !
!
" )
O(
"
)
# !
" )
'(C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
Derecognition
>
>
>
" O))(
)>
#
*
O " "* Z
( *
s }
"(( (
*)
#!
")
"
#
+'',) "
)
s _ "
>
"
'( "
(
)
<
'\`(
!
'=A8" "Z
) s >
"!
)
>(
( s > "
PricewaterhouseCoopers '(D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Derecognition (continued) M $ O
#
! O
(
!
" O!
?"
)>
)
O(
#
(
"
<
O
)>
*!
O
)'\`
"
#
<
)'
*"
<
"
"
!
?Y(
)
"")
(
?<
*
(
O
!
O
"
"
))( )
"
"
" O
O("
)
'(E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
*
(
")>
"
)>
"
(
!
(
Technical references
IFRS '\`(=91
Note
>
" +'', )
PricewaterhouseCoopers '(<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Recent/proposed guidance
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective
Control for Repurchase Agreements
'
1899('H '
'_)1899!8\(Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860):
Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements,
*
T
V"
"
"
)=
(
(
)M
(
"
)
( "
"
"
)>'!
# "
"
"
"
)'
(
" )
IASB Exposure Draft, Derecognition: Proposed Amendments to IAS 39 and IASB Amendments to IFRS 7,
Disclosures: Transfers of Financial Assets
$188`('H ;D188`Q\(Derecognition(
<
'\`)
>
<
< '\`
)>
ZT
V
T
)V
=[
\9(188`)H"*
;D
*"('H
)N('H
[1898!
"
"
)
FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Balance Sheet Offsetting, and IASB Exposure Draft, Offsetting
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
*
?(" /
<
"
"
)
''( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
[1899('H
'
(Balance Sheet Offsetting, /
'H?<
!
(Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities)
(
"#
O
O
"
"
"
O
"
)>
"
"
""*
!
)>
<
'
1899)
"/ )>'H
"
<
+'',)>'H((
<
)'
(# <
")
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011–04, Fair Value Measurement (topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs, and IASB IFRS 13, Fair
Value Measurement
$1899("
/
/ !
)>'H '
_)1899!8{(Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure
."'('H 9\(Fair Value Measurement ( )
> +'', )
Z
s Highest and best use and the valuation premise
< (
"
ZT !VT !<)V!
<
*
!
" )>"
!
!< ""/
)
"
<
!
""
)
!
(
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '''
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
<
* *<
(
)
#
<
* * *(
Z
-
"
" <
* *
* *
(
? *
)$* * *( *(
*<
(*
*)
-
" "
"
)
- #
"
"
)
s Blockage factors and other premiums or discounts
'"
*
Y
#
"
* )'
)
("
*
)B(
"
("
#
(
!
)> !
" "
*
!
("
"
* !
!
)N(
}
1\ !
)
'H?'H?
)'
/ /
/('H'H"*
"
)>'H" *
Z9
(
1
"
(\
({ )>'H
<
)
_"188`('H `(Financial Instruments( Y
)B"1898(#
"
`)_"1898('H <
)[1899('H
<
O( 'H)
B$1(1898('H
<
(Accounting for Financial Instruments and
Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities(( "("#
/
'H
)
''> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
'
'H'H
/
<
(
"
)
?
$/5$/
<6
>'H'H
B$1(1898('H
<
(Accounting for Financial Instruments and
Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities)>'H
O
O B=)
(
" O <
!
Y
"
)'
""
O
(
<
"
Y)
_"188`('H <
O)>
"
<
(
"
Q )>
<
<
)=<
!
[\8(1898)
[
1899("
"
T"*VZH*9"""
"
(H*
1"""
"
(H*\
<
)>"
" *
( O *
"
)
"/
Y
#
(* <
*
)
(
H*9 H*1H*\
<
(
"
Y)
>'H'H
)'<
!
<
#1899)
@Financial Instruments
`
" '\`
!
Z O
)=
` " ?"
Y
)'
O
"/ "
PricewaterhouseCoopers ''@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
)>
" "
)>#
"
)#
" "
O
)'"
"
Y( ?
Y
("
>"
<
`[9(189\([
9(189z(
)>;
=
!
)'
(;
"
1898!
A8 ;
"
)
"
"
`'H?
("
"
[
\9(1899)
$/< $9AAccounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities
B$1(1898('H
)>'H?
(
(
( )>
"<
O ?")<
(
O
!!
(
!! ("
"
)
"
O )
N(
" O B=
#
"
O )=
""
"
B=)_Q
"
)(
"
"
"
)="
"\8(1898)
''$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
"
'H?
`)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '';
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
+11
7
$/B
*
1!
*
*
!
*
?*!#@'@@Financial Instruments
Y
\
?
OB=
O
"
!
'H) Z
! )B
? ?
" )
O )
"
*Y))(!"*
"
T
*!
( V
#
))( O O
(
)
O B=( !
O(
(
(
O
(
O
O
?
)
")
>"
"
O
O B=(
"Z
9) >
"/'=A9z)
1) '
"
)
''C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Assets—financial assets
"
)
=
" "
"
)
Reclassification
'H?
" M "
!
"
)
(
) #
!
))(
O(
" )
"
# ! #
"
# "
O
'H?
)
O ) # !
"
" O "
B=)
O B=
"
!"!
>'H
)
#
" "
( !
# ) O (
O
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers ''D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)'"
))("
"
# "
)
'!
" !
"
!
"
"
!
"
`)
"
)
''E PricewaterhouseCoopers
} "
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
HB)!
'
*
(
O
)
D
"
<
*
"# /
?
<)'
<
188` ('H
/ < Q
"
)>
+'',
<)_
"
"'H( 'H?
/ <( <
)'!
< ( " !!
<
!
*)
><
<
*) (
(
"
<" (
"
<"
"
+'',)
<
)(
# !
<
"
"*# )+'',(("#
<
<
<
,
<
"
X
? X"#
<"
)
>
"
)
'>( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—taxes
PricewaterhouseCoopers '>'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
'<
<
!
O
O
O )
) !
)
Intraperiod allocations
D "# "# < "# <
<
"
<< "
O
* (<
<
)
<
<
!
"
O
* (
<
# !
)
9``1
"
)
"<!"
O
)
'>> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—taxes
O
< "
"
)
# )
D<
+'',
" (" (
<
/ "
<
)'<
"
"
)
"
"#
"" TO)V>
<
"
"
O<
" <
?" ?
"# "
" (
" )
"
"
O
") <
"
O)
<
)
~
")
PricewaterhouseCoopers '>@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
" '
'<
<
<
"
) <
!
< +'',
"
"
) " (< " "
"
!
<"
Q
Measurement of foreign
nonmonetary assets and
liabilities where the local
currency is not the functional
currency
>"
< _< O D< O
<< <
"
"
!
"
"
*
!
<
<"
) "
< "
( "
"<
< < < < )
<
)
'>$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—taxes
Presentation
,
>
< +
<
"
(<
</
"
?
"
"
"# ) "
<"
<
"
! )
)
"
(
"
!
"
)M
"
"
</ (< ""
"
)
<
'
"
<
)'
"
<</
!
" )
<
'
"
O<" 91
)
"
<
<
))( <
"Z
91
)
B (Y s
"
) <
"
>
<
"
<
s included in the tax line if they cannot
<<
<
"
<(
)
decision that is to be consistently applied
) >
"
)
Tax basis
(
"
><" # ><" "<
<" ( <
) " )'
"
"
<
"
<
))(
"
"
+'',) as the amount that would be deductible
)(
# )
"
" (
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '>;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Interim reporting
'
<
( <
> <
"
<
"
<
+'',)(
< !!
< )>
< / )
<
"
(
!!
< )
<
< /
< / )
Technical references
IFRS '9('91('\{('\q
US GAAP '=q9A!q{8('=q{8
Note
>
" +'', )
Recent/proposed guidance
IFRS
$188`('H
<
< )'
<
( <
('H !
/ <1899)
('H
)>
/
X
(
'>C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—taxes
"
"
)>""
<
"
# " " ( #
"#
)'
( <
"
""
'{8(Investment Property,
+'',(
)'(
"+'',)>'H
*
/
(
#
)
+'',(
'91
<
"*)>
*
"
/
<
<)(<
"
"
# "
"
<
"
")
PricewaterhouseCoopers '>D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
HBJ
)
*
!
( +'',
<
)
'
(
#
!
+'', # ")>
+'',)' (
(
O+'',
""
"
"
)>
+'',)> )
Q
[1899
"
+'', )
'
" (
" O
"
# "
O (
+'',)
>
"
)
'>E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—Other
Recognition of provisions
D T
""
V '
< ! '
"
"
! ( (
"
"
)
"
"
"
"
>T
"
V
?
)
)
"
+'',) '
"
O)
'
'
"
"
!
# Z9
""
"
" Z9
"
1
"!
< (1
""
"
) Y
"#
"
(\
"
"
")
""
(
> T
""
V
T
*
V
"
z8
)
*
)M
!
""
< (
Measurement of provisions
(! '
< > O
""
"/
<
#
*) "
)(
"
"
!
"
"
"
))(
"
)
"
#
""
) M
)
possible outcomes and each point in
,
*
(
)
"/
"
( !
"
? )
PricewaterhouseCoopers '><
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Discounting of provisions
,
"Y
! them at the amount that will be paid to <
"#
+'',)
( ! "
)>
Y
"
!<
"
)D
"
! Y*
"
assessments of the time value of money
"
*
"
"
< Y
"
);
"
! "/
)
"
,
'@( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—Other
Restructuring provisions
(excluding business
combinations)
D < >
" '
"
"
"
? O( (
))(#
)
"
)
! '
"
< (
)
"# ! (
!
<
)
tion of the details of the plan to employees "
)'
> "(<
(
")> !
)
?
(
)
"
!
" ))(
!
)'
"(
Q
*
"/
"
"("(!
)
" "
")<
(
""
("
<
)
""
"
"
) (
[1899
* '9`(Employee
#
<
<
)
"
Z
PricewaterhouseCoopers '@'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
" O
has been communicated to the affected
)>
!
! "
")
"
"
<
"
"
" O
")(
" O
)>
+'', )
~
""
"
" O
""
<
)
'@> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—Other
Onerous contracts
B
" , O! , O
O
"
"
) ))(
!) )
#
+'',
PricewaterhouseCoopers '@@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Accounting for
government grants
! ( + O
"
"
"
#
( ! = "
!
"1
" )
"
(
+
O
"
"
? (
O
)
'@$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—Other
Reimbursement and
contingent assets
+
Recovery of recognized losses—' Reimbursements—M
" O)
! <
#
'( O
""
) " O(
(
"
!
O )
Technical references
IFRS '9`('18('\q
US GAAP '={98!18('={98!\8('={18('={z8!98('={z8!18('={8!98('=`{{!{8('=`zA!8z
Note
>
" +'', )
PricewaterhouseCoopers '@;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Recent/proposed guidance
Z
s ~
( " <
?
"
s
(
"
~
""
"
O
""
<
)>
# "'9`
)>
""
!"
O
"" (
)> # "'9`
!
" )
H
" <
!
"(!
!""
");<
"
!
" # O
"
'9`'\q)
>
" T! "V
+'',)
>
[9(189\(
)>
'9`
"
+'', )
FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-27, Fees Paid to the Federal Government by Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers
$1898(, B"
, , '"
='"N
=
;
'')>'#
" [9(1899)>
"
"
?"
)>
"
"\8
"
<! "
)
>
"
"
>
"
" [9(1899)
'@C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Liabilities—Other
'1898!1q
"
" "
#
O<
!
"
IASB Exposure Draft, Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37, and Working Draft, IFRS X, Liabilities
[1898('H <
Measurement of Liabilities in IAS 37."1898('H
"
*
Liabilities. >*
[1898<
*
'H'H
O/
/)
"
(
(
*)>
"
"
# (
(
!
" (( ( "
"
),"
"#
"
))(
O
!
"
)
"
")>"<
*
/"
D"1899)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '@D
"
#
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
4
("+'',
"
# "
#
"
)
(
"
# OO # +'',
)>+'', !
#
#
"
)>+'',
#
"
" # QOO #
+'',
"
"
)
)>
" Y
+'',< #
# )
#
"
)=
Q
# Q
((
"
()'(+'',(
"
"
# );=!
((
OO # )M
#
# +'',
"
(
!
)<
(
"
"
"
!
)'
(""
" (
))( <
"
(
*"
)
#
#
")M
+'',
#
(
)
H Q
+'',
"
<
*
)
#
(
"# #
)} * (
#
))( "
!
#
)
'$( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
"
"
?)
+'',(
"#
)(
#
<" ?<(
#
"
"#
)
'
<
"
O)
"
("
+'',
O
"
Y!
"
)= <
9
"
"
"
"
O
)( Y
" " !
!
Y !
)+'',#
!!
)
' Q
('H'H /
/ "/
"
# "*)
>
"
!`9\)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '$'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Classification
Contingent settlement
provisions
=
( '
"
'\1
#
))("
#
(
"
'={A8"
!
# !
)'
"
"
)
"
!
" ) )=
*
OO #
+'',
;=!
"
) +'',(
** <(
<(
#
OO
( )
# "
)
;<
# OO ?
!
?
(
"
!
,"
)
)>(<
$OO
"
#
"#
)
( !
"
)
'
(
?
"
" )
'$> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
#
#
)
#
)
N( <
? *
<!!< '\1
"
) <
(
<
#
"(
<!
#
<
"
(
"
<!!<
# )
# !
)
"
< ?
* <
<)
>(
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '$@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
! D
=
? '=A9z!{8"9#
"
)$
!
"
)>
# (1 even if the settlement method is at the
+'',))(
"
? )
# !
+
#
"
(
#
)
)D
!
)
*+'',((
'
?
)
#
(
( (
"
)
"
Q
(
"
!
#
"
"
) # )
'$$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
"
!
"
( # +'',(
);<
?#
"
)
"
(
)
"
'={A8#
))(
"
(
"
O ) discounted value of the amount of cash
"#
)>
"
# )
"
# ) X#
)
>
"
O
"
Y
"
*
" (
#
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '$;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Convertible instruments
(compound instruments that
contain equity conversion
features)
D "
;#
"
! "
" Q
"
O"
"
"
<<"
"
) ))(
(# "
<
'=A9z)
"
"
#
)
( "
>
"
O
"
"
X <
Y Y
"
)N(
X*!
<
Z "
"X# !
s "
"
"
(
"
O #
#
"#)
"
;#
"
"
"
)
s ' "
"
"
H=
*
!
T )V>H=
'$C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
Puttable shares/redeemable
upon liquidation
Puttable shares Puttable shares Puttable shares
,"
*
"
! >
"
,"
!
"
)
<
"
"
)>
>
"
!
!
(
'={A8# "
!
)(
(
(
*
"
) ))("
"
!
#
Y
# '
!
)
) "
(;=
TOO )V
(#
("
!
# (
) ( (
(
*"
"
"
#
)
>
#
)
'
"
!
#
!
'\1)
) !
)
N(
"
!
"" !
""
?
"
"
(
#
?
+'',
(#
" !
'={A8
<
?
"
"
!
""
"
?
(
)
'\1
?
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '$D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Measurement
!
<
( (
!
)
" ")
>'=Az8
?
# !
" )
'$E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
Effective-interest-rate
calculation
D "<
> >
!
O
O
"
O
"
+'',<
" Y
"
""
Y
<
) O
(
!
<
)
( !
/"
)
<
(
Y
< (<
(
) "
+
PricewaterhouseCoopers '$<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Modification or exchange
of debt instruments and
convertible debt instruments
D '< " '"
<"
"
Y
"
Y
"
98
98
Y
Y
"(
"
)
< < !
(<
)>
< )
")
Y
"
98
(
"
"
"
"(
< (
((
!
# Z
'\`#
Step 1— Y <
"" 98
"
)'
(
"
!
(<
9
"< ! #
)>
" Y
98
1
) 98
#
")
';( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
Modification or exchange of debt Step 2—
9 ( " "
instruments and convertible debt
"Z (
instruments (continued) "
s M <
"
"
( !
98
"
""
" !
)N(!
<
98
#
" !
"
! 98
)(
<)
<
s M"
"
#
"
98
)
that was substantive at the date of
)
Technical references
IFRS '\1('\`(=1
PricewaterhouseCoopers ';'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Note
>
" +'', )
Recent/proposed guidance
#
# )_"188q"188A('H
'H(
( ,
~ (Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity(/
)'
"
"
# !
(
" (
*
)
)[
1899('H
# *
*
'H?*
(
/)"*#
'H
O!
/"
<)
>"
<
`[9(189\([9(
189z(
)
';> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Financial liabilities and equity
+11
7
$/B
*
1!
*
*
!
*
?*!#@'@@Financial Instruments
"
"
< (
"
)
O Z
s
"
)
s
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers ';@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Convertible debt
>
<
>
`
)
"
( "
")'
((
'H
"
"
O
<
#
)>#
"
"
# "
# "
# <<
"<!!<
" " # O
#
<
! " <!!
'=A9z!98!9z!q{) <# )
<
( "
"
"
O)
"
O
" #
)
"
9
'H )`( " "
Q
(
(1
"
)'
" (
"
) "
"
\
"
" )=
# "
?
" )
"
B=
"#
)
';$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
K
D
<
"+'',)M
!
+'',(
(
"*"
)
" ( "+'',!
( "# "
)B(
<
TVQT
V
(
+'',)'
(
"
"
)
(
" O
"
""
*!
'
+'',
("
!
)
" +'',(
Y< "
)
!
)>
"
"
" )<
(
!"
" #
" )N(+'',
"
)>
Y< "
"
)
+'',
)
( !
<
(" "+'',)
';C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
O
*
+'',)>
)
)
'H?'H?
)D
/ ('H'H
)Q
)
>
"
!`9\)
PricewaterhouseCoopers ';D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
#
> (
#
)
#
) )
#
(
)
"
+'',
<
# (
'=A9z > <
'\`
"
*
#
"
+'',)
"
))(
*
# (( #
"
) "
(
'
"#
)
((
"
"
"
"
*#
)
" " !
"
'\`# (
"
#
? )
" )
)
';E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
Embedded derivatives
Reassessment of embedded
derivatives
D
! "
"
"
"
(
*)+
(! " "
#+'',) ( <
Y
"
("
"
"
"
!
"!
#
)"
""
#
" )
'"
"#
T
V)!
(
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers ';<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
$
#
=
" "
puts and calls embedded in debt host
")
" !
# " ) >
""
9<
outlined tests is common and typically
< O
" ) < 1<
"
Test 1—"
< !
"
)
(
B "
)
"(
Test 2—
"
"
?
""
*)N(
"/ <
)
'C( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
*
)
(\
<
(=
|(
"
Y )
"
(
Measurement of derivatives
"
* !
""
* * !
)
) "
#
<
("*
"
>"
O
*
""
*)
"*(
Q
*)
+'',)
( O
""
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'C'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
!
)
#
)
(;=!
Hedge accounting practices allowed under US GAAP that are not acceptable under IFRS
'C> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
# !
)
#
(
!!
(
+'',)N(
Y ""
!
*" <
)'
9 "988
"
< 1 " )
(
(
! #
"
)
) ;
(
>;=
"
"
(
)'
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'C@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
!
?
)M
! "
*
? ? *(
( )'(
Y
"+'',
"
)
""
(
""
><
Y <
"
!
"
Y) (
)
"
)> "
*
)
"
!
(
"
)
"
Y
!
"
)>(
"+'',
< ),
'X
)
'C$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
Servicing rights
D < +'',
" *
)>
)
* ))(
!
*)
' ((
"
(
)
"
"
"
!
"
"
)
)
?
) "Y ! *
'
("
'
( )>(
?
" # "
(
"#
)
)
'
(
<
)
"
) '
(
*(
(
"
#
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'C;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
>
#
"
)
'CC PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
Hedge accounting practices not allowed under US GAAP that are acceptable under IFRS
Y
+'',)
+'',)
s H*
s < (
*"
Y
s = *
))(<
> *" <!" !
<
"* *
)
*(
*
"
!
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'CD
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
*
*
) "
"
*
(
)
"
)( "
>
*"
(
<
*
!
*
"
!"!
#
" )
+''," Y
) (
!
"
have to be allocated to individual assets
"
)
'CE PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
O
*
* )+'', * )
)
'
"
>
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'C<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Technical references
IFRS '\`(q(=`(=9
Note
>
" +'', )
'D( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Derivatives and hedging
Recent/proposed guidance
FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
>'H'H/
(
)'
("<
/
# (
(*
"
)
Y "
* )'
""
" "
Y
))(
B="
T
V)>
+'',(
! )
s >'H?
*
)
N(
"
)>
")D
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'D'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
>
!"'H+'',
+'',
(
)
* *"
!
? * )
>
!
)
s '"
*
!
)>'H?
*
!
(
"
"
"
)
s $Y< "
<
)>'H?
9
# !
"
'D> PricewaterhouseCoopers
=
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
*
!"*(
Y)
(
(
+'',!
Z
#
<
" "
)+'',(
"
! ~;)=
!~; " !* ); "+'',
*
( );<
< (
*
)'
(
# )
D
+'',
" ?
)M
+'',
"
O (<
#
< ) (
/
!
" "
)+'',(
#
(#
" O
)
/
+'',
)$1899'H 99(Joint arrangements)
=
/ Z/
/ )' (
/
"
);#
" / 99 ); /
/ /
'\9)
>'H
91(Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities( #
(9899)91
#
'1A(
Investments in Associates(#
(
*(
? " ( (/ (
)
"Q
98(99(91
Q
! )
>
"
)
'D$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
General requirements
Requirements to prepare
consolidated financial
statements
!
>
) ,
<
))(
!
"*Q
# " )'<
"
O (
Z
N( (
!
(Y< "
"*Q
) s
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'D;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Consolidation model
D
'
!
Z ~;
)+'',
!"
s D " # "
< )=
?
! ~;#
! "
!
"
" "
/ ))( ~;) ")=
<
(
(
#
(
z8
?
s
<
)=
<
Z
"
"
- > "
Z
s , ~; / ?
- D
" )=
~;?
<
- N
!
evaluated
s B"
""
?,;# )>
- +
"~;
# (
- ~;
Q"
)
$1899('H
!
M
,;
(
)>
( #
X
"
<
?
" ?
"~;
" (
*
X
)> "
)>
"
) / "
~;+'',)
* /
Q
B
( ( <
)B
"
"
) ~;)'
,;" "
Q" (
( !
( (
*
" /
~;
,;?"
?
!* )>"
)
"
)
'DC PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
)>
~;
?
<
(
)'
( "
(
*
" involvement with the investee and has
?
*
<
"
)
),
"
'
Y)
)
*(
"
( (
)
")
(
" )
(
<
z8
(!
(
(
*("
/
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'DD
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
#
) ")
< "
"
(
# <
"
")
" )
)
?
N(98
?
"
"
#
)
)
'DE PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
Consolidation model (continued) Agent versus principal analysis Agent versus principal analysis
=+'',~;
!
*
*
)
"
98
Q
)
)'
~;(
""
+'',
(
)=
"
"
)'
"
)98
*
# )
>'H <
(
Z9
* (1
+'',~;
"
(\
""
({
98)
)
Related parties and de facto agents Related parties and de facto agents
+'',
"
)'
!
)
?
98#
))(
" (
(
" )N
()
*
" Y
"
((
)
") (
"*
! +'',
#
" an entity on a standalone basis but the
Q" )
)
" (
" ~;)
" (
"
"
"/
~;)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'D<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Silos Silos
'
+'',
!
<
(
)N( "
!
(
"
!"/ )
> !
"
)'
"
!*
? "
"(()
" )>* # "
+'',
~;)
)M,;
!,;(
,;? *((
)
'E( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
Special-purpose entities
D
=
# D !*
~; ~;
(
,;(
<
" ,;) ,; !*
))(
) "
B(,;
"
(
~;"
!
(
O )'
(#
O("
" !
)<
(
,;"
)>
Z
<
"
(
( s M,;
) "
s M
> "
!*
"
)
/ ",;
s M
" /
",;
s M
/
*,;
,;
<
"
!
"
)
(
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'E'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)
*
! } <
< " !
)
O
)
)
O
>
( !
"
)
)
*(
>
N("
)
"
)
'E> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
Disclosures
+'',#
'
"
"
"
=,;!
" ?
~;)
)
# )
Z
Z
s /
s >
"
"
"
+'',~;)$
~;
(
!
! Q
"
" (
"
~;?
!
" (
# ( /
"
"
!
)
(
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'E@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
(
" ~;1
(Z
"
~;" 9) ,
"!
" ) "
O
"
1) }
O
!
'
#
!
(
(
/
(
)
'E$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
"# )
"# (
""
!
,
! <
Y) Y )
Y) ,
"
),
(
( !
# "
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'E;
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
"
!
(
"
/
# )
""
) = "
/ Z
$/
s [
99
/
Z
s [
(
"
"
s [ (
'EC PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
)+'',( / ~;)/ #
~;(
/
!
)
)[ "
)
(
(Q ,
#
>
(
"
( (<
"
99)
?~;);# ! "
!"!
"
z8!z8z8!z8(
?
* # ))( !
"
! ?
!
)=
)'
"
!
)
/
99(<
"
(
!
(
# )
/
"
/ ~;(
)'/
""
# O /
/
)
# !
,
'1A)
<
'/
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'ED
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
*
" / X(
(
) ))( " #
( "
X
/
O
M "
""
#
( "
(<
Z
O
), s > *
<
)' ""!
(
/
# s >
"!
) "
"
(
s > "
*
"
'EE PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
1
)
! '# < ! '# < !
+'',
) ?
! ?
!
? "
"
O
# )
" OX
X
?
) O
(
Q
)
"
>
+'',) <# )
PricewaterhouseCoopers 'E<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Technical references
IFRS '9('1q('1q 188A('1A('1A'1899('\9('\('\`(z(98(99(
91(=91(=9\
Note
>
" +'', )
'<( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
Recent/proposed guidance
$1899('H 98(Consolidated Financial Statements(99(Joint Arrangements(91(Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities('1q'(Separate Financial Statements '1A'(Investments in Associates
and Joint Ventures)>
" [9(189\(
)
98
)'
"
"
/ *
)
(
" ,;?
" "
"
)98
<
('H *
/ "
)
+'',
~;(
"
!
"
"
), "
Y)
"
( (")
>
<
98
),
"
), * ?
"
" )
>
Q
)' ""
T
V)=
X<
( )
PricewaterhouseCoopers '<'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
188`('H
/
"
!
)> 98 'H'H?
!
)N(
"?
"
/ O "
)>
/ (" "
"
/ )
99
<
/
Z
s [
X, "
"
)'/
O
Z
- '(
/
- } "
(
"
/
-
/
- ;<
(
<
/
s [ X, )'/
"
"
/ )(/
( (
*"/ );#
# / )
'<> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Consolidation
)
)N('H
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '<@
H "
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
L
+'',
)>" " +'',
( /<
Z9
"
"
)
'<C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Business combinations
Costs of acquisitions
Contingent consideration
> = O = O
)
(
"
(
(
"
(
B * #
"
#
"
+'', ) )
))(#
"
=
=
)~
"
"
"
"# )
)>
(
O
(
"
O
(
)=
#
)('=A9z("
""/ " "
"
)
'=A8z(# "#
"
Acquired contingencies
>
'#
"
"/ ># ?
"
"
O O
#
)
"
) "
"
)>
" (
"
"#
< )' O
O
#
O (
" "#
("
"
#
)
)
= O)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '<D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Assignment/allocation and
impairment of goodwill
>
+
Q
'
!
Z !
Z
9)
9(
>"
=+
"
<
(
=+ ))(
O
)
)
(
1
'
O
( )
<
1) +
) >
X
)
"
assets and liabilities included in the
)
'
O
<
)
>
)
)>
9
O )
(
#
1
*
'<E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Business combinations
Contingent consideration—
seller accounting
Entities that sell a business that includes +'',(
(
)
*
(
)
O
O"
(
)
Other
Noncontrolling interests
_
+'',
) !"! " (
(
"
" #
")>
"
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers '<<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
!
)
" ># " ># "
"# '=A98!98(
(
)
z8
z8
(
#
) (
(
=
" "
<
z8
" )
the consolidation models between the
'=A98)
*
)
>(( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Business combinations
Fair value
M
#
"
(
"
(
)>< ?!
)
#
"
<
)
) <
)
'
$1899('H'H
) *
"
(( " *
"
B (
"
*( "
( *) *<
(# ("+'',(
""
*
"
" "
"
*(
*
"*
(
""*)
if the intended use of the asset by the
)
#
T
>
"
"V
+'',)
"
*(
?
*)N(
"
"*
)>
+'',)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >('
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
(
("+'',
)'X
)
Push-down accounting
>
*
! >;=?
! \
!
"
"
# )
+'',) "
O+'',) company becomes substantially wholly
#
( # Y
)
" "
#
?
)_
"
! )
Technical references
IFRS '91('1q 188A('\A('\`(1(\ 188A(9\
US GAAP '=18z18('=\z898('=\z818('=\z8\8('=\898('=A8z('=A98
PwC Guide $
* %
'$
>
* .
Note
>
" +'', )
>(> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Business combinations
Recent/proposed guidance
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts
D"1898('H' = "
\z8!18(.
*$?- @
!
?- '
'_)1898!1A)> '
9
O )' #
1
O
*
"
(
(
("
D"9z(1898);
)
"
(
(
(" D"9z(1899)_
"
"
)
"/
# )>
>#
"
)>
"
1
O
)
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011–04, Fair Value Measurement (topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in US GAAP and IFRSs, and IASB IFRS 13, Fair
Value Measurement
$1899('H '1899!8{('=A18('H 9\(Fair Value Measurement.>
#
"
"+'',)'X
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >(@
B
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
J
( <
(
(
(
(
)
D
<
(
/
/
)
>
(
)
+'',
"
"
(
(
"
"
"
)(
<
(< # !"
)
+'',)>
X
#
X#
/
"
"" # <
)
$
#
+'', )N( /
/
"/ )
>
"
)
>(C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
Financial statements
Balance sheet—offsetting
assets and liabilities
D > T
(
"
! "?
("!
(
"
"
(
!
(
<
"
< )V' "? "
(" ( )> !
"
"
"
) O
' <
s
"
Z
O
s ;
liability simultaneously
"
("
s >
off the amount owed with the amount
"
(
s >
s > "
"
"
"?
)
!
$
("
"
"
# (" "
) "
" )" (
# )
PricewaterhouseCoopers >(D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Balance sheet—offsetting assets and >
<
liabilities (continued)
"
<
)'
9 !
O
1 !
<
O
"
"
"
!
O
);
)
>(E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
"
"
"
!
91
) "
!
<
(
"
""
"
(
!
"
" # )
)
>
"
!
"
) (
"
)
Income statement
> " > "
;
*(( 9
!
(" <
!
"
<
"
<
"
( (
O<
M
and its components in a statement of
" )N( # (
"
# (
"
<
"
< )
+'',)
)
! (
T
(+'',
V
"
"
T<
V
and its components in a statement of "
# ("
"
)
) Q
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >(<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
#
(
!
#
X (
)
Entities should not mix functional and
)
<
"
T;< V" <
<
!
" #
)
)
>T<
V
;
O )N(
!
#
Z
Q
!
s '
<
O((
s '!
!
<
ment of income and a statement of
)
s '
T;< V
" )
[1899'H !
?# '9(Presentation of Financial
[1899'H '_) Statements)
!
1899!8z(Presentation of Comprehensive (
"
Income)
(
((#
and its components in the statement of "
#
"
)
"
"
)
Q
) Q
)
Statements of equity
# , ' #
# "
?# "
)
)
>'( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
#
)
"
( (
>
Y
( )
Y)
#
"
"
Y Y)
O
#
'1\
"
!
<
( (
!
"
Y
)
O
O)<
(
"
O
""
(
(
(
(
#
Y #
"
)
? )
(
O
O
"
"
)
?
)>
><
(<
Y
<
O(
!
<
Y)
" !"
) ><
"
Y
'
<
< )B
<
)
(
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >''
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Disclosure of critical
accounting policies and
significant estimates
'
< ;= (
M
?
! ( #
"Z
! made in the Management’s Discussion and s >/!
# +'',) Analysis 98!])
+'',
O
)
s "*
!
X
*
"
X
*
/
of assets and liabilities within the next
)
Comparative financial
information
=
B
#
# (;=#
# ( "
(
<
+'',;=# )
!
)
<
"
( #
#
)
!
# (
# )
' "
#
!
!
)
<
!
((
!
)
>'> PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
Diluted earnings-per-share
calculation—year-to-date
period calculation
D
!
;,( >
!
! *
"
"
O
)>
(
!
!;,!! # "
)
"
"
;, "
)
!! !
"
"
#
;,
)
Diluted earnings-per-share
calculation—contracts that may
be settled in stock or cash
(at the issuer’s election)
D "
= "
" ="
"
;,)
)>
!
"
)
N(
"!
<
"
" "
""
"
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >'@
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Diluted earnings-per-share
calculation
> =
"
" >
;,
*
))("
"
"
;,)
"
;,
?
*
)
"
;,
X
*
")> ( !
" )
>'$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
=>'"
>
! "
#
!
! " !
=>' ")
s M
"
Y (
=>'
s M Y
(
=>'
=>'"
"
"
!
"
#
! " "!
"
Translation in consolidated
financial statements
# # ;# # "
$
"
)
)
)>
"
)
(
<
O #
choice has no impact on the amount of
# )
PricewaterhouseCoopers >';
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Determination of functional
currency
+'', > ,
"
( )
) !
< ) <
<
" (? " (
/ # /
?
!
?
) "
)
Other
>'C PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
Definition of discontinued
operations
>
>
! '
"
Y
+'',)>(
"
(
!
"
)
(
Q
"Z "
) s >
Y
"
"
/
"
(
" # <
s >
#
'
)
+'',"
"
(
(
(" (
)
+
(
!
O"
#
)
Related parties—disclosure of
management compensation
(
# ! D
* >
*
ment exists to disclose the compensation
#
*
)
)
"
)B
;=
# *
*
"
)
compensation to be disclosed outside the
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >'D
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Related parties—disclosure
of transactions with the
government and government-
related entities
><
><
"
'
<
"
#
< +'',) #
! #
!
Q! "
"Z
!
) s '
(/
( Y
s '
"
(/
(
Y"
Operating segments—segment
reporting
'
!"
;
O < ;
O <
O
# O
#
<!
O
"
"
(
))(
)
)
"
!
"
)
Technical references
IFRS '9('A('19('1{('\\(z(A
9:;$$< '=18z('=18z!18('=1\8('=18('=1A8('=\8!98('=A\8('=A\8!\8!{8!1{8!{('=Az8
Note
>
" +'', )
>'E PricewaterhouseCoopers
Other accounting and reporting topics
Recent/proposed guidance
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, and IASB Amendment to
IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
[1899('H '_)1899!8z(Presentation of Comprehensive Income( ('H
'9(Presentation of Financial Statements( #
(" (),
!
#
"
+'',)>
# "
188q)'(
)
'
"* /
( (
Z
s
#
"
<
(Y
/"
"
<
(
(
#
(
)>
< +'',(
"/
)
s >'H#
"<
"
"#
)> < +'',(
B="/
)
s >'H
B=
)>'H((
B=
(# " )
s ('H
/
)>
'H
)
# (
"*)
+!
(/
(
Y"
)>
<
#
""
"!
)_
#
" ?
!
)
# *
)
PricewaterhouseCoopers >'<
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
)
O
)>
/
)>
*
?
*
)>
<
"+'', )B"1898(
(
/
!
"#
#
)>
/
/ <
"D"1899)
(
*
)>
/ "
( <
,D(>
; (,'(B"/
= ( $1898$188A(
)B"1898(
(
/
>>( PricewaterhouseCoopers
! O
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
+,
#M
[
188`('H
"
"
)
(+'',)
&
+,
-%=
>'H
"
"
$;)'
"
!
"
9 "#
"
*
"
*(1
"
("*( (
( "*Q
)> $; ((" O)
>
("
"
$;
"
"
"
)N(
(" $;
!
"
+'',
$;
$;))( ] (
$;
))()=
"
&
+,
+,
-%=
$;
"
"
(
!
*
)
=
$;(
(
( (
( $; ) (
"
!
"
)<
"
$;
Z
/*
222 PricewaterhouseCoopers
IFRS for small and medium-sized entities
( # )
$;( "(# (
)
(
!
"
"
(
< )$;(
!
!
"
)>(
9
89>< =>
>, <
"
)>
""
)
<
)
&
N""Q
+,
-%=
+'',
))(" " ( "+'',
$;
*
""
Inventory—+'',(
! (!}B
"
) (
!
)$;(}B
)" Y "
"
"
< (
")$;(
*
)*
*
+'',(
<#
"
*
"
#
# OO # (
)$;(
!
*
"
"
(
)
,*
*
+'',(
!!
"
(
! # )$;(
!
" )
PricewaterhouseCoopers 223
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
,V
IFRS
'
"$;($;
+
$;+
#!
"$;)M
($;+
#
%')
"'H(%' !
$; *"
# )
[1899($;+ %'1899Q89(Use of the IFRS for SMEs in a Parent’s Separate Financial Statements(
$;
)%'1899Q89
"
"
(
$;
)
US GAAP
D 1898("
""
' '(
O
'H(+'',"
)[1899("
""
! (
!
" ')> "
<
+'',
)>
"
*
'H
!
(
")>'
*
*
<
1899)
W
+
=
!
$;
(
,=
"
Similarities and differences—
a comparison of IFRS for SMEs and “full IFRS.”
>>$ PricewaterhouseCoopers
'HQ'H
/< "
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
2011 2012
Responsible Board Issuance Issuance
anticipated anticipated
Joint projects
Conceptual framework
Phase B: Elements and recognition Joint
9
,=Z$ Joint
9
Phase D: Reporting entity Joint
9 >
/
/) <
"D"1899)
1 >'H<
O
1899)>
226 PricewaterhouseCoopers
FASB/IASB project summary exhibit
2011 2012
Responsible Board Issuance Issuance
anticipated anticipated
Explanation of symbols:
DP = Discussion Paper
ED = Exposure Draft
F = Final
\
("
/
PricewaterhouseCoopers 227
Index
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Index
+!
L
K
'# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9`q =
= ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9`q =Y ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9z
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 189181 D
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 99
_
>@( PricewaterhouseCoopers
Index
;<
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 981
'
Q
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) z{
$# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) zA
B
, ! ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) z ;#
# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 99q
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) zz
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 99A
$""
<!
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9999q
"
" ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ){
N"
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 99A
,
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 99q
Settlements ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1
"
"))))))))))))))))))))))) z`
4
=
"
# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{z
"LV+"L
! =
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{1
'H'H
/) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11q
= "
[
/ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )11 # ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{
B'H
/) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )11q D X<!!< <
? ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{\
D X
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{{
; ! !
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{`
'
"
!!
"
X
< Q
" ) ) ) ) ) ) `q
"
) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9{A
'
"
!!
X
$ <"
# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) `q "
" ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )9z89z9
PricewaterhouseCoopers >@'
IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
+,
#
"
(
(
* ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A1
* ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19
!
"
X
>
"
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A9
M9# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9`
!
"
X
M
9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A9
"
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A8
+,
#M
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) `8
HB }
"
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AA
H ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Az D
!
!
X
!!
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19\
= " ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) q`
D
;,
X
*
=Y ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )qqqA
!"
X
232 PricewaterhouseCoopers
Index
X
< ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {`
,
Scope ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {\
H ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \z
!
((# ) ) ) ) ) {z
= ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \\\{
><
X
) ) ) ) ) {A
= X
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1q
~
X'H>
9{ <
D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \
<
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {`
;< ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \
$
!
= ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1` )!
=
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \8 D< " (
/ (# ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 91191\
+
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1A
;<
) ) ) ) )91{
}
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \9
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))91
X
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1
PricewaterhouseCoopers 233
Looking for more on IFRS?
US IFRS resources
www.pwc.com/usifrs
Our US IFRS site contains a wealth of information and tools on
where we currently stand and what companies should be doing in
the US. Resources include our “IFRS First” newsletter, extensive
publications, in-depth webcast series, Video Learning Center,
interactive IFRS adoption by country map, and more. Designed
!
)
~
"
!
PwC IFRS pages or take advantage of our global IFRS resources
including publications, learning tools, newsletters, illustrative
)
www.pwc.com/usifrs
James G. Kaiser
US Convergence & IFRS Leader
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
267 330 2045
E-mail: james.g.kaiser@us.pwc.com
© 2011 PwC. All rights reserved. “PwC” and “PwC US” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, which is a member firm
of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity. This document is for general information purposes only,
and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. NY-12-0042