Professional Documents
Culture Documents
News Paper Commentary
News Paper Commentary
Nicholas discussing how, throughout his career, he is noticing the facts and figures of climate
depreciation and how that affected his feelings. Kimberly talks about how there is pressure
for scientists to remain objective and only look at the statistics and figures. Nevertheless, she
could not avoid the feelings that came along with “witnessing the demise or death of what we
love”. She speaks about how environmental scientists should remain “policy neutral” and
detach emotions from the work they were performing. The rhetoric behind that I assume is to
keep an objective and consistent policy making process for the environment based on facts
and reason rather than emotion. On paper, it makes sense that one should follow this attitude
when it comes to deciding on environmental policies, and for environmental scientists to stay
impartial. Yet, the author very eloquently points out that “giving space to my feelings gives
me more empathy with what others are going through as part of the shared human experience
and helps me connect with them more deeply”. In the end, she highlights the importance of
environmental scientists in helping the world navigate “environmental grief”. I think this
approach is very important to preventing climate change. I think a major part of the reason
why big companies and carbon emitting countries are not proactively making profit
minimizing decisions for the sake of protecting the environment is because they lack that
empathy earlier mentioned. It is through navigating through these feelings of empathy and
urgency in a way that we can make valuable steps towards preventing critical climate change.
A lot of people don’t necessarily believe that climate change affects them directly or it’s an
issue far away from them. Nevertheless, what we learn from environmental scientists in this
article is that developing empathy for people who are directly affected by climate change
creates incentive for action. Some are shielded from the reality that climate change creates for
opinion, emotional discourses are more conducive to change rather than just abstract facts
and figures.