Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes On The Trickster
Notes On The Trickster
Notes On The Trickster
Both versions are imperfect and somewhat removed from the original play, probably written
between 1616 and 1625, possibly 1619?
Sources:
- A group of legends widely known throughout Europe of a young man on his way
to Church kicking/insulting a skull near a cemetery and inviting it to dinner
- It is an offence against God, consisting in the assumption that the mercy of God
will be available to him, as it were on demand, and that there is no need to ask for
it until the very last moment
- Divine retribution can also be seen as a kind of blanket punishment covering a
range of other misdemeanours, most of them social
Seduction perpetrated on women
Violation of the laws of hospitality, friendship and honour
The play depicts a corrupt society bent on largely material pleasures, be it the pursuit of sex,
status or money.
1
- A protagonist in an auto sacramental: Man, who forgets God in the multiplication
of sensual experiences (with Cataliñon as the voice of Conscience or Reason, Don
Diego and the King as spokesmen for Divine Law, and the various women as
Woman, the ally of the Devil, standing for temptation)
- A hardened sinner, who refuses to listen to the teachings of the Church and damns
himself through obstinacy and lack of genuine repentance and detestation of past
sins.
Unlike Molière’s protagonist, Tirso’s DJ is a believer. He doesn’t deny the
existence of God. He simply procrastinates.
- A diabolical figure, associated with darkness and Lucifer (II, 728-9; I, 300-1)
- A “locust”, the “scourge of women”, whose function is to punish those his actions
show as guilty, namely women, but also society in general, and to reveal
generalized corruption, hypocrisy and social compromising.
His actions expose the failure of kings, unable or unwilling to restore order.
The play is not so much a revolt against the taboos of an austere society as a condemnation of the
underlying laxity of apparently rigid moral standards.
- Don Juan as a seducer? His success is often due to tricks, burlas, which do not
involve his physical charm, but rely on violence or hackneyed rhetoric.
- Still, he does have physical charm (he is “a noble, handsome, dashing fellow”;
“You speak a lot when you can barely speak” (I, 580, 609).
- Don Juan is a man who dares and whom difficulty spurs on to persevere. Even
“love” arises out of obstacles (the women have lovers, have just got married or
profess insensitivity to love). In fact, it is not the physical beauty of the woman or
the sensual pleasure of the encounter that matters but the challenge to ingenuity
2
and the conquest that provides the stimulation and the sense of triumph. He also
enjoys humiliating women by depriving them of their honour.
- Don Juan as an actor. The various seduction scenes involve a degree of play
acting. But to act is not just to play a part, but also to assert mastery and control
over the Other.
The theological lesson of the play revolves around the concepts of repentance and forgiveness.
Forgiveness can only be granted after genuine repentance. The timing of repentance is also
essential. Don Juan’s error to think “Plenty of time for me to pay that debt” (I, 904)
The second banquet scene raises a number of questions. Why is DJ refused forgiveness at the
end and told there is “no time, my friend! No time! Your time runs out”?
Why does Gonzalo disappear underground with DJ? Is he also dragged to Hell because he
doesn’t enjoy “the grace of God”? Did he die in mortal sin (see his dying words, in which he tells
DJ “you will not escape my vengeance”, II, 542)? Or is he saved and in Purgatory? In any case
he is the instrument of God’s justice, “the man through whom you meet your doom” (III, 954).