You are on page 1of 1

Digest for Tax 2

This fact need not be proven by an


CIR v. Pascor Realty
assessment.
The issuance of an assessment must be
DOCTRINE/S: An assessment is not distinguished from the filing of a complaint.
necessary before a criminal charge can be Before an assessment is issued, there is, by
filed. practice, a pre-assessment notice sent to the
taxpayer. The taxpayer is then given a
FACTS: The BIR examined the books of chance to submit position papers and
account of Pascor Realty and Devt Corp for documents to prove that the assessment is
years 1986, 1987 and 1988, from which a unwarranted. If the commissioner is
tax liability of 10.5 Million Pesos was unsatisfied, an assessment signed by him or
found. Based on the recommendations of the her is then sent to the taxpayer informing the
examiners, the CIR filed an information latter specifically and clearly that an
with the DOJ for tax evasion against the assessment has been made against him or
officers of Pascor. Upon receipt of the her. In contrast, the criminal charge need not
subpoena, the latter filed an urgent request go through all these. The criminal charge is
for reconsideration/reinvestigation with the filed directly with the DOJ. Thereafter, the
CIR, which was immediately denied upon taxpayer is notified that a criminal case had
the ground that no formal assessment has yet been filed against him, not that the
been issued by the Commisioner. Pascor commissioner has issued an assessment. It
elevated the CIR's decision to the CTA on a must be stressed that a criminal complaint is
petition for review. The CIR filed a Motion instituted not to demand payment, but to
to Dismiss on the ground of lack of penalize the taxpayer for violation of the
jurisdiction of CTA as there was no formal Tax Code.
assessment made against the respondents.
The CTA dismissed the motion, hence this
petition.

ISSUE/S: s a formal assessment necessary


in the filing of a criminal complaint

RULING: No. Section 222 of the NIRC


states that an assessment is not necessary
before a criminal charge can be filed. This is
the general rule. Private respondents failed
to show that they are entitled to an
exception. Moreover, the criminal charge
need only be supported by a prima facie
showing of failure to file a required return.

Page 1 of 1

You might also like