CIR v. Pascor Realty assessment. The issuance of an assessment must be DOCTRINE/S: An assessment is not distinguished from the filing of a complaint. necessary before a criminal charge can be Before an assessment is issued, there is, by filed. practice, a pre-assessment notice sent to the taxpayer. The taxpayer is then given a FACTS: The BIR examined the books of chance to submit position papers and account of Pascor Realty and Devt Corp for documents to prove that the assessment is years 1986, 1987 and 1988, from which a unwarranted. If the commissioner is tax liability of 10.5 Million Pesos was unsatisfied, an assessment signed by him or found. Based on the recommendations of the her is then sent to the taxpayer informing the examiners, the CIR filed an information latter specifically and clearly that an with the DOJ for tax evasion against the assessment has been made against him or officers of Pascor. Upon receipt of the her. In contrast, the criminal charge need not subpoena, the latter filed an urgent request go through all these. The criminal charge is for reconsideration/reinvestigation with the filed directly with the DOJ. Thereafter, the CIR, which was immediately denied upon taxpayer is notified that a criminal case had the ground that no formal assessment has yet been filed against him, not that the been issued by the Commisioner. Pascor commissioner has issued an assessment. It elevated the CIR's decision to the CTA on a must be stressed that a criminal complaint is petition for review. The CIR filed a Motion instituted not to demand payment, but to to Dismiss on the ground of lack of penalize the taxpayer for violation of the jurisdiction of CTA as there was no formal Tax Code. assessment made against the respondents. The CTA dismissed the motion, hence this petition.
ISSUE/S: s a formal assessment necessary
in the filing of a criminal complaint
RULING: No. Section 222 of the NIRC
states that an assessment is not necessary before a criminal charge can be filed. This is the general rule. Private respondents failed to show that they are entitled to an exception. Moreover, the criminal charge need only be supported by a prima facie showing of failure to file a required return.