Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Assignment 12

    Uploaded by

    Akash
    7 views6 pages
    1. The appellant filed this appeal against an order passed by the Senior Civil Judge of Saket District Court, Delhi on January 16, 2020. 2. The trial court passed a judgement and decree in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the appellant to pay Rs. 10,00,000. 3. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in its judgement as there was no legal agreement between the parties regarding the sale of property.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    assignment 12

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. The appellant filed this appeal against an order passed by the Senior Civil Judge of Saket District Court, Delhi on January 16, 2020. 2. The trial court passed a judgement and decree in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the appellant to pay Rs. 10,00,000. 3. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in its judgement as there was no legal agreement between the parties regarding the sale of property.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views6 pages

    Assignment 12

    Uploaded by

    Akash
    1. The appellant filed this appeal against an order passed by the Senior Civil Judge of Saket District Court, Delhi on January 16, 2020. 2. The trial court passed a judgement and decree in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the appellant to pay Rs. 10,00,000. 3. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in its judgement as there was no legal agreement between the parties regarding the sale of property.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6

    AssthMENT- 2

    THE HIG (ooRT OS, DELHI


    AT, Delh
    (CVIL Appeuate JoRiSDICTION

    Reguulo qvit APPead n.o Of 202l

    Tv THe taATTER Of

    Ms Koan haP
    ha Po
    90 P}bian
    AoAsig) f/nvo-86
    Rodgcnh Appcotuut,

    Dels APoEtt Aw T

    URSUS

    halu
    akt
    Rlo- Lana. veon
    hana, Wias APPartat

    lau. n o, 24. ResPovndand


    Dei

    SceCTlO 96
    SiS T APPeAL UNDER
    ReGULAR
    RUL e 1 AwD seCTIOU S
    eAD AITH O2DEA XT
    E, 1908,
    HE of c w L PRoceDU R
    of CoD
    JUDGEm¬WT
    DATED
    He tMPowGiED
    A GAUnsT THe LeMREVD
    PASSEo BY
    sAWUARY I
    t DA o SAKETDISTRICT
    COURT, DEL
    SertoR civjL sU DEF,
    MosT REsPECTfULLY SHoeTH

    h e d ha helaut hos Pahjoa? tus appea!


    oud doo2
    ageaut t e ohonreseid judgeend

    2 Thaut e code$e cofy o o Judgemeut


    hwnein s AnngouA -A
    vd hMLA iy anneses

    3 o d ha fac4S o L Ca se is as flous

    )THAT the Pliif f- sesPonded fed o Swt


    Distic CoUst at Dald
    tn fe Add thona
    Cuil Suii of 2o19 aganst
    o. 326
    beaing
    beaing
    Seci fiRe
    t lendou cuepeuaut or
    esonana of h e Conoaet oleged to
    witu
    euberdfudo do im PlainfP
    a appellaud. Tn tue al4e>natiue, the
    of RS l0, 0gop-
    ocyed for donmages dfewducd
    h e dfendoud
    only om
    len dars defedeuut haud
    houd
    defemdeut
    thet te
    auei
    ps eoeno
    Contac
    ComitHed

    hod ue aleges Contsocls oale of


    adiuss 34-Lami bogn
    P t o t heoiug Delh
    appotmeut, 9outn Deli,
    u i n de Ui h o
    11) Thad e Plaindil, 9toy futea sieeo
    Pcdd depvdoud, Rs, lo,oocol
    a s eos nesl momay au e belaneo Rs, 16,00poo
    O Pais on a doue o segistooion
    to
    oSade ded on, Sd tebuoy, 2o19

    THAT a lorvh@d Jucgya, udgenet


    dedad on 16do may,202, der
    Ane sui led y the Poivtitf sPeciffe
    estosmanco o the (bnteane? Oud Osdera
    eresue a Sala dha2 n
    T dajandenud

    aggneed Pyne decree


    TAT nena
    eurrnoodJudga, tna
    Possed by hue
    opbellot Marefn oegs fo psefn
    appeal on me oUecoi omong
    Cth adaund

    THAT e ooned Judg o e l in


    ul ts sPecifie
    dacnaalA
    Usbondont
    Ugmtohowe

    taPldtt0.
    Pehoomonee Ale by
    (e THAT ne Aoors hld Tudga. hoevvad în
    Ano diug
    dne dig uad e dalevalovd had entrae
    o an agrumand b sal his ouvglord
    toe
    THAT e Aeoconed Judga ougt fo have
    held out w ub not Poovel by te
    PladwhitP hued e datendont nad
    ndere mo an agzeemant o Sal

    TAT tne Aeoand Jugt ougnd p have


    ee
    vho pehoeen e Paotie, tuere wos no qwetion
    sodine33

    Peyom e alago COnoaot c al

    JeoshecSudge hous L d tn
    THAT
    Po
    tuod u a Plaintte had
    wo ding onyto u e
    Tem Joeus
    Rs,10,00,0oo 2020 a
    Apil,
    dakendauct nn 20 day of

    Sualgo has Qri in


    ) T t t aJeonnod
    deruungte afendau do erecuda on
    awow a m
    aledeac tn
    THAT no ot apbead ufslon ha baem la
    gaiust Aha impuged judmord m ouy

    THHT h i been e cotun


    appoo
    t Pea mitectiovm

    THAT J CoUTwos a Jui9d ctio

    to a u u d appeou

    Aww Exu PC-4


    JUD&EMENT AvD oecREe

    pouu0 had evdered


    ito a

    T deandad avd
    ave
    Covdoe geule
    on Ma JausuY 2020
    Peld RS lo,0o, oco to
    ne plaudP Jod
    e s nesd movau Ond tue dofendout
    doavdod o
    eout a dola doad mfauoww
    is osdr to e
    te Plodutff .

    a
    PRAYeR
    domce
    e ouppelloud, erefra, oauyhat e
    eleoanes udge n clul suit
    Passed y
    Wo 226 oh a
    2020
    P ladutHH' nmay
    On f a iled b
    uolh co 33.
    AwD foR THI9 HeT O KIMDness
    Te
    APPELLAWT 9HAL HS N DUTY BovnD
    foReeR PRAY

    DELAT APPeLLANT
    t6 202202

    Raul Si Solyon
    Aduocde fos Appeliad

    VERIfICATONU
    Veid ot Delht, on tus 24o{ May thott
    alconuevts muiualoove ova *aus and

    Cosse to Huooledae and noti"8


    Modeual has peem Condealo heeln

    Depomant

    You might also like