Professional Documents
Culture Documents
/25 7%
/25 3%
Student
Name
Instructions to Students
• Answer ONE essay questions from a choice of four.
• Submit research (not to be used during validation task)
• Provide evidence to support your arguments and reference within essay.
• Include an introduction, body paragraphs and a conclusion.
Assessment Information
• Standard items: pens (blue/black preferred), correction fluid/tape, eraser, highlighters.
• Restricted items: no additional notes, textbook or class materials
Total 100%
Type of Assessment
Response: Students respond using knowledge of the roles and powers of the Governor-General.
Assessment Feedback
See SEQTA
YEAR 12 MODERN HISTORY
Historical Inquiry
Task:
Develop a proposition examining and evaluating the role and impact of political leadership
and key individuals during the Cultural Revolution.
Conduct research to support your proposition using source material, then write an in-class
essay in which an argument is developed to support the proposition.
Historical Inquiry – Political leadership and key individuals during the Cultural
Revolution
Examine and evaluate the role and impact of key individuals and political leadership
during the Cultural Revolution 1966-1976.
• Mao Zedong,
• Lin Biao,
• Zhou Enlai,
• A leader of your choice.
Note: evaluate means you will need to make a judgement on the respective impacts of the
individuals and other factors (e.g. economic, social, political, international).
Go back to your brainstorm and label each idea according to whether it is economic, social,
political, or international in nature.
2. Find between six and eight sources that provide evidence to support your proposition; ensure
that the sources:
Reading widely will extend your own understanding of the metalanguage associated with this course
and increase the depth of knowledge that you have on the topic.
3. Outline your proposition with supporting evidence from the sources. At least two to three pieces
of evidence in each paragraph is required at this level (Year 12).
Use the given summary table to present information from each source, with annotations that link
to and explain the significance of the information to the proposition. -Your explanation of how the
evidence proves your thesis is very important. It requires you to connect the leadership and role of
the individual to the policies and tension of the Second Cold War. Linking it to what has changed in
international relations and what has stayed the same.
4. Write an in-class validation essay in which you develop an argument in support of your
proposition. Use evidence from your research and address the historical knowledge and
understanding below.There is no excuse not to write one and get feedback on the school holidays.
This is what you are considering and how you link cause and effect.
This event happened…. Because this happened…. Which had this impact…
A thesis is an argumentative statement that you will spend your research and validation essay exploring and proving.
You use them in in-class essays, exams and validation essays.
For example…
You are asked to look at the impact of Donald Trump on American society.
This is a statement: Donald Trump has divided American society along racist, conservative lines.
This is a thesis statement: Trumps election to President has had a significant impact on the lives of immigrants and
women in America and has led to a divisive style of politics which can only continue to damage America
domestically and internationally.
Let’s break down how this thesis sets me up for a good essay.
1) “had a significant impact” allows me to make a judgement about his role as a key individual and there role in
international relations at the time, I need to use language throughout my essay and topic sentences such as;
a. Damaging, causing conflict, important, consequential, noteworthy, worthy of attention…
2) “the lives of immigrants and women” narrows the focus of my essay so I am not trying to do too much. As a
marker I would now expect one or two paragraphs on immigrants and one or two paragraphs on women. An
“A” level sophisticated analysis will also include the positive and negative impacts. Is there are a group (white
immigrants- or women with conservative values) who is happy with his presidency and not negatively
impacted?
3) “led to divisive style of politics” this is the key to discussing continuity and change. If I say his role has led to
divisive politics I imply that it wasn’t divisive under Barack Obama so I need to discuss the stability and nature
of Obama’s presidency and explain that Trump’s style has changed the environment established by Obama. To
make it clear to the marker…
a. Changed from…, different to…, similarly, differently, in comparison to…, a culture shift, a power shift
from…, etc.
4) “continue to damage America” this is the final part of the question… what was the impact? The example I have
given you is present day so you will be writing in past tense about the impact that the key individual/s had.
It is important to work on your thesis after you have a good understanding of the event and the people. You will need
to have a foundational knowledge of the cultural revolution, it’s impacts and the role of the individuals before
you try and formulate a complex thesis.
I will expect all you to send me your thesis by the end of Week 11, Term 1.
If you have done your thesis correctly you will be working towards this anyway. Check with me before your validation
is due to ensure that you have considered alternative perspectives.
Submission
Research is due Week 2, Term 2 on the same day as your validation.
Marking Key
Marks
Part A: Inquiry Process available
Proposition development
Well thought-out final proposition addressing the task, with evidence of development 4
Proposition addresses task, with evidence of proposition development 3
Minimal thought evident in proposition development 1-2
Subtotal /4
Research plan
Well planned, clear, well thought out focus questions; > 5 FQ 4
Detailed planning (brainstorm), some thought gone into focus questions 3
Little evidence of planning (brainstorm), focus questions 1-2
Subtotal /4
Research retrieval chart
Retrieval chart completed. Notes are not sentences, but points. Well chosen, valid and
relevant with excellent selection of evidence. Evidence of consideration of sources from
6
multiple perspectives. Evidence of sophisticated analysis of information in light of the
emphases of the question.
Retrieval chart completed. Relevant dot points, good selection of evidence and key points.
4-5
Evidence of analysis, but may lack sophistication or consideration of perspectives.
May include full sentences or paragraphs of information; retrieval chart may not be
2-3
entirely completed; evidence may be inaccurate.
Little evidence/attempt at recording evidence of research in retrieval chart. 1
Subtotal /6
Bibliography
Bibliography set out correctly, with a variety of sources. Mix of Primary and Secondary
5-6
Sources included. Primary sources and/or different perspectives noted next to reference.
Bibliography set out correctly (use table in back of planning booklet), sorted into source
3-4
type then alphabetically. Variety of sources (minimum of 3) and several sources in each.
Mostly set out correctly, a variety of sources - less than 3 source types. 2
Little attempt at recording references – only on research notes or in annotated list. 1
Subtotal /6
Sources and annotations; validation notes
Sources are well-chosen, relevant evidence, with annotations showing clear links with
4-5
proposition.
Sources may not all be entirely relevant OR annotations lack clarity in linking to proposition
2-3
OR may have less than 5 sources.
Minimal effort in gathering relevant sources and annotating.
Subtotal /6
Total Part A /25
Part B: Validation Essay Marks
available
Thesis introductory paragraph
Introductory paragraph clearly related to the area/topic of the question, containing
understanding of focus and key terms of the question, which gives a clear sense of the direction 3
of the essay.
Introductory paragraph contains a few sentences outlining the theme of the essay and including
2
a simple proposition.
The opening paragraph has a sentence or two outlining the ‘who’ or ‘what to be discussed in
1
the essay.
Subtotal /3
Synthesised narrative
Demonstrates an understanding of the inter-relationship between events, people and ideas,
4
continuity and change.
Demonstrates an understanding of the narrative, for example that there are relationships
3
between events, people and ideas, and/or continuity and change.
A mainly chronological narrative with some content about, for example, events, people and
2
ideas, and/or continuity and change.
A simple narrative, not always showing an understanding of the correct chronology and with
1
minimal reference to events, people and ideas.
Subtotal /4
Argument
Develops a sustained and sophisticated argument which shows a depth of analysis throughout
5–6
the essay which is analytical, logical and coherent.
Develops an argument which is analytical, logical and coherent and shows an understanding of
4
the inter-connectedness of the narrative.
Written with a sense of argument using some appropriate language of history. 3
The response contains a number of generalisations and statements that lack supporting
2
evidence.
Disjointed discussion/argument suggests little understanding of the topic and/or historic
1
analysis of changing circumstance or continuity and change.
Subtotal /6
Supporting evidence
Detailed, accurate and relevant evidence used in a manner that assists analysis and evaluation.
In responding to an essay instruction of debate or evaluate that proposition, historical evidence
7–9
is used to argue for and against a view/proposition. Uses and cites accurately modern sources
to develop or strengthen arguments.
Mainly accurate and relevant evidence throughout the essay. If quotations, sources, statistics
5–6
are used as supporting evidence, they are cited in some coherent fashion.
Some relevant and accurate evidence is provided. 3–4
Limited evidence is provided that is sometimes inaccurate or irrelevant. 2
Very limited evidence is provided or is often irrelevant or inaccurate. 1
Subtotal /9
Conclusion
Draws the essay’s argument or point of view together. 3
Summarises the essay’s point of view. 2
Is based on the essay’s general focus. 1
Subtotal /3
Total Part B /25
Historical Inquiry – Source Annotation Summary Table
You may bring this completed table and your printed sources into class during the essay.
Thesis statement:
You may use the table below to present information from each source, with annotations that link
to and explain the significance of the information to the proposition.
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3
Source 4
Source 5
Source 6
Source 7
Source 8
Year 12 Modern History
Inquiry Organiser
Second Cold War
Name: _____________________________________________
Planning: What do I need to know?
Brainstorm: What do I need to research to address the topic?
ENCYCLOPEDIA or DICTIONARY
AUTHOR YEAR TITLE OF ARTICLE TITLE OF ENCYCLOPEDIA VOL PUBLISHER PLACE PAGE(S)
MAGAZINE ARTICLES
AUTHOR YEAR TITLE OF ARTICLE TITLE OF MAGAZINE VOLUME NUMBER PAGE(S)
ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA
TITLE OF ARTICLE YEAR TITLE OF WEBSITE DATE RETRIEVED URL (WEBSITE ADDRESS)