Exposing the corrupt activity of the state of Georgia racists group The Overseers

The Overseers, are a corrupt racists group of people in the state of Georgia, who are public
officials such as judges, legislators, district attorneys, in state and federal gov, and the other
members are business owners, lawyers, that conspire to deprive citizens of their civil rights.
They also control others who are not members through bribery and blackmail.
The Overseers corrupt activity is well documented in court case 11-CV-154. This corrupt
conspiracy was expose by Judge Jordan March 7, 2012 docket and the defendant Kia auto sports
attorney March 14, 2012 letter to the Chattahoochee Superior Court the clerk of the court in case
11-CV-154 attached hereto, that shows the following facts;
1) Case 11-CV-154 was filed in the Chattahoochee Superior with the Court Clerk of Laura
Marion in Cusseta, Ga.;

2) The letter by the attorney for the defendant Kia auto sports dated March 14, 2012 shows
it was the FIRST communication with the clerk of the court to place the case on judge
Jordan docket;

3) Judge Jordan docket printed on March 7, 2012 shows case 11-CV-154, seven days
before the defendant requested it.
So why would the case be placed on judge Jordan docket before anyone requested it? These
document shows a coordinated conspiracy by the defendant and judge Jordan to have the case
placed before him for a corrupt ruling. These facts are in black and white, that are undisputed.
Because Case 11-CV-154 was filed by an African-American, it was decided in favor of the white
defendant before it was even filed in court and the Georgia court system and other public
officials strongly refused to consider the above document of facts, disregarded their oath under
the Constitution show they are members of, or controlled by the overseers.
The Overseers believe African-American does not have rights to sue white people in the Georgia
courts as shown by the recent retired clerk of court statement, she informed the judge to deny it,
see at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZutwyNrQLU&feature= player_detailpage.
Although the Overseers recognized some African Americans mostly the ones that they control
through bribery and blackmail to carry out their goals, and to cover up their racist unlawful actions,
but are still regarded as beings of an inferior order, and had no rights which the white man was
bound to respect. Also see
https://www.scribd.com/document/509011690/The-State-of-Georgia-Court-Corruption
https://www.scribd.com/document/505278353/Brief-of-Appellant;
https://www.scribd.com/document/503659922/Motion-for-Declaration-of-Rights-GASC-
S21C0048;
https://www.scribd.com/document/503661747/Motion-for-Reconsideration-GASC-S21C0048;
 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA .
JAMES R. THOMAS, JR.,
and SABRINA R. THOMAS, CASE NO.: 11-CV-154
Plaintiffs,
Atssa:a Fried p --
JUN 12 2012
vs. tauntMar
chnr wochao
Supadar
ccturt
ly

KIA AUTOSPORT OF JUDGE FRANK J. JORDAN,

- J127. rli - -
COLUMBUS, INC. and
SUNTRUST BANK,,
Defendants.

ORDER +

Pending before the Court is Defendant Kia Autosport of Columbus, Inc.'s,

Motion to Dismiss Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Stay the Proceedings and

Compel Arbitration.

DISCUSSION

After considering the arguments of both parties, as well as all of the

evidence, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant Kia Autosport's Motion to Stay

the Proceedings and Compel Arbitration.

All of the claims of the Thomas's' are subject to arbitration. In completing

the purchase of their automobile from Kia Autosport of Columbus, the Thomas's

signed two arbitration agreements, both of which clearly state that all claims

on
arising from the sale shall be arbitrated. Furthermore, this Court finds the

arbitration agreements valid and all issues are arbitrable under the language of the

arbitration agreement.'

The Court hereby DISMISSES the Thomas's claims for identity theft and a

RICO Act violation. By voluntarily providing their "identifying information" to

MA, the Thomas's claim does not rise to the level of a violation of 0.C.G.A. § 16-

9-121 (a)(1), (5) and O.C.G.A. § 16-9-120 (4), (5). The Court finds their claim for

identity theft without merit. Furthermore, the Court also finds the Plaintiffs'

allegations of a RICO Act Violation meritless. The Plaintiffs' have made no

showing of a "pattern of racketeering activity"2 and therefore, this claim is also

DISMISSED.

Based upon the foregoing discussion and the findings of fact and

conclusions of law, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant Kia Autosport's Motion

to Stay the Case and Compel Arbitration.

So ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2012.

e
HONORAB J. JORDAN JR.
SUPERIOR CO T OF CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNTY
CHATTAHOOCHEE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Knit v. Whitecap Hour. Group, 268 Ga.App.436, 442-43 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
2 0.C.G.A. § 16-14-4.