The English Magazine
‘Suspicium melioris evi
Bolume G, Sou the Gigth
Romanticifm, Past & Prefent
More than one of our correspondents has
falged a queltlon concerning our use of the
Was the original Romantick movement thet,
‘with its Tove of socal and spirtuall upheavall
fer its own sake, paved the way forthe modern
acceptance of the Evils about which your Mag
eines 0. cightly complain.” Mr. NM.
Gwynne of WeSt London asks “the romantic
movement, in every Geld of human adtivity
‘which it touched, was a revolutionary movement
tnd was considered unspeakably vulgar by
those who watched the revolution, did their
‘eft to defend the old valves and cuftoms and
remembered the oid values and euBtoms when
they were all but gone. What did romanticism
‘mean if did not mean abandonment of form,
Tack of reftraint and aggressive ventimental-
{tye the appeal to the emotions rather than the
reason?”
“These are reasoned remarks and it behoves
us to reply to them as such. nthe BrSt place,
Tet us note that” the hiftoreal movement
Fomantlism (we spell It with a
to differentiate it from our own
Romanticism) comprised many different and
‘often confiting Strands from revolution (0
Teaflion, from democracy to hierarchy, from
chaos and beaftiness to chivalry and order. IF
Wordeworth's famous words on the French
Revolutions" Blise wa it in that davn to be
alive/But to be young was very heavent™
‘were romantic in the abandoned, chactie sense
oF that term, does not the very spirit of rom
‘breathe in Burke's famous words on the
same tubjedt?
‘ke sow sixteen or seventeen yours since I moe
‘rance, then the Datphiness, at Vere
tlle; and surely ncver ited ou this by which
the hardy seemed to touch, « more delight wa
ion Tan be aft ove the horeon, coring
ts cheering te elevated aphere she abt began
‘Bove in"glterng ke the morlag Rar fall ot
Ue aed apleodour, and joy Lite did dream
that Tebould have lived tp nce auch dane fal-
Fes wpon ber in alia of gullant men, in sation
‘of mea of honour and of cavers T thought ton
tMeusand. mwords tuft: have leaped Troe thir
ieablarde to avenge even» Took that threatened
hier with insult. Bot the age of chivalry is gone
‘That of sophiSicee, economifs, and clears
tar asecended.
‘The Revolution itself, far rom being a rom-
antic movement, was the spothecsia of eo-
Classical rationalism, with its revival Gn per-
verted form) of classical republicanism, its
Ceremonial enthronement of the Goddess of
Reason in Notre Dame cathedral and, beneath
all the rhetoric, its ultimately Whiggish mot-
Ive force--to replace the old hegemony of the
nobility with the new hegemony of money. IF
Certain romantics were taken in by the spur-
tous claims of the Revolution, itis also worthy
‘of note thatthe three English romantics moSt
‘oeal in its support-—Wordeworth, Coleridge
and Southey—all became Staunch conserya-
tives without ceasing to be romantics. Edmund
‘Gosse summarised the position thus:
Enrly tm the century, Wordeworh ad become,
Tha we seninedn Ghanch and Sate Pry of te
‘Rtreme types Southey. who tn 784 bad “chose
ing to ty, wavered between deisn and ace
promptly developed s horror for every species of
Mer pei abd anil go
the (high Tory) Quarterly Review. Temperament
nt eréumblance Combined to make Scott came
Mind mane. we lok back
the “Cxtracrdinary,
‘ode and wholesome law-abiding morality ef
te generation whick Introdoced romanticiem ia
thi Country
‘Both theae great writers (Wordsworth and
CGsisidgel spake much of passion, and iniBed ox
“resampled fo
‘acapeto0 long. But by passion Wordeworth ao
see ioe Pass
‘nov unruly turbulence of the nonser, 20
fevelt aguiaft conventional manners, no. dtr
Tego ei atone opel ie tryna
{ahead his conception tx his poetry, as Insnce
cpton coped apo sme ee of ge
{eal or pathetic beauty-vuch ae mountain &
shld a Bowerand ted dedly ty into the
Sanne! of imaginative expression. He stv that
there wpe apette of Beauty wich might lad to
‘but fom these he and Scott and even
Goletige, resolutely armed away thei eyes”
Perhaps the moSt important point to grasp
hhere—and the point mast obfuscated by the
whole tendency of modern Hiterary interpret-
Stion—is that these writers were nat merelyPage 2
‘passively accepting social conventions or fai
Ing, through negligence, or preoocupation, oF
cial conditioning™, to eriticise the “prud
ish” ‘conventions of ‘their time. They ‘were
helping to eftablish those conventions. They
were ahead of their time--the forerunners of
Vidtorian sensibility. They were aétvely in e-
volt againit the crude licentiousness of the
Teth century, and were setting new ftandards
of purity and refinement which were to help
{orm the better aspedts ofthe Vidorian era,
a
commonplaces of the liberal interpretation of
Sitery and Iterature that decency, propeety
find morality are blind produats of an unietel
Figent or prejudiced atcal order, while the
tman of genius. represents ineligent revel
puiit such retraite, sometimes quite over-
{raing them and helping to bring about a
"Rep forward in the hberation” of the