Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN MULTICULTURAL SETTING
Introduction:
Intercultural Communication:
The following are the concepts to consider in understanding other people across
culture.
Culture is the system of knowledge, beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, and artifacts
that are acquired, shared, and used by its members during daily living; within a culture
as a whole are co-cultures; these are composed of members of the same general
culture who differ in some ethnic or sociological way from the parent culture.
Co-Cultures use the strategy of assimilation attempt to fit in or join other people. When
people refer to others as African American, Hispanic, Japanese and other titles they are
referring to Co-Cultures within a Culture. The different types of culture can really be
anything. Anything you can think of is a culture. People from the Co-Cultures are
passive, assertive, aggressive, and confrontational.
People judge you because of what you say or believe your culture is. Judgment
happens no matter what goes on and it’s about time people learn to understand and
realize that cultures are not different, they are extraordinary. When you visit or learn
about a culture and Co-Cultures you learn about yourself. You find things that you didn't
know you liked or enjoyed. You find out that you are part of a culture that you personally
were judging and making fun of. The beliefs you get and customs or values from
Cultures make up who you are as a person. On the other hand Co-Cultures use a
method called separation because they believe that it’s not right to interact with
someone who is an outsider. They are more comfortable staying with people who are
alike to them.
Co-Cultures and Cultures are alike and different in many ways but more different than
any. They have their own beliefs and values which pretty much lead into cultures. It’s
amazing how many different people, customs, beliefs, clothes, art, and music there is in
the world. Below are some suggestions on how one conducts himself/herself within co-
cultural occasion.
Assimilation: this is the means by which co-culture members attempt to fit in with
members of the dominant culture.
Accommodation: this is the means by which co-culture members maintain their culture
identity while striving to establish relationships with members of the dominant culture.
Separation: this is the means co-culture members use to resist interacting with
members of the dominant culture.
Ex. United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Italy
Territoriality: Space is communal. People stand close to each other and share
the same space.
Temporality: Everything has its own time, and time is not easily scheduled.
Change is slow, and time is a process that belongs to others and nature.
Temporality: Events and tasks are scheduled and to be done at particular times.
Change is fast, and time is a commodity to be spent or saved. One’s time is
one’s own.
People should also watch for differences within high- and low-context cultures.
High power distance vs. Low power distance
High Power Distance: Countries that have high power distance include many Latin
American, African and Asian countries. In these countries, hierarchy is an essential part
of the society, and unequal distribution of power is seen as beneficial. Those higher on
the hierarchy are expected to take care of those lower on the hierarchy, and it is often
appropriate for those in power to make decisions without consulting their subordinates.
Those lower on the hierarchy generally are expected to obey their superiors. For
instance, students may not be allowed to argue with their professors, and it may not be
acceptable for employees to disagree with their boss.
Low Power Distance: In countries with low power distance, such as Israel, Denmark,
Ireland and Austria, members of the society value equality and democracy, and it is
more acceptable for those who are junior in age or rank to question authority. For
instance, students in schools and universities are encouraged to express opinions freely
and disagree with their professors, while decisions in organizations are often reached at
by taking into account opinions of all employers.
The terms masculinity and femininity refer to traits or characteristics typically associated
with being male or female, respectively. Traditionally, masculinity and femininity have
been conceptualized as opposite ends of a single dimension, with masculinity at one
extreme and femininity at the other. By this definition, high masculinity implies the
absence of femininity, and vice versa. In other words, people can be classified as either
masculine or feminine. Contemporary definitions propose that masculinity and femininity
are separate dimensions, allowing for the possibility that individuals may simultaneously
possess both masculine and feminine attributes.
Cultures differ in their attitudes toward gender role. Masculine cultures value
aggressiveness, strength, and material symbols of success. Feminine cultures are
culture that value tenderness and relationships. Among highly masculine cultures are
Japan, Italy, Germany, Mexico, and Great Britain. Among highly feminine cultures are
Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Thailand, and Chile.
Key Points:
Ethnocentrism often entails the belief that one’s own race or ethnic group is the
most important or that some or all aspects of its culture are superior to those of
other groups.
Within this ideology, individuals will judge other groups in relation to their own
particular ethnic group or culture, especially with concern to language, behavior,
customs, and religion.
Cultural relativism is the belief that the concepts and values of a culture cannot
be fully translated into, or fully understood in, other languages; that a specific
cultural artifact (e.g., a ritual) has to be understood in terms of the larger symbolic
system of which it is a part.
Cultural relativism is the principle that an individual person’s beliefs and activities
should be understood by others in terms of that individual’s own culture.
Stereotype and Prejudice: The impact of stereotypes and prejudice are as follows:
Stereotypes are mental images or pictures we carry around in our heads; they
are shortcuts, whether positive, that guide our reactions to others. When
attached to the way we view the world, stereotypes generate unrealistic pictures
of others and prevent us from distinguishing an individual from a group. Racial
profiling is just one example of how stereotyping affects worldwide.
Prejudice describes how we feel about a group of people whom, more likely than
not, we do not personally know. A negative or positive prejudgment, prejudice
arises either because we want to feel more positively about our own group, or
because we feel others present a threat, real or not.
I will try to understand how the experiences of persons from different cultures
lead them to develop perspectives that differ from mine.
I will pay attention to the situation and the context when I communicate with
persons from different cultures.
INTRODUCTION:
How then do we understand each other if we do not always share the same
perspective? Communication of any type usually happens very quickly. Communicating
“across” cultures is even more complicated because we tend to interpret messages in
split second because on the past experiences and the cultural grids that were passed
down to us in our home culture. A cultural grid is a framework of understanding for
processing verbal and nonverbal cues specific to a particular culture. We are usually
unaware of the many ways that culture can influence the way we listen to, speak to, and
understand other human beings.
We base much of our understanding on the verbal and nonverbal cues available to us.
Verbal cues are the words and sounds people emit when communicating. Nonverbal
cues are facial expressions, gestures, and other things that don’t require sound, but still
offer a message. For example, when someone wants to agree, he or she can verbally
say ‘yes’ or nonverbally nod their head, or both.
Communication must be placed into a framework of understanding or it is meaningless.
That framework is based on assumptions from our home culture and any other cultures
that we come into contact with. Everyone has had some experience with verbal and
nonverbal cues, but there is no one who fully understands all of the languages and
cultures in the world and how they are similar or different from one another. To bridge
the intercultural communication gaps, we should be familiar to the different terms,
expressions and images reflecting different cultures because some aspects of
intercultural communication are somewhat embarrassing, complicated, and mysterious
to other cultures.
Cultural ignorance
Communicators who fail to realize that persons from different cultures may not look,
think, or act as they themselves do run the risk of having those with whom they interact
judge them to be sensitive, ignorant, or culturally confused. The culturally confused pay
a high price. Cultural misunderstanding often lead to lost opportunities and increased
levels of tension between people.
The following examples demonstrate the extent to which cultural ignorance affects
communication:
Showing the sole of a shoe means nothing to observers in the United States or
Europe. As a result, when visiting Saudi Arabia, the American and European
delegates to a conference thought nothing about crossing their legs and pointing
their shoes towards the speaker while listening to his presentation. The speaker,
however, was horrified. In Muslim cultures, the gesture is perceived as insulting.
Similarly, while crossing your legs in the United States indicates you are relaxed,
in Korea it is a social faux pas.
The Japanese view the business card as the extension of a person, while
Americans view it as a business formality and a convenience. Consequently,
while the Japanese handle business cards with great care, making certain to put
them in safe places, Americans are quick to put them away and thus often
insulting the Japanese.
Eye contact preferences also differ across cultures. Americans place a high
value on eye-to-eye communication and tend to distrust those who fail to look at
them directly. The Japanese, in contrast, believe eye contact over a sustained
period of time show disrespect. Among Asian cultures, too much eye contact is
deemed intrusive. Arabs, on the other hand, maintain direct eye contact with
those they interact with for prolonged periods.
A soft drink was introduced into Arab countries with an attractive label that had
six pointed stars on it. The Arabs interpreted this as pro-Israeli and refused to
buy it. Another label was printed in ten languages, one of which was Hebrew,
and again the Arabs did not buy it.