Field Test &
Interpretation128
Gaswell Testing
In this chapter we shall undertake the analysis of an actual
well lest. The well to be tested, the Melancon Heirs #1, is
focated in Acadia Parish, Louisiana, about 12 miles due
testo’ Lafayette. tis a North Rayne Field stepout well and
was perforated and cleaned up just priorto the test. Both gas
ond quid production were expected, and, because a pipe:
line was not available, it was decided to flare the produced
hydrocarbons and dispose any water production in the pit.
During the conventional backpressure test, the proce
dure specified by the State of Louisiana, stabilization was
achieved rather fast, and both liquid and gas production
seve encountered. Because of the presence of liquids, the
Sovface equipment included two stages of separation, There
sine no indication of coning or sand production. The well
Was produced in the reverse sequence of rates, thats, from
high to low, to prevent liquid buildup in the well bore.
There was no H,5 present in the gas, pressures were mea-
cured at the wellhead using both a deadweight tester and a
continuous recorder and depth measurements are vertical.
‘& photograph of the testing equipment is shown in
figure 5.1.
Tables 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 givethe well data, summary of
testdata, and calculation of the constants for adeliverability
test for the Melancon Heirs # 1, respectively.
{TABLE 5.1 Wel Daa
2770 508
hee aad Weights 5 12", 208
1397"
Packer Setiiig: 19,935"
Perorlions: 12,758"=12,778"
Tubing iD. 2.441
eeFigure 5.1
Pressure Reorder ad Ceti Flay rover Ue
during Caswell Tete
TABLE 5.2 Summon Of tex an
- tN,
“ ho Tha Thee
Sutlh 4261 po 4261 in 4265 pk 4201 pig
Feng it 2015 010 3970 4045 pig
Fong inal 340 rin 920 mk 983 pe 4065 pon
ro 5 pst 100 si, 6 i 40s
predation Rate tan si 2ST 10192 51510 405180
pe rodtion Rate 12siWo Tee Trae race
te Pravin Rate 392i MSC 3.199 SCID 2SIOMSCHD HO MSCHO
TABLE 5.3 Caleulstion Of The Constants Fora Deliverability Test On the Mrlancen #1, Weel of Lafayette, UA.
oe Pe (welbead) pay (botomboted
MMscrD sia
a a6 x
Fon ¢ 3.931 ants arm pea x ie 2.256. io
ron 2 ain 3933 923 24751 ee 297 x ie
210 ‘000 4975 24206 % 3432 x 10
a7] 110 160 sou 22963 x 108 4.708 x Ur
Ficld Test & Interpretation 129130 Gaswell Testing
All the calculations are based on a datum depth of
12,768 ft, the midpoint of the perforated interval. The
fallowing additional data is required: Gas Crown) = 0.625
(air =. 1.00), Reservoir Temperature = 707°R, Atmos-
pheric Pressure = 15 psia.
ie efiurst and Bellis” formula was used {0 calculate
bottomhole pressures from surface pressure.
svar aed Bellis ealcultion 6
Tene out athe wetlsite ung
fats can be saved forthe fol
pressure
Pasnurinde
where
we ose el
+ 1.82090 bos 22%,
2+ 1.82950 los
fog = 1-103 on
recat
Pataaness = whens presse, psa
rite ang baton oes #8
“Mh = gis tavty ir =D
ea the midpoint of the perforations, fect
7 Seerage floyeing temperature fo tubing,
Teri on faci average ening abing presse and ane
Bure, Faction
ra trad condor M465 ys and a", MMSE
b
= 1D. ol tubing, rehes
oom the companion of
fvailgbie and e=
(Howser moy be
the yas avi pg espations kod ng Fan be cla
Grgsentlly, Hf composition is
Towsrcam of speared ePe
toate et posses geraey of cmos
tnotoe from the flung etn
pee G+ AL
erry
where
fullateear gas Geluk a¥ty
gejantens gouty ty
em spec gravity or welll
Bea gavliquid tio, cu BBLUsing the data in table 5.3, a log-log plot of
Oe? — po?) was prepared and is shown in figure 5.2.
From the plot, the AOF is read opposite ip?
Par) = py? as 23 MMSCFID,
The slope of the line or the tangent ofits angle to the
horizontal gives the inverse of n, that is,
1 _ bog (1.5 x 109 = log a x 109
i OB EX 104)
logo x 10 — log 41 x 104
= 1.02
orn = 0,980,
And for the constant C, we can write
AOF = Pat)"
24 C 127.668 x oye
Cc = 0.000001222 IMMSCF/D Mp
Pay 10°
(osig?
7
8 lent a
Pveilty Ot i soem
Og (MMSCEIO} =p n OMe Goa ten
AOF = 2a mse.
Ficld Test & Interpretation 131fA
If the AOF used had been 24,000 MSCF/D instead of 24
MMSCE/D, then the value of Cin the more appealing units
would be C = 0.001222 (MSCF/DYpsi*
132 Gaswell Testing
sue pnitaivirechanSiintistemeamneevociesanp
Dynamics of Pb (II) adsorption on nanostructured γ-alumina: calculations of axial dispersion and overall mass transfer coef ficients in the fixed-bed column