Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/from-covid-to-cancers-hcq-is-wonder-drug-of-our-time/
http://qplusnews.com/hydroxychloroquine-cures-cancer
The title of this study is both true and misleading, because the reader puts trust in the author
and therefore would imply that it was done correctly (monotherapy, dosage and time). Again,
this is rarely performed.
Only the first sentence of the Abstract is true: “Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine
(HCQ) are well-known 4-aminoquinoline antimalarial agents”
The deception begins at the second sentence: “Scientific evidence also supports the use of CQ
and HCQ in the treatment of cancer. Overall, preclinical studies support CQ and HCQ use
in anti-cancer therapy”
“Treatment of cancer” and “anti-cancer therapy” At the very beginning they are saying you
won’t be healed, only treated.
The lies begin at the second part of that sentence: “especially in combination with
conventional anti-cancer treatments since they are able to sensitise tumour cells to a
variety of drugs, potentiating the therapeutic activity.” This will be explained as we go
through five of the studies that are referenced in this article.
https://ecancer.org/en/journal/article/781-repurposing-drugs-in-oncology-redo-chloroquine-
and-hydroxychloroquine-as-anti-cancer-agents
I chose the first five studies in the Table 1 to use as the examples.
The human equivalent doses (HED) as shown the last column will be compared to person
weighing 175 pounds. I used this dosing calculator from the link below. The recommended
daily dose of Hydroxychloroquine is 397 mg.
https://www.mdcalc.com/hydroxychloroquine-plaquenil-dosing-calculator
Table 1 lists the main characteristics [animal models, tumour types, animal (H)CQ doses and
human equivalent doses (HED)] of the in vivo studies performed with CQ or HCQ alone.”
Focusing in on the last two columns I broke down the HED equivalent dosage of
Hydroxychloroquine given in the study to a compared to what person weighing 175 pounds
would receive. Only one of the five was given the correct dosage.
A person weighing 175 pounds and given 397 mg of Hydroxychloroquine for 25 days would
receive a total of 9,925 mg over that period of time. The percentages of what was given in the
studies are shown to the right. One was undeterminable and three were massively under
dosed at only 21%, 6% and 7% of what they should have been given. The study that gave 398
mg twice a day for three days on and two days off for a period of 25 days administer a total
of 11,940 mg. This was 120% of the requirement for a person weighing 175 pounds.
Chloroquine inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo
https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/or.2015.4380#
“Revealed that CQ treatment triggered G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, induced DNA damage
and apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner in liver cancer cells.”
“Apoptosis: A type of cell death in which a series of molecular steps in a cell lead to its
death. This is one method the body uses to get rid of unneeded or abnormal cells. The
process of apoptosis may be blocked in cancer cells.”
“CQ could be repositioned as a treatment option for liver cancer as a single treatment or in
combination.“
This is the throwback to Big Pharma. Why would it be used as “treatment” or “in
combination” if they just proved it destroyed the cancer cells by itself?
Never forget what this is all about. The money is in the treatment, not the cure.
“Previous studies have shown that single treatment of CQ exerted an antitumor effect in
several types of tumors in a cell type-dependent manner.”
So we have previous studies saying its effective at destroying several types of tumors and
apoptosis of melanoma cells. It is strange that this has never been mentioned before. You
would think a drug that kills cancer would be the top story, right?
But instead of this miraculous news being spread all over the world, what happens?
Of course, the throwback to Big Pharma. The exact same line that was in the first paragraph
is repeated as the last line of this study.
“Treatment” or “In Combination” Think of your loved ones that have died as you read those
words. They had it, they lied to you and said they didn’t, and you watched that loved one
wither away from chemotherapy and radiation.
I debated on whether or not to put this image in the article. It will hurt, but I think it must be
done. Once again read these words, “Treatment” or “In Combination” and now look at this.
Here is the ultimate Red Pill. Please spread this far and wide. It is time for heads to roll for
these atrocities and crimes against humanity.
PAUL MUADDIB is a journalist, investigator and QAnon with a focus on uncovering the
truth.