Professional Documents
Culture Documents
moire
Full paper/Me
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Commercially available activated MnO2 has been investigated as a catalyst for the oxida-
Received 16 September 2015 tion of alcohols (phenylethanol, 4-methyl- and 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, trans-cinnamyl
Accepted 15 February 2016 alcohol, cyclohexanol, menthol, perillyl alcohol and myrtenol) by TBHP/decane or TBHP/
Available online 30 March 2016
water in MeCN. The activity is highest for benzylic and allylic alcohols. Secondary alcohols
yield ketones with good selectivities, while the aldehydes generated from primary alcohols
Keywords:
are further oxidized. The process competes with the TBHP catalyzed decomposition. It thus
Oxidation
requires the use of excess TBHP and high catalyst loadings to achieve high conversions.
Alcohols
Hydroperoxides
However, the low cost of the reagents makes this new protocol convenient for the
Manganese oxidation of reactive secondary alcohols. The study also suggests that MnO2 should be
proscribed as a reagent to quench excess TBHP in oxidative processes when the synthetic
target contains easily oxidizable alcohol functions and when carrying our detailed kinetic
monitoring of oxidation processes.
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Acade mie des sciences. This is an
open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-nd/4.0/).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.02.012
mie des sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
1631-0748/© 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Acade
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
C. Bhaumik et al. / C. R. Chimie 19 (2016) 566e570 567
2. Results and discussion observed when using TBHP/decane in the absence of MnO2
(entry 8). However, MnO2 alone was able to slowly
2.1. Catalytic studies consume 1-phenylethanol as a stoichiometric oxidant and
transform it into acetophenone with good selectivity (en-
The present study was motivated by the accidental tries 9e10). The use of TBHP as the commercially available
discovery that commercially available technical activated aqueous solution also gave good results (entry 11). This
MnO2 (Aldrich: activated, >90%, reference 63548-250G-F) shows that the presence of water in the system does not
affects the determination of the conversions during kinetic negatively affect the reaction. Finally, we attempted to use
monitoring of alcohol oxidation by TBHP. A frequently used hydrogen peroxide, a greener oxidant generating only
procedure to quench the excess oxidant, typically H2O2 [5] water as a by-product [7], in place of TBHP but neither
but also TBHP [6], involves the treatment of the withdrawn substrate conversion nor acetophenone formation were
reaction mixture aliquots with excess MnO2 before gas- observed (entry 12). In this experiment, we presume that
chromatographic or NMR quantification of conversion. In the catalase activity (disproportionation of H2O2 to H2O
an experiment where 1-phenylethanol (1a) was oxidized and O2 catalyzed by manganese compounds [8], including
with 2 equivalents of TBHP in the presence of a molybde- MnO2 [9]) is faster than O atom transfer to the alcohol
num catalyst, we obtained erratic and non-reproducible substrate. Finally, we carried out a catalyst recycling
conversions as a function of time. These results interro- experiment. At the end of the reaction, MnO2 was collected
gated us on the role of MnO2 as a stoichiometric oxidant or at the bottom of the reaction vessel by centrifugation,
as an oxidation catalyst during the TBHP quenching phase. carefully washed with the reaction solvent (acetonitrile/
We therefore proceeded to study the same oxidation pro- toluene mixture) after the removal of the organic solution,
cess in the presence of various amounts of the above- and reused by adding a fresh acetonitrile/toluene solution
mentioned, commercially available MnO2 (Table 1). When containing 1-phenylethanol and TBHP (see entry 13).
using one equivalent of MnO2 (entry 1), a high substrate Indeed, MnO2 was still active in the recycle run but with a
conversion was observed after 7 h at room temperature. significant decrease of the catalytic activity.
The amount of MnO2 could be limited to 20 mol%, proving The substrate scope of this catalytic system was subse-
its catalytic role in the reaction, but longer reaction times quently explored (the investigated substrate trans-
were needed to obtain high conversions (entries 2e3). The formations are summarized in Scheme 1 and the results are
amount could be further decreased to 5 mol% but the re- collected in Tables 2 and 3). In all the studied cases, the
action was rather slow even at 40 C (entries 4e5). At 80 C, presence of MnO2 substantially increases the reaction rate
good conversions and yields could be obtained limiting the (cf. the experiments run at 40 C with the corresponding
amount of MnO2 to 10 mol% and the reaction time to 7 h blank reactions run in the absence of MnO2, i.e. entries 18,
(entry 6). We also checked another MnO2 source, more 24, 29, 35, 44 and 47). We first investigated primary
precisely a purer product although non-activated benzylic alcohols (2a) and (3a) (Table 2). These alcohols
(ReagentPlus® Sigma-Aldrich, 99%) (see Table 1, entry proved a little more difficult to oxidize than the secondary
7). This ReagentPlus® MnO2 exhibited a very low catalytic benzylic alcohol (1a) (entries 16e17 and 22e23 versus
activity. We checked also that both the catalyst and oxidant entry 5 in Table 1) but their transformation into the cor-
are essential to the reactivity. Negligible conversion was responding aldehydes was efficient using 1 equivalent of
the catalyst at RT (entries 14e15 and 19e21). On the other
hand, the aldehyde product yield decreased at long reac-
Table 1 tion times due to further oxidation under these conditions.
Oxidation of 1-phenylethanol (1a).а 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (3b) was consumed much faster
Entry Substr./MnO2/TBHP T/ C time/h Conversion/%b Yield/%b than 4-methylbenzaldehyde (2b). Similar results were ob-
1 1/1/2 RT 7 96 84
tained for the oxidation of the allylic alcohol (4a) (entries
2 1/0.2/2 RT 7 75 25e26), the rate of consumption of the cinnamaldehyde
c
3 1/0.2/2 RT 16 >99 product (4b) being similar to that of (2b). The withdrawn
4 1/0.05/2 RT 16 35 aliquots for entries 25 and 26, after removing the solid
5 1/0.05/2 40 7 39 33
MnO2 by filtration but remaining in the presence of resid-
6 1/0.1/2 80 7 76 67
7d 1/0.2/2 RT 7 5 ual TBHP, showed a decrease of the (4b) product upon
8 1/0/2 40 24 6 0 reinjection into the GC after 24 days. This decrease, how-
9 1/1/0 40 7 20 14 ever, is much slower than in the reaction in the presence of
10 1/1/0 40 24 33 30 solid MnO2 and is probably attributed to traces of soluble
11 1/0.05/2e 40 7 38 34
12 1/0.05/2f 40 5 1 0
manganese compounds. Non-activated substrates like
13g 1/1/2 RT 7 65 57 cyclohexanol, (5a), can also be oxidized (entries 30e34),
although more slowly than the activated ones. Better re-
a
1.2 mmol alcohol in 3 mL of acetonitrile and 1 mL of toluene, 453 mL of
5.3 M TBHP solution in decane (2.4 mmol), MnO2. sults could be obtained at a slightly higher temperature
b
Determined by GC. (60 C, entry 34), while using one equivalent of MnO2 at
c
70% isolated yield. room temperature results in low conversions (entries 30
d
ReagentPlus® MnO2 was used instead of technical activated MnO2 and 31).
(see the experimental part).
e
TBHP (70%) in water instead of TBHP in decane.
The catalytic system was then tested for the oxidation of
f
H2O2 (30%) in water instead of TBHP in decane. alcohols from biomass (Table 3). For the oxidation of
g
Catalyst recycle after run 1 (see text). menthol (6a), whatever conditions were tried, no
568 C. Bhaumik et al. / C. R. Chimie 19 (2016) 566e570
satisfactory yields of menthone could be obtained (entries relatively good conversions using 1 equivalent of MnO2 at
36e41). In particular, increasing the amount of catalyst room temperature (entries 42e43 and 45e46) but afforded
from 0.05 to 1 equivalent or raising the temperature from the corresponding aldehydes (7b) and (8b) with moderate
40 C to 80 C did not significantly improve the substrate selectivities and with slow erosion of the yield at longer
conversion. The more activated perillyl alcohol (7a) and reaction times, like for the other aldehyde products, (2b),
myrtenol (8a), on the other hand, were oxidized with (3b) and (4b), discussed above.
Since one possible cause for the poor performance of
this system for less reactive alcohols is the competing
MnO2-catalyzed TBHP disproportionation (see next sec-
Table 2
tion), we have also investigated the oxidation of menthol
Oxidation of other alcohols.а
with slow addition of the substrate via a syringe pump
Entry Substr. Substr./MnO2/ T/ C time/h Conversion/% Yield/%b (complete addition of 2.4 equiv of TBHP in 15 h), under
TBHP
conditions otherwise identical to those of run 36e37 (40 C,
14 (2a) 1/1/2 RT 7 94 51 substr./MnO2 ¼ 1/0.05). The results of this experiment, see
15 (2a) 1/1/2 RT 24 100 39
Fig. 1, demonstrate that this stratagem does not signifi-
16 (2a) 1/0.05/2 40 7 26
17 (2a) 1/0.05/2 40 16 39 cantly improve the system performance, since a conversion
18 (2a) 1/0/2 40 24 54 33 of only 13% was measured after 48 h.
19 (3a) 1/1/2 RT 2.5 86 50
20 (3a) 1/1/2 RT 7 99 20
21 (3a) 1/1/2 RT 24 100 0
22 (3a) 1/0.05/2 40 7 35 Table 3
23 (3a) 1/0.05/2 40 16 47 Oxidation of alcohols from biomass.а
24 (3a) 1/0/2 40 24 11 7
Entry Substr. Substr./MnO2/TBHP T/ C time/t Conv./% Yield/%b
25 (4a) 1/1/2 RT 7 100 60c
26 (4a) 1/1/2 RT 24 100 36c 36 (6a) 1/0.05/2 40 5 5
27 (4a) 1/0.05/2 40 5 12 37 (6a) 1/0.05/2 40 16 10
28 (4a) 1/0.05/2 40 16 22 38 (6a) 1/0.1/2 40 7 7
29 (4a) 1/0/2 40 24 29 5 39 (6a) 1/0.1/2 80 7 11
30 (5a) 1/1/2 RT 7 28 28 40 (6a) 1/0.1/2 80 16 12
31 (5a) 1/1/2 RT 24 36 35 41 (6a) 1/1/2 40 5 5
32 (5a) 1/0.05/2 40 7 23 42 (7a) 1/1/2 RT 7 64 22
33 (5a) 1/0.05/2 40 16 40 43 (7a) 1/1/2 RT 24 81 20
34 (5a) 1/0.1/2 60 7 48 44 (7a) 1/0/2 40 24 5 4
35 (5a) 1/0/2 40 24 5 0 45 (8a) 1/1/2 RT 7 74 28
46 (8a) 1/1/2 RT 24 89 25
a
1.2 mmol alcohol in 3 mL of acetonitrile and 1 mL of toluene, 453 mL of
47 (8a) 1/0/2 40 24 9 9
5.3 M TBHP solution in decane (2.4 mmol), MnO2.
b
Determined by GC. a
1.2 mmol alcohol in 3 mL of acetonitrile and 1 mL of toluene, 453 mL of
c
A new injection of the withdrawn aliquots after 24 days gave a yield of 5.3 M TBHP solution in decane (2.4 mmol), MnO2.
b
36 for 7 h and 26 for 24 h of reaction. Determined by GC.
C. Bhaumik et al. / C. R. Chimie 19 (2016) 566e570 569
mixture, which was set at the desired reaction temperature [3] (a) A.J. Fatiadi, Synthesis (1976) 65e104;
(b) A.J. Fatiadi, Synthesis (1976) 133e167.
with magnetic stirring in air. Aliquots (0.2 ml) were with-
[4] (a) Y. Su, L.-C. Wang, Y.-M. Liu, Y. Cao, H.-Y. He, K.-N. Fan, Catal.
drawn at different time intervals, diluted with 1 ml of Commun. 8 (2007) 2181e2185;
diethyl ether and filtered through a Pasteur pipette filled up (b) H.-Y. Sun, Q. Hua, F.-F. Guo, Z.-Y. Wang, W.-X. Huang, Adv.
with silica to eliminate the residual MnO2. The silica was Synth. Catal. 354 (2012) 569e573;
(c) A.R. Massah, R.J. Kalbasi, M. Azadi, C. R. Chimie 15 (2012)
washed with 2 ml of diethyl ether. The resulting organic 428e436;
phase was analyzed by gas chromatography using dieth- (d) A. Kamimura, H. Komatsu, T. Moriyama, Y. Nozaki, Tetrahedron
yleneglycol dibutyl ether as an external standard. 69 (2013) 5968e5972;
(e) M. Ilyas, M. Siddique, M. Saeed, Chin. Sci. Bull. 58 (2013)
2354e2359.
Acknowledgment [5] (a) M. Ciclosi, C. Dinoi, L. Gonsalvi, M. Peruzzini, E. Manoury, R. Poli,
Organometallics 27 (2008) 2281e2286;
(b) C. Dinoi, M. Ciclosi, E. Manoury, L. Maron, L. Perrin, R. Poli,
We are grateful to the CNRS (Centre National de la Chem. Eur. J. 16 (2010) 9572e9584.
Recherche Scientifique) and the IUF (Institut Universitaire [6] (a) C. Cordelle, D. Agustin, J.-C. Daran, R. Poli, Inorg. Chim. Acta 364
de France) for financial support and the “Conseil Re gional (2010) 144;
(b) J. Pisk, D. Agustin, V. Vrdoljak, R. Poli, Adv. Synth. Catal. 353
ne
Midi-Pyre es” for a post-doctoral fellowship to CB.
(2011) 2910e2914;
(c) B. Gue rin, D. Mesquita Fernandes, J.-C. Daran, D. Agustin, R. Poli,
References New J. Chem. 37 (2013) 3466e3475;
(d) P. So €zen-Aktas, E. Manoury, F. Demirhan, R. Poli, Eur. J. Inorg.
[1] (a) M. Hudlicky, Oxidations in Organic Chemistry, American Chem. 19 (2013) 2728e2735;
Chemical Society, Washingto D.C., 1990; (e) J. Morlot, N. Uyttebroeck, D. Agustin, R. Poli, ChemCatChem 5
(b) R.A. Sheldon, I.W.C.E. Arendt, A. Dijksman, Catal. Today 57 (2013) 601e611;
(f) C. Bhaumik, E. Manoury, J.-C. Daran, P. So €zen-Atkaş, F. Demirhan,
(2000) 157e166;
(c) J.B. Aterburn, Tetrahedron 57 (2001) 9765e9788; R. Poli, J. Organomet. Chem. 760 (2014) 115e123;
(d) R.A. Sheldon, I.W.C.E. Arendt, G.-J. ten Brink, A. Dijksman, Acc. (g) J. Pisk, J.-C. Daran, R. Poli, D. Agustin, J. Mol. Cat. A 403 (2015)
52e63;
Chem. Res. 35 (2002) 774e781.
[2] (a) S. Ball, T.W. Goodwin, R.A. Morton, Biochem. J. 42 (1948) (h) W. Wang, T. Guerrero, S.R. Merecias, H. García-Ortega,
516e523; R. Santillan, J.-C. Daran, N. Farf an, D. Agustin, R. Poli, Inorg. Chim.
(b) K.R. Barucha, J. Chem. Soc. (1956) 2446e2447; Acta 431 (2015) 176e183;
(c) J. Attenborrow, A.F.B. Cameron, J.H. Chapman, R.M. Evans, (i) W. Wang, T. Vanderbeeken, D. Agustin, R. Poli, Catal. Commun.
63 (2015) 26e30.
B.A. Hems, A.B.A. Jansen, T. Walker, J. Chem. Soc. (1952) 1094e1111;
(d) M. Harfenist, A. Bavley, W.A. Lazier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (1954) [7] For recent reviews on the use of hydrogen peroxide as oxidizing
1608e1616; agents for organic compounds, see:
(e) R.J. Highet, W.C. Wilman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) (a) J. Piera, J.-E. B€ackvall, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008)
4399e4401; 3506e3523;
(f) H.M. Fales, W.C. Wilman, J. Org. Chem. 26 (1961) 881e886; (b) A. Podgorsek, M. Zupan, J. Iskra, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009)
(g) L. Crombie, J. Crossley, J. Chem. Soc. (1963) 4943e4944; 8424e8450;
(c) G. De Faveri, G. Ilyashenko, M. Watkinson, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40
(h) L.J.P. van Amsterdam, J. Lugtenburg, J. Chem. Soc. (1982)
946e947; (2011) 1722e1760;
(i) B.M. Trost, C.G. Caldwell, E. Murayama, D. Heissler, J. Org. Chem. (d)Sheldon, R. A. Catalysis Today (doi: 10.1016/
48 (1983) 3252e3265; j.cattod.2014.08.024).
(j) Y. Hamada, M. Shibata, T. Sugiura, S. Kato, T. Shiori, J. Org. Chem. [8] (a) E.R. Stadtman, B.S. Berlett, P.B. Chock, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 87
(1990) 384;
52 (1987) 1252e1255;
(k) M. Hirano, S. Yakabe, H. Chikamori, J.H. Clark, T. Moromoto, J. (b) E.J. Larson, V.L. Pecoraro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 7809.
Chem. Res. (1998) 308e309; [9] S.H. Do, B. Batchelor, H.-K. Lee, S.-H. Kong, Chemosphere 75 (2009)
(l) M. Hirano, S. Yakabe, H. Chikamori, J.H. Clark, T. Moromoto, J. 8e12.
Chem. Res. (1998) 770e771; [10] H.J. Neuburg, M.J. Phillips, W.F. Graydon, J. Catal. 33 (1974)
(m) H. Firouzabadi, B. Karimi, M. Abassi, J. Chem. Res. (1999) 355e364.
236e237; [11] (a) K.R. Reddy, C.U. Maheswari, M. Venkateshwar, M.L. Kantam,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 351 (2009) 93;
(n) L.A. Martinez, O. Garcia, F. Delgado, C. Alvarez, R. Patino, Tet.
Lett. 34 (1993) 5293e5294; (b) K.R. Reddy, M. Venkateshwar, C.U. Maheswari, S. Prashanthi,
(o) R.S. Varma, R.K. Saini, R. Dahita, Tet. Lett. 45 (1997) 7823e7824; Synth. Commun. 40 (2010) 186;
(p) X. Wei, R.J.K. Taylor, J. Org. Chem. 65 (2000) 616e620; (c) W.-P. Mai, G. Song, J.-W. Yuan, L.-R. Yang, G.-C. Sun, Y.-M. Xiao,
(q) J.-D. Lou, Z.-N. Xu, Tet. Lett. 43 (2002) 6149e6150. P. Mao, L.-B. Qu, Rsc Adv. 3 (2013) 3869.