Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Sample preparation Chromatographic conditions
Five separate solutions (test solutions a and b and
Table 1. HPLC conditions
reference solutions b, c, and f) were prepared as described
in the Ph. Eur. monograph. Parameter Value
Thermo Scientific™ Hypersil
Test solution a Column GOLD™ aQ (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm)
Test solution a was prepared by dissolving 0.125 g cefprozil P/N 25305-254630*
3
100
1 3
Peaks: threshold based on the ICH Q3A guideline. Two of the six
1. Impurity D (i.e., impurity 1 and 3) showed a relative area of >0.1%, the
2. Impurity F
75 3. Cefprozil Z-isomer
identification threshold. To identify these two impurities
Absorbance (mAU)
4. Cefprozil E-isomer (i.e., impurities 1 and 3), two reference solutions (i.e.,
50 reference solutions b and f) were analyzed. By comparison
of the injections of reference solutions b and f, impurities
25 2 1 and 3 were identified as impurities A and B. Table 1 lists
4 retention times and relative peak areas for cefprozil Z- and
0 E-isomers, as well as the six impurities. In addition, the two
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 34
identified impurities above the corresponding threshold
Time (min) were indicated in the parentheses (Impurities A and B from
Figure 2. Chromatogram of reference solution c for system suitability the monograph).
test, showing a baseline separation of impurity F and cefprozil
Z-isomer (Rs of 4.25). Peaks due to cefprozil Z- and E-isomers, and
impurities D and F were assigned by comparing to the chromatogram
4.0 3
Cefprozil Z-isomer
Cefprozil E-isomer
provided by the Ph. Eur. with cefprozil impurity mixture CRS.
3.0
Absorbance (mAU)
2.0 1
According to the monograph, peaks were assigned by
comparing the chromatogram in Figure 2 to the one 1.0 4 5
2 6
supplied with cefprozil impurity mixture CRS.7 Retention *
times of impurities D and F, and cefprozil Z- and 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25
E-isomers were found to be 3.9, 4.7, 5.2, and 6.9 min, Time (min)
respectively. The cefprozil Z-isomer and the impurity F Figure 3. Chromatogram of cefprozil test solution b, diluted with
test solution a (consisting of cefprozil CRS) in a ratio of 1 to 15. The
were well separated (Rs of 4.25), outperforming the Ph. Eur.
chromatogram was subtracted from the chromatogram of the sample
acceptance criteria. In addition, the peak asymmetry values matrix. For the preparation of the sample matrix, refer to experimental
were in the range 0.87–1.02 (refer to Table 2 in the section section. All impurities above the reporting threshold are labelled with
numbers according to the elution order. By comparison of the injections
“Method performance test”), meeting the Ph. Eur. criteria
of reference solutions b and f, impurities 1 and 3, found above the
(i.e., 0.8–1.5). identification threshold, were identified as impurities A and B as stated in
the monograph, respectively.
Determination of cefprozil-related impurities
Impurities in cefprozil were quantified by peak area relative
Table 1. Retention time (RT) and relative area for all impurities in
to the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) cefprozil
cefprozil solution, found above the reporting threshold, and API
Z-isomer. The cefprozil standard solution (i.e., test solution isomers (n = 3). The two identified impurities above the corresponding
b) was prepared by diluting test solution a (consisting threshold were indicated in the parentheses (Impurities A and B from the
monograph).
of cefprozil CRS) in a ratio of 1 to 15, so that the UV
absorbance of the API (i.e., cefprozil Z-isomer, around Average RT Average relative area
1100 mAU) fell within the linear range of the detector. (min) (%)
Figure 3. Cefprozil Z- and E-isomers were well resolved Impurity 2 3.09 0.06
from all impurities. The cefprozil isomers peaks were Impurity 3 (Impurity B) 3.50 0.28
pure, as indicated by the Peak Purity Match values, 985 Impurity 4 3.61 0.09
for isomer Z and 1000 for isomer E. A low-level impurity Cefprozil Z-isomer 5.16 89.23
(indicated with *) eluted in front of cefprozil Z-isomer;
Cefprozil E-isomer 6.74 9.67
however, the peak pair of isomer Z and impurity * was still
Impurity 5 8.17 0.07
sufficiently resolved (Rs 1.9). A total of 26 impurities were
detected, accounting for 1.1% of the total relative area of Impurity 6 8.77 0.06
4
Method performance test Conclusion
Repeatability tests were performed for cefprozil Z- and • The quantification of cefprozil-related impurities based on
E-isomers, and two identified impurities (i.e., impurities A the Ph. Eur. method was successfully demonstrated.
and B). Three individual reference solutions with pure peaks
• The Vanquish Core HPLC system delivered high precision
were injected, resulting in clear peak area integration. This
in retention time and area.
enabled accurate determination of the peak area precision
to characterize the quantification performance of the • The Hypersil GOLD aQ column provided sufficient
method. The reference solution b (the standard for impurity separation of impurity F and cefprozil Z-isomer,
B) and the reference solution c (the standard for cefprozil outperforming the criteria for system suitability.
Z- and E-isomers) were injected seven consecutive times,
the reference solution f (the standard for impurity A) three References
1. Rai, B.P.; Tewari, N.; Nizar, H.; Prasad, M.; Joseph, S. Commercial synthesis of
consecutive times. Table 2 summarizes the quantification
cefprozil: Development and control of process impurity, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014,
performance result. Excellent precision of retention times 18, 662–664.
and peak areas, as well as peak asymmetry were achieved 2. Kong, K.-F.; Schneper, L.; Mathee, K. Beta-lactam antibiotics: From antibiosis to
on the Vanquish Core HPLC system. The relative standard resistance and bacteriology, APMIS 2010, 118, 1–36.
3. Pilaniya, K.; Chandrawanshi, H.K.; Pilaniya, U.; Manchandani, P.; Jain, P.; Singh, N. J.
deviation (RSD) of retention times and areas were less than Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010, 302–310.
0.1% and 0.4%, respectively, for all cefprozil isomers and 4. Barriere, S.L., Update on new oral cephalosporins, Antimicrobic newsletter 1992, 8,
related impurities. 21–24.
5. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). Q3A (R2): Impurities in new drug
substances. 2008.
Table 2. Precision of RT and peak area for cefprozil and related 6. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare; European
impurities, along with peak asymmetry (n = 7). Pharmacopeia (Ph.Eur.) Online, 9th edition 2018 (9.4), monograph 2342; Cefprozil
monohydrate.
Average Area Average 7. Cefprozil impurity mixture CRS batch 2: European Directorate for the Quality of
RT RT RSD RSD asymmetry Medicines & Health Care; European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.); 7, Allée Kastner CS
Name (min) (%) (%) (Ph. Eur.) 30026, F-67081 Strasbourg (France).
Impurity A*
2.82 0.00 0.04 1.08
(impurity 1)
Impurity B
3.51 0.04 0.29 0.98
(impurity 3)
Cefprozil Z-isomer 5.24 0.06 0.36 1.00
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. ©2020 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks
are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc. products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual
property rights of others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all locations. Please
consult your local sales representative for details. AN73372-EN 0220S