Professional Documents
Culture Documents
II ౹౹౹ 3
III ౹౹౹౹ 4
Table 1 is showing the distribution of CXC passes in Mathematics for Miss Welcome’s
Caribbean Studies students. It shows that a pass in 1 has a frequency of 4, a pass in 2 has
a frequency of 3, and a pass in 3 has a frequency of 4.
2. A cumulative frequency distribution table to show the information below:
A researcher collected data on 10 students and the distance they travel to school each day.
Her results were: Kilometres travelled daily 8, 10, 3, 7, 6, 10, 5, 8, 6, 10
5 1 2
6 2 4
7 1 5
8 2 7
10 3 10
Total 29
Figure 1 reflects the percentage of respondents that are within each of the four age ranges
given. 20% of the respondents fall within the age range of 18-25. 50% of the respondents
fall within the 26-33 age range. 15% of the respondents fall within the 34-41 age range,
and 15% of the respondents fall within the 42-50 age range.
4. A bar graph showing the causes of unemployment.
Figure 2 shows the amount of respondents that listed each individual cause for their
reason for being unemployed. 8 respondents listed ‘lack of education’ as their reason for
being unemployed. ‘Lack of needed skills’ and ‘no jobs available’ were both listed by 4
persons each. ‘Laziness’ was listed by one person, and 1 person gave no response.
5. Pictogram showing effects of unemployment.
Political instability
Brain drain
Suicidal Tendencies
Key ⇒ = 2 Respondents
Figure 3 shows the amount of respondents that listed each individual effect of
unemployment as the impact that unemployment has had on them personally. The key
was given by 2 respondents per image, meaning that half an image represents 1
respondent. 7 persons gave ‘increase in crime’ as the major effect of unemployment, 5
gave ‘political instability’, 4 gave ‘brain drain’, 2 gave ‘low standard of living’, and 2
gave ‘suicidal tendencies’.
6. A line graph with the information below
Research conducted on the number of artistes penalised in Trinidad and Tobago for lyrical
content of their songs over the past 10 years yielded.
Figure 4 shows the number of artistes that were penalised in each year, from 2004-2013.
12 artistes were penalized in 2004, 17 in 2005, 13 in 2006, 19 in 2007, 24 in 2008, 25 in
2009, 18 in 2010, 22 in 2011, 27 in 2012 and 21 were penalized in 2013.