Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 1248 – 1252

The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 “Education Facing Contemporary World
Issues”, 7th - 9th November 2014

The analysis of the scientific research projects management in the

higher system of physical education
Fleancu Julien Leonard*

University of Pitesti, Romania

Abstract

Projects management comprises organization structure necessary for projects of the organization, internal organization of the
project and correlations with organization structure of the institution, organization of the processes, and some aspects relate to
manage of the project. Unity of the team project and degree of the identification of team members can be positive influenced by:
constitute the commune concepts about projects objectives; appreciate positive results of the team; repeatedly communication
and interaction among team members and performing concurrence medium.

©
© 2015
2015TheTheAuthors.
Authors.Published
Publishedby by
Elsevier Ltd.Ltd.
Elsevier This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of The Association “Education for tomorrow” / [Asociatia “Educatie pentru maine”].
Peer-review under responsibility of The Association “Education for tomorrow” / [Asociatia “Educatie pentru maine”].
Keywords: physical education and sport, higher education, management, projects, scientific research

Introduction

The projects management comprises the organizational structures necessary for the development of the projects
at the level of the organization, the internal organization of the project and its correlations with the organizational
structures of the entire institution, the processes organization, as well as aspects related to the leading of the project.
The origin from different social areas or speciality domains of those implied in projects leads to different
perceptions regarding the acceptance of a situation as being problematic, so also to a different perception of the
necessity of a project development.

* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: leonef2002@yahoo.com

1877-0428 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of The Association “Education for tomorrow” / [Asociatia “Educatie pentru maine”].
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.258
 Fleancu Julien Leonard / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 1248 – 1252 1249

In order to have a successful project it is firs necessary a common conception of the problem and its defying
together with the beneficiary.
The access to information and the quality of the information has a special importance in the development of the
process.
The information must be sufficiently comprehensive and qualitative in order to allow at any time a proper
evaluation of the situation.
They must get to those who use them in taking decisions or in some activities at time and in an adequate form.
Also, at the beginning of a project, a realist evaluation will be made to the existent facilities and to the
necessary technique, in order to start the project.
One cannot start the project with the idea that some necessary facilities will be found in the future, when the
achieving is imminent.
The developing of a project requires specific work methods, a systematic approach and adequate principles. The
method and the approach structure of the projects has the origin in the systematic thought.
The systematic thought allows in practice an integrated, complex approach of the project management,
regarding:
1. the methodology of approaching the projects, so regarding the phases and processes of a project;
2. the methods used in different phases (for example from simple to complex, from known to unknown);
3. the including of different connected systems (social, communicational, cultural) in the project
approach way.
The development of the projects in structures- phases and processes- reduces the uncertainty degree, allows the
introduction of some decision points after each phase, a control over the development of the project, clear
responsibilities and a differentiated assigning of the project budget. (chart 1)

Table 1. The phases and the processes within the scientific research projects

Project phases The processes within a project

The life cycle of a The project initiation Initialization
project Preliminary study Planification
Main study Controlling
Detailed study Execution
The concept elaboration Closure
Implementation

All the projects, no matter the domain, have a similar life cycle- similar project phases: concept elaboration
phase, fulfilling phase and the concept implementation phase, respectively, the proper utilizing phases.
The staging and the inherent introduction of some evaluation and decision phases after each important stage
reduces the risks and the uncertainty within the life cycle of each project.
The development of the project comprises several phases: each phase is characterized by clear results which
lead to decisions for the next phase.
Each phase ends with the analyse of the results suggested for the respective phase, as well as of the results of
the entire project in order to determine whether the projects will be continued or not, to discover the possibly errors
or discordances and to correct them.
Depending on the fulfilled competences there are three fundamental, different, organizational types in the
structure of the projects. (Table 1)

Table 2. Types of structural fundamental organization and establishment of the competences

Competences of the functional organizational structure
( primary and basical structure)

Competences of the project organizational structure

1250 Fleancu Julien Leonard / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 1248 – 1252

(secondary structure)
Project coordination Project matrix organization Project organization
Competences of decision- tottaly in The primary and the secondary Competences of decision Tottaly in
the primary organization organization are ionterdependent the primary organization
(after the Mocanu M., Schuster C. model, 2001)

There are few projects in which a single person develops the entire activity. Through the establishment of
project team for the fulfilling of a certain task one wishes to exceed the needs of the primary organization, which
does not allow the interdisciplinary fulfilling of certain project tasks, only in a reduced extend.
This is why it is formed a team which, under the leading of the project manager accomplishes the
established objectives.
The main rules which lead to the establishing of a team for the fulfilling of the work tasks are:
1. the work team usually manage to better fulfil a complex task;
2. taking decision is based on a rigorous grounding of a group of specialists;
3. the innovative spirit is better emphasized through confronting different team members’ opinions;
4. the elaboration and the fulfilling of some new solutions is usually easier in the team, the team members
sustain and motivate themselves mutually.
5. the acceptance of a new solution by the society is higher than if the proposals would be the result of a
collective effort.
The importance of the work is special for the development of every person.
Through work, the person can satisfy his/her aspirations, he/she can achieve the personal goals and can enrich
his/her personality as well.
When we choose our career, we keep in mind our ideals, aspirations, interests and personal abilities.
So, while some people choose a certain job, because we think that only in this way we can accomplish our
hopes, other people choose another job in order to have a better income or to satisfy the need of affiliation or there is
still a category which choose a job at random, without knowing much about what they will do.
On the basis of choosing a career, the reasons are very different.
The motivation is considered an internal factor which mobilizes, stimulates and directs the organism, it is the
inner force which leads the people towards the achievement of the personal purposes.
The motivation is defined in various ways.
The most of this definitions have in common the fact that the motivation is a complex of forces which
stimulates the person to assume a certain behavior.
This is about a concept which has a reference both to the external factors that make the person behave in a
particular way and to the internal factors (for example- aspirations, needs).
The internal factors can be the necessities which stimulates the person to assume a precise behavior (the
curiosity, the need of personal development, the pleasure to make certain activities).
The project leader has leading tasks specific to the project team, of a real interest for the good development of
the team work and for the fulfilling of the tasks.
The project team, in order to be permanent, it must develop a minimum of cohesion, of identification with the
project objectives.
That is why the project manager has to be sensitive regarding the social interdependences and the processes of
forming the team, so, the team dynamic.
The team forming process comprises, ideally, four different phases:
1. the mutual acceptance : after a distrust phase, the project team members search for common tasks and
objectives and begin to accept each other.
2. decisions making: in an open atmosphere the common problems are discussed and each team member
position/role is defined. The way of developing the common activities is decided together.
3. motivation: the team work gets to the phase of maturing, the members help each other in order to fulfil the
common objectives.
 Fleancu Julien Leonard / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 1248 – 1252 1251

4. control: the team work becomes efficient, the team members respect and control the established norms and
rules for the team work. The non-compliance with the norms is punished.
In fact, the phases which are passed through by the team are much more complex and the result for the forming
process of the team is not always positive for each member. (table 2).
Even if, apparently, the time and emotional investment of the project leader in forming the project team is too
big, it is justified by the fact that in this way, one can avoid postponing ambiguities, the unsolved problems or even
some conflicts from an advanced phase of the project, which could lead to crisis during its development.

Table 3. Developing phases of the project

The phase Group/team structure Attitude towards the work task

1. Forming Uncertainty, dependence on the
leader, the adequate behaviour
testing made by the team members.
2. Storming The conflict between the team
members, rejection of the team
leader, polarization of the team
members’ positions, denying their
control.
3. Norming The developing of the team cohesion,
of the group norms, mutual helping,
reducing the level of opposition and
conflicts
4. Performing There are no interpersonal problems,
the structure of the team is
functional, the team members’
behaviour is flexible and addapted to
the team work requests.
Defining the work tasks by the
team members, choosing
approaching methods/
cooperation rules
Emotional denial in accepting the
project task
Openly discussion of the team
members’oppinions and
positions, discussion of the
emotions, beginning of the
cooperation
Finding solutions, constructive
attitude towards the project tasks,
the energy is used in order to
fulfill the project tasks.

Conclusions

Projects management comprises organization structure necessary for projects of the organization, internal
organization of the project and correlations with organization structure of the institution, organization of the
processes, and some aspects relate to manage of the project.
Unity of the team project and degree of the identification of team members can be positive influenced by:
constitute the commune concepts about projects objectives; appreciate positive results of the team; repeatedly
communication and interaction among team members and performing concurrence medium.
That is why the project manager has to be sensitive regarding the social interdependences and the processes of
forming the team, so, the team dynamic.
The team forming process comprises, ideally, four different phases:
5. the mutual acceptance : after a distrust phase, the project team members search for common tasks and
objectives and begin to accept each other.
6. decisions making: in an open atmosphere the common problems are discussed and each team member
position/role is defined. The way of developing the common activities is decided together.
7. motivation: the team work gets to the phase of maturing, the members help each other in order to fulfil the
common objectives.
8. control: the team work becomes efficient, the team members respect and control the established norms and
rules for the team work. The non-compliance with the norms is punished.
1252 Fleancu Julien Leonard / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 1248 – 1252

The cohesion of the project team and the members’ identification degree can be positively influenced
through:
1. Supporting the forming of some common ideas on the project objectives to all the project team members.
2. appreciation of the team positive results.
3. more frequent communication and interaction with the project team members also through a competitive
and motivational environment towards other teams.

References

Cornescu V., Mihaescu I., Stanciu S., - Management- theory and practice, Actami publishing house, Bucharest, 1994.
Kotler P., - Marketing Management. Teora publishing house, Bucharest, 1997.
Mocanu M., Schuster C., -Management of the projects. All Beck publishing house, Bucharest, 2001.
arest, 2001.