You are on page 1of 93

*35 o - OO

7T* O

^30=13^6

a 1950

100L
2. a a

8.

* e

6 T^b 5?o5b3i>5b o5o*)c3 o^So 2A


W
O ' '

7. -3#o#tfv-%t$ ... 30
.UK 1 ^^r ^ fl ^ ^^ ^J
O o^^^ v^

9. oXj^cfibaex)
~*^L^
' ...
W V 88
^rfUr

e r
"1 fl \ x* cy** x *x ^x **s

~*
11.

12.

13. IPax)
^
S)e5^oS>3O3 . .
V 53
^ ^^

a o 55

3-0-0
^v' O.

(Historical
-CSB/Sfcfc

LJ

195, 58, 85, 05Q

O
oo O
i ll

^
. ^ ^ ^ ., .< *^..^ _ ft ^^..^^

(1
Io
V^/ I
^
cu o.

^ CV. - Q
>
d3oO(vP > So.
oL
~g") "^ T3
ur o
^

2
( )

^^ *<

-tf8/e

(Literary evi-
(Archealogical evidence)

(Historical
c5
superstition) feKo ptfvss$ex>- esSeS^
9

e&o

eo 9

Neoo

r oiio
"^^o^oe)^b

(? o
.
eo
<

c8l 1 55bau 5T
1>
Q &

f ^
Surgeon")
^ e; \ y

(Surgery^
KSjKRrtX^ak tf/^H\?\^ *t?

OO

esoj^ao

a
CO
14-11-1950. Lecturer, S, E. E. & C V. E. College,
as cSb
a
43,,

o
^So 25^o^2J^o^o^D^)^^^) -{5?Jrfb

oe

oTV>^ "^9-tf8/

\
'

\Soooo KB ~
TLJ
oO

e)o)

rf "S'S^^fiib.

^e-tfd&^Tv^ S-S-

oc

^5SDO^o^^?j

sSj-rftfS S
vi

^tf*yn$ewr8S;58fc>B3 rsr'&ti "The dynasties of the kali


Age" e<& iXo$Sy*&*J$Q<3&g'3fa$
es

9
rs

(^ 8wr^&
ts
^o^^Sfet^ ^Co^Jix. B'-Qo-Otf The
Arctic Home"

-
"

^^oai a

Era

oooo25o

o
X^tfsS

^-1 0-.1950.

A- P. H, D. L. T
Q

cp

8068, 3044
Vlll

3fctfcJ-tfOT$8(j$5Sx>
3rtfpS)&
oi

e^o/S

cX5bo

"3 c /

0_ L Q

/?Co$sSx>wS)o8'i& loT-cSfe "S

otfotfoSitfej
>

Kb

3950
r

CO

CO C?
2

'^8&.
CO
25-5-50

5-6-50.

77-56 a 25-5-50ll 2^200


Q
o o

9^ ?6oo3^355o3 -

oo

TT'OZT

c\X)"0\

.
b
e 7^8 o^
Kb
-^> -u>[g'o5Soex>
.
^ o_

z)

80-3-50

198 -n

"LJ

7vj5TT=SSb.
(wS
,
e 16
21
305

c4.ro

471, 472, 698

eo

ro ol
13

fib So-tfgsS

'
o
'

cxxr*

c)
Acr-Stf
Kb

CO

8
ro

O
b

CO

Oil

H ~> IS

II 3 IS
'"
Sjg$ro

II oo il

il oO |,

s-

'

8 >,

\
*

23

2. S^slSoSfcr-S'S' 3.
e/FS
Kb

(38)

ra
or'^So SJcSSb
ag
" TT !

0^55- ^r*^^ SSJ

V"

^-880

. 0. Oc
-u)

o 8 6

n
ro
I&JI

11211

llcrll
-
V

"u

o ^

(19S4-35
140
co
^c^b
o

o5i ^p. 322


ST^"Sl^Sb. |J,

9
ooo So ^) So

o
e!)

9 ^ G
-. n L_
V~ \lJ ' L -A '
00

cxxr*

\Ko$ X ocxr^
9 ~ 6 _ 50

O T^ y> a 5-6-50

"W
tfo-Qr Sfcr'itfo o3>

co

140

jcp qo
:>03SN "W g% oood&b ~3TT ^
2j6"^>
00 *
x . ^ c
C f
oocr

* '
: i
J

9-6-50
v.

Cc

27.6-50^

eo

STT"

^9-6-50
V
9
2. "3 cooo"!

22-6-50

3.

21255

V
4

-tfoi&te

V
o

g' o
o
90
Qo
^ 00 23

-u

27-6-50
15

eo
o

12-7.50

XJ 00
. 1950
20 2l5

oo

"3

F3
g'o 1967 tfoll tfo ^rS^PSS^^^o 1832 tfoll

1910 tfoll
tfo)
^021*000^

i ^ 1882 KJoll

20

o 1

C? eo

(22)
ot3ro Tjrpi^S's^
(23)

(24)

"
(26)
95
(27)

5? VfW .V^Wl^ wuuWoJ-Q 'QoJoJ*?^ II


(29)
1
J

CJ

26
CO

>,
oJ

wtl

LJ
,59 9

00

ro
fib

S^D-S) \cS5boow,

V__

. fib ^
LJ oO

O
CO

o e

a;xro ou

9
(
"fib S5

a
^S"J

x$ 7^8^
r
e>^ 50 dvjQej^ \
Q )

*LJ

11 . 9-
o
~
~i * i

657-661

A"
.9-498-500)

9236)
co

O
e ^ '

. OOOO^S

$8o-O tf a^i5e>D?Ce)2X>.
oxo 3 Ib

OO

eo

Cp

2007V3

cXX)O t o3?,V
CT>

C?

7^55*5 ^7^

9
-o 13

O
-rw<*^

-tfQ \o-ft 5, . 8.

S).

ot

oJ

3. C5

CO

9
'

ex fib tf

n b

-3

^
c o
28

LJ

\
LJ

5Sb tf SO SD o

b'o3

(1) So^88;
^j (2) e^^as^ro; v.* (3) ^>rfs (4)
(Brahmin)

on

dCb^So. ^'i=-0.\

CO

oocr

o o
e
fS^cS o
24

ot>
a ) oo

60
o ^6"\
LJ

LJ F3 W tJ

CO

p-Cfo \c5fi
O

-O

no 'o5 5 ?3 8 o -0
*

tf-Qo-Q

eo i
-
X
wrfb
"S

4.
" sr#vb
C?

5.

12

6. 948-949

cO

7, 950-9^8 S

8.

ro

o
fib ^TT ^ 9
135SC&

:;

cyV)
/;/>o

o
C;

o ^5 r* Q S

o y "
c35oo i 5Scr ^ 5X0 tw

" ""
8 3 la

ooo -0555 Sox^fOcJSoooSQ. ^DOO 3 too

G o

^
a"t)
''

C)
27

r~t-
28 rtb

3-2,3^0^0

1950 Soil
"
/No
eo

15

\
-u3

"S
o cp

o ic e;

oJ

so

co

u)

1T

C?
~e3;55b

XOTV oWCo-tf I
-tr~$Q 0X^0 tfz?* f

CO O
^PTY-8^ b -ST^^o
O
s5j-^6\ci3bo Xb ^
LJ CO c

9
)>cbo Sj^>oioo)^o2Sb S5o

o ^ S"?o
c CO

Stoop "^^^3 ^Jlo^oS^odJSpo cooed

>tfd&SSx>

"^ o Sn

"Sfib.
,

ro
i

3n"3r
Q-- '

cO
o

^r^o^
CO

IJ -LJ

OL-

23- o

oJ

0% ^

eo
S) O
<)

-CLO
(1)
50-0-.0

25-CLO

6 IS

5c&<20!3b5b.

o.

3 0.0
! 3.

J o

0-6-0
r. 1.8-0 2.
CtJ
gj
tf\ 0-6-0
r. 3_8-0
5 no. 2-8-0
* rto
1_8 ~ Q

i e>3 \

8.
;

V-

Q itj

VW%J

V -G

87V

1468 1684

T I

*3
)
34

^ (?

sSo

673

. "/
j ^

191-193 aotb3ex>-67 3
' "BrfociS ^S^TV ?) r5rtfo55o#

%.
S By
Senart P. P. 1,254

(Vide Kshatriya Clans in Bud 1 hist India. By


Bhimala Charan Law, M. A- B. L. Ed 193 P. 2 -
9 3).

,
(^

w
(Lecchavi)
W^bSfo.
(Licchavi - Dauhitra).
a e) 35
I. 5f)^7V^
:
ur*\t}c$5:oo ^Sofi^<^o&:> e*>) /'SPcS&w&rfS.

(Kshatriya Clans in Biidd, India P. 7)&


(Vide Inscriptions of the Early Gupta Kings,
Edited by T. F. Fleet Corpus Inscriptionum
Indicarum Vol. Ill P 8S a

II.
a
^

Tfc^s ^^TT-8^j(5KS^ (Vide ffl Fleet Op. Git. P. 27)

III.

98 r5oii (Do Page 43)

IV. aoo^JSoSSar'S'XbS aSs&-8&ifc iSj-oS

(Do Page 50)


..-jg S

a 35
Vic tf^(&X:>^) ft"d&> e^> "eF So^^rf / fe> (which Is

considered to be spurious e?

(Vide Fleet, Inscriptions of the Early Gupta


Kings, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Vol. Ill P
256., (&) Kshatriya Clans in Budd, India 8) R
'

(Licchivi)

w -
(Licchavi
\ / LJ

Inac Vola
_ ln 17
(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist times P=8); & Indian
Antiquary Vol. IX P. 168.f.f.)

"
(Licchavi)
(Vide Legge, FaHien P. P. 71, 76 )

(Licehavi)

(Vide Buddhist records of the Western World By


S. Beal Vol. II P. 73)
"
The Licchavis were neither Tibetan nor Iranian
in their origin, but there is very clear evidence in th
Buddhist literature show that they belongedto to the
9

Aryan ruling
g^.jm^^.y^^^.^ m ,^ ^.^,mi^
caste -the Kshatriya \
A-Mij\l!!^^J?i;iJV:mMa!g^ ; -reytpHiiir^qMrm^^^^ llmr-nnr-im
i

(Kshatrlya Clans In Buddhist India P. 9)

eo

Q
& cc

(5

C?
^)
no L O

(Vide Mahaparinibhana Suttana. Translated by


T. W. &
C. A. F. Rhys Davids in Dialogues of
Buddha. VoL III P. 187).
"The Exalted one was a Kshatriya and so are
we- We are worthy to receive a portion of the relics
of the Exalted one ".
(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 9)
fi
The Lord is a Kshatriya and so am
59

fore I deserve a share of the relics

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India

- "

Nikaya. P. T. S. VoL III P. P. 164, 1660 & Kshatriya


Clans in Budd. India P. 10)
A Licchavi named Mahali says,
46
1 am a is the Buddha.
Kshatriya, so If his

knowledge increases, and he becomes all -Knowing,


why should it not happen to me 5 '

(Vide Suraangala Vilasim Pt I P. T, S. P. 312) &


Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India, P A

8c55bo
B/
*X
A3 J
..._..
O 2^ O I

no
ss
The eighteen confederate Kings of Kasi and
Hosala the nlae Mallakis and Nine LIcchavis, on theBEZjL-^g^^MRLiJail'.ti.'UBlL
i.JLil^^^fflyTO7H"Sa>at-!ll^' VJ^ttBfmPfmf^!^
_

day of new moon, instituted in illumination on the


Poshadha, which was a fasting day; for they said,
"
Since the light of intelligence is gone, Jet us
make an illumination of material matter ".
(Kalpa Sutra. 128 Translated by Prof. H. Jacobi
Vol. XXII P. 268) & Kshatriya Clans iii
,

Buddhist times P. 12)

(Vide Jacobi Op. Git. 108-110. P. P. 255-6.


P. X-XII). fKshtriya Clans in,
&
Buddhist India P P
13,36)

dtsss-8os5warfa. (Do P. 13)


oo

no -
Q a --

1
3Ttfs
L

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 14.


"
The Liochavis were looked upon as persons of
5?
very high Pedigree
(Kshatriya CJans in Buddhist India P. 13).
5 \-x-ctfcoOO -
(& e^^SbsSoS' (vJospS^SDwo.T* 75oi520o
TJ

"The Licchavis were Kshatriyas of Vasistha


Gotra" (do P. 13)

41
The Sakyas and the Licchavis are branches of
the same people ".

(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P, 17/

"
The Sakya, race (to which the Buddha belonged
was divided into three parts, whose most celebrated
'epresentativeswere Sakya the Great (the Buddha),
3akya the Licchavi, and Sakya the rr ountaineer ".
(Vide His. of the Eastern Mongols, Page 21. By
3anang Setsen &
Kshatriya Clans 17),

oex. 3
''The Tibetan King, belonged to the family
first

of Sakya the Licchavi ".


(The life of the Buddha. By Rockhill Popular
.Edition Page 203 Note )

" The Licchavis were of pure Kshatriya parentage


"
on both sides
(Page 27 of Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India),

The Licchavis were pure Kshatiiyas by_origin^

(Kshatriya Clans in Btrld. India P. 25)

Just as Ajatasatru had gbried in the -title of


4 *

Videhiputto \ the son of a daughter of Videha


%' 9

people, that is, of the Licchavis


who occupied the
.Videha country, so also it was considered a glory to
an orthodox Gupta Emperor to have been a "Lecchavi '
1

dauhitra or the son of a daughter of the Licchavis.


(Kshatiiya Clans in Budihist India P. 27.. 28.)

11
The power and glory of the Licchavis during
the period of Brahmanic revival under the Guptas
were as great as under the Sisunakas and the
43

Mauryas and that their position as one of the leading


and most honoured Kshatriya fannies in Eastern
India was fully recognise 1."
(Kshatriya Clans In Buddhist Inlia P. 29)

(Vide SigaUjataka Edited by V. Fausboll Vol, III


P. 5) & Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India P. 10
Foot-Note 3.)

^(^ O

&i^SdSb
189 rfoii (i
n
37*11 1713)
^ptfo
<o
x x: a
,
^^ ^v

V o G?
a- 5$!;55Stfj S'e) 276* o?Y-c^bSo 282 >
<?

88-277J

S'O 3001

101)

B'D 3001-3059

^
A son-in-law of thg_Ljj^ a sou of
Ghatotkacha Gupta, Chandra Gupta itm^LiU|-^''r'Miinii'jiy--!'^j^^Tfcyrrp^'^ri-ffl^^
1 Established a
B^^tt^iy^p^^g-jqaj^Mp^-^g.-a^afflif "ii^p} r^****Mjp|3my7^f<i -y^^jm^
j

New
(Prachina Mudra, P. 121 By R D. Bauer ji) &
(Kshatriya Clans in Bu Id. In ha P. 13").

iJ 00

co-v 3
/o

Sjc^bj^) '^iT
B
^9cCb^aorfb. ^j^ SosSbn'&.rSo ^^D/e5^,^)

"The Nepal inscriptions point oufc that there were


two distinct houses, one of which known as the
Thakuri family, is mentioned
the Vamsavali but is in
not recorded in the inscriptions; and the other one was
the Licchavi or the Surya Vamai family which issued
its charters from the house or palaca called
Managriha
and used an era uniformly with the Gupta epoch.
Thus we find that the Licchavis were not inferior
to the imperial Guptas so far as rank and power were
concerned. Their friendly relations with the Guptas
were established by the marriage af Chandra Gupta
^ with Kumara Devi a daughter of the I icchavis."
(Vide Fleet, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum,
Vol. Ill P. P. 133, 135) & Kshatriya Clans in Budd.
India P. 138).
fl

. 457

\o

(
\

TP=rf ^3^^^/eSb tf ^sSbr^

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P- I Si 5).

"In the Nepal Vamsavali, the Liccha^is have


been alloted to the Suryavamsa or solar race of ttfe
Kshatriyas.'*
(Indian Antiquary. Vol. XXXVII P. P. 78-90)
Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P, 14)
)

Kshatriya Clans in BuiH. India P. 17.

(Kshtriya Clans in Budd, India. P


?^
Co

So^S,

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd. India P 23)

(if! ^rII 327 to 82

11

was considered a glory to an _o^thodox_Giipfca


It

Emperor to have been a Licchavi - Puhitiaor the son


of a daughter of the Licohavis."

(Kshatriya Clans in Budd, India (P. P. 27 9 2

V "V
Dr. Fleet

"
The Llcchavis were then at least of equal
rank
and power with the early Guptas is shown by the pride
manifested by the latter in this alliance as exhibited
in the record of names of Kumara Devi etc.
9 '

(Kshatriya Glaus in Buddhist India P. 28) & J.


Fleet Gupta Insertions-' Co rpous Ins. Ind. VoL III
9

Introduction, P. 155

o
eT

&n>tfo

-3
T c?
e

cj--^do-ae.

a atf ^Tris5e5og)^o, ^uT-Sob'o^ osSotfK) rfo^Po-O

QsSb es^tfox&e^ rfiSD^) ^^-sy^ SooSfo^b "S

"3 'Soo'S dfibooS


^(8d!5b

^^J

$b^. -
C?
^ft
t?U &
AO ^
oJ TTO
O o*>
<r ~P^
ti)
K
cO X>
OO
^
*

00,0=

eo
S"

00

oo

co

\ N
"V ^

oo-oo.)
So

x
^ft
t?U &
AO ^
oJ TTO
O o*>
<r ~P^
ti)
K
cO X>
OO
^
*

00,0=

eo
S"

00

oo

co

\ N
"V ^

oo-oo.)
So

x
TP & "e3 S SS

8)5-888; (2)
9 2
,
(8)
cxxr^

/ 950-958 sSSSS
V

/ S)B
Vv

PO c

a (
v-
eo

o
2.

3 5, 6 e 3^055^0 7.

8.

1021 (
(

1026
C?
e 13, 14

"3.

972

o. o

co
980 Klolltfo 1003 tfolltfo
o
)
V. (p

^3-8

00

V G "V
S"

,& ^S^5^^>
-
O^i
i
)8orf aS-ttrfb c^o^ S
i

no

SSsSa "^^eX)"^^^) -^^oo-

O
1. &tf\b^^oo 2. ^^J'rfK'tf^wScssboex), 8.

ro V

6. 8S*
x g'.' 7. sfcsdfc, 8. r^&cssb, 9.

1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9

,
8
o
/
a3

-a^T>o"-s^tf;lx>
^**

%J
^r
B
-
'
r
-
o' .-

(^

aioooo-D

(Vide History of India By K. V. Rangaswamy


lyyangar. Part I Page 93).

"
The Vajjians, a confederation of eight clans of
vhich the chief were the Licchavis of Vaisah."
(Ancient India. By S. Krishnaswamy Ayyangar
3d. 1911 Page
of India
(Vide Cunnigham, Ancient Geography
P. 447).

66
Some of the coins of Chandra Gupta 1 have the
" 9 '
them"
name Licchavl on
(Kshatriya Clans in Buddhist India. P. 8)

"v

eo
tfnfc B-'oSxSb \rib7VS)
ij

o
5
C4-)

"A was introduced under the name of


gold coin
Chandra Gupta 1 On one side of it were insiscd the
figures of Chandra Gupta and his queen Kumara
" " "
Devi and the words Chandra Gupta Sree Kumara
"
Devi in the Brahmi Character, and on the other
side were engraved the fignre of Laxml, the goddess
"
of Fortune seated on a Lion and the word Liccha-
5!
vayah .

("Kshafcriya Clans In Buddhist India P. 137) &


Prachina Mudra By R. D Banerjee. P. 122).

rn

^)^7T -v

2-
L&;&)
tfo/ *
SS 8oo&r<>&~S tfrfb ffo

rasb T^8 Xorf-^ti$& -so


o_ (pL
2J(Sd^o^"^aS:>
u)

o
(J58wo$8's5a37v
"
200

3.

...... / eo
l) 3^5r*K5e

oo ocn^r o o

o
)(rd ro ^^re

4.

o
/

L
s s>
/

^.
~ V

V. P)
____-'T^L

c
C~
_

i?o )sroo D5j-sr'o

9 r>o 25

90 s6

"
The second record of the Gupta heritage^
likewise perpetuated on stone, is to be seen in the
Mathura inscription from the Katra Mound, wherein
Samudra's parentage is apparently repeated in accor-
dance with the tenor of the earlier monument The
genealogy of the family is further extended in the
District of Ghazipur a and Its counterpart at Bihar,

and an unnamed heir/


lb (X'oSJ
Q . L S

s
~i .'"V i

.
OL >v-

S.

w,
"
girlsborn in Vaisah, to that city alone No marriage
was to ba contracted outside Valsali.
(Kshatriya Cldiis In Buddfa, India

v -7.) L /

g'tfowtfb "B-Sb\S^(6S6oi&>e6ioooSSb
2j ^*J

XJ

-
s

b'
tf

"V

w
eo

EI

(Kumara Devi) She ^belonged to a royal family


of the Licchavis."

(Kshatriya Clans in Bnddhisfc India P. 137).

212
O no

oo

V
vXJ cWixXJ \J Cj&J fO &J &J oJ cxXJ C>c(\XJj
.y_
9 ^r'exr-'QO, '
212

-tfo/tf^^ SS-O\
"3
"
Ghaadragupta was crowned as King of Kings, a
date thereafter reckoned as the beginning of the great
Gupta Era, To celebrate the event lie struck coins
inscribed With his own name, that of his queen,
Kumara Davi, and of the Licchavi Clans of
<IESN
which he
was the chief."
the e n

\
CD "i*J
* Bf

;6555od$joex>
XJ
~s
X

11

It is
wholly misleading to describe the Gupta
Era as a Hindu or Brahraanical reaction, Ttwas rather
an Aryan revival, for it was the effort of the
Aryan
K^trivas, aided by the Aryan Brahmins, to restore
the political and spiritual supremacy of the Indo-
Aryan race in Aryavarta. 95
His, of the Aryan Rule in India. By HavelL
P.P. 151-52.
v-
(p

oi

01

efo-Cfc-Sb

eo

"They (The Gupta Emperors) were fall-blooded


Aryans of the historic Licchavi Clan who rallied the
*
nmu.niiaimini ..... ni llll m__^ rT _ TIII , B|| ........... . --- n-J -_____^____^,, ^_^__

Kshatriya Clans to the defence of the Tryavarta


against the Turks, and HLIDS of those days who were
threatening the existence of Aryan Empire in India"
(Bhandarkar's Commemoration Vol. P. 442
Ed. 1917.

x.
"
Mr. Allen presumes that Jfemudr^^

bornjg.j., L ic
_
chajjjJa rn Iy an 1 to keep up the memory
.
.

of the father, Chandragupta and mother, Kumara


9 5
Devi the coin was Issued .

(Kshatnya Claris in Budd. India, P. 137).

Samudragupta by Ms conquests considerably


6S

enlarged the Empire of the Guptas ..... .and reasserting


the principle of Kshatriya hegemony over the whole
9 '
of India
(HavelFs History of the Aryan Rule in India P. 154).

15
Sanskrit, therefore, naturally was the official

language oi the Gupta Imperial Court"


(Do Book P, 155).

41
Thevillage kathaks found ready listeners to
praises of the mighty kshafcriya (Samudragupta) then-
B^afTgmmmLaaagaTOn- nmnxrTmrvKfn. Mamifk**iatfm*mttmm*aiH'..f Uf mia fi
.

seated on Rama's throne at Ayodhya."


(Havell's His. of the Aryan Rule in India P. 155)
Qtf
o

S^Sooo

"The Guptas were undoubte


f-Ttm-KXiJi _|f^rt^ ?^ri--nnyjy.'i HJ , fBja^jJtt.u-i^^ JJd
*^ ..MUBBwBM.TtTJHaMiiifc.^jtriii u
) > ^aiafcj.g^U _J-fflmi-.-^Tr''Trft pKt1 [rf a .^ ^
Tr^av.^-^'
j^ffT[r^ t
L,
t .-.^T
ily the representa-
>^I^^T^ ip*eu^ ..idtif^j^Jne^. ^-r^^^

5 '

tives of Aryan Kshattiya tradition, (Do P. 178).

!T"II

"In fact the instinct of caste lias become so


Ingrained in and natural to the Indian mind, that the
Ka]aputs of pure Aryan descent decline even now, as
thousands of years ago, to take girls from, or give
girls in marriage to the Aryans of mixed descent
whether they be the Kshatriyas of the united provin-
ces, or the Kathis of Katiawar and the Maharatta of
Maharastra." (Epic India. By Q. V Vaidya P. 45)
IT !!

"

o-rf\"^o^ e^,9c55boe>D
,5

1940

ds

800 tf
eo
No one " he wrote is allowed to marry out of
ss
"
5

his own class or exercise any calling except his own?


(Epic India P. 49. By a V. Vaidya, M. A )

S' ooo$tfrf\
o).

G ,9
45

11
There is no doubt whatever that the caste
system as we know it to-day with all its elaborate
restrictions with regard to marrige. food, ceremonial
pollution, etc. existed in its iully developed form in
'

the days of Harsha. (i. e 606-640 A. D.)


9
a

606^640
E^Q
?!
S&T*
1

12

<?

/ K
3
(? TJ

tfoll S'olj

L
00

5
SO
SP8

o Mr, 3.0.0 o

3. tffitt

3 .

fc-

z.

<r. esoixno

oo,
DO.
j_g Q
o a tf

V,

1J

O W3 "i
SjJ

o eo'
, T
i
e 284s "4>tiej e9fc>"3o5fc^ ^V 8 '

c 23

o r
The Genesis of the Human Race
GjoSb

oO Q

LJ

i 114 1-8-0
<^
o 5050 00

o 5050

86

3188 (li
^.
1950)
sSea&S

1836
^*Pdtfbw&c5
2775 4988 o (II
827
1S2

S'O 2775 oir e) 5050 n


((

1949)
PtfdSoo;
XIV
THE HINDU, Sunday, July 17, 1949

Manavasrishti Vijnanam. (Tho Genesis -of th


Human. Kace, )
By Kota Veukatachalara (Author)
Gandhinagar, Vijayavada.
"This is an attempt to ascertain the cradle ol
mankind with the almost exclusive aid of Vedic tosti
money, The author believes that the first man was an
Aryan and that he was created in Aryavarta - the
Valley of the Saraawati, etc,

XV
INDIAN REPUBLIC, Monday, July, 18; 1949.
a
^ o <3 d& fe" & 3 C) 86 3 /&
oo

Manava Srishti Vijnanam* By Kota Venkata-


chelam..v He points out that the first abode
of the Aryans was Aryavarta. He quotes profusely
from the Rigveda, Manusmriti, the Puranas, and the
vedic commentaries. He supports Ms statements from
the findings of the Geological and Archaeological
researches etc An attempt is made in the work
to stimulate in the minds of the students the spirit of
"
research into this all important matter of the writ
ings of foreigners on the subject and rejecting what is
not supported by Vedic writings, by the author is a
wholsome feature. The maps supplied by Jfe
Venkatachalam are useful (See Pages 27 81, 83). 9

"
The Appendix on the Ancient Geography of the
"
Puranas is very interesting study. The section on
modern countries which correspond to ancient names
may be perused with interest The problems raised
are of practical value and should be solved with the
aid of our own ancient literature and by a proper
interpretation. The conclusions are thought provok-
ing and deserve to be widely read and thought over.
>*

I I

oo fl

O ^ X" tf O

S) Zj cSSb ttT 2e 2.

SXr

, 36-.Y-1949
no

Q
^^
?>) ^g'o
-
o
&

ii

c5o
ep- 6 d Sa ST 60

>

18-10-49.

no

no

v
i .
'
j3

"8- dfoS- o;5a

J7_
My Dear Sir,
I thank you sincerely for
sending me a copy of
your excellent book "Manavasrishti
Vijnanam". You

aS.reclS
Ur ^^
nave given convincing reasons for
your views I feel
r6C6iV6 6Ver inCreasin
^ P ublic
S, R, B. & 0. V. B. College,
f*

So

1)26

( D
0-
9

'

6
<?

<C .
sOO

iJ oo

"3
(The
^ Genesis of the Human Race) & itfo#5&>3b

00

VII

a; Q 40
^'x7o
^

.The process of the Evolution of the Universe


explained therein is covincing to all unprejudiced
minds I have my own doubts as to whether the
leaders of our secular state will give the book the
attention it deserves. I hope it will enable the present
and coming generations to know in an understanding
manner the eternal truths contained In our ancient
books.

VIII
CV

Dear Sir, 13
I thank you once more heartily for sending me the
" 5'
book Manavasrishti Vijnanarn which I have read
with great Interest and benefit to myself, and admire
the profound knowledge and close reasoning which it
displays on the subject which greatly enhances the
prestige of the Aryan Race.
(The
^ Genesis of the Human Race) & itfo#5&>3b

00

VII

a; Q 40
^'x7o
^

.The process of the Evolution of the Universe


explained therein is covincing to all unprejudiced
minds I have my own doubts as to whether the
leaders of our secular state will give the book the
attention it deserves. I hope it will enable the present
and coming generations to know in an understanding
manner the eternal truths contained In our ancient
books.

VIII
CV

Dear Sir, 13
I thank you once more heartily for sending me the
" 5'
book Manavasrishti Vijnanarn which I have read
with great Interest and benefit to myself, and admire
the profound knowledge and close reasoning which it
displays on the subject which greatly enhances the
prestige of the Aryan Race.
o

<sy
C?

e
a

C J

*sSb, -tfB/tf
v.
Stop's
^o

XIII
ST 15-8-1949

^a,
XIV
THE HINDU, Sunday, July 17, 1949

Manavasrishti Vijnanam. (Tho Genesis -of th


Human. Kace, )
By Kota Veukatachalara (Author)
Gandhinagar, Vijayavada.
"This is an attempt to ascertain the cradle ol
mankind with the almost exclusive aid of Vedic tosti
money, The author believes that the first man was an
Aryan and that he was created in Aryavarta - the
Valley of the Saraawati, etc,

XV
INDIAN REPUBLIC, Monday, July, 18; 1949.
a
^ o <3 d& fe" & 3 C) 86 3 /&
oo

Manava Srishti Vijnanam* By Kota Venkata-


chelam..v He points out that the first abode
of the Aryans was Aryavarta. He quotes profusely
from the Rigveda, Manusmriti, the Puranas, and the
vedic commentaries. He supports Ms statements from
the findings of the Geological and Archaeological
researches etc An attempt is made in the work
to stimulate in the minds of the students the spirit of
"
research into this all important matter of the writ
ings of foreigners on the subject and rejecting what is
not supported by Vedic writings, by the author is a
wholsome feature. The maps supplied by Jfe
Venkatachalam are useful (See Pages 27 81, 83). 9

"
The Appendix on the Ancient Geography of the
"
Puranas is very interesting study. The section on
modern countries which correspond to ancient names
may be perused with interest The problems raised
are of practical value and should be solved with the
aid of our own ancient literature and by a proper
interpretation. The conclusions are thought provok-
ing and deserve to be widely read and thought over.
The need for a reorientation of the study of Indian
History is well indicated by the facts brought
t tl 11
H^j*A V out \J> 14. (y

in this work. .

"

&t
In this exceedingly well written the
booklet,
author has collecte and set forth all the Vedic' 1
and
Puranic authorities bearing on the question of the
origin of the Human race and original home of the

His opening up of the mine of evidence


relating to
that question must appeal
* to the heart of every
^ VJi V
"
,,,,....,.
i *
"*
1 T" U a qj>
>'
.

I a(J lan ete _

XVII
o
o~ e ^)o/90"e3^5o ? &^a i^o^^o3^r^& & 11-12-^1949

28 5S6 - "lXAb?r"sS$iw 9-685 S!


w^gd&o ^'rf^ex>
XIV
THE HINDU, Sunday, July 17, 1949

Manavasrishti Vijnanam. (Tho Genesis -of th


Human. Kace, )
By Kota Veukatachalara (Author)
Gandhinagar, Vijayavada.
"This is an attempt to ascertain the cradle ol
mankind with the almost exclusive aid of Vedic tosti
money, The author believes that the first man was an
Aryan and that he was created in Aryavarta - the
Valley of the Saraawati, etc,

XV
INDIAN REPUBLIC, Monday, July, 18; 1949.
a
^ o <3 d& fe" & 3 C) 86 3 /&
oo

Manava Srishti Vijnanam* By Kota Venkata-


chelam..v He points out that the first abode
of the Aryans was Aryavarta. He quotes profusely
from the Rigveda, Manusmriti, the Puranas, and the
vedic commentaries. He supports Ms statements from
the findings of the Geological and Archaeological
researches etc An attempt is made in the work
to stimulate in the minds of the students the spirit of
"
research into this all important matter of the writ
ings of foreigners on the subject and rejecting what is
not supported by Vedic writings, by the author is a
wholsome feature. The maps supplied by Jfe
Venkatachalam are useful (See Pages 27 81, 83). 9

"
The Appendix on the Ancient Geography of the
"
Puranas is very interesting study. The section on
modern countries which correspond to ancient names
may be perused with interest The problems raised
are of practical value and should be solved with the
aid of our own ancient literature and by a proper
interpretation. The conclusions are thought provok-
ing and deserve to be widely read and thought over.

You might also like