_ Tlanede v. CA, GE. tle, OMAR, Janvary Ub, Pe On October 10, WHY, Lazardo Taitede erecvied a wotarized deed of absolite Sale m favor of hi eldest brother, Ricardo Taiiedo, and the latters wike, Teresita Barera, private vesgondents herein, wherely he conveyed +o the latter in consideration of PL50000, "one hectare of whatever shave T shall have over Lot WW cated at Gevona, Province of Tarlac, the Saud grogerty leeing Ws “Future wherstance” From he gavents Upon the death of hv Cather Matias, Lazaro executed an "AEKidaut of Conformity’ dated Feiorary 14, (980 to "ve-aF Fw, vesgect. acknowledge avd voidate the sale I made in it" On January {> HA, Lazaro exawted another notanited deed of Sale im Favor of grate veszondent's Covering h6 “Undivided OE TWELVE (ML) of a parcel of land Known 06 Lot (A. Ricardo leavwed that Lazavo Sold the Same grogerty to Hs chibieen, getitionees heeein. On Tune 7, (FPL, grivate vesgondents vecorded the Deed of Sale (Exh, 4 in their favor in the Registry of Deeds Feritioners (ied a complaint For ¥2scistion (US damages) of the deeds of Sale executed oy Lazace in favor of private resgondents covering, the grogerty inherited ly Lazare Eom his Father Pewate vesgondents, however presented in evidence a Weed of Revocation of a Veed of Sole dated March \1, WAR wheven Lazavo revoked the Sale in Favor of getitiontes For the reason that it was "swmulated or fictitious - without any consideration whatsoever “the twial court decided in Favor of grivate vesgondents, holding that getitioners failed “to adduce a gcagondevance of evderce to Sugart (thei? claim" On age, the Cowrt of Aggeals affirmed te decsion of the teil covet. ewe: ether oF wot the Sale of Future iheritance is valid elk No contvact may be entowed into tly, Saud contvact made i 61 6 wot Vad Gnd comet We the Sonse oF Ory eat on 0 Gute iebevitonce excagt im cases exgeetihy ovtharzed ly tt Contes noe te exeator of ony dbuyation between the gartie “the documents that ave eetical to the vesoivtion of ths case ave: (a the deed of Sale of January 1, AL in Favor of grivae respondents covering Lazare’ Undivided ihevitance of ove-twelfth GAT shore we Lot slo. whch was Subsequently vegistered on Tune 7, FT, and to) the deed of sale dated Geceweer 19, 80 in Gaver of getitiontes covering the Same frogerty, Tse two dauiments were erecvted a€ter the death of Matas land hs Seas) and after a deed of entrajiseal settlement of hs (matas? estate was crewed, Hus vesting in Lazavo actual rte over Said grerty. Le other words, Tase dgentons thay conflicting, weve vo longer infected with the infremities of tHe Kt Sole