Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harley Slides
Harley Slides
Heidi Harley
University of Arizona
hharley@email.arizona.edu
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 1
Not long ago, in a galaxy not far away:
IP
NP I'
I° VP
V'
V° NP
Mary -edopened
open it
2
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
Shortly therafter: VP-internal subjects
IP
NP I'
I° VP
NP
t V'
V° NP
Mary -edopened
Mary open it
3
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
Nowadays: VPIS with split VP
IP
I'
NP
I° vP
NP
t v'
v° VP
V v° tV
V NP
Mary
open∅ ∅ open
-edopened
Mary it 4
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
Plan of talk
5
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
1: Split-vP: syntax
DP V’ ?
Subj
Agθ V DP PP
(Agθ, Thθ, Goθ) Obj
Thθ Goθ
Mary gave the book to John? 6
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
1: Split-vP: syntax
V DP
Obj
Thθ Goθ
7
Mary gave the book
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007to John?
1: Split-vP: syntax
VP2
Larson’s solution:
DP V2’ Split VPs
Agθ
V2 VP1
(Agθ, Thθ, Goθ)
DP V1’
Thθ
V1 PP
Goθ
Mary gave a book t to John
9
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
Questions
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
VP
DP V'
V° SC (='Small Clause')
DP PredP
Pred° A°
VP
DP V'
V’ A°
V° SC
DP Pred
14
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
15
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
VP1
DP V'
DP V’
V2° A°
VP1
DP V'
V’ A°
V° VP2
DP V°
18
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
19
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
VP1
DP V'
DP V’
V2° PP
21
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
• Marantz 1984:
kill a bug = cause the bug to die
kill a conversation = cause the conversation
to end
kill an evening = while away the time span of
the evening
kill a bottle = empty the bottle
kill an audience = entertain the audience
to an extreme degree
22
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
23
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
24
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
• Kratzer 1996:
• Only way to capture notion that V+O
can idiomatize but V+S cannot is if S
is not selected for by V, but rather by
a separate predicate
• Neo-Davidsonian Agent(x, e)
25
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
• Kratzer 1996:
• Verb composes with an event argument
• Agent-introducing predicate composes
with an event argument
• An operation identifying the two events as
identical, ‘Event Identification’, unifies the
representation
26
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
2. Split-vP: Semantics
• Kratzer 1996:
• ∃e [Cause(e, Mary) & [Open(e, the
door)]
• “There is an event. Mary is the cause
of the event, and the event is an
opening of the door”
• Verb itself selects for object
• Little v° selects for external arg.
27
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
40
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
41
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
derâz keshidan
long pulling ’ to lie down, to take a nap'
44
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
birun kardan
out doing
'to dismiss, to fire (someone)'
Prt+LV
bâlâ âvardan
up bringing
'to vomit'
bâlâ keshidan
up pulling
'to steal' 45
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
be yâd dâshtan
to memory having
'to have in memory'
PP+LV
bejâ âvardan
to place bringing
'to recognize'
be bâd dâdan
to wind giving
'to waste' 46
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
47
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP Pred°
48
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
3. Split-vP: Morphology
vP
DP v’
SC v°
DP Pred°
vP
DP v’
SC v°
DP Pred°
vP
DP v’
SC v°
DP Pred°
52
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
• Verb-particle constructions
• Particle, not verb root, represents
endstate
1. (After letting him in only an hour before,) Mary
threw the cat out again.
2. Mary threw the cat out for two hours (then she let
him in again).
1. In (1),what’s happening again is the cat being out
2. In (2), what lasts for two hours is the cat being out
54
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP Pred°
55
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
v° Prt° DP Pred°
56
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
58
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP Pred°
59
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP Pred°
60
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP Pred°
61
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
• For example
1. Mary whistled the dog to her side.
*Mary whistled the dog.
2. Mary shoved her way to the front of the line.
*Mary shoved her way.
3. Mary talked herself onto the stage.
*Mary talked herself.
4. Mary pitched her team into the finals.
*Mary pitched her team.
65
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP PP
66
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
67
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
to Spec- vP
TP
v° SC
BECOME
DP Pred°
70
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
71
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
II: Bipartite English vPs
vP
v° SC
BECOME
DP PP
72
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
III: Restricting Vs in v°
73
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
III: Restricting Vs in v°
• Talmy 1987:
75
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v°
in English
76
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v°
in English
write it up *compose it up/*arrange it up
eat it up *consume it up
finish it up *complete it up
throw it out *discard it out
lie down *recline it down
hand it out *distribute it out
show it off *exhibit it off / *reveal it off
fire it up *ignite it up
slice it off *incise it off
77
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v°
in English
tidy it up *arrange it up
hide it away *conceal it away
cut it apart *dissect it apart
figure it out *calculate it out
move it over *displace it over
go away *depart away
clear it up *clarify it up
write it up *compose it up
cast it off *release it off
dig it up *excavate it up 78
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v°
in English
80
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v° in
English
84
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
IV: Restrictions on V in v° in
English
87
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
VP2
Larson’s solution:
DP V2’ Split VPs
Agθ
V2 VP1
(Agθ, Thθ, Goθ)
DP V1’
Thθ
V1 PP
Goθ
Mary gave a book t to John
88
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
vP
DP v’
Agθ
v° SC
(Agθ, Thθ, Goθ)
DP Pred’
Thθ
Pred PP
Goθ
Mary gave a book t to John
89
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
91
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
92
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
93
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
94
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
96
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
V: Dative shift and v°
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP PredP
Have DP
Mary give the car ∅ a new
engine
97
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
VI: The failure to alternate
98
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
VI: The failure to alternate
vP
DP v’
v° SC
CAUSE
DP PredP
Part PP
Mary hibit her ex- to John
paintings
99
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007
VI: The failure to alternate
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 0
VI: The failure to alternate
• A side note
• The analysis also predicts that verb-
particle constructions won’t appear in the
double object construction, which is
generally true:
1. Mary showed (*off) John her paintings.
(cf. Mary showed off her paintings)
2. Mary passed (*around) the kids the potatoes.
(cf. Mary passed around the potatoes)
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 1
VII: Synchronic segmentation?
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 4
VII: Synchronic segmentation?
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 5
Conclusions
10
ALC, Oct. 19, 2007 6