1. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K.

(2010).How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. San

Francisco, CA: Wiley.
2. American Psychological Association. (2019). Reasonable accommodations explained.
Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/disability/dart/toolkit-three
3. American Society for Quality. (2019). Total quality management. Retrieved from
https://asq.org/quality-resources/total-quality-management Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
4. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching,
and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY:
Longman.
5. Angelo, T. A. & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook
for college teachers (2nd ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Ashwin, P., Boud, D., Coate, K., Hallett, F., Keane, E.; Krause, K-L., . . . Tooher,
M. (2015).Reflective teaching in higher education. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
7. Assess. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assess
8. Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2019). Value rubrics. Retrieved
from https://www.aacu.org/value-rubrics
9. Astin, A. W., Banta, T. W., Cross, K. P., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P, T., Hutchings,
Pat, Wright, B. D. (1993). Principles of good practice for assessing student learning.
Leader- ship Abstracts, 6(4), 1–3.
10. Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of
mean- ingful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.
Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
11. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
12. Baldridge Performance Excellence Program. (2019). Baldridge excellence framework.
Retrieved from https://baldrigefoundation.org/
13. Banta, T. (Ed.). (2004). Community college assessment: Assessment update collections.
San Fran- cisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Banta, T. W., & Associates. (2002). Building a scholarship of assessment. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Barkley, E., & Major, C. (2016a). LAT quick reference guide. Retrieved from
http://www.designlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/LAT-Quick-Reference.docx
16. Barkley, E., & Major, C. (2016b). Learning assessment techniques. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey- Bass.
17. Beckem, J. M., II, & Watkins, M. (2012). Bringing life to learning: Immersive
experien- tial learning simulations for online and blended courses. Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 61–70.
18. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every
class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
19. Bernstein, D., & Burnett, A. N. (2006). Making teaching and learning visible: Course
portfolios and the peer review of teaching. Boston, MA: Anker.
20. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R.
(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals.
New York, NY: David McKay.
21. Boser, U. (2017). What do people know about excellent teaching and learning?
22. Brame, C. (2016). Active learning. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-
learning/ Brame, C. J. (2015). Effective educational videos
23. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn:
Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
24. Bresciani Ludvik, M. (Ed.) (2016). The neuroscience of learning and development.
Sterling, VA: Stylus.
25. Bresciani Ludvik, M. (2019). Outcomes based program review. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Brookfield, S. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San
Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
26. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Brookfi S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching (2nd
ed.).San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2016). The discussion book. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass. Brown, M. (1975). Stone soup: An old tale retold. New York, NY:
Atheneum Books.
29. Brown, P., Roediger, H., & McDaniel, M. (2014). Make it stick: The science of
successful learn- ing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Burgstahler, S. (Ed.). (2015). Universal design in higher education (2nd ed.).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
31. Cambridge, D. (2010). E-portfolios for lifelong learning and assessment. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Canada, M. (2013). The syllabus: A place to engage students’ egos. New Directions in
Teaching and Learning, 135, 37–42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20062
33. Carl D. Perkins Career and Education Act, Pub. Law 109-270, 20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.
(2006). Carrington, A. (2015). The padagogy wheel V. 4.1. Retrieved from
https://designingoutcomes com/assets/PadWheelV4/PadWheel_Poster_V4.pdf
34. Center for Applied Special Technology. (n.d.). Legal obligations for accessibility.
35. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2019). The UD guidelines.
36. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987) Seven principles for good practice in
undergradu- ate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3–
7.
37. College Board. (2019). Trends in higher education: Average estimated undergraduate
budgets, 2018–19.
38. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. (2019). Why CCSSE? Retrieved
from http://www.ccsse.org/.
39. Coombs, N. (2010). Making online teaching accessible: Inclusive course design for
students with disabilities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. Council for Aid to Education. (2019). Collegiate learning assessment. Retrieved from
https:// cae.org/flagship-assessments-cla-cwra/cla/
41. Cowie, A. (1936). Educational problems at Yale College in the eighteenth century.
New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
42. Cox, M. & Richlin, L. (2004). Building faculty learning communities. New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 1–4.
43. Creative Commons. (n.d.). About the licenses. Retrieved from
https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/
44. Cross, K. P. (1998, July/August). Why learning communities? Why now? About
Campus,4–11.
45. Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. (2008). Biology in bloom: Implementing
Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. Bethesda, MD: CBE Life
Sciences Education.
46. Curriculum. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary (11th ed.).
47. Daniels, E., Pirayoff, R., & Bessant, S. (2013). Using peer observation and
collaboration to improve teaching practices. Universal Journal of Educational
Research, 1, 269–274.
48. Davis, B. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49. De Gale, S., & Boisselle, L. (2015). The effect of POGIL on academic performance
and academic confidence. Science Education International, 26(1), 56–79.
50. Dehn, R. (2003). Is technology contributing to academic dishonesty? Journal of
Physician Assistant Education, 14, 190–192.
51. Diamond, R. (2008). Designing and assessing courses and curricula (3rd ed.). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52. Doyle, T., & Zakrajsek, T. (2019). The new science of learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
53. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., Allen, D. E. (2001a). Team-based learning: A transformative
use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
54. Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., Allen, D. E. (2001b). Why problem-based learning? A case
study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. Duch, S. Groh, & D.
Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3–11). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
55. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T.
(2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising
directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the
Public Interest, 14, 4–58.
56. Dunn, D. S., McCarthy, M. A., Baker, S. C., & Halonen, J. S. (2010). Using quality
bench- marks for assessing and developing undergraduate programs. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
57. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine.
58. Educational Testing Service. (2019a). ETS graduate record examinations. Retrieved
from https://www.ets.org/gre
59. Educational Testing Service. (2019b). ETS professional assessment for beginning
teachers.Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/praxis
60. Educational Testing Service. (2019c). ETS proficiency profile.
61. Educational Testing Service. (2019d). Test of English as a foreign language. Retrieved
from https://www.ets.org/toefl
62. Educause. (2019). Horizon Report preview 2019.
63. Epstein. (n.d.). What is the IT-AF?
64. Ernst, D. (2015). “Open Textbooks: Let Us Begin.” Keynote address at US
MoodleMoot conference, 2015.
65. Eynon, B., & Gambino, L. M. (2017). High-impact ePortfolio practice. Sterling, VA:
Stylus.
66. Federal Communications Commission. (2018). Closed captioning on television.
67. Felder, R., Bullard, L., & Raubenheimer, D. (2008, June). Effects of active learning on
student performance and retention. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the
American Society for Engineering Education. Pittsburgh, PA.
68. Felten, P., Bauman, H-D. L., Kheriaty, A., & Taylor, E. (2013). Transformative
conversations: A guide to mentoring communities among colleagues in higher education.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences [revised and updated].
San Fran- cisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70. Fink, L. D. (2005). A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant
Learning..
71. Fink, D. L. (2011). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning.
72. Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences. (Revised and updated).
San Fran- cisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
73. Fink, L. Dee (2018a). Situational factors to consider..org/wp-
content/uploads/2010/03/Situational-Factors-to-Consider-When-Designing-a-Course.pdf
74. Fink, L. D. (2018b). Three-column table. Retrieved from
http://www.designlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/3-column-table-blank-2-
pp.doc
75. Fornaciari, C. J., & Dean, K. L. (2014). The 21st century syllabus: From pedagogy to
andra- gogy. Journal of Management Education, 38, 701–723.
76. Gabriel, K. F. (2018). Creating the path to success in the classroom: Teaching to
close the graduation gap for minority, first-generation, and academically unprepared
students. Sterling,VA: Stylus.
77. Gannon, K. (n.d.). How to create a syllabus: Advice guide. Retrieved from
https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/advice-syllabus
78. Gray, C. (2017). Podcasting in education: What are the benefits? Retrieved from
https://www.thepodcasthost.com/niche-case-study/podcasting-in-education/
79. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Robin, R. (2014, March 4–5). How video production affects
student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. Presentation at Learning at
Scale 2014 Conference of the First Association of Computer Machinery Conference
on Learning at Scale, New York, NY.
80. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium, Theory Into
Practice,39,50–56.
81. Harrington, C. & Thomas, M. (2018). Designing a motivational syllabus: Creating a
learning path for student engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
82. Haugnes, N., Holmgren, H., & Springborg, M. (2018). Meaningful grading: A guide
for faculty in the arts. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
83. Heffernan, K. (2001). Fundamentals of service-learning course construction. Boston,
MA: Campus Compact.
84. Heller, R. (2018). All about adolescent literacy. Retrieved from
http://www.adlit.org/adlit_101/improving_literacy_instruction_in_your_school/vocabul
ary/
85. Herman, J., Aschbacher, P., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative
assessment.
86. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
87. Herman, J., & Nilson, L. B. (2018). Creating engaging discussions. Sterling, VA:
Stylus. History on the Net. (n.d.). World War II Timeline. Retrieved from
https://wwwhistoryonthenet.com/world-war-two-timeline-2/
88. Hockenbury, D., & Hockenbury, S. (2013). Discovering psychology, (6th ed.). New
York, NY: Worth.
89. Howard, J. (2015). Discussion in the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
90. Hutchings, P. (1998). The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to
advance practice and improve student learning. the teaching initiatives. Washington, DC:
American Association for Higher Education.
91. Insight Assessment. (2019). California Critical Thinking Test.
92. International Organization for Standardization. (n.d.). ISO 9000.
93. Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. (2019).
Class- room assessment techniques: Quick strategies.
94. Jacoby, B. (2014). Service learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons
learned.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
95. Jankowski, N. A., Timmer, J. D., Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D. (2018, January).
Assessment that matters: Trending toward practices that document authentic student
learning. Urbana: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for
Learning Outcomes Assessment.
96. Jimenez, L., Sargrad, S., Morales, J., & Thompson, M. (2016). Remedial education:
The cost of catching up.
97. Kamenetz, A. (2015). The test: Why our schools are obsessed with standardized testing—
but you don’t have to be. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
98. King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1),
30–35. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview.
Theory Into Practice,41, 212–218.
99. Kuh, G, D., Ikenberry, S. O., Jankowski, N. A., Cain, T. R., Ewell, P. T.;
Hutchings, P.,
100. & Kinzie, J. (2015). Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
101. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Shuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates. (2005). Student success in
 college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
102. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten
thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–100.
103. Lecture. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary, 11th ed. Retrieved from
https://www
104. .merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lecture
105. Lee, V. S. (Ed.). (2004). Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for
institutions and instructors. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
106. Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a
peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 135–139.
107. Lial, M., & Hestwood, Diana L. (2018). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Lieberman, M. (2018, February 28). Centers of the pedagogical universe. Inside
Higher
108. Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/
02/28/centers-teaching-and-learning-serve-hub-improving-teaching
109. Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the technique of teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
110. Luckin, R. (2018). Enhancing learning and teaching with technology. Sterling, VA:
Stylus. Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. In A. S.
Anderson (Ed.),Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). College Park, MD: University
of Maryland College of Education.
111. Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K., & Spiers, H. J. (2006). London taxi drivers and bus
drivers: A structural MRI neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus, 16, 1091–1101.
112. Maki, P. (2010). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the
institution (2nd ed.) Sterling, VA: Stylus.
113. Maki, P. (2017). Real-time student assessment: Meeting the imperative for improved
time to degree, closing the opportunity gap, and assuring student competencies for 21st-
century needs. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
114. McDonald, B. (2012). Portfolio assessment: Direct from the classroom. Assessment &
Evalua- tion in Higher Education, 37, 335–347.
115. McDougal, B. (2006). Rubric project. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Community
and Technical College.
116. McGuire, S. Y. (2015). Teach students how to learn: Strategies you can incorporate into
any course to improve student metacognition, study skills, and motivation. Sterling, VA:
Stylus.
117. McKeachie, W. J. (2014). Teaching tips (14th ed.) Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Mentkowski, M., & Associates. (2000). Learning that lasts: Integrating learning,
development,and performance in college and beyond. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
118. Microsoft. (2019). Get your document’s readability and level statistics.
119. Middendorf, J., & Shopkow, L. (2018). Overcoming student learning bottlenecks:
Decode the critical thinking of your discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
120. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits
on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
121. Minneapolis Community and Technical College, Information Literacy Department
Rubric, 2006.
122. Minnesota Information Technology Accessibility. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://mn.gov/ mnit/about-mnit/accessibility/
123. Mintu Wimsatt, A., Kernek, C., & Lozada, H. R. (2010). Netiquette: Make it part of
your syllabus. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 264–267.
124. Mueller, P. A. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the
keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25,
1159–1168.
125. Mullen, C. A. (2012). Mentoring: An overview. In S. J. Fletcher & C. A. Mullen, Sage
hand- book of mentoring and coaching in education, 13. London, UK: Sage.
126. National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Percentage of first-year undergraduate
students who reported taking remedial education courses, by selected student and
institution charac- teristics 2003–04, 2007–08, and 2011–12. Retrieved from
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/ digest/d15/tables/dt15_311.40.asp.
127. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. (2018). Uses of assessment
data for all schools.
128. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2019). Registration for NSSE and FSSE
2020 is now open! Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/
129. Nilson, L. B. (2007). The graphic syllabus and the outcomes map: Communicating your
course.
130. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
131. Nilson, L. B., & Goodson, L. A. (2017). Online teaching at its best: Merging
instructional design with teaching and learning research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
132. Oakley, B. (2014). A mind for numbers: How to excel at math and science (even if you
flunked algebra). New York, NY: Penguin.
133. O’Brien, G., Millis, B. J., & Cohen, M. W. (2008). The course syllabus: A learning-
centered approach (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
134. OERCommons.(2019).Explore.Create.Collaborate. Retrievedfromhttps://www.oercommons
org/
135. Ormrod, J. E. (2017). How we think and learn: Theoretical perspectives and practical
implica- tions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
136. Palmer, M. S., Bach, D. J., & Streifer, A. C. (2014). Measuring the promise: A
learning focused syllabus rubric. To Improve the Academy, 33(1), 14–36.
137. Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (Eds.). (2001). Assessing student competence in
accredited dis- ciplines. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
138. Pantelidis, V. S. (2017). Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training
courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality [Special issue]. Themes
in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 59–70.
139. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and
insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
140. Paymar, J. (2012). Speak like a leader. Forbes. Retrieved from
 https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimpaymar/2012/02/02/speak-like-a-
leader/#d5b783a71443
141. Pearson. (n.d.). Evolution of developmental education. Retrieved from
https://www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/584H072-
EvolutionOfDevEd_infographic_new.pdf
142. Pew Research Center (May 25, 2017). Factank. Retrieved from
https://www.pewresearch
143. .org/fact-tank/2017/05/25/a-third-of-americans-live-in-a-household-with-three-or-more-
smartphones/
144. Pew Research Center. (2018). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from
https://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/
145. Phillips, S. L., & Dennison, S. T. (2015). Faculty mentoring: A practical manual for
mentors, mentees, administrators, and faculty developers. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
146. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
147. Quality Matters (2018a). Course design rubric standards. Retrieved from
https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric
148. Quality Matters (2018b). Helping you deliver on your online promise. Retrieved from
https:// www.qualitymatters.org/
149. Matters, Q. (2018). QM rubrics and standards.
150. Rawitsch, D., Heinemann, B., & Dillenbeger, P. (1971). The Oregon trail [Computer
game].
151. Haugo, J. E. (1973). Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium.
152. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-112. 29 U.S.C. §794d
(1973).
153. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §794d (1998).
154. Research Portfolio Rubric. (2006). Rubric project. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis
Community and Technical College.
155. Respondus Test Bank Network. (2019). Thousands of ready-to-use publisher test
banks.Retrieved from https://www.respondus.com/products/testbank/index.shtml
156. Reynolds, C., & Patton, J. (2014). Leveraging the ePortfolio for integrative learning.
Sterling, VA: Stylus.
157. Richards, S. L. (2001). The interactive syllabus: A resource-based, constructivist
approach to learning.
158. Schwartz, D., Tsang, J. M. & Blair, K. P. (2016). The ABC’s of how we learn: 26
scientifically proven approaches, how they work, and when to use them. New York,
NY: Norton.
159. Seale, J. K. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility
research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
160. Seldin, P. (2010). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and
promotion/ tenure decisions (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
161. Şen, Ș., Yilmaz, A., & Geban, Ö. (2015). The effects of process oriented guided
inquiry learning environment on students’ self-regulated learning skills. Problems of
Education in the 21st Century, 66, 54–65.
162. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning
organization. New York, NY: Random House.
163. Shanahan,T. (2017, March 15). Disciplinary literacy:The basics [Web log post].
164. Shea, V. (2004). Netiquette. San Francisco, CA: Albion.
165. Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. Boston, MA:
Allyn& Bacon.
166. Silva, E. (2008). Measuring skills for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Education
Sector. Silverthorn, D. (2015). Human physiology: An integrated approach (7th ed.).
Boston, MA:Pearson.
167. Skogstrom, D. (2006). Rubric project. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Community
and Technical College.
168. Smilkstein, R. (2011). We’re born to learn (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press. Smith, R. (2016). Conquering the content: A blueprint for online course design and
development.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
169. Spanish Diplomas. (2019). 2019 DELE exams, deadlines and exam dates: Spanish
diplomas.Retrieved from https://www.dele.org/
170. State University of New York. (n.d.). Open SUNY course quality review rubric.
Retrieved from http://oscqr.org/
171. Stevens, D., & Levi, A. (2012). Introduction to rubrics (2nd ed.). Sterling, VA. Stylus.
172. Strait, J. R., & Lima, M. (2009). The future of service learning: New solutions for
sustaining and improving practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
173. Sweet, C., Blythe, H., & Carpenter, R. (2017). Teaching for deep learning. NEA
Advocate, 33(4), 12–15.
174. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.
Cognitive Sci- ence, 12, 257–285.
175. Teach Learn Online. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.howtostudy.org.
176. Thompson, B. (2007). The syllabus as a communication document: Constructing and
presenting the syllabus. Communication Education, 56(1), 54–71. doi:10.1080/
03634520601011575
177. Tinto, V., Russo, P., & Stephanie, K. (1994). Students who interact with their
teachers develop a support network and are more likely to persist in classes.
Community College Journal, 64(4), 18–22.
178. Tobin, T. J., & Behling, K. T. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal
design for learn- ing in higher education. Morgantown: West Virginia University
Press.
179. Tomlinson, L. M. (1989). Postsecondary developmental programs: A traditional agenda
with new imperatives. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED316076)
180. University of Cincinnati. (n.d.) Rubric for assessing your teaching syllabus.
181. U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Resolution agreement: South Carolina Technical
College System OCR compliance review number 11-11-6002.
182. Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen; learning to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading (2nd ed.). San
 Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
183. Walvoord, B. E., & Banta, T. W. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical
guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2nd ed.). San Francisco,
CA: Wiley.
184. Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2018). Brain drain: The mere
presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the
Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154.
185. WebAIM. (n.d.). Web accessibility in mind. Retrieved from
https://webaim.org/ Whyte, W. H. (1950, September). Is anybody
listening? Fortune, p. 174.
186. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
187. Wilson, R. C. (1986). Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of student
evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education 57, 196–211.
188. Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
189. Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. (2011). Acquiring “the knowledge” of London’s layout
drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21, 2109–2114.
190. Xianglei, C., & Simone, S. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year
institutions: Scope, experience, and outcomes.
191. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
192. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th
ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
193. Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student
learning(2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.