Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WHY THE ACT IS SAME IN OTHER COUNTRIES BUT NOT THE RESULTS ARE SAME?
In China
As in India education is subject of concurrent list but in China it is different as the education
system run in china is State run system .so there is no conflict between state and central as in
India. China public education system is run by ministry of education. So, in china there also the
provision of providing free and compulsory education in 3 tiers.
Primary education for 6 to 9 Years Starting at the age of 6 to 7
Secondary education for 6 years from 12 to 18
Higher education also for 3 years.
As due to the highly impressive Education setup in china there is almost 90 % of students get
primary education so the India should have done this by putting education in one list rather than
concurrent list.so this will help in proper implementation of right to education. As in china it is
mandatory to pursue higher studies so this would also help in proper implementation of right to
education. Which is not in India to compulsory pursue higher education.
In Germany
As in the Germany there is also provision for free education till the higher studies so as a result
here is more literacy rate in Germany as compared to India as in India there is free and
compulsory education is for the period of 8 years only which is Way less than Germany I.e. 12
years. There is also a system in Germany of compulsory attendance for the students.in Germany
but this system is not followed in the India. The education sector is look by one department that
is state. But this negative part according to me because there should be one central should be
there to frame laws regarding education policy.
In U.S.A
In U.S.A there also state frames law regarding education policy according to their state and these
states also provide basic education to age of 18 years So there should be a flaw that India should
see if this programmed has to be really implement correctly. But India is also Ahead of this
country as far as from this country Because both national and state can frame laws but in other
countries only state law prevails. In U.S.A there is also not basic Problem what India faces that is
the U.S.A have better Financial structure than India and also there is Majority of competent and
qualified teachers.
CONCLUSION
According to me The Government is right in Implementation with right to education as it is need
for something To improve the standard of education in the country but due to some flaws it
becomes ineffective to some extent as in other countries it is working effectively for years to
years as right to education is a good initiative by government so there should be proper planning
and organizing of the programmed so that we can achieve the more . As it Cannot be said that
government has done nothing to improve the education standards they have done several things
such as various educational programs.