CRITICAL APPRAISAL

IDENTITAS
Judul artikel

Penulis
Publikasi

CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Guidelines :
1. Critically appraised Topic (CAT) Checklist and Guide Questions Sullivan 2008
(EBP@NUHS)
2. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrumen, The Agree
Research Trust, May 2008 (modification worksheet)

Appraisal Checklist and Guide Questions

Study Objectives and hypothesis
1 2 3 4
Komentar

1. Tujuan dari penelitian

2. Signifikansi studi dijelaskan secara rinci

Study design
1 2 3 4
Komentar

1. Desain penelitian

2. Tujuan dan kebermaknaan penelitian

3. Sampel yang digunakan

4. Pengumpulan data
 5. Analisis data

Methods : Subjects/Participants/Patient/Population
Population/Subjects/Sample 1 2 3 4
Selection/Inclusion &exclusion criteria/recruitment study site and 1 2 3 4
circumstances
Baseline diffrences 1 2 3 4
What is/are the sample size, number participants ? Was the 1 2 3 4
sample size adequate to support the measurement of outcomes
Is the sample size (population numbered) large enough to 1 2 3 4
analyze statistically
Was the rationale for choosing the sample size ? 1 2 3 4
Follow up/Accountability 1 2 3 4
Ethical Approval 1 2 3 4
Komentar
(berikan komentar berdasarkan poin-poin di atas)
 Sample

Inklusi ekslusi

Baseline diff

Size

Follow up
 Ethical approval

Methods : Intervention
Description of intervention 1 2 3 4
Comparison/Placebo/Control intervention 1 2 3 4
Randomization 1 2 3 4
Blinding : study subjects/participants (masking) 1 2 3 4
Blinding : investigators, researchers, administrators selecting, 1 2 3 4
randomizing or allocating

Komentar

Methods : Outcomes, measurements, observation

Outcomes measured 1 2 3 4
Are outcomes valid ? 1 2 3 4
Does the measurement “tool” match of the outcome 1 2 3 4
Are measurements reliable 1 2 3 4
Are measurements reproducible 1 2 3 4
Komentar

Methods : Analysis and Validity

Is the analysis valid and sufficient ? 1 2 3 4
Is the trial or experiment also being used to test new methods of 1 2 3 4
measurement and analysis ?
Komentar
Analysis pakai Anova

Key result
Are the basic data adequately decribes ? 1 2 3 4
Are tables and graphs readable and clear ? 1 2 3 4
Does the data presented match the text 1 2 3 4
Komentar
 adekuat

Statistical significance
Describe the statistical methods. Do they seem adequate for this 1 2 3 4
study design
How “p values” been calculated 1 2 3 4
Have “p values” been stated and interpreted appropriately 1 2 3 4
Have confidence interval (CI) been calculated, stated correctly, 1 2 3 4
matching the data and have they been interpreted adequately and
correctly ?
Do the authors conclusions and discussion reflect the calculated 1 2 3 4
statistic, including the mean, p values or CI ?
Komentar

Overall, is the study valid ?

Assess the overall validity of the study considering the aspects 1 2 3 4
already appraised
Was systematic bias avaioded or minimized ? 1 2 3 4
Were the outcomes measured the same as those stated in the 1 2 3 4
study objectives ? Were the outcomes appropriately described in
the title of paper
Komentar

Author’s conclusions
Do the authors conclusions match the data, analysis and 1 2 3 4
statistical significance ?
Komentar
Penulis telah menuliskan kesimpulan dan rekomendasi berdasarkan data, analisis dan
diskusi yang telah dilakukan.

Kesimpulan
Komponen CA Jumlah Skor Skor Prosen
pertanyaan max capaian tase
Study Objectives and hypothesis 1 4 4 100%
Study design 1 4 4 100%
Methods : 8 4 32 100%
Subjects/Participants/Patient/Population
Methods : Intervention 5 4 20 100%
Methods : Outcomes, measurements, 4 4 13 81,25
observation %
Methods : Analysis and Validity 2 4 6 75%
Key result 3 4 11 91,67
%
Statistical significance 5 4 17 85%
Overall, is the study valid ? 3 4 9 75%
Author’s conclusions 1 4 3 75%
Prosentase capain 88,292
%
Berdasarkan telaah kritis di atas, artikel penelitian ini dikategorikan sebagai penelitian
yang .........