7/24/2017 SGV & Co.

Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

Type text to search

Home
About Us
Our Services
Company Profile
Our Leaders
Partners & Principals
News & Publications
Latest News
Publications
Suits the C-Suite
SGV Tax Bulletin
Events & Seminars
Tax Seminar
IFRS/PFRS and Financial Reporting Seminar
FIDS Seminar
Corporate Governance
Risk Management Seminar
Other Seminars
Photos & Videos
Alumni
Registration Form
Alumni News
SGV Foundation
SGV Museum
Careers

Presumptions in tax assessments

SUITS THE C-SUITE By Erickson Errol R. Sabile

Business World (05/25/2015 – p.S1/4)

In tax examinations, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) usually applies a set of standard procedures, with two
being the most common. First, it compares the purchases reported on the Summary List of Sales (SLS)
submitted by suppliers, on the one hand, with the purchases reported on the value-added tax (VAT)
returns/Summary List of Purchases (SLP) by the taxpayer, also known as the Reconciliation Listing for
Enforcement System (RELIEF) audit.

Second, it compares the expense items reported in the Financial Statements (FS)/Income Tax Return (ITR) with
the items reported on the Alphabetical List of Payees From Whom Taxes Were Withheld (Alphalist).

Where the amounts per SLS submitted by suppliers are higher than the amounts on the taxpayer’s VAT
returns/SLP, or where the expense amounts per taxpayer’s Alphalist are greater than those reflected in the
^ Back to Top
FS/ITR, the BIR examiners will assess deficiency income tax and VAT on the basis that the unreported
http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 1/6
7/24/2017 SGV & Co. Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

purchases and expenses result in undeclared income. This approach and conclusion traces its roots from the “Net
Worth Method” first used in 1956 in the case of Eugenio Perez vs. J. Antonio Araneta to prove unreported
income.

THE ‘NET WORTH METHOD’

In the Net Worth Method, there are five ways by which taxpayers may be assessed for deficiency income tax:

· The taxpayer’s own books and records, if made available by lawful means. When truthful, the taxpayer’s own
books and records usually establish the nature and source of the unreported income; if false, these at least afford
a starting point from which income items may be verified from other sources.

· Books and records and corroborative statements of third persons who have dealt with the taxpayer, often
establishing payment of monies which would constitute taxable income to the taxpayer.

· Bank deposits and bank records.

· Increase in net worth; including investments, purchases of property and other business transactions by the
taxpayer.

· Analysis of expenditures, to show that expenditures were in excess of declared or available income or
expenditures for claimed items of deductions were fictitious or overstated.

The purpose of each of these is to establish taxable but unreported income and any combination of the methods
may be resorted to by the government to support its case.

More recently, however, the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has promulgated decisions which effectively restrict an
unfettered use of the Net Worth Method.

AMOUNTS PER SLS SUBMITTED BY SUPPLIERS HIGHER THAN THOSE IN VAT RETURNS/SLP

Three elements are required for the imposition of income tax, namely: (a) there must be gain or profit, (b) the
gain or profit is realized or received, actually or constructively, and (c) it is not exempted by law or treaty.
Income tax is assessed on income received from any property, activity or service and it must be clearly
established that the taxpayer received such income.

In a January 2015 case, the CTA ruled that a finding of underdeclaration of purchases does not, by itself, result
in the imposition of income tax and VAT. The CTA ruled that deficiency income tax and VAT may be assessed
when there was an income realized by the taxpayer and such income was not reported. No deficiency assessment
can be made on account of undeclared purchases. The CTA said that a taxpayer is free to deduct from its gross
income a lesser amount, or not claim any deduction at all. What is prohibited by the income tax law is to claim a
deduction beyond the authorized amount, not an underdeclaration of purchase or unaccounted expense.

The same is true for VAT, which is based either on the gross selling price or gross value in money of the goods
or properties sold, bartered or exchanged, or gross receipts derived from the sale or exchange of services.
Section 108 (A) of the Tax Code defines “gross receipts” as the total amount of money or its equivalent
representing the contract price, compensation, service fee, rental or royalty, including the amount charged for
materials supplied with the services and deposits and advance payments actually or constructively received
during the taxable period for the services performed or to be performed for another person, excluding VAT.

In assessing VAT, it must be shown that the taxpayer received an amount of money or its equivalent from its
sale, barter or exchange of goods or properties, or from the sale or exchange of services performed. VAT, like
income tax, also cannot be assessed based on underdeclared purchases.

AMOUNTS PER TAXPAYER’S ALPHALIST GREATER THAN FS/ITR TOTAL ^ Back to Top

http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 2/6
7/24/2017 SGV & Co. Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

Similarly, in a January 2014 case, the CTA rejected the BIR’s allegation that the taxpayer had undeclared
income on the basis that there was an unaccounted source of cash and therefore undeclared income since the
income payments per Alphalist were greater than the expenses per FS/ITR. The CTA said that such comparison
failed to show that the income payments to the taxpayer’s payees per se could be equated to taxable income. The
purported unaccounted cash could well be presented in the balance sheet for accounting purposes and not in the
Income Statement; hence, it is not proper to form the conclusion that the supposed unaccounted cash is part of
the reportable income in the Income Statement.

Thus, even if the expenses per Alphalist were to be considered as income, the same shall be offset by treating
the equivalent payments as purchases for which input tax credits may be claimed. Thus, no taxable income will
result from the said transactions.

In these and other similar CTA decisions, the message is clear. While tax assessments are presumed to be
correct, the assessment itself should not be based on presumptions regardless of how logical the presumption
might be. The assessment must be based on actual facts in order to stand the test of judicial scrutiny — a
reiteration of a 2005 decision by the CTA that in a naked or a baseless assessment, the determination of the tax
due is without rational basis, and that the determination must rest on all the evidence introduced and its ultimate
determination must find support on credible evidence.

In a February 2015 decision, the CTA also ruled that while the BIR can resort to the Best Evidence Obtainable
Rule and estimate the tax liability of taxpayers who failed to submit their accounting records lost due to
calamities, the BIR is still, however, required to provide sufficient basis for its estimate.

Given the seriousness of a BIR tax assessment, it is important that taxpayers have a clear understanding of the
due process and other legal considerations involved in the tax assessment. They must be equipped with the latest
jurisprudence not only for better compliance but also to defend themselves against tax assessments.

Erickson Errol R. Sabile is a Tax Senior Director of SGV & Co.

^ Back to Top

http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 3/6
7/24/2017 SGV & Co. Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

RELATED ARTICLES

“The proposed value Getting money back via Understanding VAT refunds Understanding VAT refunds
simplified tax system” by input VAT refund By By Cecille Santillan-Visto By Cecille Santillan-Visto
Mary Ann C. Capuchino Josenilo G. Mendoza July 7, January 9, 2017 January 16, 2017
(January 17, 2011) 2014

Claiming CWT credits By “Sharing information for tax Brace yourselves for more VAT compliance By Edward
Cherry Liez O. Rafal-Roble collection” by Fabian K. VAT audits By Saha P. M. Menor July 08, 2013
April 25, 2016 Delos Santos (February 7, Adlawan-Bulagsak
2011) November 2, 2016

BEPS Action Plan 8:
Transfer pricing of
intangibles By Reynante M.
Marcelo and Ronald Steven
A. Arriesgado March 23,
2015
“Filing US income tax
returns made more
challenging (2nd of 2
parts)” by Rogelanne E.
Ofiaza-Villarubia (February
27, 2012)
“Looking into the lifestyles Tax treaty relief made easy
of the rich and famous” by By Jonald R. Vergara and
Anthony A. Dy (April 5, Betheena C. Dizon April 24,
2010) 2017

Business World
Suits the C-Suite column
Suits the C-Suite archive 2017
^ Back to Top
Suits the C-Suite archive 2016
http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 4/6
7/24/2017 SGV & Co. Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

Suits the C-Suite archive 2015

Suits the C-Suite archive 2014

Suits the C-Suite archive 2013

Suits the C-Suite archive 2012

Suits the C-Suite archive 2011

Suits the C-Suite archive 2010

Suits the C-Suite archive 2009

News
SGV fetes retiring partners

SGV recently hosted a dinner at the Solaire Grand …

VLS is now a Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist

SGV Financial Services Organization service line l…

LPF speaks at the 4th CFO Innovation Philippines Forum

SGV Tax Leader Luis Jose P. Ferrer shared regulato…

CGL presents at the RBAP National Convention

FSRM Partner Ian Lauron was one of the guest speak…

ASG associate tops SGV’s Got Talent Year 6!

Over 3,000 SGVeans filled the World Trade Center i…

SGV Cebu conducts seminar on BIR audit and expenditures taxation

SGV Cebu held a seminar last month on recent devel…

SGV is Philippines Tax Firm of the Year!

SGV was awarded the Philippines Tax Firm of the Ye…

WS receives Japan’s Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Star

In recognition of his contributions to the develop…

More from “News”

Moments and Milestones

EY expands its global footprint; inaugurates 5th Global Delivery Network location in the Philippines

Makati City, 15 September 2015. EY, one of the big…

^ Back to Top

http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 5/6
7/24/2017 SGV & Co. Philippines | Ernst & Young | Accounting Firm

SGV is Number One again!

SGV maintains its lead among auditors in the count…

SGV gives back to the Typhoon Yolanda victims

As part of our efforts to provide relief and aid t…

Kudos to our CISA and CRISC top placers and CIA passers!

Our Information Technology Risk and Assurance (ITR…

New and improved Washington SyCip Development Center unveiled

Run like an educational institution, SGV upholds i…

Meet some of SGV’s sports enthusiasts!

Not only do Maricris See and Emmanuel Ang from ACE…

Meet SGV’s Got Talent Season 2 Vocal Category finalists!

Eight of SGV’s finest singers successfully hurdled…

DDA is UPAA Most Distinguished Alumna for…

SGV senior adviser Amb. Delia Albert (DDA) was sel…

More from “Moments and Milestones”

Copyright 2017 SGV & Co. All Rights Reserved.

Web enabled by TechCellar.com

^ Back to Top

http://www.sgv.ph/presumptions-in-tax-assessments-by-erickson-errol-r-sabile-may-25-2015/ 6/6