S A V E E T H A D E N T A L C O L L E G E & HO SP ITALS

S RB AP PL I C AT I ON
AKHIL ASHREF EK 152003003
STUDENT NAME REG NO. P I C O

Ridge augmentation Periosteal tunnelling Conventional Flap Bone quantity and quality
NULL HYPOTHESES. There is no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of complications, anterior maxilla technique technique and complications
bone quality and quantity Does tunnelling technique have advantage over conventional grafting in terms of
bone gain and quality of the bone formed and does it minimise the postoperative
RESEARCH QUESTION complications and give better soft tissue outcomes
ALTERNATE HYPOTHESES There is significant difference in bone gain by the use of tunnelling technique

AIM OBJECTIVES RATIONALE

To evaluate the efficiency and advantage of a minimally invasive flap
design for GBR
* To compare the bone quality and quantity in the two techniques * To prevent regional accelerated phenomenon occurring due to flap
* To compare and evaluate the soft tissue outcome elevation
* To compare the post operative complication * To obtain a better aesthetic results by preventing recession
* To minimise the risk of infection
* To minimise post op complications

BACKG RO UND LITERATURE

OUTCOME MEASURES
Kakar et al George R et al VARIABLES UNIT
Maxillofacial plastic Journal of oral and Bone gain Mm
Author
Journal & Year
and reconstructive maxillofacial Healing index Score
Present/not present
surgery surgery Wound dehiscence
Present/not present
Suture infection
Present/not present
Membrane exposure Present/not present
Pilot study Retrospective infection
9 patients cohort study with
Design (Study type, STATISTICS
50 patients
Material, Method or
Product, Groups, DEPENDENT VARIABLES INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
Sample size) Bone gain Complications
Healing index
Histomorphometric Incidence of wound
assessment dehiscence
No of post op visits
Parameters evaluated
Ridge width gain required PUBLICATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
(Include Mean & SD)
No of systemic
Journal Clinical oral implant research
antibiotics required
Impact Factor 3.723
Minimal Tunnelling was
ISI Reports Citation ranking
complication was cost effective
found with compared to open
ATTACHMENTS AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION
Conclusion predictable bone technique
gain Power Annex no First Akhil Ashref EK
Second Dr. Thiyaneshwaran
Informed Consent
Third Dr.Abhinav R P
There was no It was a
comparison with retrospective Data Collection Form Annex no
any other cohort study with SIGNATURE
Critique techniques limited data , like
bone quality and Information Sheet Annex no Student
quantity
Grant Application Annex no Guide