Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WA 86378 [now BM 86378]. Mul.Apin tablet 1 (obverse side and reverse side) in the
British Museum, London. (The tablet is 8.4 cms high and is considered to be a
masterpiece of miniature cuneiform writing.) The broad astronomical content and
significance of the (two-tablet) Mul.Apin series had been identified by the English
assyriologists Archibald Sayce and Robert Bosanquet in a journal article published in
1880. The first part of the Mul.Apin series to be published was BM 86378 in Cuneiform
Texts from Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum: Part XXXIII (Plates 1-8) by
Leonard King (1912). This tablet is almost complete copy of tablet 1. See also "A Neo-
Babylonian Astronomical Treatise in the British Museum and its Bearing on the Age of
Babylonian Astronomy." by Leonard King (Proceedings of the Society for Biblical
Archaeology, Volume 35, 1913). This article by the English assyriologist Leonard King
drew attention to the importance of this text for identifying the Babylonian
constellations. In the next two years numerous articles and books appeared that utilised
its star list information in the attempt to identify the Babylonian constellations and the
stars that comprised such.
This principal copy of tablet 1 (WA 86378 [now BM 86378]) probably dates to circa
500 BCE and is a late Babylonian copy of tablet 1 of the astronomical compendium
Mul.Apin. The earliest copies were recovered from the royal archives of the Assyrian
King Assurbanipal (667-626 BCE) in Nineveh (and also from Assur). The Mul.Apin
series contains the most comprehensive surviving star/constellation catalogue. It is
largely devoted to describing the risings and settings of constellations/stars in relation to
the schematic calendar of twelve 30-day months.
The text of tablet 1 was able to be completely restored with the aid of five copies - one
dated to the Neo-Babylonian Period, two from Assurbanipal's library (hence written
before 612 BCE), and two from Assur.
The principal copy of the second tablet is VAT 9412 from Assur, dated 687 BCE. (This
is the oldest of the texts.) Multiple copies of tablet 2 are known: principally three from
Assur, three from Assurbanipal's library, and one dated to the Neo-Babylonian period.
Each tablet contains 4 columns with about 50 lines of text per column.
There are also texts of Mul.Apin in which the two tablets are combined in one large
tablet. The connection of a third tablet to the Mul.Apin series, by some modern
commentators, was probably only an occasionally added appendix to Mul.Apin.
Many copies of Mul.Apin texts exist from across the entire Neo-Assyrian Period, and it
was still being recopied as late as the Seleucid Era.
The Mul.Apin series (the name being derived from its opening words) is obviously a
compilation of nearly all astronomical knowledge of the period before 700 BCE.
(Because the Mul.Apin series is a compilation from various sources no single date is
assignable.) It is difficult to identify the history of the text or the sources for its parts.
However, it is reasonably certain the origin of the Mul.Apin series dates to the Assyrian
Period circa 1000 BCE. (Component parts of Mul.Apin date at least to the early first
millennium BCE.) The Mul.Apin series contain improvements to the older astrolabe
lists of the stars of Anu, Enlil, and Ea. Various facts make a Babylonian origin of the
series probable. Everything that is known about the astronomy of this period is in some
way related to the series Mul.Apin. The Mul.Apin series follows the "astrolabe" system
(i.e., "three stars each" calendrical system) very closely, but at the same time, it also
makes some substantial improvements.
A list of 17/18 stars/asterisms in the path of the moon is given. A statement that the
Sun, Moon, and five planets were considered to move on the same path also appears.
Reports of lunar eclipses dating from the 7th-century BCE are also recorded.
The Mul.Apin series contains the earliest (surviving) full description of the
Mesopotamian constellations. Its detailed constellation material dates to the late 2nd-
millennium BCE possibly relates to the Mesopotamian constellations being largely
formalised around the time of the completion of the omen series Enuma Anu Enlil.
The data contained in the Mul.Apin series is not quantifiable (i.e., precisely defined)
and appropriate assumptions are required to be made (i.e., of the stars forming each
constellation and which of these stars were listed to rise heliacally). In a Hastro-L
posting (June 5, 2007) the assyriologist Hermann Hunger explained: "The tablets
contain no observations. They state on which calendar date certain phenomena (mostly
risings and settings) are supposed to occur. Since that calendar used real lunar months,
and years consisting of either 12 or 13 such months, the date of a stellar rising, e.g.,
cannot occur on the same date each year. Assuming that the dates given in the text are
the result of averaging, one can use them as if they were observations."
Analysing all of the star list data in the Mul.Apin series the American astronomer Brad
Schaefer has concluded (2007) that the epoch for the data comprising Mul.Apin star
lists is 1370 ± 100 BCE with a latitude of 35° ± 1.2°. The actual observations to
establish the data through averaging were obviously a little earlier. This corresponds
with the cuneiform evidence (the omen series Enuma Anu Enlil, the Astrolabes (i.e.,
star calendars), the creation epic Enuma Elish) indicating that most of the
Mesopotamian constellation set was established during the late 2nd millennium BCE.
Note: Ziqpu-stars were stars "so chosen that one crosses the meridian before dawn, in
the middle of each month, as another constellation is rising heliacally." (See: Mul.Apin
by Hermann Hunger and David Pingree (1989) Page 142.) The ziqpu-stars were useful
if, for whatever reason, the eastern horizon was obscured and the heliacal rising of
important stars was unable to be directly observed. The most common version of the
ziqpu-star list contained 25 stars.
Appendix 1: Franz Kugler's Identification of most of the Stars in the Path of Anu, in the
Path of Enlil, and in the Path of Ea (SSB. Ergän. II. Teil 1914).
2) ĸ. Šú-gi, šēbu (senex) -- Perseus (a) (kàkkabu níbū ša ĸ. Šúgi -- α or β Persei) (b)
(kakkabāni ummulūtum ša Šugi (the dim stars of Perseus -- group of small stars in East
Perseus) (c) (ĸ. Nasrapu - most probably ε Persei, (or group composed of μ, λ etc.)
6) ĸ. AL-LUL Šittu (?) -- Cancer, exclusive of β which belongs to ĸ. Siru, the serpent
constellation
7) ĸ. Ur-gu-la (the great dog) -- Nēšu (lion) -- Leo (a) (kakkabē ša kakkad ĸ. Ur-gu-la --
(the two stars of the lion's head) -- ε and μ Leonis) (b) (kakkabu IV ša irti-šu -- the 4th
star of his breast -- γ Leonis) (c) (ĸ. Lugal (ĸ. šarru) -- king -- Regulus) (d) (kakkabu II
ša rapašti-šu -- the 2nd star of his hips -- δ Leonis) (e) (kakkabu edu ša zibbati-šu -- the
single star of his tail -- β Leonis)
10.(a)) ĸ. ŠU-PA, kakkabu namru -- the shining star - Arcturus (α Boötes), at times
probably the entire southern part of Boötes
10.(b)) ĸ. Šudun -- yoke -- also Arcturus (a) (ĸ. Šudun-anšu -- the (forward) yoke of the
ass -- η Bootis (+ neighbouring stars) (b) (ĸ. Šudun-anšu arkitu -- the rear yoke of the
ass - ε Bootis (very probably also ξ, π and ζ Bootis)
12) ĸ. Mar-gid-da, sumbu -- wain -- Ursa Major (a) (ĸ. LUL-A, ĸ. Ka-a, ĸ. Šelibu, -- fox
star -- ġ (Alkor) above ζ Ursae Majoris) (b) ĸ. γ, kakkabu ša ina pani (put) Margidda
izzazu -- the star which stands before η (?) Ursae Majoris
17) ĸ. Ur-ku (Lik-ku ?) -- kalbu -- dog -- Hercules (a) (MAŠ-a-ti (ĸ. Aha-a-ti) -- star of
the side -- (γ +) β Herculis) (b) (ĸ. Ur-ka-a-ti -- ζ Herculis) (c) (kakkabu edu -- the
single star -- μ Herculis)
18) ĸ. Uza -- she-goat -- Lyra (also ĸ. Gašan-din, ĸ. Bēlit balāti) (a) (kakkabu nibū ša ĸ.
Uza -- α Lyrae (b) (the two stars behind him (sukal il Ba-u, i.e., α Lyrae) -- probably η
and θ Lyrae)
6) giš ĸ. Li-e -- tablet (of fate), ĸ. Gú-an-na, tiara of Anu -- Aldebaran plus Hyades
8) ĸ. Maš-tab-ba ša ina mihrit ĸ. Sibzianna -- the twins who stand opposite Orion -- γ
and ξ Geminorum
10) ĸ. Kak-si-di, kakkab mišrē -- bow star -- Sirius plus a star in Southern Canis Major
(ε or η)
13) ĸ. U-NAG-GA hu, BÁD-GA, Ú-ga, Aribu -- raven -- Corvus - and part of Crater
15) ĸ. Zi-ba-an-na, Zibānitu, scale: karān ĸ. Akrabi -- horn (claw) of the scorpion --
Libra
2 (a)) ĸ. NUN ĸı (Eridu) il E-a -- Eridu, city of Ea -- Vela plus Southern Puppis
2 (b)) (with this (see 2a above) are wholly or partially identified (α) ĸ. MU-GID-a-ab-ba
-- ĸ. Šudun a-ab-ba -- yoke of the ocean (of Ea)) (β) ĸ. BIR, il Ni-ru il E-a, yoke of Ea
Appendix 3: The Mul.Apin list of (17/18) constellations/stars that marked the path of
the Moon (See: Note 2 below)
The list begins with MUL.MUL (Pleiades) and concludes with mulLU.HUN.GA (Hired
Man = (Greek) Aries). The list draws from SA2 by Bartel van der Waerden.
Note 1: On the uncertainty of 17/18 constellations Bartel van der Waerden (Science
Awakening II: The Birth of Astronomy, 1974, Page 80) states: "The number 18 is not
quite certain, because the 'tails' zibbati.mesh are probably to be taken together with both
the following names ('tails of SHIM.MAH and Anunitum').
Note 2: As the exact identification of Babylonian constellations is still under debate the
modern constellations listed as equivalents can, at best, only be considered as partly
identical to them. In writing the constellation/star names I have attempted to follow
modern convention and give the usual constellation transliterations which variously
appear in both capitals or normal (roman) script (conventionally used to indicate
Sumerian logographic spelling) and italics (conventionally used to indicate Akkadian)
and a mix of the two conventions indicating joint use of both scripts.
The recent doctoral thesis The Exact Transmission of Texts in the First Millennium
B.C.E. by Russell Hobson (2009) includes examination of Enuma Anu Enlil tablet 63
(the ‘Venus Tablet’) and the Mul.Apin series. Of interest is the concluding statement
(Page 494) regarding the lack of stabilisation in the transmission of astronomical/omen
cuneiform texts. The latter is interesting. Hobson's examination demonstrates persistent
error-making by the trained scribal elite in copying cuneiform astronomical/omen texts.
And this error-making occurred over a relatively short period of time.