MBA HRM Portfolio Grading Criteria
Student ID:
   
Portfolio Poster -30%
Mark  
90-100 Outstanding presentation & poster structure,
Outstanding with flowing sections. Articulate & fluent
academic writing style. No grammatical / spelling
errors.
Outstanding exploration of topic showing
excellent knowledge & understanding through
thorough & appropriate research. Impressive
choice and range of appropriate content.
80-89 Excellent presentation & poster structure, with
Excellent flowing sections. Articulate & fluent academic
writing style. Only minor errors.
Excellent business insight & application. Excellent
integration of literature/data into work.
Impressive breadth and depth.
70-79 Very Very good presentation & poster structure, with
Good flowing sections. Fluent academic writing style.
Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.
Very good business insight & application.
Literature/data is integrated in a way that
demonstrates very good breadth and depth of
understanding.
Module Code:
 
A 1000 -word critical evaluation of the
section of the poster that was assigned
to you in your group- 50%
Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with
flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic
writing style. No grammatical / spelling errors.
Excellent presentation & essay structure, with
flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic
writing style. Only minor errors.
Very good presentation & essay structure, with
flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing
style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling
mistakes.
Marker:
 
A 200-word reflection of
lessons learned working
in the groups-10%
Outstanding exploration of
what happened in team
meetings
Excellent level of knowledge &
understanding demonstrated in
the narration of team meetings
Very good level of knowledge &
understanding demonstrated in
the narration of team meetings
 
Total Mark Awarded ->
Attendance diary- 10%
Outstanding level of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
&/or reflection. Highly developed/
focused on what was learned during
the sessions. Evidenced by 6 entries
Excellent level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection.
Clearly developed points all of which
are relevant to the topics learned
during the sessions. Evidenced by 6
entries
Very good level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection. A
few less relevant ideas/points or would
benefit from further development &/or
evaluation/comparison. Evidenced by 6
entries
60-69 Good Good: clear presentation & poster structure with
clear sections. Writing is mainly good with some
flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom impede
understanding
Good business insight & application. Literature
/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates
good breadth and depth of understanding.
50-59 Clear Satisfactory: Basic poster structure. Not always
Pass written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling
errors which impede understanding.
Satisfactory business insight & application.
Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of
literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
40-49 Weak poster format. Limited or poor structure.
Marginal Fail Muddled work with many spelling & / or
grammatical errors. Must see CASE with
feedback
Satisfactory business insight & application.
Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of
literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
20-39 Clear Inadequate poster format & poor paragraphing /
Fail signposting. Inappropriate writing style. Poorly
written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see
CASE with feedback
Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business
application & insight. Some literature missing or
irrelevant to topic.
Good: clear presentation & essay structure with
paragraphing. Writing is mainly good with some
flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom
impede understanding
Satisfactory: Basic essay structure. Not always
written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling
errors which impede understanding. See CASE
with feedback
Weak essay format. Limited or poor structure.
Muddled work with many spelling & / or
grammatical errors. Must see CASE with
feedback
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing /
signposting. Inappropriate writing style. Poorly
written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see
CASE with feedback
Good grasp of the team
activities evidenced by the
narration of team meetings
Satisfactory content / level of
knowledge evidenced by the
narration of team meetings
Weak: Limited content /
knowledge of team activities.
Inadequate: Lacking in relevant
content.
Good level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation &/or reflection but
more ideas/points could be
addressed /developed further.
Evidenced by 6 entries
Satisfactory: Basic evidence of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
&/or reflection but some points
superficially made so need further
development. Evidenced by 6 entries
Weak: Limited evidence of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
&/or reflection. More development &
comment needed. May need to do
more than describe. Must see CASE
with feedback
Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level
of discussion/ analysis/critical
evaluation & /or reflection. Must see
CASE with feedback
 0-19 Little Nothing of merit: Poorly written work, lacking Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with Nothing of merit: Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level
or Nothing of structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic Unsatisfactory level of of discussion/analysis/critical
merit inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. Must see writing style. No grammatical / spelling errors. knowledge demonstrated. evaluation &/or reflection. Must see
CASE with feedback CASE with feedback

Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate

business application & insight.