You are on page 1of 7
I Bg Cho” ve fan, Mercer World Mirays Ic 2B No. 23 5u0, 24 March dowd __ ei vate te ng cho a_bwinasyan wha travels prom tims Malai, Taipes and Heng kong. Or July 10, 19%, plainkippe bought plane —. frm dependant “Clauclia Tagunucar nha nprtonted hursely de be an agent of dependant Tenricl World Servcce, Inc. (twSl). Ty dabnakion Or feng Kong, Toho, San francivco,Usi Ga caid date, oly the pomsage From Manila to Hog Kung, Huw ty Tokyo, were omeirmed. PAB plight 002 Fem Tobuo tp San franckZo wa am "RO" tabs, which meant "Qa eguitt” fir inruction op dependant, glainipgc rebaned_ oper pu doye por_ Hie. Con rmabion op Ye Tokyo ~ Sow Francisco sequod op Whe tip. dpler ollng op Casi of TH, dependent fold plinheer “at fir pigt ic nod omeiradd al He Non Sud 5,196, planing lupt por Hong Kotg and thurcapkr lept Fer Toko. upon Hair arrival in Jokyo, tog colled wp Fanchw, Qpgice fer rect entalin of air plight ® Gow Francceo. Said oppice, however, inporned them that Hhuir nama are not in te sf. Since plainfipes bere fuppoced te Krave me the 29% op ily ,199%, and. omld not remain iw Japon for more than 72 hows, they were conshinined fo agree to accept airline tickds far Taipet imtkad, per advice op TAL obpicials. Upon racking Taipe, Hae were 2 plights available _ var plainhiprc, Has, Hay wire porced 10 tehurn back fo Manila. A comploded pur damages vas piled by pebowcrs agaimt privaky Napendeall. Th RTC held He dependants jointly anol severally liable, except dependoat Julieta Canilod respondents Fan-Au and Taguricar appealed fo Ke CA Which rendered judy want modliying he amovat of amages awarded, holding private resp Taguaicar clely liable Huregor, ane absolving ipindends Pan her coe WSL Fri, ang on allay ISSUE; WON thar i am agency ndahionshap bebwcen, fon- Am, TWS1 aad Tagunicor HELD : NO. by Hu Contrack Of agenoy ur percowe birds hingele to Nader Come b Camething in Npraeatetion Or on behalf of another, eat or authority 6p Ber lather nthe cose of bon, pehhonere idavit be Kepondterd Taqurvear where the Ceted frat she Twsl. This ‘davit, kewerer, hat weak prababive vale court ty Ke condmsy - Apgidarits, beikg Sea aaa One PAGE DATE Pe een ae ee ee token av parte, are almort alwaye incomplete anc apten inaccurate, comebnetd nal _ewagecton, a por moat ap cuggerhon and mquiriee. [he declarebion, Bf _agent aline ave A or extend TSE ea oath aa ete nt — Iw addihn, as felweer Hu negahre allegahon oF teaporderts Cosilao ard Taguaicor Hat either i¢ an agent nor principal pr fhe oles, ont te Affirmative allegohou of pehhunut Hal an agency welahouhip exerts it is fe [aber who hate Hu burden of evidence “fe prow fhuir allega- tim, failing in which, their elain mut ecersarily paul: ) ———____Bval Bal ry laor yc Finan Orpen chal GR No. 13468 5 February 8, 20 ee Lpehne_op He rupendeat’ rand, hy feo le Mele —Sprmues_Felicivima and Juanita Wcpemia wire nat able fo wacom the mot —9q¢d_properticn coumcting of seven parcels of land and go woh | —_fardeved._and_fhurcaper, wnurchip was _harsgered fo He pebour bok. Qt |e He teen pared op land Hat were forecaed, pve of Hen arti He petn ; CeMon Sp flu tehpondents because tse pive porcelt of land were cold_by F He _pehtioner bank fo fe respondents as dvidenced by o Deed Of i the Five_purels of [and cannot be frnigemed in He nom of He parents of Marie Nino, on 6 Hu ppondea,becowte tre is ov wed ave. Hu docu of cake regichewd: The Reger of Deed, hover, oid_Hat Hy document of cele Sa a ae ae aie og Hu _pokitioncr oonk conpiraung. Wik the Deed of Sake ond fe oultoily of Hr ark manager fe euber suck Yrancachon. the pehiioer bank repused hur Nguest for a board pwvoluhon. onl made mang adibis. Rupondeds initiated the prosert proceedings oo that they mld, transper fo Heir names the subject pive parcels of land ond cubs myo, said, lak ad to wie He vom proceeds por Hu medical errenses oe Hair ailing. ole. igs UE: WON He Beard of Directors oF ov rural barking corpsrahen be compelled to cmpiem av deed op abclule Sale. of real property ounce ly the Corporation which : deed of Golo was cacortea by te bonk manager vlo_prior authority. oF He. ford of direchrs of the eure barking. omporatien? WELD: eG. The bank aclyuledges, by ike own ace Or failure fr act +e oumtarely & FES. Tena_fo ent into binding contrac. The bank is also extoppecl prom quahoning tu authorihy of the bank tv enter into oottrack of sale. Ip av Corpor rafion Knmingly permits onc ike Oppicers or ong ihr agerd to act_wifin. the Soop 6F A apparent aubhurify, it bales tre Zagent out fo the prlolic od prssessing thy _pewer Tp_do those acts; thus, the Corporation, will, a against annonce who hab in quy faith dealt with it Hrough suck ageat, be topped prem deming. he agent's outharity a oo e@2é “6 ACES: Reber Aderacion Laclan ic fe vegikeed omer op a parcel land ofer- WKO kaewty ag Lot 2064 of the Cadac 5 Calin, lilo containing an area oe TeT No. aot ae rar iacat "rehire He _abeve described property Ripe pala Nicolas Parangan per ov term OF ten (ie) years and an annual reat o¢ P1000 pecos. During He pericdl OF Keate, Rarangan wai regularly cbending loons in cmall_amovatt to pebiioner_te degroy her daily expenses and fo finance her daughter's educehion. Or uly 24,1990, pebtiner cecculed a Gpecioh Power of Atorney in paver op Parangan to Stourton agriculhurak ena, from, prvade, Nipondent PNB with fhe aporecai Jot at collateral Gy Feb. 18,1412, a second, GPA was eacouktd by pehbioner, by virhwr OF which, Parangon mwas able to secure four (4) additional lout. The last loans were, witout He knouledge op Kertin petitioner and all Ke proceeds Hureprom, wert witd. bg. Parangan per his own Ioenepit. ISSUE: WON _pektioner'é property ic linble tv PNB for the leans conhacked ley Paragon by virwe op the Special power op attorney. HELD: NES- The murtgages can be Unporced against pebtimer. It is admitted that Hy petitioner is the omer op He parcel of land mutgaged fo PNB ot pave (5) occamns ley virtl of thu Special Powers op Attorney thecuted by petitioner in paver of Porangan. Pohhoner argues that the last tree purtgages were void por lack of owthevity. Che fotally “failed to comsder that caid SPAc cure a Continuing me ond obserd a valid revocation dy purnished fo He mortgagee, the came umhoucs pp hove pore and erect os against third persons who hac no krew- Fedge oF guch lack oF authority oe = <2 icarp Ww. Cowl th Apeal GR NO. Ie Ul ; March 7, 1997 —__Pehhoner and privale reipondeat were fenante op Hu W- dor —_____ Barretto Apartments formerly. swned by foes belly, Inc. Semchine ine April 148, privade? reepondent vas oleched Premident op the Barelto Tenascts Astooahin __ wich Was permed among others, "fo promt, opeguard and. protec _inkeest and welkone of its members." Ina (ter daked Judy 30,1484, pri 2 rebgondeat, od president OF the Ascociakion sought the auwichance of the then Muck 8 Haman Settlements fr cause He expropriation of the subject property under He, Urlosn Land Regorm rogram fer fubsequest resale, fp its kenaxlt. foiling te get Hu awvclonce or the government, He tenanh underin fo negofioke dlirecHy with Wwe wwners Inifially, privaly reipondent Orally expraced fp Mec. Rosita Barretto Qchor He fenants' desire fo purhale fir rupechve unite. Lake, in a beter dated May 20, 1486, cigned by 40 kenanls op He commercial and residential units, the, fenante pormally LUprerseds to Mrs. Ochoa Huir inkast fo purchate. One anda. hale years Laer, on Morch [2s 119%, pehifioner and 424 co-plainfiges were nohpied that privale respondent wat thy new Gwnor Up the wuts ocenpied lay trem. [SSUE : WON a conbbruchive prudt existed bobween the prties” plaintipes and He, degendoat- : TEE. Cnstruchee udts ane created in order fo Sahicpy phe demands of juthice ond, prevent yajust ourichmest: They arise against one who, by proud. Yurus 6r abuse oF conpidence, oblains gr holds He legal Hght fo property w/c. he sught not, in equi ond gud conscience, t hold. The tenants could. not be _aulhed_por_not inquiring jptd te cates oF privake respondent ‘ negohahon with Ho ownerc Of the apartments. They had a right fo expect private respondent fo be fw. fe ku _duby as their _represenfafive and fo ia Lions. fol He inthabive of informing Heni_of fhe progres of his negotiations HELD: _ ORION: w Kenton ve Cont of Appeal ER No. Man} ; Bek. 28, 1990 oe shart was under He name op He pormer, bul thu laller paid por the ae Pine, having benericial ownurchip over Hu Gaid, chart. During hid ay bh American Chamber of Commerce demanded Thumum fo acknowledge, Peroccce Fonmur's ownerchip over the aid chare, but Thomson nrurer trancperred thu ie chores in Manila Polo Cub fo the formar. hs ov result, Amtrican Chamber of ——. Come qe fadt against Thome por the recovery op He Guid chart, fo cuit RIC ruled that the freniper cannot be made gince Manila Polo lubic Articles oF Iorparahion and by-lant prokabit franiper vp chart fe artipi- tah pervens. The CA rwverced RTC! decision, hence this appeal. ISSUE: WON American Chamber af Commerce ean own MOC's chek and fansper it fo & _haminee: HELD: NES. The pehibiomer contends that the Articles gp Incorporation and By-laws oF Manila Polo Club prohibit corporate memberchip. However, private reepondent does no} inact or intend to trantper the club memberchip in is name but ralker fo ite designatd nemince- Furthur, hr Manila Polo Club cock not necessarily prohili} Hw franeper of proprietary shares hy its members. The Cli only rectricks members p to deserving applicants in accordance wit its rules, when the amen- ed, brtivlet of Incorporation

You might also like