Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FLESH
1. Mark does not have infancy narratives. Matthew and Luke have it but there are the
similarity but also difference.
2. John 1:1-18 follows the model of the book of Genesis mentions ‘from the beginning’:
beresyit (H) – en arche (G) – in principio (L). God is eternity, timeless. The beginning means
when human being come to the consciousness of time.
3. Dabar (H) as noun also memra and the verb amar, ne’um – Logos G) connected with
legein = to speak) – Verbum (L) = Word. It is not a noun, a substantive. As the words live in a
man then when a man speaks, there are words but the word is the concrete expression of a human
being. The Word was God (Elohim – H – Theos - G – Deus (L).
4. The time is ‘imperfect’ (not perfect) denoting continuous, timeless existence contrasts
with ‘aorist’ (past tense without time) in verse 3 (all things), verse 6 (John) and 14 (was made
flesh in time and space).
5. In Hellenistic thinking logos meant divine utterance, emanation, mediation. In the OT
the Dabar is God’s manifestation, the revelaton of God himself, whether in creation, in deeds of
power and of grace, in prophecy, in the whole Ktb. In the OT there are two strands of Jewish
speculation: (1) the personification of the hokmah in wisdom literature (2) the glorification of
Torah.
6. John’s synthesis of this Jewish thought with Christian revelation is partly polemical:
Christ is the true Word of God existing from eternity. The Word was in god’s presence. The
Word was God (without article) means The Word is divine, but is not all of divinity, for he has
already been distinguished from another divine person (7:28 ‘the One having sent’; 8:42 ‘Ho
Theos pater’; 16:28 Pater).
7. As The Word is living God, so The word gives life as in the creation. In The Word there
was life (hayyiym - in Indonesian hayat) – zoe (G) – vita (L) in the living Word. Life signifies
some kind of sharing in the being of God.
8. Also ‘light’ = or in H – phos in G – lumen (L) not only that physical one as in the
beginning of creation with darkness that is also the evil one. Darkness is antithesis of light, the
opposition to God, the rejection of god, the world bound over to the sin. There is the irony: the
same word or phrase may also have several levels of meaning at one and the same time.
9. John is mentioned as martus (G) – witness who has his martyria until the shedding of
blood because and to many who did not receive him. Martyria is one of John’s fundamental
ideas: John the Baptist, the Samaritan woman, the works (asah in Hebrew – ergon-erga, The OT,
the crowd, The The Ruah Ha-emet (H) -Parakletos, to pneuma tes aletheias G) (chapter 15) and
the disciples, The Father, the evangelist: all bear witness (martyria) to The Word.
10. The world did not know does not mean simply to perceive, but has the full Semitic sense
attached to knowledge in which personal involvement is always supposed.
11. Aman in the name that is an euquvalence of a person. Those receive The Word has the
power to become sons (ben – H – tekna (not huios) of God, was newly created in The Only Son
(Ben H - Huios G) of God. Those believe = amin (H) – pisteuein (G) - credere (L) = put the
whole ‘aman’, a commitment to God.
12. Those were born negatively not in blood, flesh and man’s will: all human capacities but
the Dabar (Logos) became (in passivum theologicum: totally of God) flesh – basar (H) – sarx
(G) – caro (L) and has his real presence as the tent in the desert is the presence of Yhwh. Basar is
not evil, the antithesis of God; but it is transitory, mortal, and imperfect, and at first glance
incompatible to God. John was striking the docetims, a gnostic view that the incarnation is only a
matter of appearance (G dokeo = seem) and monophysitism (one physic).
13. The kabod (H) – doxa (G) – gloria (L) is the real presence of the abstract God visibly
manifested, especially in the connection with the Tent of Meeting (Ex 40) and the Temple
(1Kings 8:11).
14. The pre-existence of the Word is above the presence of Torah through Moses and The
OT.
15. The superiority of The Word over the prophets and The OT: through whom, not through
the Torah, comes hesed (H) – xaris (G)– gratia (L) = grace = freely given: the loving kindness
exercised by God toward Israel in election and covenant (used only in this prologue); and emet
(H) – aletheia (G), veritas (L) = truth not a thing but God himself who is faithful and reliable in
his covenant commitment (used 25 times in the gospel) that can be translated in its more proper
Greek sense as ‘truth’, for it represents from OT as divine revelation (8:32) and therefore is
identified with Jesus himself (14:6 way, truth, life).
16. The final title of this part (verse 18) can be read ‘God, the only Son’ or ‘the only-begotten
Son’: the sense is the same for John has already identified The Word with The Son, and The Son
with God. He is in The Father’s bosom: denotes the complete intimacy, a community of life.
17. Dabar = Logos = Verbum = Word is a central theme in the Bible, dominating every major
strand of biblical literature. It denotes that God is a speaking, revealing, and communicating
God. From Genesis, there is an equivalence of word/speaking and fact/matter. Psalms summarize
that the word is God himself who creates. The Torah also is a revealed Word of God. The
Pentateuchal legislation is likewise promulgated by God who speaks. The nebi’im with oracle,
vision, word that received from God who speaks. In hokmah literature, the wisdom is offered by
God who speaks through the wise men. John identifies the word as Jesus. This is parallel to
Paul’s teaching that the wisdom of god visited earth in the form of Jesus. Similarly, the writer to
the Hebrews directly applies wisdom terminology drawn from widom to Christ. The same in
Apkalypsis. So, for the Bible, the Dabar = Logos = Verbum = Word is God and paramountly
Jesus Christ.
1. Synoptics tell the temple story by the end of Jesus public life. John puts it at the
beginning.
2. They have almost the same story. In Synoptics the priests, the elders and the scribes ask
the authority.
3. In John the sign and Jesus answered that the sign is his body. The disciples aman the
scripture = katub in H – graphe in G and the word = dabar that Jesus dabar in H – logos that
Jesus eipen (not legein).
4. It is important in John that Jesus gave a sign and the disciples learn to aman (verse 22).
5. By the end of chapter 2:23-24 it is mentioned the Passover, many aman in his name that
is he himself.
6. Jesus does not trust = commit himself to them. In English there is a difference between
believe (verse 23) and trust (verse 24) as in H but the G has the same verb pisteuein.
FROM GROUP TO INDIVIDUAL DISCIPLE : A PHARISEE, A RABBI
1. Nicodemus, a Pharisee, a ruler of the Jews is one of the candidates to become disciple.
2. He comes by night. It is darkness, evil, sin, not knowing anything. But he acknowledges
Jesus as rabbi from God and the semeia done by God through Jesus. As many in 2:23 also
Nicodemus in 3:2 acknowledges the semeia (plural): at Cana and the temple called in H miqdosh
– in G hieron with the content of ‘holy’. Then called by Jesus ‘my Father’s house = bet in H –
oikos in G.
3. Nicodemus gets opportunity to learn to become a disciple.
4. Jesus says: “Amen, amen” twice as certain and serious.
5. The process of misunderstanding begin with Jesus mentions to be born milma’lah in H –
anothen in G that has two meanings: from above and once again (anew).
6. Nicodemus gets the second meaning. Then Jesus explains the first meaning by insisting
the double ‘amen’ and the birth should be of water and Ruah = Pneuma not born of flesh (basar
in H – sarx in G with negative nuance not that dabar made basar in John 1:14.
7. Ruah (H) – pneuma (G) – spiritus (L) can mean wind, breath, or spirit. The wordplay in
John 3:8 with both meanings. The title Ruah Qadosh occurs 3 times in the OT (Psalm 51:12 and
Isaiah 63:10-11 (two times). In the NT Pneuma Hagion appears nearly one hundred times, more
than half in Luke-Praxeis. John mentions three times (1:33; 14:26; 20:22). In John 3 Jesus
teaches Nicodemus to see the connection between the Spirit and martyria not only a noun or an
act but the wholeness of a self to be Word of God and consequently a disciple to aman.
8. Jesus takes the example from the desert to explain the exaltation of the Son of man =
Ben-Adam (H) = Huios tou anthropou (G) = filius hominis (L). The gospel of John uses the Son
of man for Jesus in relation to John’s Christology of the descending and ascending redeemer
(3:13; 6:62; 1:51; 5:27; 6:27) and in relation to the death of Jesus, viewed as his glorification
(3:14; 12:23.34; 13:31).
9. Jesus speaks about God agape (not that eros or philos) in giving his only Son so all can
aman and will not be judged and condemned that is do not live in darkness (evil deeds) but in
light that is wrought in God. The Son saves the world ( = all in enmity with God) and gives
eternal life. The connection between Jesus and eternal life in Johannine literature (3:15-16; 6:68)
so that the disciples has eternal life (3:36; 5:24; 6:47.54; 10:28; 17:2-3; 1John 5:11.13), that
Jesus is life (11:25; 14:6; 6:48; 1John 1:2) and that he is, like the living God, the one who has life
in himself (1:4; 5:26).
10. Hebrew or = phos (G) = lux (L) as a metaphor of life. In John Jesus is the true light (1,
the light of the world (8:12; 9:5; 12:46; 1John 1:5-7), so also are believers in him ‘sons of light’
(12:36).
11. The darkness = hosek (H) = scotia (G) = tenebrae (L). John contrasts the realms of light
and darkness. The light, as John identified Christ (8:12) comes into the world (1:5) in order to
lead people out of spiritual darkness (12:46). Though people would reject Jesus’ message (3:19),
he urges his disciples to continue to walk in the light rather than to be misled into spiritual
darkness (12:35). 1John presents an even more pronounced contrast between light – God and
Christian community – and the darkness of the hateful and disobedient (2:9.11).