Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nonwovens Containing
Immobilized Superabsorbent
Polymer Particles
By Darryl L. Whitmore, BASF Corp., Portsmouth, Virginia
Abstract bulk staple fiber using a carding operation. The monomer solu-
In the early 1980’s Johnson & Johnson developed a revolu- tion may be applied to the web using a variety of application
tionary process for the production of webs containing superab- techniques such as brush coating, pressurized liquid spray, air-
sorbent polymers (SAP) produced by in-situ polymerization of assisted spray or airless spray. Initiation of the polymerization
partially neutralized acrylic monomers directly on a synthetic may be carried out by using a redox package, thermal initiation,
nonwoven substrate [1, 2, 3, 4]. A fresh look at this forgotten UV, electron beam radiation or a combination of methods.
technology will be presented from both a manufacturing and Partial drying of the web may be achieved using the heat of poly-
application perspective. In particular, In-situ, SAP-containing merization if the acrylic acid concentration of the monomer solu-
nonwovens offer many unique properties for application in the tion is above 30%. The moisture content of the final product may
personal hygiene industry, such as, improved fluid acquisition, be adjusted to the desired level using either a through-air, air
permeability, compressibility and pH control. These materials flotation, or forced-air infrared dryer. The dried product is then
also provide a more homogenous SAP distribution, eliminate the mechanically softened, slit to the desired use width and wound.
need for SAP powder handling and have superior wet integrity A schematic comparison of a conventional SAP production
as compared to conventional fluff pulp/SAP air laid structures. process and an in-situ process is shown in Figure 1.
This technology also offers some unique opportunities for The in-situ SAP process offers a number of potential advan-
designing and manufacturing profiled absorbent articles with tages for hygiene converters over conventional technology. Since
specific zones tailored to perform specific functions. the process produces stable, immobilized SAP structures, it elim-
inates the need for SAP powder handling and the associated
Introduction dust exposure issues. It also offers the potential to provide more
Typically, conventional superabsorbent powder polymer pro- uniform SAP distribution in absorbent core structures and will
duction begins with solution polymerization of partially neutral- remain stable during transport. The immobilized SAP particles
ized acrylic acid along with a small amount of a crosslinking also remain stable even in the hydrated state. Other possibilities
agent in water. The polymerization results in a water insoluble, include zoned SAP gradients and strategic placement of SAP’s
water swellable gel containing approximately 25 to 40 % solids, with different performance properties within the core structure.
which must then be cut, dried, milled and sifted to produce a The technology further offers the possibility of reducing produc-
powdered SAP product with a typical particle size ranging tion costs through the minimization of SAP processing steps.
between 100 to 800 µm. The sifting operation typically generates
a fines stream that must be recycled back into the production Nonwoven Substrate
process creating a production bottleneck. The finished SAP One of the major objectives of the in-situ process is the forma-
product is then shipped to a hygiene-industry converter where it tion and bonding of discrete SAP micro-droplets to individual
is blended with fibrillated wood fluff to form the absorbent core web fibers as shown in Figure 2. An optimized nonwoven struc-
structure of a personal hygiene article such as a diaper. ture is critical to the achievement of this state. Typically, a high-
In an in-situ SAP process, the partially neutralized acrylic acid loft nonwoven structure is required, depending on the desired
•
monomer solution is applied directly to a nonwoven substrate SAP loading and application. Key substrate properties include
and polymerized. The web may be fed to the process either as a the basis weight, bulk density, loft and porosity. A delicate and
pre-manufactured roll good or, preferably, made in-line from intricate balance of these properties must be maintained in order
to avoid saturation of the web structure during the monomer Other factors to consider when choosing a nonwoven for in-
coating process. Saturation, where droplets of monomer solution situ SAP polymerization include flexibility, softness, compress-
coalesce on the web, leads to agglomeration and film formation. ibility, resilience and elasticity. For hygiene applications, the final
Figure 3 shows the functional relationship between SAP basis product must, of course, remain soft and flexible even though it
weight and weight percent loading for 55, 80 and 100 gsm sub- is generally compressed to produce a thin structure. Resiliency
strates at a constant substrate density of 0.018 g/cc. Once the sat- and elasticity are important aspects of the nonwoven in that the
uration zone is reached for a given substrate, film and agglomer- substrate must be able to expand as the SAP particles begin to
ate formation begins to occur and negatively impacts the flexibil- swell. Any impedance to the swelling of the SAP particles in the
ity of the structure. In addition, this phenomenon also
adversely affects the absorbency rate of the applied SAP. Figure 2
The monomer coating process is also critical to SAP IN-SITU SAP POLYMERIZATION ON
droplet formation. For spray application, the degree of A FIBROUS SUBSTRATE
atomization is controlled by: (1) the viscosity of the
coating (the higher the solution viscosity with the high Highly permeable structures with good absorption properties that
shear rate encountered going through the nozzle ori- simplify the manufacturing process for superabsorbents and diapers
fice, the larger the particle size), (2) atomization gas
pressure (higher gas pressure giving smaller particle
size), (3) diameter of the nozzle orifice (smaller orifice
giving smaller particles), (4) pressure forcing the coat-
SAP Particle (<400 mm) Pore
ing through the orifice (higher pressure leading to Volume
smaller particle size), and (5) surface tension (lower
surface tension yielding smaller particle size) [5]. By
maintaining a critical balance among all of these para-
meters, the SAP particle size on the web can be con- SAP Bond Point
trolled. Both fiber type and finish also play a crucial
roll in droplet formation. As shown in Figure 4,
hydrophobic fibers and finishes promote more spheri-
cal droplet formation, while hydrophilic types tend to
promote film formation of the applied hydrophilic Web Fiber
monomer mixture.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF FSEV AND EVUL TESTS FOR IN-SITU SAP NONWOVEN
Initial Final Expansion Gel Capillary
Test height (mm) Height (mm) Volume (ml) Volume (ml) Volume (ml)
FSEV 0.72 3.5 9.8 3.1 6.2
EVUL 0.61 2.5 7.1 3.4 3.1
FSEV Uncoated Web 0.45 0.45 1.3 0.03 1.1
STRIKETHROUGH (SEC)
Figure 10b
Figure 9 STRIKETHROUGH COMPARISON OF ADULT
INCLINED WICKING COMPARISON OF IN- MEDIUM BRIEFS AND IN-SITU SAP WEB CORE
SITU COMPOSITE AND ADULT BRIEF CORES
4,537,590, Aug. 27, 1985
4. Pieniak, et al., “Method of forming a superthin absorbent
sess a number of unique properties for application in the per- product,” U.S. Patent 4,540,454, Sep. 10, 1985
sonal hygiene industry, such as improved fluid acquisition, per- 5. Z. Wicks, Jr., F. Jones, S. Pappas, Organic Coatings (2nd ed.),
meability, compressibility and pH control. These materials also pg. 420, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY (1999)
provide a more homogeneous SAP distribution, eliminate the 6. Whitmore, D., Engelhardt, F., “Absorbent article and process
need for SAP powder handling and have superior wet integrity for preparing an absorbent article,” U.S. Patent 6,417,425 B1, Jul.
compared to conventional fluff pulp and SAP air-laid structures. 9, 2002
This technology also offers some unique opportunities for 7. Latimer et al., “Absorbent structure having improved fluid
designing and manufacturing profiled absorbent articles with surge management and product incorporating same,” U.S.
specific zones tailored to perform specific functions. Patent 5,364,382, Nov. 15, 1994
8. Zimmerer, “Disposable absorbent articles,” U.S. Patent
References 4,657,537, Apr. 14, 1987
1. Pieniak, et al., “Superthin absorbent product,” U.S. Patent 9. Blaney, “Disposable diaper containing ammonia inhibitor,”
4,573,988, Mar. 4, 1986 U.S. Patent 3,964,486, Jun. 22, 1976
2. Erdman, et al., “Stable disposable absorbent structure,” U.S. 10. Alonso, et al., “Composition for treatment and prevention
Patent 4,676,784, Jun. 30, 1987 of malodorous generating skin conditions,” U.S. Patent
3. Pieniak, et al., “Superthin absorbent product,” U.S. Patent 4,382,919, May 10, 1983 — INJ