Professional Documents
Culture Documents
airplane engines
Abstract
The need to prevent failures in mechanical components has always been huge not only
for safety reasons but also for economical reasons. In this work two commercial airplane engine
failures are studied, the fracture mechanism of the components are analyzed in order to
determine possible root causes.
There is also a report on the most common failures in airplane engines and their
causes.
In order to carry out this investigation, non destructive tests were performed, visual
analyzes, optical microscope analyzes and scanning electron microscope analyzes were carried
out.
Every necessary step to perform a similar investigation is indicated in this document.
After all analysis it was possible to identify and determine the possible causes that lead
to both engines failure.
1
reliability and consequently reduce the vertical, then it began to descend quickly
maintenance costs. and crashed into the ground killing all the
passengers and crew members. An
The first failure investigation in investigation was made by the North
aviation started in its early years, when the American entity National Transportation
first military plane projected by the Wright Safety Board, and realized that the rotation
brothers crashed, killing one airplane was caused by a slat movement caused by
passenger and dangerously injuring Orville the engine separation which was caused by
Wright. As soon as Wilbur Wright received fatigue, [3].
the news he ordered the airplane parts
were brought back to him in order to 2.2. Failure modes and
investigate what happened, [1].
their caractherization
This study is a failure investigation
on two airplane engines, a Rolls-Royce
2.2.1. Fatigue
engine RB211-524B and a CFM56-5C
engine. Both were in Transportes Aéreos
One of the most common failure
Portugueses Maintenance and Engineering
mode is without doubt Fatigue.
workshop.
Fatigue is the progressive, localized, and
permanent structural change that occurs in
2. Bibliographic revision a material subjected to repeated or
fluctuating strains at nominal stresses that
2.1. Historical analysis of have maximum values less than (and often
airplanes failures much less than) the static yield strength of
the material. Fatigue may culminate into
One of the most known and tragic one or more cracks and cause fracture after
incidents in aviation were the accidents that a sufficient number of fluctuations. Fatigue
airplanes, those airplanes were very action of cyclic stress, and plastic strain, [4].
advance in their time and were easily Fatigue failures leave easy to
defeating all competition, however they identify signatures, like absence of plastic
fuselage, [2].
A very well know case is also the 2.2.1.1. Low cycle fatigue
failure of a McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 in
1979. Soon after the airplane takeoff his left It is considered that a fracture is
engine, a CF6-6D from General Electric, due to low cycle fatigue when the number
got separated from the wing, not too long of cycles needed to achieve fracture is less
4 5
after the airplane began to rotate to his left than 10 or 10 , low cycle fatigue can be
side until it’s wings were completely observed mostly on pressured tanks and
2
vapor turbines, components that are subject 2.2.1.2 High cycle fatigue
to repeated stresses from thermal loadings.
The most used equation in low cycle fatigue High cycle fatigue is the continuous
is the Coffin-Manson (1), [15]. damage to a component cause by a low
stress with a very high frequency.
p
'f 2 N f
c Although it is not considered to be
(1)
2 as dangerous as low cycle fatigue, because
Where p is the plastic extension range, in some cases the material can withstand
infinite equal loads, if the material suffered
N r is the number of cycles until the any previous damage its resistance to high
material fractures, c is the graphic slope cycle fatigue can be compromised, and the
that relates the plastic extension and the part will fail, [4].
number of cycles until the material rupture,
p 'f
2 N b f (3)
2 E
Where b is the fatigue resistance
2 N 'f 2 N f
experiences with creep and he proposed
f b c
f (4)
2 E the following equation, [6]:
t 3 t (5)
3
Where t is the time, α and β 3. Experimental Procedure
material constants and ε is the extension.
Graham and Whales extrapolated
3.1. Failure Analysis
Andrade analysis and proposed another
equation (6), where γ is another material
There are five important steps
constant, Ref [6]:
during a failure analysis, see figure 2, [1]:
Identify – Describe the situation,
1
t t t 3
3
(6)
gather as much information as
possible.
Determine root cause – analyze
2.2.3. Corrosion
the problem and the information
gathered and discover the root
Corrosion is the loss of material
cause.
because of its reactions with the
Develop corrective actions –
environment. It has been estimated that
Create a list of possible solutions,
USA spends every year around 276 billion
think of alternatives.
dollars with corrosion control methods,
Validate and verify corrective
reparations and damages caused by it, [7].
actions – Test if the corrective
In aviation corrosion is a serious
actions are effective or not.
issue, airplanes deal with many corrosion
Standardize – Create a standard
agents like oil, water and some components
with the corrective actions, change
that are produced during fuel combustion.
the manuals.
2.2.4. Wear
4
NDT, are very important in any industry and 3.2.3. Boroscope
are developing at a very fast pace.
One of the most used and airplane engines because it can be used to
important NDT is without doubt, the see places that are impossible to evaluate
5
3.3. Information gathering 4. Results and Discussion
process for the engines
damaged parts 4.1. Engine RB211-524B
6
direction of the normal air flow, fracture surface can be seen in figure 7, the
proving that they broke during the red area is the fatigue affected zone and
engine surge and got heavily the green area is the final quick fracture
deformed. zone.
Some of the samples are rotated in
the direction of the normal air flow,
showing that they were already
broken and were deformed before
the surge occurred.
Most of the impact evidence are Figure 7 – Vane 5 fracture surface
located in the trailing edge which
indicates that a lot of material Clear beachmarks can be seen on
fragments hit the components after the left side of the vane, and the point from
the surge, see figure 5. where the fatigue started to propagate can
be easily seen using an optical microscope,
an example of this can be seen in figure 8.
7
The fatigue started in the welding
zone, the starting position is indicated by According to the engine manual the
the ratchet marks and by the beachmarks vane material is a “Modified 12 per cent
that move away from it. The distance chrome steel” which is compatible to the
between striations is very small which results of the EDS in Table 1, the material
indicates that the vane suffered high is probably a AISI 410 steel.
frequency loadings, which are related to the The Vane welding material has a
engine rotating speed in this particular very high concentration of gold the idea is
stage which is around 10611 RPM, and the to withstand the high temperatures in this
number of blades that are present in this particularly area.
stage around one hundred making a
loading frequency of 17000 Hertz. 4.1.1. Estimative of the number
An EDS was performed on the
of cycles the vanes
Vane and the Welding material, their results
withstood
can be seen on the tables 1 and 2.
8
The blades were cut using an
Applying equation (4) the following abrasive wheel and were examined using
equation can be reached: the SEM, in the figure 11 the corrosion
layer is measured.
520 1 1 0 , 5
3,762 10 3 N r0,08 ln Nr
2 10 5
2 1 0,3
This equation can be easily solved
9
could possibly be used for a lot more flight [2] http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/re
cycles. ports/arc/rm/3248.pdf - 5/2/2011
After reading a CFM report about [3] National Transportation Safety
one of the three engine failures, I could Board Aircraft Accident Report
observe images that made me believe that American Airlines, Inc., DC-10-10,
the blades fractured because of tensile N110AA May 25, 1979.
stress corrosion, however CFM
[4] ASM (1992) “Fatigue And
investigation is still not over and it will take th
Fracture” ASM Handbook 19 (9
several more months to reach an end.
edition)
[5] http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/~lakes/V
5. Conclusions Enotes.html
[6] Mecânica dos Materiais, Carlos A.
With all the data acquired during G. De Moura Branco, 4º Edição,
the duration of this investigation, it was 2006, Fundação Calouste
possible to reach some conclusions. Gulbenkian
Regarding the engine RB211-524B, [7] http://www.watermainbreakclock.co
it is possible that some older vanes had m/docs/techbrief.pdf 20/1/2011
already internal damage that cannot be
[8] ASM (1992) “Nondestructive
detected using fluorescent liquid penetrant
Evaluation and Quality Control”
test, those internal defects propagated by th
ASM Handbook 17 (9 edition)
fatigue until the vane fractured, those early
[9] http://www.icems.ist.utl.pt/
fractured vanes created abnormal
27/11/2010
vibrations that caused other vanes to be
[10] http://www.efunda.com/Materials/all
damaged quicker than what was expected,
oys/stainless_steels/show_stainles
leading to a surge that caused major
s.cfm?ID=AISI_Type_410&prop=all
damage making the engine inoperative.
&Page_Title=AISI%20Type%20410
Regarding the CFM56-5C in my
– 10/8/2011
opinion we are looking at a tensile strength
corrosion phenomenon caused by
continuously treatments on the blades that
keep reducing the thickness of the blades
until they have a critical area where they
are susceptible of suffering this kind of
corrosion.
6. References
10