RMU TD MAL» SHE pp. $96~602. 2006, PA SAS STA ROLE AS F7/BO] LOPE SAO] Se HOH OAIE VS ad op ugal. ate ava ARID ASG a Fa es ceMeR AEaEAp (20064 24 2091 H+, 20064 64 5Q AM) ‘A Comparision Study of LDPE Pyrolysis over Resin Additives and Inorganic Compounds of Silica Alumina Type ‘Young-Cheol Bak" + Joo-Hong Choi - NanyKyung Kim Department of Chemical Engincering/ Engineering Research Institte, Gyeongsang National University “Department of Automosive Engincering, inte National University ABSTRACT : The afless of resin adlives and inane comeuns ation en the themal dscorgxiion of kw’ density polethene(LDPL) resin have been staid in a thermal analyzer(TGA, DSC) and a small batch reactor. The silca-akumina type compounds tested wore aol rite, benonite, petite, ditoaccous earth, activated clay and clay. The resin additives were antfoging-agent and langevity-agen, As the reuits of TGA experiment, addition of antifging-ger, longoviy-agent and clay increwsed the temperate of the maim reaction FateTau) The sifcaalunina type inorganic materials inreased the pyrolysis reaction rate in the order of sctvsted ey, dialomaceoes earth, hestnits, petites, and kalinie, In the DSC experiments, ation of anifogsing-agent and clay decreased the heat of fison and the he ‘of pytoiyss ration, Bentonite decreased 20% of the heat of fson and 25% oF the he of pytoysis reason. In the hatch system experi ments, the mixing of cay retarded the intial producing rte of fuel oil but increased the yield of uel oil Adkiion of bertnite insect the yield of fuel oil from LDPE: resin, Mixing of antfogins-aget and engeviy-agent produced the fel oll huving lower carbon numb ‘The amounts of the carbon raznber below 12 in fuel oll deceased with ating the clay. That below 23 in el oil ineeased with mising of temonit, pete, kaolinite, and activated clay. But the miing of diatomaceous earth did not affect the carbon cowees of fuel vil fem pure LDPE resin. In the silica-alumina type inorganic material used in this experiments, beronite was the most effective from the poly sis eat, yields, and the characteristics of fuel oll Key Wonk + LDPE, Py, Fuel Oi, Sila Alumina TG, DSC QF: AVES Mol aisle FAAS BFA) FAS Stoll w= Pest MAM Om EMS Fase BE EA SHS] CIV AG PF] H7}o] lag We WA HE AHS WAAISIRA, AAT AY aly Eris) ah aishe IGA Qa4 £34. al, E29] B7He LDPE AD eA visio} AGEASE SETI SIA. AeAeee WAG HRS HIME, FAu, WEVIE, MEK BBE Coe ESSE |r-ige. bsc AA Faas} Be7} A7iste LDPE Algo} ASHE Sols WHATS VE als wag. dayPERey aL WE MEV a7} A BARS I BE, QUIS 29% TE ANAT. VA Weds BUS OS Bes 7) Ash BY Gt He You aS LY FRE OE LAS Vale. De -MENY AA Sola Wedel = a7 Ai 29) $8 Bao] SA Gee. BANE AMC FH CBMIEA EES RAM SoM AEA) Be ALA He Gob ee Hoe oma He OR U7 AS Cis ole) SL AHO] VASA. Cy ols] AE ARE MEUIE, ells nee aye a7 Al Feo Gee) 2 uo srclou Fee Wh Ale Ste Ale YasO. Ved ABA del A 89 PS SMES QUaes dag FH MARE SAS also He RAR, FAO | AUSECLNT. Veoh, GLH, delat HO Raa, Gea, BEAT] LAs ALS SAANLALLDPE HE ALA TE obetOL ELEVA) ake oo} Man It. BS] HE EAS a 4M S08 Ne FETE STAD, Ay BS. TNS SOR FEMS ae. MCAS HUE a S502 FAS Ve WIS TASS PRO ap 1 Conesparang author SUSE, HASSE olf 4 Soh oh gqagy Fama yehaki@esta ache Bad 2 PA) £8 es Gee HAR May Ae “Tel. 055-751-5390 Fax: 055-753-1806 J. of KSEE / Vol, 28, No, 6, lune, 2008FARAAD Ae AD FA AD Po] LOPE FAI Aeeehod viajes aw ws ae 597 Bas OIL MURA AS Bee aL ole Ae MAS FAS 2 Beso} 48, BES TTS ASS 47 Bde ASIA 3719 Se EEA 4 WA AOS ahs] SE HI AAS BE ART wd. AbgSIaL ANNE] WAS) My olla] Me TA Be ae PEs Sra st. We G4 18 B98 74 88 F Bases eee dae Wiged 47 dS BE Aeol e eet 28 Aaa] Ae eel. mee) SHS ATE ANeloE MARS A8olHS F 7] Wa 9. BAG BB Fa + Qe A HTT PSA vals} So} ela Us + oleh LOPES “IRS AB ded AVE Park §°2 LOPES “18S Aol 4) BSzlta 40~ 5000 FAA Ute Us TH Ua LET BST #9 Weslo CHAE GAGES BG Ek BET Wolke ASe vebto. £@ LDPE LDPE Se = GeAY, NiOsitcoatumina Sos are AE Ast LOPE eae aeele 32 Bee] AVVO, Soh AS A) = 9ARo) AASI4 ee WL deh Jang BE al et ABS URE do] 41009] BA wSziaal aah attels Ale A FCC St ABE Ha} AOE ae AA] A FCC S07} HAE ALS BEA. Seo! MH AGeo] EU sl FOC Sas a, ete) Aelaa go = Solely ede ae dase ed da are + BAB. Park S'S PE Fao aha} 2~40%3) ASE 15 Sah} 300~S00 FMI BF B49 LVE C 190) 20% ol} BeHE ALE VERE, Leesh Shin 2 AEA Gea WSs Ae 400T, LDPE, HDPE, PP, PS 2h chet HENLE AalelA che Bea + AA visio] PES] BH WE AIM] obs BAAe] Aas SAE Kms} Woo" LDPE $218 AGSIG] 2S Mol 9 Ast WENA BOL ES ad Be aa Bat BF LU BFR0) Sri WEEE BRE AAS Uke AAI AI aso get tah Fe ADVE AS FS BE BEI BH 1S Se AB BSC we Ba Ae HBO] BA UEISES ols} Be] LOPE $218 248 oa} 7b} Ale) aio} ROU, Be AVA TL HAA, BEA SS Wt Vso at RUE Be AEA ae Hal $9) Jv Be AHS Bale) A Qs. SE VE oS A WE7S ABE Vol AOC oF aE AFovlS ys] Gael Fed LDPE + Al AMS FAM, BEA EAI Ae BFS ARS tise) Ee Be 7 debe Uae FIs SHE ARS CEMM. 1G Ale cele} aera 29 wOlAG Ast GSI TEA AVS Aol Cat USSEF UUAT I O1FSH AMES 54 Sa a seats. 2a 8 24. ALB 2 AFM Me Hat eS AI Aha] dete oF Sh] ato} aed gal Vole LOPEFACAAL BHR, QHEAAI=24.000, YE=0.92 wem'yt FAS Eat SoA Ao ABS. AAS AL asst 2eacbs] 1 eta Be LOPE eel Ais (PANAAAA AZ Bokeh. Qe r-weeoly A AMISee 14 Be, AA ASAE, BF ae ole, SH FA MOLES} Atel tam, ea we Bo] ASSIch Bebo|es e+ E AMOMA -BzE A) 2 RS ABSSIC. LDPEL Geas}o] JSS uct ae ap app] Site} Soke 80 mesh(180 moles Hk obo} AGB. 7A) ufo Ge serFwWe Table 13h Ze. Qua deo Fee Soh Ae PAE So} eA ol 10% IES LFA, LSA intemal mixed 13008 7 BH Al F SE BBs, Suns} FA) 7 dae] 26 ad AS ARE ABs 22, MESA) BI aleEhe avawgy £8 ARS Agee apts suHo] AVS ASA sols] ato} BSo ¥A7I(TGA2050, TA instrument) LB WB WAst AAEM] (SDT 2960, TA instrumenyS o]Be}o) Gig wae at S}StCh. 9171 ZAMS New AHBSHRLOL, 72 PS) OLE Fe MAS Nel Fh Maal Sas atest. TGA ABS oS mg} Bt ASE NEA Behe SL WF BS IW BA AG 100 em'mins Fe} 7) BAL A, OUiming] SLFER oso NS LOe ESHA ARS] SEMHE Seat. DSC Ago BG GE ES OF 5 me BE RS AEs, WEI YS] IE BLS E71 ae Na SAH] sho} Ne S100 cm'imin $42 308 7 SAwaeh ARS a ‘Table 1, Chesical composition of silica alumina type compounds pe ommaiatay [Sale Benne Pee ST chy “SiO: 485 62.99 55.33 8248. avo; | as man 251130269 Feo: 25 6) Sk GOD mo | a ons 13 co 22th ome igo 0208s 04s 4 Ko of 10s 94005035 N20 os xT 6s 0s M0 uo os 10, or Loss on inn | 13 201133 Holmes RAIA 26m Gs, DODO OB508 ga alte. ava ‘Table 2. Analysis conditions of GC. Coneais Condon Injection Splic 10:1, 360, 1 a Carries gas He, constant flow 2.2 mL/min Oven program 407C 10 340% at STCimin, 340% for 10 min Desecae HID, 340% Sample 1% in 8s AA UA 7A WATE BUR SESE SCiminz AE #4 650TH) HELOR ALS WE was sda sath. BEA GLA Qe Be 250 om AT FAAS of Bao} YE 7 ELE ALBA Fig. 19} ao] Faehste UTS Ha RW BAIN BRUTE Basie} WHE abe Mom, SEAS waldo wes, ‘2 GST, AEA AE B40 Hale BANE 27 BAGH IS AMEE Ball 1S} AVA Sash att. AVES ALA WL7] I LDPE Fad BB ALR 100 g $Ys A429 Hole be ase AS evel ae BEE 100 ommin $249} LOCA ae RoE A dS Fach. W871 WHS Fat BOA RUZIE 1s Se} 200 pms) HER BE AEE we7loA UeeEe 7 At S718 AAG AA Bebe alatslecw, off LDPE, S BAE Gee 47} B87] wo Sais ge 5 a7) deel 4} Baie deer falasle 2 2S Ae 18h ALT MASA BES SMHS TARBC-10, JEIO TECHS °18S8}9} 209) W347 BESS otalD. AV) dae SA S1E She 14 7 4 72: $PAHuman & Nature Technology) oA] $4] 29] Fase. AA as Bae ha AS PA Boh tal $e wee Fest. Veo) Besa eal 34 Qs Wohle wAEde FAS eo ae aH = BS Folate AY ARR UATE EAS] gale} GC. (HP 6890/71 ALBA. ALE BBS zebvon ZB-( 30m * 032 mmx 0.25 pmol} BA 2S Table 2 eh HE EMRE RESTEK D 2887 calibration mix(C.~Cu) AP gorge veers pea) ne i Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus J. of KSEE / Val, 28, No, 6, June, 2008 3. Ba}! Dab 31. TGA SEA LOPES) 47H BPN Av Fal Alol chee eS BE ME] GEA Alo] Gea SEF mae Bee Ss S VANAA VUE AH} Fig 204 gle LOPE Salat BH AOTC BAIN 27] 12S) 3% At ae IA SAE 7 SD BF 5% FAA Bt a AF 15%, BE B7h AVE 3.8% BER, 45004 Ae LDPE 27%, FA AE A) 23.1%, FAM Bt Al 28.9%, BE Bt Ad 2% Uebath Ole Astlay Fala) B7He LDPES) #a¥a WE FEE OR eed, BAS gE a 7S WAGE SESH AM 7b Aes ded. =22}4} DTG(dorivaive thermogravimetry) 24k 450° M4 2 WEGEE LDPE 138%nin, BFA AA 98 Yimin, FAA A7t A) 6.0%e'min, HE Az A) 11.3% min 2-4 Bt 188 esheets. Marilla 5"@ LDPES} MCM, USY, ZSM-5 ub A}2@ TGA BAM AMUSSEM YERHS A] SET AMEE of Sh ASE REI] LDPE 2} EAS] BF Tae) 4597020 149% MCM 1 SoH a7} AT STRSCR Soh 38 MCAS. whats) Te QE visa) 8A LOPE gh 8 BS AT, Be aA 477 C, FAIA AE A) ase, SE WA 477Cz eh} dies Whe ae Ot AMINE AS A + ale. AMALS 4200 144] FAA ALAA o)Foj AA SOOT clad Aka} Masj2e Sg] Ges s & AG 4 o] SE WAS FAse Ao] Paar. LDPE GeobHAl dele} Ate] Sol7} eel Seo) aS AHS 2) v7] Helo} 10% SHS Se Be # Ald ARS AGO ASS SA Aspt Fig. 36} atch. 7141 LOPE +2}ts] BF3} BEE A} AS A AV Bae] FA MSH VELA Foy DES 10% SATS OF Fall de A US UU Gadel = eigtt 4) Temperatire( ©) Fig. 2. Effects of additives and clay on the pyrolysis reac- tion in TGA,Faale ele Mal FIR LOPE FAI} Bea IE TE wR a 599 wieght (%) “Temperature (°C) Fig, 3, Effects of silcasalumina type compounds on the pyroly- sis reaction in TGA. AbOlE UEHAR E.G ava BE 400TAA) LDPE +2) = 3%, MBE VPA 33% GEvSLS a7 AL 5.2% AOE At A) 40% FRE At A 39% BAM Ah A) 61%E HEPA 450 TOE LDPE $2) 27% 2 & BPA) 30%, WEUSE B7t A 50.1% SHeOLE at A 324%, FRE Ah A) 474%, BASE AP A] SIT UOC. Tra EE RYE ab A) 470, EUS at 4) 4620, sMebo| = A7E AL 468, FER B7E A 456, gage a7 8202 Yeste. meh) as, S, WEE, Hele, BIE Soe WERSS 37H Ae AS SF WH AACE OT VI WSS 7 aaa gre AS tS DIO. 32. DSC BAY LOPES) 7H abs ated AOL ce BE ge Be) Gea ol eed Boh mae IES A AGRWIAA ABE BH? Hig. 404 seh O14) 1000 BA F719] BAM] Daas, ov SAE S AG Fle] AAS dal Bes Go dag Aes > Slt, @AAe Table 3019} Zo] LDPE Fal Be SscHM Sar ASLO BEA BA OT SA) lst, BE ah ATE OLIUE A BE Seo Belt A) ARG. Gad Zoe Gaes LOPES) 2H 685 Heo] Bash} PAM BE AD BF 417 dest 494 Je 22 BATE Ve AS Bld. Aga Ase BEE 370 Bal Aesth Be BAHS LOPE FAI} BF 630 Jeo BE a 7G BF 560 Ji, AAPL A B BH 520 Sig, BEA 7 a7} a OF 480 Moe YEE Bur Bd Say BAZ AAAS He WHE AVE aso LOPE alee ROA a] Sol Br A a = ENE apt Fig. So seh. ANAOE 100U SAH SABE AOC BAA a wade] dae Savgelate. Fae BaMEs Be Lope #2ieis} QFuc Beebe) oe VAS Bsich Heat ow (Wig) Fig. 4. Effecs of additives and clay on the eat ow of pyrolysis reaction, Temperature (°C) Fig. §. Effects of silicz-alumina type compounds on the heat flow of pyrolysis reaction Table 4914 SHES Bawa deere ae 9 SE A a BF SHE HT SAE HSC A = $8 WISES Whe Ae 2+ lc. Ges aa) Be EUS) WP AVE SH igs LDPE A] Hal oT Ao} 20% BE GAAS WHE AS a Gal Geet S ES wel 370~3890T SALT Soh VE AAS TEE at AA 100 QE ee 2s7 Ae Se Se Ub uglou, Fe 2el-ae Ne Solve SAS Uehizis Balch AvAS Aso} LOPES ¥ ae] MEMES siebolES A7} +] 25% BEI WEE o) dase AS 2 > Ue fe 3. Effects of additive and clay on the heat of fusion and heat of pyrolysis Material ——_Mehing Heat of Pyrobs Heat of (catalyst) __poin(C) fusions) point’) pyrolysis) LDPE 950 8ST LDPE(cly) 914A TD HB iy 4733 sin9 taniogzineaven) ie aso aT97 ongity-agent tporgia gees 762 68, 200014 60 ua aae- aye Table 4, Effects of silica-alumina type compounds on the heat of fusion and heat of pyrolysis Macca Meking et of Pyrolysis Hew of (catalyst) point C) fasion) poi) pyeoysi ie) LDPE 30 8S TTR Lope aot) LDPE (bentonite) Lope (pete) Lee r Hal iaomaceous cary S'S SI HERE THB LDPE (astvted clay) wo S60 SB 89 Al meats sos 600-5750 ee) Se} FRED BYES Wh Ale 15—-20%a=4 oF 2 ata Me) Aas|eeh 33. PmoH Ste BY oH St Ae 200 SEA Sol leo} WE DA Ae wel a7 a Me BE Avo) 89 FRI aE ade ae aa, Tie, OF BE AS aaa. BS A} A] 27) FRE Oe eu 200% Bah A, LDPE FARE 65% FHS UE BE AME Ale F401 72% SZ Yeh AS FEE LDPE Fa}ehs] Be TH BE Su AS a7} Ale 786 Helstsleh MePT DSC EAL AMS 26 BE aie 24 Bal BAe wate Uy Baa ATS PAA A Ne AB 28 FH] Bem) BF 68, FAA AN BF 62% ALS Halste} a7 AG AH ARE LOPERS} 29} visto] oe HHO] cH: Ya Yesich. 8 49 91 WE LDPE asl g FHS ALBANS, Fay BHAA BEA Aa 298 AFH BAS cach. Awa ae 5 med 2e FASE ABMS OT BA BEE ABA Ae AA AN TS 4 F9) WAS Rls aaa of FOIA ASO] NF ACA OR Was, Te) a G9 BF TAMA BEAT BB AZ ALAA olay #9] Wao A So] Bises ay 29 Azo} oe EHS O Ase Wea. Fo] tel Fay o| Be WHE) Yoh wel od FRE UTE doe es GAO. Fig. 73 Bo) deletsoy Age] eq a7} AQ FE WHE WEYL BF AM 200% Bat A) 77% AES LDPE FAC BF osteo veto HS SM HE UAHA. FASS wiehol=, DIES] SMe He Be WHE Bad. AB FRE WEE ae eae UEhHO] QM AGE aed ZelA-ehpey ee WEA 84 229) HAE LDPE Fale) BAO eet AIF @ ANS Bola] Be He AUIS mg ab 294 G27 ABD BE 22 Mol A BOS BAT 1 Bast BA A948 AGE VERE wsleh PE 2 Fae Ae UNM Base ae aed | ABao] Ueste}” Sakata $2 PE ALR} he 430 oi oie] 79] Soh Mal AY Bah, 2d FBR Bat BSAA 693%, Baer Bo gH A] 67s~ 743% ZSMSHA_ B72] 49.8%, FSM AT ae 7L1%R HERE WA Sols] BH RAL Alo ee} chee @ 29 FER HeRAatN. Uddin $!".@ 430C4}4] LDPE, LLDPE, HDPE, XLPE. Bol TAS ole] 712) SAW Mae BBS 250 em'9] 219 W871 ABAM LDPE AHO) FFE ge 25 OU FE 75.06 Balch 0) B9 ee sae AA} WS7Ie 10 go} ARE AGS.OZ Gage) Bo1e} o 2 AUH wae A Be og See de doe 2Uach op] dee 4) 7 SEs daw wes od FER 84 249) SAE deoe aq aa a W982 SUS Ja Zee) Gat ade. a. a. Bs i 3 é Tien) Tine nin) Whe 6 Hats of avn end lay oa the oil ysl of ig, 7; HPs of stl ype compounds on tbe of batch reactor. J. of KSEE j Val, 28, No, 6, lune, 2006 yield of batch reactorSalas lel vtshu|U Ale P71] LOPE AS} Seehol wae Ie vim AF — 601 ‘Accumulated fraction (%) carbon number Fig. & Effects of additives and clay on the carbon number of ful oil obtained fiom batch reactor. 34, WS ABR Ela > BM LOPE FA FS Roh DOH Pa, Bea, BE a7 il 28 SA BSE AAA TO ea EA ast 7 Fig, 89 30. ANAS FH GUAT Wee Raa at AWA GA HES oe SHE Ae Es a 291 BE A At AMA IEA Ce leis} Bo] Be Se AG a + Me 4 Cn old) BF Fa Ueeh BF 36% ALOU, FAA 7h AE 26%, BEA A ANS 30%, BE AW Ae 2% BSH EH VA 71 #9 Cy 1819] BR RGA AMA] BH 7% FAA a7 A) 90%, BHM AEA 83%, BE AP A) THE abla. eal Leah Qast Mel hetEy AD Sah eal AG BS watael Fig OF Bh LSM alests] BF MF EU Cre lsh} 36% BEM Hae B72) 40%, WEUIE, FEE, LIME At A) somo}ou BRE a7} Ae Fea Ave Ad S Aoi WE 2 22 Yet Cn lls] BFE we Fh Led Be BF IE Als, MEUONE a7} A 81%, 3 Accumulated fraction (%) ‘carbon number Fig. 9. Effects of silica-alumina type compounds on the ear ‘bon number of fuel oil obtained fom batch reactor. AOL AP A) 79% BE AEA) 7M AINE at 4) 16%, FRE BAS B Aol Wis ALE YEE. On SS ALAR AL FONE AE PET Best AG DH AS LIS Ce lL FEE HA ME 48 ste. aa ape | at ase He wal PERM ALY SOME AS VF Co olstel a A We S86 Ge a @ Zee GeO. chy al ASAE AG THE Co olts] BR ALO BE OVS Bae] Hales AU Sel 1S He EOL & WHS HAO Res Bee. 442 syd 9} Ql LDPE F7lel Urbs} Bel7}-eeOy AGS) PES) Wi BF A WE Olas Wee Bist H2A USI BUS ast dest Be ae Bae 1) TGA 2B] FAA, gals} BES Abe ahs SES AM 7b AOz yet dayton ae PALS VSS, FEE, MEGS Bele, was ~ 22 B8hER Bt lae. 2) DSC Ao BAe dae sade LOPE FA) 3 APus 24a ger} ar @ Ae Sas BE ASHE use. Ges LDPE Galo] 29 woh she, Faia, Qha7 a7 a BH dk Ash slsich. Ael7e AHO AL H71BS] Ah a AH WHOLE a7 AE LOPE 42) viol ulate} 20% AE BAIS VEST, a Ba US WEES weolEs a 4) Wee) Bae qo] 25% AE PAK Ale Yee. aay TEU MAME a7} Ae 15~20% AES oh Be eA ao} a Sate. 3) #4 World BE a7} a7] ARR Ae = BO cet YOU 200% Yah A] LDPE Pa 65% HH 2 Une BE A Ae Fo] ME UE aS FSS LDPE AILS] AF MM AEM BE At A) $e 78E Hla Aol 7A AS] Sh ah A 9) 99) $R wshs MEUSE a7} At 2002 Bah A) 7% ALR LOPE ales] BF 6s%el vIslel SE Sh HAS UChesc. TESS wees, RA Sze 2 Fe Go ES usta, ) MARNIE ASS FS) Wea THe Baldy aa) at Al WA Ft Be Hee Oe SSC. BE At AS Ce olstel AM A) BAIS] ch RRoh AMY BH Co leit 36% BEIM ale OLE BFA] 43% MEMES, FEE, DAME a7} A) 39% NLU BBE Wh AES FH WA A = aoy7} BIA Co lt) BFS BA HRM Geel eel y F TMH AAIAMOY, WEIN At A] 81%, slope cHRrREABoreIA| 26 ow, 20008 owot wala wee BA) 19% WEE A A) 1% BAME A A] 76%, FRE A} AS a bolt WE Wow Yep 5) AR BASHA HE S MEUSE ae HARE Aho} Fe SRO. Ab At ¥ BRE ADF TALS AIS ae 2] Be} Jao FAIVOM ol) BEM. EE SOT WAS @ UPB BFOIE BEE BAH. aizee Le Park, J. J, Park, K, Park, J. W, and Kim, D. C., “Characteristics of LDPE pyrolysis” Korean J Chem: Eng., 1914), 658 ~662(2002). 2 Jang, N. P, Park, J. W., and Seo, G. “Liguid-phase degradation of waste agricultural film over used-FCC catalyst." HWAHAK KONGHAK, 41(6), 694 ~699(2003), 3. Seo, G, “FCC B49 ARASH] Mae Ba | 2 EAS So} AZ PHF o Sole olga AT a} Bao] Ya} SA” SAAel, §2003-0035638(2009). 4 Seo, G, “EA BAI oa HB Behe] AZ WY 21g Se ah EY SARL, 52002- 1046027(2002), 5. Park, D. W, “AEALAG HAR Soh Do] Sekt o} Ba ABAACS) tol ws” BAe, $20000043100 (2000. |. of KSEE 7 Vol, 28, No.6, une, 2006, Lee, KH. and Shin, D. HL, “Influence of plastic type and pyrolysis of waste themoplasties into oil recovery.” J. Korea Society of Waste Management, 2106), 646~ 661(2004), Kim, D.C. and Woo, J. K. catalytic decompasition condi time and oil quality in plastic wastes into fuel oil,” J of KSEE, 26(11), 1232~1237(2008), Marcilla, A., Belt, M., and Conesa, J. A., “Catalyst addition in polyethylene pyrolysis Thermogravimetric study,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 58-59, 117~126 2001), Kim, D.C, Woo, J. K., and Nao, N. S. of oil qulity in thermal and catalytic decomposition of waste plastics into fuel oil” Gm 7180F6}2], 22(8), 165 ~17312005), Sakata, Y., Uddin, M.A, Muto, A. polyethylene and polypropylene into fuel oil by using solid acid and non-acid catalysts Journal of Analyticat ‘and Applied Pyrolysis, $1, 135~155(1999). Uddin, M.A, Koizumi, K., Murata, K., and Sakata, ¥., “Thermal and catalytic degradation of structually diffe- rent types of polyethylene into fuel oil," Polymer De- ‘gradation and Stability, $6, 37~ 441997). Onu, P., Vasile, C., Ciocilten, S., lojoju, E., and Darie, HL, “Thermal and catalytic decomposition of polyethylene and polypropylene,” Journal of Anaistical and Applied Porolssis, 49, 145~153(1999). ‘effect of thermal and non decomposition lapse ~Byaluation “Degradation of