HOHE a a eA 0601/1001/2075 Nees LL.B. VI Semester / 5 Year B.A. LL.B. X Semester / 5 Year B.A. LL.B. (Maj.-Min. System) X Semester / 5 Year B.B.A. LL.B. X Semester (Old/New) Examination, June/July 2019 LAW OF EVIDENCE Duration ; 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100 Instructions ; 1. Answer Q. No. 9 and any five of the remaining. 2. Q.No. 9 carries 20 marks and rest carry 16 marks each. 3. Answers must be written either in English or Kannada completely. Define Evidence. Explain the different kinds of evidence. Marks : 16 FOE, Tah SAX me,3 203 Smdrivay, detox. Explain the doctrine of ‘Res gestae’ with decided cases. Marks : 16 ‘oe rig) Amgaay AGrOS Bedeardeoat AoA. What is dying declaration ? What are the conditions for its Marks : 16 admissibility as evidence ? burs DOs Sees aocide 2 eday mE, =” aedoxen adds} sda ands ? Q. No. 3. Who is an Expert ? State the circumstances in which expert Marks : 16 opinion becomes relevent. 3e,5006 odadd 2 343 exmgctored AxowciserbsS Roduse hea, 8220. Q. No. 5. What are public documents 2 How they are proved ? Marks : 16 marund dagasexondo ond naa) 2 varday, Geri menaced 7 Q. No. 6. Define Estoppel. State the different kinds of estoppel. Marks : 16 2 Zz 20. Qwoe 33ax, IDA. aa spond Dvnogndar, Sen P.1.0(AOE 00 A 0601/1001/2075 Q. No. 7. Explain the protection given to the following communications under Indian Evidence Act. (a) Communications between Husband and Wife (b) Communications between a client and his advocate. DEFSah Bevsron ywwdseor Ws, eQrobwhseq, Fa, OBR. (a) 23 = S28 weosred (b) 88pd mba mAadeodab Sedds Bevsred. Marks : 16 ot Sot BS OF Q. No. 8. Write short notes on any two of the following. Marks : 2x8=16 ews avrg opo wars wow. (a) Confession by co-accused RB sdacLod sxe (b) Alibi egy xan0g (c) Leading questions engd Ande sete Q. No. 9. Answer any two. Marks : 2x10=20 Gerad avwe wgor. (a) The question is whether ‘A’ robbed ‘B’. Does the fact that shortly before the robbery, ‘B’ went to a shop with money in his possession and showed it to third persons, become relevant ? ‘e’ Qowwasa ‘wy’ aowasdas adr Bna@moode rowed SeowaAd. ROrkaxd soooes ‘wad Bkqonrt weak Sricdsooa> wor soerbep, & wrakky abadsob Airienk gcoudsY sagowaty abRoweese ? (b) The question is whether ‘A’ was a legitimate son of ‘B’. Does the fact that, ‘A’ was always treated as such by the members of the family relevant ? ‘od ‘ws Gadrw arse aow B8 aes. Deowed AGA Soca ‘v'dao Gabe es abridecie atichasygche megodsomy stots 2 (c) ‘A’ sues ‘B’ for money due on a bond. ‘B’ has admitted the execution of bond, but contends that it was obtained by fraud. ‘A’ denies it. On whom the burden of proof was ? ‘ed roc mows SRO worsewd BewyA ‘ws ddd md BOARS. ‘was w mows ndcddouin wdgecd, edd” eda BawOod wowadegennd sond “maxsed. ‘va ecss 4 . 2, serWornega, BRT shes cease od ass 2