Baking, Daniel Joshua C.

BSIT-3A

Parallel Lines in Computer Manufacturing Model Probability Tools And Analysis

(Module 3 Activity 1)

Microsimulation is one of the most prevalent paradigms of demographic simulation. Orcutt's work relies
on the original work in micro simulation (1957). In this simulation paradigm, modelers must specify a
random sampling method at each simulation point for each individual, to establish each person's status
at the next time of the simulation. At one extreme, a simple random sampling is necessary.
At a different end, a complicated regression model may be necessary. However, for particular public
policies, most microsimulation technologies were developed. Dahlen (2009) creates an open source
LaMPsim microsimulation tool for the labor market. System dynamics is another commonly used
paradigm in developing demographic simulation models.

A variety of tests were carried out to understand the effect on performance of population size
and migration. The model uses an ongoing period in which future occurrences might virtually
immediately take place. The viewpoint is somewhat small and less efficient in a conservative technique.
All studies were conducted using a dedicated gigabit Ethernet switch on a cluster of PCs. The results are
based on the 5 replications average.
 Operations Research and Management Science (OR/MS) using Modelling and Simulation (M&S)
Probability Tools And Analysis(Module 3 Activity 2)

According to the reviewers, the suggested AHS methodology integrates multiple well-developed
data mining approaches and may function effectively under specific scenarios. However, at the moment,
the technology has numerous severe drawbacks in terms of designing and deploying real-world
production applications. Scalability issues, parameter selection issues, and a lack of suitability for
production computing settings are among the constraints.

Analysts were able to support campaign evaluation while also focusing on projects that
produced clearer and more easily accessible outcomes. The majority of these were related to force
protection or logistics assistance. Major Andrew Farnsler, for example, deployed to Iraq in 2006 to
support the Multi-National Corps—Iraq, where he conducted a wide range of assessments ranging from
campaign evaluation to logistical optimization and force protection. He was able to assist the command
in improving the performance of its ground-based ISR equipment in one case:

This research determined and measured the effectiveness of ISR systems, which was the first
step in bettering their operational and tactical use. Success was defined by the command as acquiring a
system that resulted in enemy BDA [battle damage assessment]... Major Farnsler visited Balad [base],
where he observed ISR activities from sensors to integration. He spoke with [ISR] operators,
maintenance staff, and a battalion operations officer, all of whom gave him valuable advice on how to
use [ISR] effectively. Many of [Farnsler's] proposals were implemented by the Command.