Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHHENDIPADA OCP,
TALCHER CF, MCL
Submitted to:
March-2012
CONTENTS
1.0 Background 1
2.0 Objective 2
3.0 Methodology 2
List of Tables
List of Plates
List of Figures
List of Photographs
Photo-1 Plantation on External OB (Lilari OCP) 12
Photo-2 Plantation on Backfill (Lilari OCP) 12
Executive Summary
TABLE-1
Area in Hectare % Calculated in respect of total Excaveted area
Plantation Backfilled/OB Active Mining Area Total Excaveted Area Total Reclaimed Area
Sl No. Projects Leasehold 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011
1 Chhendipada 20.31 1.10 7.87 9.21 18.18 8.97
6.06 43.29 50.67 49.34
2 Lilari 141.81 47.03 20.00 26.23 93.26 67.03
50.43 21.45 28.13 71.87
3 Kulda 538.10 0.55 7.05 47.74 55.34 7.60
1.00 12.74 86.27 13.73
Fig 1: Projject Wise Land Reclamation Status In Year 2011
600
538.10
500
Area(Hectare)
400
Leasehold Area
Minedout Area
300
Reclaimed Area
141.81
200
93.26
67.03
55.34
20.31
18.18
100
7.60
8.97
0
Chhend
dipada Lilari Kulda
1.0 Background
1.1 Land is the most important natural resource which embodies soil, water, flora, fauna
and total ecosystem. All human activities are based on the land which is the scarcest
natural resource in our country. Mining is a site specific industry and it could not be
shifted anywhere else from the location where mineral occurs. It is a fact that surface
mining activities do effect the land environment due to ground breaking. Therefore,
there is an urgent need to reclaim and restore the mined out land for its productive use
for sustainable development of mining. This will not only mitigate environmental
degradation, but would also help in creating a more congenial environment for land
acquisition by coal companies in future.
1.2 Keeping above in view, M/s. Coal India Ltd. (CIL) issued a work order vide letter no.
CIL/WBP/ENV./2011 dated 23/08/11 was issued by CIL for monitoring of opencast
mines of less than 5 million m3 per annum capacity (Coal +OB) from the year 2011 at
intervals of three years. The result of land reclamation status of all such mines is to be
published on the website of CIL, (www.coalindia.in), CMPDI (www.cmpdi.co.in) and the
concerned coal companies in public domain. Detailed reports are to be submitted to
Coal India and respective subsidiaries.
1.3 Land reclamation monitoring of all open cast projects will have to comply the statutory
requirements of Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF). Such monitoring will not only
facilitate in taking remedial measures against environmental degradation, but also
enable Coal companies to utilize the reclaimed land for further socio-economic benefits
in a planned way.
1.4 Present report is embodying the finding of the study based on satellite data of the year
2011 carried out for 3 no. of OC projects of capacity less than 5 mcm (coal +OB) for
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.
2.0 Objective
Objective of the landd reclamation/restoration monitoring is to assess
a the area of
backfilled, plantation, OB
O dumps, social forestry, active mining areea, settlements and
water bodies, distributioon of wasteland, agricultural land and forest laand in the leasehold
area of the project. Thhis is an important step taken up for assessing the progressive
status of mined land reeclamation and for taking up remedial measures, if any, required
for environmental proteection.
3.0 Methodology
There are number off steps involved between raw satellite dataa procurement and
preparation of final maap. National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC)) Hyderabad, being
the nodal agency for satellite data supply in India, provides only raw digital satellite
data, which needs furtther digital image processing for extracting the
t information and
map preparation before uploading the same in the website. Meethodology for land
reclamation monitoringg is given in given in fig 2. Following steps are
a involved in land
reclamation /restorationn monitoring:
3.1 Data Procurement: After browsing the data quality and date of pass on internet,
supply order for data is placed to NRSC. Secondary data like leasehold boundary, topo
sheets are procured for creation of vector database.
3.2 Satellite Data Processing: Satellite data are processed using ERDAS IMAGINE
digital image processing s/w. Methodology involves the following major steps:
• Area calculation
The area of each land use class in the leasehold is determined using ERDAS IMAGINE
v. 9.0 software and given in table 2.
4.2 Area statistics of different land use classes present in OC projects in the year 2011 is
given in Table 2. Land use maps derived from the satellite data is given in Plate no. 1 to
3. Land use statuses are shown in Fig. 3 – 5 and field photographs showing plantation
and backfilled area in mining projects are shown in photos 1 & 2.
4.3 Study reveals that 50.13% of excavated area has already been reclaimed by MCL in the
OC projects, out of which 29.19% area has been revegitated and 20.94% area are
backfilled.
4.4 After analyzing the satellite data of year 2011, it is evident that plantation carried out on
backfilled area, OB dumps as well as under social forestry in all the 3 mines of MCL
taken up for study, has reached 29.19% till now. It can also be seen from the Table.1
that the total area of reclamation has reached 50.13% till the year 2011.
Table 2: STATUS OF LAND RECLAMATION IN MCL BASED ON SATELLITE DATA OF THE YEAR 2011
(Area in Hectare)
CHHENDIPADA LILARI KULDA TOTAL
Area % Area % Area % Area %
Dense Forest 41.92
FORESTS
Social Forestry 1.10 5.40 1.78 1.26 0.55 0.10 3.43 0.49
PLANTATION
Plantation on OB Dump 0.00 0.00 20.16 14.22 0.00 0.00 20.16 2.88
Plantation on Backfill 0.00 0.00 25.09 17.69 0.00 0.00 25.09 3.58
Total Plantation (Biological Reclamation) 1.10 5.40 47.03 33.17 0.55 0.10 48.68 6.95
Total Vegetation 2.41 11.84 68.16 48.07 236.17 43.89 306.74 43.81
Coal Quarry 5.20 25.60 21.99 15.51 28.16 5.23 55.35 7.90
ACTIVE MINING
Coal Face 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Coal Dump 1.14 5.60 2.48 1.75 0.51 0.09 4.13 0.59
Advance Quarry Site 1.73 8.52 0.00 0.00 3.80 0.71 5.53 0.79
Quarry Filled With Water 1.15 5.64 1.76 1.24 15.27 2.84 18.18 2.60
Total Area under Active Mining 9.21 45.35 26.23 18.50 47.74 8.87 83.18 11.88
RECLAIMED
Barren OB Dump 0.00 0.00 1.97 1.39 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.28
Barren Backfilled Area 7.87 38.74 18.03 12.71 7.05 1.31 32.95 4.71
Total Area under Technical Reclamation 7.87 38.74 20.00 14.10 7.05 1.31 34.92 4.99
Total Area under Mine Operation 17.08 84.10 46.23 32.60 54.79 10.18 118.10 16.87
WATERBODIES WASTELAND
Waste Lands 0.71 3.50 20.40 14.38 133.78 24.86 154.89 22.12
Fly Ash Pond / Sand Body 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.04
Total Wasteland 0.71 3.50 20.65 14.56 133.78 24.86 155.14 22.16
Reservoir, nallah, ponds 0.12 0.57 3.80 2.68 4.89 0.91 8.81 1.26
Total Waterbodies 0.12 0.57 3.80 2.68 4.89 0.91 8.81 1.26
AGRICULTURE
Crop Lands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.48 2.57 0.37
Fallow Lands 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 102.85 19.11 102.87 14.69
Total Agriculture 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 105.42 19.59 105.44 15.06
Urban Settlement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SETTLEMENTS
Rural Settlement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.36 0.44 2.36 0.34
Industrial Settlement 0.00 0.00 2.95 2.08 0.69 0.13 3.64 0.52
Total Settlement 0.00 0.00 2.95 2.08 3.05 0.57 6.00 0.86
Grand Total 20.31 100.00 141.81 100.00 538.10 100.00 700.22 100.00
Plate 1
Plate 2
Plate 3
STATUS O
OF LAND RECLAMATION IN CHHENDIPAD
DA OCP
20
16
17.08
Area (Hectare)
12
Year
2011
8
2.41
1.10
0.71
0.12
4
0.00
0
Settlement Plantaation Vegetation Wasteland Mining Surfface
Cover Area watter
Land Use/Cover Classes
FIGURE - 3
STATUSS OF LAND RECLAMATION IN LILARI OCP
80
68.16
Area (Hectare)
60
47.03
46.23
40 Year
2011
3.80
2.95
20
20.65
0
Settlement Planttation Vegetation Wasteland Mining Surfacce
Cover Area wate
er
FIGURE - 4
STATU
US OF LAND RECLAMATION IN KULDA OCP
250
236.17
200
Area (Hectare)
150
Year
133.78
54.79
100
2011
0.55
4.89
3.05
50
0
Settlement Plaantation Vegetation Wasteland Mining SSurface
Cover Area w
water
Land Use/Cover Classes
FIGURE – 5