Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enzymes and Sustainability: Dr. Lutz Popper Ahrensburg, Germany
Enzymes and Sustainability: Dr. Lutz Popper Ahrensburg, Germany
LP01072014 4
Chemical Reactions at Ambient Conditions
LP17062014 5
Enzymes in Food Applications, Examples
LP20062014 6
Potential Improvement of Sustainability in Milling
and Baking by Enzymes
LP29032017 7
Sustainability Options for Baked Goods
Regionalism
Short supply chain
Reduction of the carbon footprint
Support of the local economy
Use of sustainable raw materials
Fats and oils (RSPO membership, IP palm oil etc.)
Enzymes
Reduced carbon footprint
Reduced formulation costs
Reduced transport and storage costs
Use of locally produced raw materials
LP29032017 8
Improved Shelf-life of Bread – an
Important Contribution to Sustainability
Use of Baked Goods
wagners.nz
Bakery items in Germany
Production: 83 kg/a p.p.
Consumption*: 57 kg/a p.p. 10 %
70 %
*National survey of consumption II,
MRI 2008
LP20102015 10
Use of Return Bread from Supermarkets
captive use
donations
13%
39% 5%
6% others
17% biogas
20%
feed, industrial
farming
LP20102015 11
Maltogenic amylases –
Shelf-life prolongation for bread and rolls
Bread from mixed flour (rye/wheat 51/49 %)
Cool storage at 8 °C for 21 days
Mass of the weights: 2 kg each
Advantages:
For all wheat and mixed flour
products
Significant prolongation of crumb
softness
High dosage tolerance
Compatible to flour treatment and
standard bread improvers
treated untreated
50 ppm Alphamalt Fresh
LP30012017 12
Alphamalt Fresh – Advantages
13 LP23052012
Ecologic and Economic Advantages of Enzymes for
improved Shelf-Life
LP30012017 14
Improved Energy Efficiency by
Reduced Water Evaporation
Baking Processes Demanding a Low Water
Addition
Crisp bread
Rusks
Bread crumbs
LP01092016 16
Energy Saving Potential for Wafers
100 50
90 40
(g/Wafer, 29x46 cm)
Specific weight
Energy costs
80 30
(%)
70 20
2 1
60 10
50 0
160 140 120 100
LP11042012 17
Reduction of Vital Wheat Gluten
Whole Meal Bread Baking Trials with Gluten
Enhancer EMCEgluten Plus*
TKP/LP03052011
Gluten Enhancer* (GE) vs. Vital Wheat Gluten
(VWG) in Whole Meal Sandwich Bread
*EMCEgluten Plus
TKP/LP03052011 20
Comparison of the Production of
Emulsifiers and Enzymes
Comparsion of the Production of DATEM and
Enzymes
Tartaric acid Acetic acid anhydride Glycerol Fatty acids Nutrient broth
Reaction Filtration/separation
Distillation Concentration
Cooling Drying
Grinding Standardisation
Powder packaging
LP20102015 22
Typical Dosages of Enzymes and Emulsifiers
LP19092011 23
Restoring the Bake-Ability of
Flour from Bug-Damaged Wheat
Bug-Damaged Wheat
Extension (mm)
500 100
W = 150·10-4 J
Resistance (BU)
80
60
40
Min 20
Max
0
Mean
0 0 20 40 60 80 100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Resistance (mm)
Time (min)
1000
900
Resistance (BU)
Extension (mm)
LP13052010 26
BugStop Complete – Tin Bread
0.1 % Control
BugStop Complete
500
Resistance (B.U.)
400
300
200
with BugStop
100
untreated
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Time (min)
0.2 % BugStop, flour type 55
Approx. 3.5 % bug-damaged kernels
LP12012012 29
BugStop Complete - Extensogram
1000
900 Untreated
800 0.2 % BugStop
Resistance (B.U.)
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Extension (cm)
0.2 % BugStop, flour type 55
Approx. 3.5 % bug-damaged kernels
(untreated: values from 45 min resting time; treated: 90 min values)
LP17072012 30
BugStop - Summary
LP30012017 31
Enzymatic Grain Treatment – Future
or Fiction?
Conditioning with enzymes could improve yield and
flour quality
Improved Yield by Enzyme-Assisted Conditioning
60
50
90
80
70
60
50
LP01092016 37
Don’t miss the